US warship upskirt pic, NSFW

Mar 30, 2017 11:40 PM

I am about to be stationed on one. Wish me luck.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

USS Boondoggle?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is a fast vessel

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno what I expected the bottom to look like, but that wasn't it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can see her Littoris

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

They call them little crappy ships for a reason.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's a freedom class littoral combat ship

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think the freedom class are the monohulls, this is the independence class trimaran.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That thing is already back in the fucking drydock?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

huh no balls.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Bow chicka bow-wow!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whaaaaat?! I've seen concepts for this but apparently they actually exist now...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Littoral Combat Ship.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

aka Little Crappy Ships

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That name is one C away from greatness.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

it happens

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Really dude? Nauty.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

This deserves more upvotes

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ho Lee Fuk

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine how many science experiments we could have funded, how many children could have been fed, how many educations could have been funded

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stealthy McStealthface

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when pirates and ninjas set aside their differences and work together.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy shit! It looks like the bottom half is missing

9 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 3

It's a clip-on

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No its a tri-maran it's meant to be like that.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Holy ship ! It does!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Its designed for litoral combat ie the space from inshore out to the open sea

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Read that as clitoral combat at first. I was like clitoral combat eh? You have my attention lol

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Much different missile reserved for clitoral combat

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can't hit what's not there

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

Fired my missile a few times to this one.

9 years ago | Likes 198 Dislikes 3

"Fired my missile" sounds like you had a good time..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man your stations, there's an in coming

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

In your stations, there's a man coming.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

In your man, there's a station coming.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The way it looks on the water reminds me of Civil War Ironclads.

9 years ago | Likes 407 Dislikes 0

It's "retro"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's an independence class littoral combat ship

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You would be thinking of the zumwalt class then, aka DDX

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They look SO WEIRD. But in a futuristic space ship kind of way.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The key thing about the design is that they self right in the ocean, so as long as it doesn't completely fill with water it will fix itself

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought the same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the wave breaker sides. The ship narrows towards the top. They used to have flooding problems when introduced.

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

Why would that shape flood more than the standard?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Physics. When a wave hits the side of a normal ship, the force is deflected downwards, and pushed the ship up. With a wave-breaker, the (1/2

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

wave breaks (heh) over the top of the ship, and pushes the ship down at the same time. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Huh. So a manufacturing fault since they couldn't make it watertight?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You can't get torpedoed if you don't have a hull

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

but but but... 3 hulls! But I too can't wait for hover-ships!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 239 Dislikes 3

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YES ! a KanColle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

YES ! a KanColle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

YES ! a KanColle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

YES ! a KanColle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

WHY WOULD ANYONE TURN A SHIP INTO A HUMAN

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

BECAUSE ANIME

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Same reason they would turn military grade guns into humans (Upotte!! Looking at you. )

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well, looked that up. Why must these abominations exist.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I Ain't gonna Upotte.. But I'll upvote.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YES ! a KanColle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

YES ! a Kancolle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

YES ! a Kancolle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

YES ! a Kancolle reply this post is perfect now !

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In port because it cracked its hull?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And / or aluminum dust in engine

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You mean, solid rocket fuel? Bet that helps it go faster.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's an LCS and they are all kinds of fucked up. There's a reason it's not in the water

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

do tell?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

literal combat ship

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*littoral

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol, every enlisted sailor new these were gonna have a boatload (intended) of problems at first. Usually that way with gov. projects.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, they dissolve in salt water.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

This problem was fixed. They don't rust (faster than normal) anymore.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well we shouldn't feed them after midnight!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They originally planned for 15 or so. Then cut down to 7 or so. Now only 3. All wer supposed to be ready by now but only 1 is. And it broke

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

I don't know where you're getting those from. There's 26 currently planned, 13 of each variant. More than a dozen are under construction now

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Took the words right outta my mouth

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah my bad. Talking about a different ship class.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You are thinking of the Zumwalt, not LCS

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You're right. When I saw all the issues in the comments I assumed that was the ship. Didn't know we had another one having big issues.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No matter how you design it a ships gonna have issues. The ocean is a super caustic environment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even the zumwalt has many more on the way. I think it's just outdated info

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Info I have access to still says there will only be 3. One is complete, two more in production.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, but they have I think five more scheduled. At least that's what the LT said when I was on the zumwalt two weeks ago

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is from a PSA, planned service availability. That's like saying your car doesn't work because it's parked while you get an oil change.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what you get when you base a military design on a one-off cruise ship/passenger ferry.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

It's galvanic corrosion!!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This bad boy was made new from the ground up and the other contractors boat (Single hull) caught fire during sea trials!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll need to talk with my dad (former naval engineer) but one of the reasons is there are two metals touching that are corroding

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

cannot for the life of me remember the name but its a very stupid and simple (from an engineering perspective) thing they overlooked

