Oliver Twists FCC's balls

Feb 27, 2015 1:02 AM

TizButAScratch

Views

536747

Likes

11208

Dislikes

342

A Great Day for the Internets

President Obama sent out this letter today in response to the FCC's growing some larger balls and passing a strong rule protecting net neutrality. There were a lot of online and offline activists, but one stood out.

John Oliver made it a mission on his new cable show to get the FCC attention

He crashed the FCC website!

He gave zero fucks for taking on the cable companies that carry his show.

Thank you British Man for being an American Hero

FP edit: FP cherry popped. Long live usersub.
Here's the FCC's summary (save if for the toilet, it's a 5 page read).
http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-strong-sustainable-rules-protect-open-internet

I'M ONLY LIKE 1/5TH OF THE WAY THROUGH READING IT, BUT SO FAR IT SEEMS DECENT. HAS ANYONE FINISHED THIS THING YET WANT TO GIVE A SYNOPSIS?

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 23

Not sure why you got downvoted. Here's the FCC summary http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-strong-sustainable-rules-protect-open-internet

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thank-you and fuck comcast.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Am I going crazy or has the flag always been Red gold and black?

11 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 23

Red white and blue unless you buy one from China. Those ones are always defective.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

don't, just, don't

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You shut your mouth.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Get out.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

These comments still get points for a limited time :)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

if your referencing what i think you are it's BLUE AND BLACK

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

It's light blue and goldish brown

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

You mistake color with light hitting them for colors. Black with white hitting it is still black.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Im not mistaking anything. I put it into photoshop and directly sampled the colors. It's light blue and goldish brown.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's because the light is hitting them, rofl

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Now we'll see what other consequences there will be that we were not made aware of by this decision.

11 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 7

There will no doubt be taxes imposed including a fee to make internet "affordable" to everyone.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Which could be virtually nothing at all

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

How idealistic.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

His signature looks like dickbutt

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Obamas initials stink..... get it?....

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He didn't crash the FCC site, reddit and 4chan did.

11 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 10

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Hmm, which gets more of an internet response, a tv show or massive online communities?

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Well, he sanctioned a considerable portion of people to do that, so.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

jumping in front of a bandwagon is not the same as leading

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Not really, probably less than 5% of the amount that reddit and 4chan did. He just tailed on to their idea like he always does.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm so glad the FCC saved us from all these major problems we've been having lately. Now things will change!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"You just obliterated my argument, better ad hominem"

11 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 0

"If you like your internet you can keep your internet"

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Comcast did nothing to stop any of their networks promoting net neutrality (See MSNBC), seems like they may be fine with it...

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Probably because they fucked up in the past. http://www.cnet.com/news/net-neutrality-from-there-to-here/

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Verizon was the biggest opponent. They may be fine with it now after all that has happened, but they were already charging for "fast lanes"

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

as a multi-carrier verizon was in a unique position n successfully challenged the previous attempts in court. this is nothing like thise

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

there were no previous attempts. this new rule is a direct result of the Verizon case that got rid of the original 1990s Net Neutrality rule

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yeah, that's just wrong. look beyond the sjw sites for information

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Thanks" - Obama

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's scary to me to see how many people actually listened to Ted Cruz's dumb ass on this issue.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

fuck comcast

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Yay... a poorly conceived/executed solution to a problem that didn't exist! I'm sure there are no surprises in the 300 pages!

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 15

The problem was there. Major cable companies were fucking over smaller companies and being anti consumer.This is exactly what the FXX is for

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Its only 5 pages. Read it. It is clear and concise and allows for future flexibility... Smart ass.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Ah yes, because the executive summary being released by the organization in question is SUCH a reliable citation.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

WHO ELSE IS SUPPOSED TO RELEASE IT?!?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

And would I rather trust the FCC over Comcast?? Yes. yes I would. Every time.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Your misstep is that you accept the premise you have to trust either.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He is but a useful Idiot

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The 5 pages are a summation of a ~323 document that is not yet released to the public.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The broadstrokes are pretty clearly laid out bythe summation. I VERY highly doubt that the full doc goes against the "Bright Line Rules" (1)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

which are clearly bullet pointed on the second page of the summation. And how is any one upset about a document that ISNT released yet???

