Yo mama...

Aug 18, 2017 9:11 AM

So this universe is an atom. With atoms in it. But is an atom that is part of a body of atoms.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But...but what's in the empty space?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok I am going to need a proof of that claim

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Though, we should really acknowledge that this cube would be the most dense object in the universe. Next to your mom, of course.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people ARE just empty space....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now that's a knee slapper

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Sweet"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sugar is bad for you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the expanse of everything there is more of nothing than there is anything which really is quite something

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is sort of how we explain death to our kids. We're all made of stardust and someday we all go back to stardust.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure would solve the housing shortage.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats not ENTIRELY accurate considering the wave function takes up most of that space until a measurement is made and the function collapses

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, you'd create a black hole. For an example, please also see OP's mom.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First we are 77% water and now we are 99.99% air?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except air is atoms too. That means air is 99.999 % nothing. Just like you!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Just like you"? Was called for here, uh?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not meant to me snarky. just the facts!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So there is more than 4.9e+27 atoms in a sugar cube?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This comment is just straight retarded please disregard

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But we would still weight the same as the whole population of earth. And we all die due to not being able to breath or anything.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What if someone had already removed 1% of the empty space and we're now the size of a sugar cube in a lab somewhere?

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 4

we'd be dead tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if our universe is something else's sugar cube

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1%

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would prohibit stuff like movement. And since things appear to move, probably not the case.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cant be. The resulting substance would be homogeneous.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Somebody make the spongebob thing with travis' comment.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not so. You're just a brain in a vat attached to electrodes. You're hallucinating all this for my amusement.

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

Indeed. The electrodes are your nerves and the vat your head/body

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice, can you give me a harem of sexy ladies?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had a writing prompt about this..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your life must be boring as shit if you find mine amusing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like watching paint dry & grass grow. You're downright fascinating.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only reason we exist is to walk around, producing energy for some dude's car battery.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

I always wondered why a guy capable of making wormholes and entire universes would choose literally the least efficient way to make energy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because he has a power complex.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Couldn't he like, harvest stars or something? Or miniaturize a nuclear fusion reactor? Or trap a black hole in his universe box?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a miniverse, and he could do anything. Even make another smaller miniverse inside!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the idea behind Pym particles, right? Shrinking the space between atoms?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So how can a shrunken Ant Man, with the same weight of a full Ant Man, run around on people without stomping their arms to the ground? -

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah he would have sunken into their flesh, like an adult man putting their weight onto a nail, balanced on a security guard's shoulder.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or when he gets super huge, not be a total push-over?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because movie physics, that's why.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

yeah he should have collapsed when he went big mode.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So... Ant man?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but how big is the sugar cube?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The Sugar Cubes where quite big. Interestingly enough a part of the Sugar Cubes called a Bjork is bigger than the Sugar Cubes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sugarcubes here are 1 x 1 cm.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only if you subscribe to the holographic principle. Otherwise, they are 1 x 1 x 1 cm.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's funny because she's fat

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I once had a 4 hour conversion with my Electronic Engineering professor about the fact that no two objects ever truly touch.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I see where you're comming from, but if you want to be THAT technical about the object. You have to be that technical about the word touch >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

> Touching, is another word for making contact, and one of the definitions of contact is "immediate proximity or association".

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, well, it's not "immediate", that's the point. It's really fucking far away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Relatively far for two of the molecules of the object. But we define the object as a whole. And then relatively it is immediate.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Were they saying that as they touched your junk? :D

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I figured that one out in 5th grade. Delighted me for days. Drove other students nuts for days.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahh semantics, the deepest rabbit hole.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What I've always had trouble wrapping my brain around is how knives cut at an atomic level.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If you had a thin enough (ie. very microscopic) knife I wonder if you could chop an atom in half.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

well the smallest possible width of the blade would be one atom, no? I doubt you could cut an atom in half with another atom essentially

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good point. What about if you had a one-atom-wide titanium knife and you were cutting a (soft?) atom like magnesium?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A) A titanium atom is larger than a magnesium atom B) The atom isn't soft, the metal is

