Pinokus
221483
3959
62
60fps
30fps
20fps
15fps
10fps
5fps
4fps
3fps
2fps
1fps
Launch. 60fps.
goobernoodles
Need 144fps plz.
Shufadragon
Open notepad and type a sentence. Then drag the window in circles trying to read the text. Now change refresh rate and try again.
woonkill
You missed your chance at including 0 fps as a still
whothehellareyouanyway
FUCKIN LAG!!!
Ididthisforthelol
Imagine really wanting to watch all these but your internet is shit regardless of where you go so it loads the first two seconds of each gif
zangypoo
SO HERE'S WHERE ALL THE PIXELS WENT!?! All those previous posts that had no pixels... so sad.
ICantCount
I don't see any difference until 10 fps.
SnikwaH
Where's the 144fps?
VictorFries
Lunch. 60food per second.
Pinokus
I have a speed of 60fps. 60 fries per second
VictorFries
OrangelightingZAZAZING
I was disappointed when there was no 0fps
SpikeTheGoat
Exactly what I was scrolling down for. Wasn't sure if I expected the same image or something off the wall as a joke.
Kilo11
More thrust than a rollerbladders dance routine
verone3784
Amazeballs
candiedhotdogs
Where dat 144 frames
mrcreosote
1fps, also known as Australian Broadband Quality
Groxegar
HandoB4Javert
stormegedendarklordofall
Youknowitsblue
All looks the same when your internet is slow
SprayAndPray
Where is my 144fps?
Dyslexicglove
I get it. This was a countdown to a rocket launch. clever.
LordTesla
It gets more and more cinematic as you scroll down
MisterD90
ooh i see what you did there... you sly bastard
CaptainQuarkk
Would you care to enlighten us?
MisterD90
he went from 20-15-10-5-4-3-2-1... blastoff... like a countdown
Pinokus
I thought nobody would notice. Thanks
StMC19
T-plus the amount it takes for people to get the joke.
RaisedByTurnips
hate to be the bearer of bad news here @OP but your 60fps's are actually 50. Imgur removes a few frames when compressing
Pinokus
Ho. Good to know thanks.
qr1983
Harsh, he was trying to help and you called him a ho.
HowsItGoinEh
Hit less then 30fps and
TheIndigoManticore
I feel I go through all of these when playing Arma 3
Cammo353
TIL that I can't see the difference between 20, 30, and 60 fps
RevArtillery
Play a game at 20 fps. You'll notice
Shufadragon
Open notepad and type a sentence. Then drag the window in circles trying to read the text. Now change refresh rate and try again.
TheStealthHippopotamus
Not enough thrust
CodyLilley
Ah, I see that your rig also struggles with Kerbal Space Program
kuriosly
I have been living on KSP for the last few days
Adv3r5ity
The perfect comment. Goodnight.
Azerai
Goodnight
MattRexPuns
I'm used to seeing stuff like that at <20 FPS. Seeing this in 60 FPS was like watching a cutscene!
AlwaysDownvoteDots
*builds 900-part spaceplane* Come on 15fps!
PrincessDonaldTrumpBANNED
Haha haha! 6600k oc'd to 4.5 GHz. 900 parts is doable at high fps in 4k!
ItAintGayIfItsAFemininePenis
Absolutely not. It's not your rig that slows down, its the game engine.
PrincessDonaldTrumpBANNED
No, its single core CPU bound. 900 parts isn't that stressful when you have a strong core running at a high speed.
Sibire
15? I'm lucky to get that on a four part rover
CodyLilley
I tend to go way overboard and end up with a 2,000 part asparagus style heavy lifter. 1 frame every 5 seconds.
Cereaza
0.2 fps. Impressive.
SUGG8
The hell kind of spaceplane has 900 parts?
thewiggins
the best ones
baldewok
shonasof
heyGuysItsPete
.
KenmoreChalfant
And that's why games need higher fps, things are often moving very quick.
[deleted]
[deleted]
UnimatriX
.
CodyLilley
Is there one out there with 240, 144,120, 60, 30, 15 and 5? I think that'd be neat
shonasof
They probably exist, but they would be useless unless your monitor actually runs that fast.