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

How are you NOT upset about a document that isn't released yet? Would you sign a mortgage based on bullet points and ignore the fine print?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

because the US legal system never hid things we wouldnt like in extremely long documents hoping we dont notice. (yes this is sarcasm)

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

His show is shockingly accurate with facts for being in it's most basic description a satirical news show

11 years ago | Likes 725 Dislikes 23

The US can be so bizarre, just reporting straight up facts can SOUND like satire anyway. But really, his journalisticness and comedy are A+.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i think its safe to say he will be the new John Steward

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

He will steward Johns everywhere

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You have to be well informed if you are going to be jabbing holes in stupid things

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He does have facts, but sometimes it's one sided. That being said I still love the show.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Seems funky that satirical news is more newsy than news news. Is what it is, I suppose.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's how it works in the US now. If you want real news you have to watch the satirical news shows.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In the same way that South Park is a cartoon.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an amazing show. I almost kept HBO after GoT season ended for no reason other than this show. But I couldn't justify 18/month for it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That may be how he describes himself, but I would argue that he really hosts a long-form journalism show, that tells jokes on the side.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

True that

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I learn and lmao.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where is his show streaming

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hbo. You can watch like 13 minute clips on YouTube. It's called Last Week Tonight

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The satire is in the presentation. The news are real.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Satirical news shows like his and daily show have been shown consistently to have the best informed viewers.

11 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 5

Well that's frightening

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, the audience and the show's creators laughing together about stuff they understand, cutting through the crap and finding the humour.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You have to understand the topics to get the humor.

11 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

yes

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also, if you have a go at someone, you pretty much need to have your facts straight.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Also, I saw an interview with Jon Stewart the other day where he pointed out that jokes aren't funny if they're inaccurate.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

To be fair his major stories are very well researched. He does investigative reports and just happens to be hilarious.

11 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 1

if by very well researched you mean very left biased. Then you're right!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Eh. I wouldn't say very. Perhaps leaning left. Or maybe I'm just a normal person who's views are mixed and not dependant on a party.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was also on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Leaves are green, but sometimes they can be other colors.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The man is my hero.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He makes news I'm already interested in fun to watch.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

As much as I'd like to watch it everyday, I'm glad he has a full week to do research and to come up with solutions.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don't just happen to be funny, they have a team of writers who work hard at it jeez how do you think television is made

11 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

Every heard of the word understatement?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No matter how great your writers are, if you aren't a funny person you can't deliver jokes effectively.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He learned from the best.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

That's because these days reality is a satire of the supposed views and principles we hold.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Facts thats describe the superficial outermost edge of an issue. Lets not forget that first and foremost, it has to fit into a joke.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Too be fair, a lot of the time, they don't even need to have a punchline -- some politicians do it on their own.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Eh, the deeper you dig into any story, the more sober and humanistic the characters become. It wouldn't be as funny then though.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Like when Vito Barbieri thought that a woman could swallow a camera pill to do a gynecological exam? No, pretty sure you don't need more.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"you got me"

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

John Oliver's show Last Week Tonight is the best spinoff of the Daily Show--even better, in my opinion, than The Colbert Report.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Ima let you finish but Colbert Report was the best spin off of the Daily Show.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

although I also really liked the Colbert Report

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These satirical news shows are generally more informative and honest than "actual" news networks, these days.

11 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 4

100 percent agreed.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pick a topic - any one - where you don't agree with Oliver's opinion on it. Then describe to me how it's "informative and honest".

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Just because I disagree with someone doesn't make their information or opinions wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely right. And the fact that you say that makes me think you'd be a more honest presenter than Oliver (or Stewart, or Colbert...)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In order to critique something one has to remove all biases and rate it from a neutral point of view. A movie might be about abortion and1/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not sure where you're going yet, but I don't think that's true. You can be biased but give a good-faith representation of the other side.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A pro life critic *could* give it a poor rating due to that, but he'd/she'd stand to lose their job or just not have a respected review.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

e.g. I don't think the moon landing was fake but I could explain why some people think so without being insulting to them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except that they have no real accountability unlike the news. Anything that's twisted or spun is assumed to be needed for the joke to work.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

That's what's so sad. Satirical news that can get away with no accountability, still does a better job.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

This doesn't discount how great a service they have provided, but it is true that they wouldn't be held to the same journalistic standards

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There's also no accountability to people paying the bills aside from "be funny," so no need to polish over news for certain groups.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could you say that in a different way? I'm not sure what you mean.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fox, CNN, all them have people paying them, so they have to cater to their wants to some degree. Comedic news shows don't have to.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Yes, operator? I'd like to report an emergency. ...OP's sentence structure."