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Knife edge cuts down. Cutter and cuttee repel each other. Cutter is made of sterner stuff. Cuttee gets pushed away in two directions.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So it's more of a ripping than a cutting?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Mind blown

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wedging, like chopping wood

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be one heavy cube.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 2

Dooting the dooty doot for some obvious reasons

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always needs a gif like this. Now I have one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need my personal space

9 years ago | Likes 544 Dislikes 1

So why don't we step up here, everyone get stepped up and let's get some stepped up. Personal space up in this place

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Stay outta that personal space

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1 personal space, 2 personal space

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

3 personal place, 4 more personal place, 5, hey get out of my personal space, 6 personal space

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

I take my personal space very seriously. Up to the point I don't really want all this empty space up in my space.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We still need to verify this

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

let's get some personal space up in this place

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 1

I don't want all this skin in my personal space!

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Haha what an asshole.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Perfect user name

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love how ye all brush past the your momma joke!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It seems a bit rude to talk about mamma in her eclipse

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you trying to make a black hole because that's how you make a black hoke

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

But it'd be tiny so it's cute and harmless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how do you make a black hole, then?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Did you ask your mom?! She knows!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! And a black hole the size of a sugarcane ain't gonna Hawking radiation evaporate. It would swallow the entire earth and there 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2be a black hole circling the sun where eart is now. The moon would orbit a black hole.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I saw that episode of Doctor Who. It didn't end well for everybody.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we are the legion of the beast. the legion shall be many. and the legion shall be free. he has woven himself in the fabric of your life.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

since the dawn of time

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damm those black hokes

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't quite be a black hole, but extremely compacted matter such as that of a white dwarf star. Sauce: Schwarzschild radius.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Ok a sugar cube that someone dropped and it got a little smaller. Like a quarter inch smaller

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Had a science teacher who was lazy with his l's. Often said "black hoe"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My second favorite flavor of hoe

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you want black hoes because that's how you get black hoes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...yes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a concept I can't wrap my head around.

9 years ago | Likes 578 Dislikes 9

I just love facts like that, for example a Modern Transitor is around 2nm, That is the size of 37 Hydrogen Atoms in a row.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The empire state building would be about the size of a pencil eraser if all empty space were removed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

wouldn't all the people on earth in a big naked pile be bigger than the empire state building?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are sugar cubes not larger than pencil erasers? The ones I've seen are.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's amazing how huge your mom really is.

9 years ago | Likes 747 Dislikes 3

Nice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Couldn't wrap his arms around her either.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just ran this one past my pregnant fiancee, and our daughter "how did you catch them all? on your mama's booty"

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Think of everything like a tent crammed full of inflated beach balls; things seem full but they're mostly empty,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing really contacts anything. If you touch a table, it's magnetic fields of the objects pushing against each other.

9 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 5

Cosmos when Neil touches his nose episode blew my mind

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So... what table?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It's not magnetic fields... it's the weak and strong nuclear forces

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if you touch yourself, that is a very weak nuclear force.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

incorrect! it's electrostatic forces.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

*Electric

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it's electrostatic forces not magnetic fields.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how can I feel the grains in my wood table?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Electromagnetic

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you sit on a chair you remove the ch

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So why do things break then? If you're not really touching the piece of wood when you're chopping it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are separating the magnetic fields of atoms from each other.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But where the connection between what you just stated and everything being mostly empty space? Because I have also heard that before too

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre An atomic nucleus is about 15fm or less. Electrons orbit at .05nm minimum. HUGE relative distance

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Normal people doesn't know what FM is, if it isn't on their radio.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The atoms are so tiny, the space between them dwarfs the mass of the atoms themselves. Even the electrons of the atom are incredibly far /1

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

away from the nucleus, relative to their mass. Think of it like the solar system, with the sun as the nucleus and the planets as the /2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

electrons. It's mostly empty space. Every atom is like that, and then the spaces between the atoms are massive as well. There's hardly /3

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"so if i put a dick in my mouth, is really no touching my mouth, therefore not gay"

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

Hahahahaha

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's correct! Go have some fun!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same for asses and armpits