CodyLilley
Yea, you are probably right. I've been thinking about upgrading to a faster monitor but can't justify it. Maybe someday.
shonasof
I'd love to get a 120hz monitor. I used to have a CRT that was 70hz and even that was a noticeable jump in clarity.
CodyLilley
I've heard that the jump from 60 to 120 or 144 was a huge improvement. 144 to 240 was nice but not as rewarding for the investment.
HappyShark
I'm running off of 1 hour of sleep. This is melting my mind trying to understand this gif
RoseTheSpecialEdTeacher
Thank you. I could barely see any difference until 15 with the rockets. Lol
SplashesinPuddles
Watch the sparks. It is easier to see there.
jocloud31
I can understand not seeing the difference between 60 and 30, but 30 to 20 seems very significant to me
Pikachoochoo
But your eyes can only see 30fps
Hedgehoglet
http://www.testufo.com syncs to your monitors hertz so it can show diff of 120 vs 60, or higher
SilkyZ
just noticed Toothless in the bottom right
YoungToast
As a mobile user, THANK YOU.
joedirty1
I bet 61fps is much better
shonasof
Odd numbered frame rates make people's eyes bleed. There should be a warning label.
shonasof
Rin007
Good stuff if it's real because I saw no difference in the thruster 60/30 fps
DefinitelyNotASithLord
Ubisoft? Is that you?
jocloud31
Try tracking the sparks in the bottom left corner. In the 60FPS image, they appear to move smoothly, whereas in the 30FPS image they //
Rin007
Oh yeah, I can see it a bit. Wouldn't find it if I wasn't looking for it.
jocloud31
Yeah. 30->60 is a nice upgrade, but it's certainly not a HUGE deal.
Treblaine
This is hardly the most strenuous test, nothing in the shuttle video moves across the frame particularly fast.
SonOfASelkie
FPS also matters less when watching stuff than it does playing, because you aren't inputting anything. With games 144/60/30 matters more 1/?
SonOfASelkie
because your IRL actions are translated more smoothly and faster into a response in-game at a higher FPS, so when I'm spinning for a 2/?
SonOfASelkie
shot I can really feel the FPS difference. 3/3.
TrillRainbowUnicorn
Wtf, the 30FPS line works fine when not zoomed in and sync's with the 60FPS line when zoomed on mobile.
Cassiraa
that's right. The more detail, the more important it is.
Krodeon
I hope no one less missed the Toothless.
shonasof
Hah! I didn't see him until just now.
notanothertobbe
Do tell
Krodeon
Bottom right corner
PianoandPads
So sad that we don't do that anymore. Those were the good old times.
ElbowDeepinaTinyOctopus
I'm glad we did it, and I'm glad it appears to have paid off to the point where Private entities can step in (like Space X).
paradoxagon
elon musk is launching the falcon heavy soon
IPostAboutPoliticsIfYouDontLikeItSuckIt
DidNotInhale
Space X is better
AzgarOgly
Considering 40 year difference, no surprise.
stormegedendarklordofall
So there were some difficulties with the sts. It should have launched 2 times a month. Been much cheaper to overhaul 3. More payload prt 1
stormegedendarklordofall
For cheaper.
Janusha
Thats what you get when Ted Cruz, a raving creationist, is in charge of NASAs funding. And with Donald Trump in the White House.
whereigotogetdownvotes
We must have war now. The mega rich command it.
LogarthSheppy
https://youtu.be/WbV_zwSFNhA?t=10m45s We literally launch rockets on the regular. This was YESTERDAY. (yes it's in 360 view)
fuckpowerlevelsfucksupersaiyansandfuckyou
Cheer up! You still launch those all the time! :D they just land on brown people now instead of celestial objects.