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It, afraid, must tell you that I: hope, there is none.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seig heil das grammatik nazi.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality how is internet equality bad? I think I'm misunderstanding something please help

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Take something good that's not regulated and either: A. Let big companies monopolize it or B. Seize it and let politicians ruin in.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because, for some reason, people here just can't leave something alone and let a good thing just be a good thing.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If the government banned torturing kittens, conservatives would complain about a "government takeover of animal rights" or some such b.s..

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

1/2 In the USA, you can make a segment of the populatuon believe ANYTHING I'd bad by calling it a "government takeover"

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Now to wait for comments about how the gub'mint now controls the internet and we're all in for 1984 because Comcast didn't get their way.

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 20

comfortably in the pocket of the Cable industry before you oppose legislation that's beneficial to you. [2]

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

These people make me irrationally angry. Fucking hell, do 10 minutes of research before you parrot some politician who resides [1]

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

You make me irrationally angry. People that continue to listen to media "prestitutes" and politicians that don't give a fuck about us.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

You're wrong and the latter isn't a sentence.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Spoilers: The government doesn't "control" shit. Net Neutrality is nothing but a set of rules that stop ISPs fucking up the internet.

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 15

and a bunch of potential other shit we know nothing about. i'm holding my breath until we see what those other details are

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Naivete at it's finest

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Mar 26, 2017 5:02 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They re-categorized Internet connections under Title II, the same as LAN phone lines. Basically, it's the same set of rules that --1/2--

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

--2/3-- keeps phone companies from saying "you can call these areas of the US, but nowhere else." Essentially ridding it of a subscription

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3… that everyone thinks is so awful

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

-like system where you pay to get more, you know, like cable and satellite television.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2…there are 4 zones of calls with diff prices that they are allowed to charge me. how is that diff from the speed lanes for video etc …

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for argument, i accept that i'm protected fom the telephone co cutting off access to some places…i can call anywhere …

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If this was so good for America, why were the proposed rules not made public before the vote?

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

EXACTLY!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

exactly my thoughts...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The FCC traditionally doesn't release the full text of their draft documents before a vote because they are still subject to change. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

in this case the draft was changed fairly near to the vote to reflect input from Commissioner Clyburn to eliminate a potential loophole. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Great job everyone! We should all be very proud of what we accomplished together! http://media3.giphy.com/media/WKdPOVCG5LPaM/giphy.gif

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

#PreventCableCompanyFuckery

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Cable companies need more competition.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

They need to actually compete with each other. Verizon and AT&T's land and wireless businesses should be split, and Comcast should too

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ted Cruz made a comment that this was the Obamacare of the Internet and it was shameful. What a twat.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

He was right in the sense that it does nothing to regulate the crazy pricing, kinda like how Obamacare does noting for health care costs.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most people who vote for Ted Cruz don't understand tech (they probably ask younger Dem voters to fix their wi fi & program their VCR).

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

WTF VCR Realy

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know you will not be back to eat your words so....TED CRUZ IS 100% CORRECT. Get ready for government fuckery of the web.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Ted Cruz is basically always wrong

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

14 months later. Where's the government fuckery?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hello? Comcast customer service....read the news much?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I <3 John Oliver. ...and America. ...and the internet. ...and beer. ...and bacon. I love you all

11 years ago | Likes 180 Dislikes 18

Don't forget the pair of jeans that fit just right

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

And the radioooo*retching sound*

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about pumpkins? And robots? And robot pumpkin robots?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love you too

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And BOOBIES! Do not forget BOOBIES!!!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I give multiple fucks when it comes to this topic.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

We have successfully stopped Cable Company Fuckery. Now to make sure we didn't allow Government Fuckery in the process...