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's a pretty major oversight. Oh well, ready, fire, aim!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the engines iirc. The word your looking for is galvanic corrosion

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They didn't overlook it, the non-engineers didn't approve funding for the rubber pieces (washers?) that the engineers called for

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's an expensive mistake

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

See my comment above: galvanic corrosion

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This bad boy was made new from the ground up and the other contractors boat (Single hull) caught fire during sea trials!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could you explain why? It looks fucken cool imo.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Short answer, first ship of its class always has problems. The first Mercury rockets wouldn't stop blowing up but nobody bad mouths them!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The first mercury rockets were crap!" My job is done here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh they look badass. Every ship is put through rigorous testing and scenarios when first commissioned, and these puppies failed so many

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Has there been any new class that didn't have problems? Specifically one as different as this?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Personally I don't know, but someone posted about this in the other comments.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's definitely been ships with better track records. The aluminum Hull on these ships isn't very rugged and is one of the main problems.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google the LCS navy program and see what they say.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are two different variants from different builders. This is not the fucked up kind. The Lockheed Martin's are fucked not GDs variant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey, fair enough. Good input

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Take your little hands out of it! You can't handle it!!!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Imagine this: Trump will be the first US president to have control over a fully operational, field deployed rail gun. -shudder-

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NSFW - Not Safe For War?

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 5

Yup. Still think they should use this hull layout with an all-steel construction. There's a reason they made the Burkes out of steel.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not Safe For Wallets.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I regret that have only one Upvote to give for this comment. We'll done Sir or Madame

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

not for our enemies

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 4

"our"

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

this is America dood, you know we're always sticking ourselves between people.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

You're making one flawed assumption...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Wherever you are from, thers a good chance we spilled some blood and treasure for you.(Unless you're Canadian, who wants to live in igloo's)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

To be fair, "our" can be used to include oneself and a group of which the person being talked to is not a part

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not Safe For Water

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Talking with some American navy guys(I'm Canadian navy) they told me that this ship is unreliable, but I could be mixing it up with another.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's a piece of shit.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Naw your right, they spend most of the time broken.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That seems to eternally be the case with new equipment

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Across the Atlantic, the British are running Windows 4 Warships. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/05/windows_for_warships_hits_type_23s

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The engineering plant on both classes of LCSs are prone to failure. The Freedom is currently in dry dock replacing its main diesel.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yup, cracks forming everywhere in the hull structure (gotta love us secrets being free to know_

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They were just a rushed design, production was done far too quickly, but don't get me started on Canadian navy ships lmao ????????????

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm waiting to see the issues with the new Australian Airwarfare destroyers ( Hobart class DDG) going to be a few teething issues there

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

made in China probably

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is this one of those new destroyers that are horrendously expensive but don't work

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

Currently classed as a "Littoral Combat Ship", soon to be reclassed as a Frigate. Which is bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quit talking about your girlfriend like that...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're thinking of the Zumwalt, probably. The Independence-class LCS are about $360 million a piece.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a destroyer. They're littoral combat ships. But yes, more than double the budget per ship. And pentagon currently think there's a 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Is the price increase due to the cancellation of orders, thus increasing the per-unit cost?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Double compared to what? They're $360 million a pop compared to $4 billion for a Zumwalt destroyer or $1 billion for a Aegis cruiser.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dude, that's easy. They are double compared to $180 million.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, the Zumwalt is grossly over budget. They're currently costing $7.5b per ship, not $4b.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They were initially expected to cost $220m each but by 2008 the program cost had risen to $478m each.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Zumwalt isn't an apt comparison because they fit different roles, one is a destroyer the other made for close-to-shore operations.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even the old Arleigh Burke destroyers were almost $2 billion each.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Zumwalt is 3 or 4 times that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How the fuck is it that a goddam DESTROYER costs 4x as much as a CRUISER? Goddam Pentagon procurement bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

it's a stealth destroyer

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aegis is relatively old now compared to the much newer Zumwalt.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

0% chance that they can complete a 30 day mission without a critical systems failure. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

That's what happens when you go for the cheapest contractor

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The NAVY awards contracts based on minimum price that meets minimum requirements. Everybody lowballs wildly then overruns.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lcs - like a scout ship. Destroyers - major fire power ship

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 destroyers are not a major firepower ship. they are supposed to be close combat screening ship that is sacrificial if needed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 Cruisers are the fire power since battleships are no longer used

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

CGs are getting phased out in favor of DDGs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for the price of 1 cruiser they can make several DDGs or Frigates(which is the LCS are now becoming the disposable one in place of the DD

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. And the modern Arleigh Burke class is just as capable offensively as the Ticonderoga class.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1398 Dislikes 5

lold hard

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is he actually doing?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 amazing use of a gif!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HOLY SHIT IVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THIS GIF FOREVER

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Gif game on point!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is the best use of this gif I've seen yet.

9 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 7

Dafuq

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lmao

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As you wish.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

ty

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yw

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0