[deleted]
[deleted]
fuckpowerlevelsfucksupersaiyansandfuckyou
they ran out of rockets caus they dropped them all. last week the president used the biggest non nuke cause he thought it was cool. But sure
AncientSeraph
Why do people always think every military encounter is somehow micro-managed by the pres?Especially with this dude missing his daily briefs.
fuckpowerlevelsfucksupersaiyansandfuckyou
Cause we have reports of him authorising it, over "the most beautiful, tremendous chocolate cake"
paradoxagon
1. you said brown people, sorry i dont respect you 2. rockets, bombs, and missles are different 3. if you actually cared about politics you-
paradoxagon
would know there is more to it than "he thought it was cool" 4. again, you said "brown people"
HolyShitDudeCalmDown
The sheer amount of CFCs to be ejected from this was mind baffling. Really hope they can do this again without all the pollution.
TheZade
[deleted]
[deleted]
Janusha
Today if USA wants up or down from the ISS, the International Space Station, they have to ride with Russia or China.
Sarahsmomhasgotitgoingon
PianoandPads
True, that all things do come to an end. But I mean, we as a country just stopped. Relying on Russia for a taxi service.
StoicJ
That's why the Dragon Capsule is being worked on so hard. The Russians are out dated
AzgarOgly
It was quite a good move actually. Buying use of cheap aging technology from Russians so it would linger and investing the money into //
AzgarOgly
next generation of craft, which would put competitors out of business.
PianoandPads
I'm glad we have Space X and Virgin Atlantic but what happened to NASA? I know we're planning to go to Mars which is good.
PrincessDonaldTrumpBANNED
NASA straight up said, "were done with low orbital test". They've been building a bunch of satellites
PrincessDonaldTrumpBANNED
Plus the James Webb telescope.
diddleyhole
I can't wait for that to launch. Whenever thatll be. I love deep space so much.
SpacePlaceGuy
(1/2) NASA's still here! Quite a bit of its focus is on Earth science missions, in addition to "deep space" stuff. In human spaceflight ...
SpacePlaceGuy
(2/2) ... NASA is building Orion as its next vehicle. Both it and the SLS rocket that will carry it are currently undergoing testing.
shimmernshine
They focus on unmanned deep space missions, with significant results. Water on mars, etc.
thegarlicawakens
Money. No one wants to have the kind of budget used to go to the moon. NASA is amazing, but only the space program is widely familiar.
PianoandPads
I agree with you whole hardly. Moon, been there done that. So many more places to see. Just wish we didn't have so much political B.S.
[deleted]
[deleted]
AzgarOgly
Well, there are laws of physics and technological limitations there. You can draw anything as a sketch, but when it comes to working thing//
AzgarOgly
it gets more and more complicated. There was not much to be done to make it simpler without giving up capacity requirements.
PianoandPads
Leave it to the bureaucracy and the military to overrule any original idea and engineering r concepts. L
AncientSeraph
You can critique the military for a hell of a lot, but there's a shit-ton of experiments done by/with them.
FactCheckerExtraordinaire
Didn't it "only" have 2 disasters in 135 flights? Or do you mean stuff going wrong in general?
stormegedendarklordofall
Statistically speaking, it was one of the worst crewed launch vehicles.
GolFoehammer
For the chance to fly in the shuttle, I'd still take those odds, compared to those in the Apollo program,
stormegedendarklordofall
The saturn v's launch success rate is 100%. The space craft rate is 100% (Apollo 13 was only a partial failure).
mnorthwood13
To be fair if they were properly maintained or upgraded (budget cuts) they probably would have been better
RoomTemperatureCoffee
This. The vehicles themselves were not the weak links in the chain.
Bystandr
Apollo was better, but I think they did well with what it was. Until they get tech up to allow for more vehicle durability , I think private
Bystandr
launch contracting is the way to go.
Komer
I honestly can't see the difference between 30 and 60
thedeg
I think this is a really poor example for showing fps.
zalan26
I barely notice the difference between 30 and 15. As long as you get a steady fps it's fine.
YouCantHaveMyHouse
Your eyes are broken, you should get them checked.
ButterfaceTaintClown
It's exactly 30 difference.
ptijay
Take attention to the motion of the sparks, the rest of the image is quite immobile. 30 FPS is good enough for watching something, not (1/2)
ptijay
interacting with/whitin it, like in video games, or when it goes quite fast. (2/2)
BigRai
Try watching F1 in 60 fps and you'll never go back
fatheroftwogirls
how do i do that? what service provides a 60fps pic?