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I volunteer.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You say that but it has also been proved that everything is connected. Aka quantum entanglement / teleportation

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

you're diving deep as hell into pseudoscience my friend.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ha whatever man I could link 10 articles to you explaining it but you sound opinionated as fuck

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

has nothing to do with opinion. link me to anything legitimate... feel free.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Different scales (atomic vs sub-atomic). Plus not all things are entangled. Not even close.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Hmm can you check that? I have read articles claiming to entangle protons and entire atoms...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I see the articles you're referencing. Idk, as a chemist and not a physicist, I'm out of my element here (get it?). I don't understand if...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's not kid ourselves here. Big picture, we don't know jack shit, especially about something we've so recently begun to explore.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Okay. So imagine people at a bus stop. People stand FAR apart from each other, making them seem a lot bigger than they need to be.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's because you haven't seen how fat OP's mom really is.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine using a rope as a shield, by spinning the rope fast enough you create what appears to be a solid circular barrier.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

everything is just a shape of empty space

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Think of it like an electric egg-beater's arm, spinning really fast. Mostly nothing, but enough moving fast to be super influential!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

atoms and their particles are held apart by electromagnetic forcefields.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

electrons move so quickly that it makes it act solid, is probably the best way to convey what we see on the large scale.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The repulsive force of the universe is stronger than the attractive force but gravity creates ripples in space that things get caught in.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” ― Nikola Tesla

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Also a ton of hippies oddly enough

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Its like a balloon. When its deflated, it takes up basically no space at all. Fill it with air and its HUGE by comparison.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Did you see Ant-man? Same basic concept, they found a way to manipulate the amount of space particles occupy, hence ability to shrink

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We don't need a lot of space for your head. Sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because let's be honest.... It's absolute nonsense

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Force is more important than mass. It just means without energy to keep everything apart the universe is much denser than you thought

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But it's a head yo momma can wrap her mouth around OOOOOOOHHHHH

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What I want to know is what it the empty space? What does it consist of?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Somehow this make atoms easier to understandstand for me.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I tend to think of atoms as nuclei surrounded by clouds of electrons.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Though really it's more like clouds of places where an electronic could be.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Though really really, it's even more complicated.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Though really really really, it's all just a computer simulation and someone forgot to initialize some variables.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

TL;DR you're basically nothing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Matter on a quantum scale doesn't really exist as you would picture it. Particles are basically just disturbances in space

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So saying that they are 99% space is a little misleading

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can understand the infinitely small, it's the infinite vastness of space that gets me. We are nothing compared to the earth, which is (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nothing compared to the sun, which is less than nothing compared to the galacy, and it just gets bigger from there. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me too. If atoms are 99% empty space then how come we don't have a bunch of holes in us?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Atoms are not 99% empty space.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We do, its just that you dont see them.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Technically you do, they're just really, really small.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

we... do? I'm confused by the question.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It is because the atoms are in constant motion, they move so fast the "holes" are effectively covered up. Like a spinning fan vs stationary

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that's kinda true but a pretty serious misinterpretation.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please elaborate. I'd like to improve my understating of this subject.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the space in the atom is between the electron "cloud" and the nucleus. the electron does move around quickly... kinda. it's more like

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So in a way... we are made of tiny little fidget spinners?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

100% I see you are aware of the great fidget prophecy. The signs are all around us.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's amazing. A star more massive than the sun would collapse upon itself once it dies and form a neutron star smaller than Earth...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

..and that neutron star is composed almost entirely of neutrons pressed exactly as densely against eachother.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Still smaller than ops mum

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A teaspoon of neutron star matter would weigh more than 10,000 fully laden battleships.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What class?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Smaller than Earth is really an understatement. Earth has a diameter of over 6000 km, while a neutron star is usually 10-20 km in diameter.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It really depends a bit on the mass of the star.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A star with a higher mass would turn into a black hole, a star with a lower mass would turn into a white dwarf, is that what you mean?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A star the mass of up to 1.4x Suns mass sheds its outer layers and leaves only the glowing degenerated core, now a white dwarf...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0