nevergonnasleep
585
29
5
From an NYT article: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/us/politics/minnesota-church-protest-immigration.html?unlocked_article_code=1.91A.qWs-.GkFhpkngbVoH&smid=url-share
Look at all these political radicals from back in the day!
wejustdontknow
We're going to look back on this time and have no way of explaining it.
ghostly69
How do you call those people who can read (write), but do not understand whate they are reading (writing)?
MoonMoon89
Overton window... at this point if you aren't blatantly fascist, then you are considered "far-left"
nevergonnasleep
THIS
[deleted]
[deleted]
PatrickDenStore
In this case they are, they are just reporting on the charges and apparently one of the charges is "belonging to the far-left movement known as antifa". Be outraged at the prosecutors and the charge and thank NYT for informing you on the matter.
DongleDingler
You're right, I misread the sentence
PatrickDenStore
Happens to the best of us. :)
ImJustHereAtThisPoint
They chose their side. Act like it
PatrickDenStore
In this article they did not choose any side at all. It's good journalism where they report on the matter and on the charges, one of which is "belonging to the far-left movement known as antifa". Be outraged at the prosecutors and the charge, not at NYT for reporting on the matter.
ImJustHereAtThisPoint
I wasnt talking JUST about this article. I'm more than happy to link NYT being fucky
PatrickDenStore
I was talking about the subject that this post is about but if you have links then go right ahead.