BigRai
I think u can get it off torrents or just watch on a TV that supports linear interpolation (clear motion etc)
radxz
Honestly, you're a jerk
pres2pond
Look at the sparks. Not many things in that image move fast enough for the motion to be noticeably different between 30 and 60.
ElbowDeepinaTinyOctopus
The biggest difference would be found in the sparks, and I do see a bit more motion (the 30 FPS starts looking a bit more like static).
Leverbee
I honestly didn't see any difference until I got to 10fps.
eggmuffin
You can when there's more motion. (Also, imgur compression means that it's closer to 50 FPS.)
Geo80
That's not how compression works.
eggmuffin
Maybe I used the wrong word. Regardless, imgur won't include all the frames of a high-FPS gif. I guess it's for size or bandwith purposes.
GreedyJungle
Same. Something something human eye can't see more than 30fps something something.
thedogemperorofmankind
which is, y'know, bullcrap
PrincessDonaldTrumpBANNED
The argument is the difference is negligible. Its better to get higher fidelity than push past 30 fps in non shooter/racing games.
Zreen
Except when I edit videos there is a small smoothness with 60 that isn't in 30, but before I got into that I also didn't see a difference.
RaynWisp
This is the real truth. Like when HD just came out, a lot of people didn't notice a difference. Until you have an HDTV...
RepostFromLastWeek
[deleted]
[deleted]
RaynWisp
I, too notice things when I'm smoking meth.
idownvoteplottwist
That or if you have synthetic examples like the gifs shown above, where there is only a single thing moving on a black background.
Komer
Any video.. Nothing changes that I can notice.
TrillRainbowUnicorn
Console user in denial. Join the master race.
swefur
https://frames-per-second.appspot.com/ 60 and 30 fps, set motion blur to none. If you can't see any difference, you have a 30 hz monitor.
Komer
Certainly not 30hz monitor and still no
AncientSeraph
You must have 30hz eyes. The difference is pretty obvious.
Cereaza
With fast moving particles (like sparks). It's the difference between actually seeing the sparks, and seeing a blur of sparks.
SwedishRationalist
Seriously? It's clear as day for me. In 30 fps you can't tell the movement of individual sparks, it just turns into visual noise.
tzxAzrael
i didn't really even notice until the 15 to 10 fps jump. guess who has two thumbs and will be saving money on fancy tv's :D
LurKaiSen
Bob Kelso?
Spacemayo
Dr. Bob Kelso
Zeroji
Same, I'm fine with 15 fps, 60 isn't helpful out of gaming imo
MerToo
Pfft, fussy kids these days, when I was little you heard about the rocket on the radio, drew one in pencil & imagined all the FPS you want
Genotex
Did you have to walk 160 miles to the nearest radio? In snow, without shoes... Uphill. Both ways.
Zeroji
Uphill both ways? Where is that?
chimichangatemptress
Glad to know I'm not the only one!
chefjohn2006
K1rby
Depends what your monitor is using it might actually be 30fps instead of 60 if you only have a 30hz monitor. Also it's a bad example.
mimomisu
probably not a monitor, those have been 60hz for a while but in on older phone, possible, I guess. Never thought about it
Zeefox
I'm stuck with 30fps as that's the best my HDMI can run a 4K monitor.
tekcor
If it were me, I'd spend the $10-20 to fix that in a heartbeat.
Genotex
So much this. "Stuck with 30 fps" sounds like a nightmare to me..
thedogemperorofmankind
it is my understanding that you are sincere. but I absolutely cannot see how, it's as clear as the difference between green and blue!
TheDauphin
Well, green and blue are pretty close on the color spectrum
eggmuffin
And yet you still consider them different, no? Stop being pedantic for the purpose of being pedantic.
TheDauphin
Maybe not, I could be colorblind. They could be varying shades of blue or green. You're talking to a design person here
eggmuffin
Cut the bullshit. Do you, or do you not, consider green and blue to be different colours?