11 years ago | Likes 376 Dislikes 17

"People continue to elect rich cocksuckers tht dont give a fuck about them. They dont give a fuck about you. THEY DONT GIVE..."-G Carlin

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Carlin was such a baller. RIP

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At least with Cable Company Fuckery, if it gets bad enough, someone will come along with something better. Not so much with Gvt. Fuckery

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well...the main problem with ISPs are local monopolies, which the FCC did not address.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

HAHAHAH you never stop Gov. Fuckery... that's what this bill was!

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Did we allow Government Fuckery when they regulated land lines? Because theirs your answer right there. (IDK, serious question)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Laws were in place to protect us before. Is our government just not into enforcing laws?

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Look back to 2008 for your answer. (Spoilers: Generally not where money is concerned.)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you think government fuckery is worse than private sector, you haven't been paying attention to world affairs since WW2.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It amuses me that "Cable Company Fuckery," when abbreviated, is a mirror to to the abbreviation for the Federal Communications Commission.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Hmm. Nice. I didn't catch that.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Palindrome?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't have character space for a word longer than "mirror." :P

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too late.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Allow it? Because it isn't already in full effect with Bonehead about to shut down Capitol Hill again?

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Sadly it did allow Govt. Fuckery. Net Neutrality is a term for a problem that doesn't exist. Thanks for letting the Govt. control the net.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

332 pages we're not allowed to see til unelected officials approve it. Corporations use government regulation to silence competition.1/2

11 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 8

8 pages, and the holdup is the two who voted nay are refusing to give their final edits. FCC cannot release until they do.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2015 3:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

8 pages of ruling. 324 pages of precedence and research. Fox is lying to you.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

www.FCC. gov

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nope, not 322 pages. 8 pages. http://imgur.com/iTNd9Zf

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

On the plus side, you can always negate Government Fuckery with a good old fashioned revolution.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Unintended consequences shall commence.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

imgur will be shut down

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I see that AT&T, Verizon and Comcast have downvoted.

11 years ago | Likes 2814 Dislikes 71

Or people who understand that the situation was just Netflix trying to get out of payment negotiations by crying to the government.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Netflix paid up. Netflix can afford the "fast lanes" and have negotiating power. A rival start-up would not be able to compete & be shut out

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Comcast wanted to downvote, but the technician they put on the job fell asleep waiting for support to fix the connection.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What does charter do? Oh, he downvoted too.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

seriously every post i see about net nutrality has loads of asshats downvoting everyone

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

"HURR DURR IT'S GOV'T REGULATION, THE FEDS ARE TRYING TO TAKE OVER MY INTERNET HURR DURR DURR!" -Downvoters

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

I'm a Charter employee and I upvoted.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh their statements they released are absolutely hilarious and also full of blatant lies, like how net neutrality is "misguided"

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Did you see the letter from Verizon? They send it in morse code! They are so fucking stupid and this hurt them so much! So happy rigth now

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuck'em. They started this whole ball rolling when they challenged the original rules. Don't forget they are a reincarnation of ol' Ma Bell

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love how the court case they were in a long time ago came up to show that net neutrality is necessary :D

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You may be the first imgurian to successfully tackle the downvotes with a good joke...have yourself a +1 you genius.

11 years ago | Likes 272 Dislikes 19

Tis but a scratch!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I once came back from like - 10 to the positives due to a joke.... Not to this extent though. *sigh*

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do recall at least one Imgurian who did it in the past.

11 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Sauce?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He was a legend. What was his name? Dickinurmom69? Truly an inspiration.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

AND.......?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you my generous king. A knight is grateful for your upvote.

11 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 3

Go forth and ride to the Front Page good sir. You have my blessings.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And my axe.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And my words!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally the only double-dip I've ever enjoyed. Will totally let slide. +1 for you.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

I'm just curious, what exactly did the Internet providers do to warrant this... Law? Act? I don't even know how to classify it.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They have shitty pseudo-monopolies and sell preferential bandwidth to certain companies, which is unethical.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The companies offering the best service haven't lived up to the standards of the people not doing it.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Verizon successfully challenged in court the original Net Neutrality rules from the 1990's. This is the public's response.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

i have dilemma, i approve this post but i disapprove front page edits.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

perhaps make an exception for a first FP. If I am ever blessed with this journey out of usersub, i won't do it again.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'll make very rare exception in this case and upvote!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fuck them. We've got you back, bro.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I see that you've double-dipped......and succeeded!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

double dipped back during this post's sprouting in usersub and it had 3 downvotes. wasn't expecting to be here. but i likey like.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

as a fake internet points junkie, I approve (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧ ✧゚・: *ヽ(◕ヮ◕ヽ)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also I really care a lot about this subject, so grats

