AustinHaught
1811
4
7
Sep 9, 2016 10:01 AM
AustinHaught
1811
4
7
LockedForGood
60fps is "real time" how we see.. anymore and it's lost on us. We also can only see up to 30 polygons.
BakaZora
Try playing on a 144Hz monitor then going back to 60 and saying that. We don't really see in fps, it's a lot more complicated than that
LockedForGood
Ah, Shit BF just confirmed this. +1
TallestGargoyle
I'm just going to assume that was a joke based on the second part of that. But the first part is still bollocks.
LockedForGood
Eh, I thought we could only register 60fps but it's true that the human eye can only see above 30 polygons. As in can't be seen in detail.
TallestGargoyle
I'm interested in a source on that, my searches are only coming up with memes.
sterchulius
We see around 24fps not 60.
[deleted]
[deleted]
YttriumTyclief
Isn't the minimum like 17 or something? A couple studies have been done on this.
Calamababa
Nope, films runs in 24fps. Eyes see somewhere 120+
TallestGargoyle
Please no, eyes don't see in FPS.
laguna80
Unless it's a movie being shown in frames per second. :p
TallestGargoyle
But a movie recorded in higher framerate will be noticeably different.
TallestGargoyle
Well a movie image is created by motion blur inherently applied by the camera capturing a short period of light entering the lens.
TallestGargoyle
No we don't. We're not robots, we don't see in FPS.
sterchulius
You're right. On the other hand there is a delay in the reception of photos by the retina which can be measured and an analgous statement1/2
sterchulius
Of FPS can be applied. We see in the equivalent of fps.
TallestGargoyle
Except framerate implies a single image. Retinas don't work like that.