downvote at will, hence unpopular opinionĀ 

Jan 16, 2017 5:13 PM

pupitus

Views

714

Likes

38

Dislikes

34

i have nothing against trans, i do not understand it, but i do not condemn it. i just dont think they should be part of the gay community. The gays have fought for so long to be accepted and we finally are, but throwing a wrench in there like trans can scare off those who were starting to accept

Downvoted for the title

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

I don't think outsiders will see trans & gays as one group, so they will keep acting differently to each one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People are going to associate them anyway, this way the two communities can support and help each other.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"My pain is worse than your pain, therefore your pain doesn't matter" -OP, basically.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Ah yes, the old "I'm doing fine now, why should I help the less fortunate?"

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

climb the ladder and then set it on fire

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I hate that trans people are grouped with trans people, I hate that anyone is grouped with anyone for anything except the personalty...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're still a dick for thinking that has a bad influence on gays though :P

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Technically, twinks dress pretty 'trans' themselves. Should they be thrown in with the trans?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Everyone knows gays are just trans that are too afraid to transition anyways, common knowledge really #totallyserious

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wow. "i have nothing against trans" Sure, buddy. First, you do know trans people can be gay too, right? Second, trans people aren't 1/

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Found the trans person.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

grouped into the gay community. LGBTQ+ encompasses a large selection of people, not just gays.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

LGBTQRSTUV, man you people add a new letter every day don't you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The only problem I have with the trans community is allowing young children to get reassignment surgery. They should have to be at LEAST 16.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

While I do agree that it's a bit touchy, the earlier therapy/surgery starts, the less likely you are to find a chick with bruce wayne's chin

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That has nothing to do with surgery, the only surgery required if started early is for genitals, and doing that while the patient is still

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

growing is just asking for problems.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, they don't. Requirements by any decent surgeon I read up on: 18+, below 20 permission from parents required.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I feel like in some cases it's actually the parents pushing the kids, which is obviously really concerning.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, pushy parents are out there. But imagine the social stigma a child would face and the emotional trauma for 18 years before the surgery

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would be terrible, yes, but I have never heard of that actually happening, it probably would get obvious fast,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wrong hormones can cause depression/suicidality.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's good to hear. I'm sure the alarming stories I've heard are quite rare.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might mean puberty blockers, that can be started at a younger age, but that is reversible.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not just rare, but outright lies. The only thing minors would be given just delays the onset of puberty.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's really reassuring - thanks! :-)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(not sarcastic - just in case there was any doubt)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0