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

me too. if something i post gets to the FP, i'm glad it was this. Most things I post belong in usersub, where I belong.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the second I get money im fucking getting off at&t

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Time Warner

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some things make me wonder just how many downvotes on the internet are misclicks made in a hurry?

11 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

...and touch screens

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

None, or next to none, there's a clear indicator of your vote.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do that a lot. Then I want to upvote but it just cancels out my vote entirely and then I'm sad. I very carefully upvoted all of this. :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, just read the bad comment section. People with absolutely no concept of this issue think the "guberment is stealing our internets!!!"

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Immeadeatly scrolled to the bad comments.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it can be both good and bad. i'm waiting for all the documents to be revealed for the public to see

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I don't know why there's people believing that net neutrality is about the government taking over the internet...

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Stupidity.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Because that's how republicans pitch it.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

"Net Neutrality" is not about the government taking over the internet. Legal classification of ISPs as "regulated monopolies" is.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fuck comcast

11 years ago | Likes 3066 Dislikes 62

Fuck the king

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

11 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Whats with the fuck Comcast? I hate em too,but what'd I miss?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso <--- Comcast's latest commercial

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They supported the version that passed. Think about that for a minute.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Jump straight from the oppression of the corporations to the oppression of the government, freedom dies with thunderous applause.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

That's completely unfair. You forgot about Verizon, AT&T, and Time Warner.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Comcast owns all of those, IIRC

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck them all.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Frontier.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And you forgot that Comcast owns Time Warner

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should actually thank Verizon. Their fuckery triggered this ruling. http://www.cnet.com/news/net-neutrality-from-there-to-here/

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And EA

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also Ubisoft

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've tried to research, but I'm still confused by what would happen if this didn't go so well? What exactly would Comcast do?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*cumcast

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also fuck Rogers

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

keep this at 666. it seems... right

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Its so hot right now

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Highest of upvotes ma brotha/sista

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Cox. I don't like Cox.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cato the Elder would make that the last part of his speeches, regardless of the subject. Comcast delenda est! Comcast must be destroyed! 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in Ogden, UT. it's either DSL or cable. And i'm not about to throttle my steam downloads by going to DSL. FML.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've never had Comcast, but fuck them anyway. Because bandwagons.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Be thankful you've never had Comcast. Had it for a while in Connecticut, went back to DSL because it was so shitty. Reliability > bandwidth.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We just did. May this be but the first of many.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not American, but I agree, fuck scumcast.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey I have comcast!....FUCK COMCAST!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>as my Internet starts to crash.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

besides being shit what did comcast do?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fucking fuck comcast

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck Comcast

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I feel like this could be the top comment on any picture. *Cat photo* "Fuck comcast." "Hell yeah, fuck comcast! +1"

11 years ago | Likes 292 Dislikes 9

I just gave it a shot.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

http://imgur.com/oGujUho

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I deserved that

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is all your fault.

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

...Brb, I'm off to UserSub.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I got downvote to oblivion :D

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fuck Comcast

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fuck the king

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ironically this act will cause these companies to essentially continue their monopoly on broadband services.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

What it WILL do is stop said monopolies from being even worse to their customers by banning blocking throttling and paid prioritization. 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It won't stop it. The fix already has ruled for these types of things. Telecoms get fined all the time for these offenses.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This really doesn't change the monopoly status of the companies either way as local loop unbundling wasn't part of the new regulation. 1/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lobbying and litigation for favorable regulation will kill the businesses that can't afford the legal fees.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Municipal Internet doesn't equal competition.The private sector is almost always cheaper and more efficient than that of a government entity

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Monopolies are challenged and enforced by the justice system. There are rules against that. This was about controlling distribution & access

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

This resolution was about reclassification to regulate an industry. It will only provide for litigation and needless politicization.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0