This is so sad.

Apr 7, 2017 1:33 PM

ShamelessBirdGiver

Views

46905

Likes

2121

Dislikes

260

The ones that actualy emathised with this kudos to y'all but I wanted to see how far this post would get seeing as it is reposted every other day lolol send you dog/cat pics and i mean the animals not the other type

Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

She should go to prison for 12 years. Double the time she made him lose for no reason.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The damange is done. Hope he makes something of his life. Nothing will get him the life he would have had. Hope that cunt gets f'd in prison

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hell yes.

9 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 8

yes

9 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 7

This was 5 years ago and he plays for Vegas.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

HOW MANY TIMES MUST WE SEE THIS POST!!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 7

Not all of us are on Imgur all the time, relax man.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

until another instance occurs which people can throw around as "proof" that this is actually a common issue

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Many more times I think.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

We could also stop hanging men before the trial occurs. Plus, perjury is already illegal. Don't make women more scared to report rape.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Why would punishing perjurers severely and consistently make someone who's telling the truth fear anything?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Could be because women are frequently accused of lying when they accuse someone of rape even if they are not

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Being accused of lying and being proven to be guilty of perjury are two very different things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes this is always on here this seriously doesn't happen as much as all of you liker to think most of the time women really do get raped 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

but if they lie and there is proof of course they should also go to jail for lying and intending to ruin that persons life.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If there isn't proof of a rape a then... you shouldn't be able to send anyone to jail

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

In theory yes, but life is never so easy.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yes, yes they should. She should do at LEAST 6 years for what happened.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

She should do life

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because that mans life is ruined, the career path he wanted to take, he can no longer take

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

She's been ordered to pay all the money she got from the case(1.5M) + another 1.1.She's basically fucked for life.Better than jail.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'd rather her be in jail, no way shes making enough to pay that off

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 7

This is the shit that absolutely infuriates me. Nothing will probably happen to the woman, and he lost so much.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

EQUALITY

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

DIVERSITY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is not a question that needs to be asked, and not controversial in the least. Of course. Why are we talking about this?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My thoughts exactly. Nobody is disputing this.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The happy ending! http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Woman-Falsely-Accused-Brian-Banks-Rape-Ordered-to-Pay-26M-211689741.html?amp=y

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Tl:dr. Bitch sued the school for 1.5 mil and won. She has been ordered to pay it back plus 1.1 mil more. Banks got signed by the Falcons.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I thinks hes now working for the NFL Department of Operations last time I checked

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Falcons gave him a training camp roster spot in 2013, and he made it all the way to the final rounds of cuts.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Damn, that's a great gesture by the Falcons.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was at a disadvantage entering training at 26.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

When I saw this reposted by another user 15hrs before you, I downvoted it bc it's a bullshit picture that I've seen here 100 times already.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Did you downvote this too?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I absolutely did. I'm so tired of seeing it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not everyone has seen it before though, have they? You only have to hIt the right arrow key as well; hardly a big deal is it really mate?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In general I don't mind reposts bc you're right. Just bc someone saw it a year ago doesn't mean I did. But this is under 24hrs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What proof did he get convicted with anyway?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There was no proof. If something didn't happen, you can't prove it happened.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Im not talking philosophy here, Im talking legal.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He works for the NFL now

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The last time this was posted the top comment was "yes."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

absolutely. Even if it's a dropped case, he lost 6 years of his life, and technically still has the allegations to haunt him

9 years ago | Likes 373 Dislikes 7

I've posted on this story before. He tried outwith the Atl falcons after prison, but he lost his prime in a cell. Poor guy. No repay forthat

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It'll be one hell of a civil case. I know it doesn't make up for it but he'd take everything from her

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

More than 6 years in a sense, because he lost out on a career path that would never come back to him.

9 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 1

Also, the trauma he experienced in prison

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He works for the NFL now, so his life is back on track though nothing will make up for his time in prison

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

His entire life is ruined. Even if they fully clear his record he's still forever known as a rapist and ex prison guest

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

The NFL gave him a job so his life is back on track, still doesn't make up for his time in jail

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

And not as the millionaire next-best-thing in the NFL.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I mean his football career probably won't be what it was, but entire life ruined at 26 might be a tad dramatic

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

I mean his football career probably won't be what it was, but entire life ruined at 26 might be a tad dramatic

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

Are u trying to say that it wasn't that bad?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm trying to say at 26 he's got a good shot at a long happy life

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Should you go to jail for reposts and point whoring?

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

Lol wanted to see how far this would go

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

The problem is with less clear-cut cases. It doesn't seem right to tell a rape victim that she might go to jail if she doesn't win the case

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These are not equivalent. If a *Suspected* rape victim doesn't win the case (Innocent Until Proven Guilty) then nobody is charged. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No damages are assumed to be done, so there's nothing to charge yet. That doesn't compare to this case, where lots damages WERE done.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

So you're suggesting that we hold an additional trial for them, putting them through that much more? And that seems reasonable to you?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't tell what you're saying. As long as a falsely accused person never goes behind bars, there's no need to punish the accuser. No harm.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No need to bring her to court again cause the innocent wasn't hurt by the trial any more than the cost of a lawyer.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone of any gender who falsely accuses someone of rape should have to pay for it. It's treated with far too much bias one way or another.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

They should pay damages. We don't need more idiots in our jail system. I'd rather get paid than see them in jail.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Jail systems in the US are broken as hell, anyway. Tons of people sent to jail because the privatization incentivizes judges to lock em up.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I like your way of thinking. Just garnish their wages for 20 years and make them understand that their bullshit has consequences.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In cases line this where you can absolutely prove she lied? Of course.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why does it have to come to that. I can't get my neighbor convicted of colluding with ISIS just by swearing to it in court...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because if any victim who went to trial and didn't win could have charges brought against them virtually no one would report actual rapes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thousands of people lose court cases and don't have charges brought against them. The value of testimony isn't emotional.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We can't consider victims guilty until proven innocent. You shouldn't be able to get a victim tried just by swearing to it either.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Especially because it's relatively easy to cast doubt on evidence in rape cases.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So in most there'd be enough ambiguity to bring charges against an accuser under this law, even if they actually were raped.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And again, in cases like this where there is clear evidence of perjury there is legal recourse, which was taken in this case.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is that if her admitting to lying about the rape meant jail time she would have never admitted it he would still be in jail

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Another thing to consider is that women not being able to prove a rape could count as a false accusation.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Which would only further discourage women (and men) from reporting rape, and even now very very few reported rapes are prosecuted.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer"

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Not having evidence to convict is much different than having evidence of lying

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Because they'll know that very very few reported rapes get prosecuted.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is true

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It really isn't. If defense attorneys can threaten to try a victim they'll use it to get them to drop the accusation.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But it really is. Threatening means nothing if they have no evidence of lying or if the person is telling the truth.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's very hard to get hard evidence in rape cases, and attorneys can usually argue the evidence is a result of consensual sex.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Apart from bias, rape cases are difficult to prosecute. It's very easy to attack the reputation of the accuser and make them out as a liar.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because most people are biased in favor of the accused over the accuser in cases like this, for exactly the reason this post made the FP.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If people were biased in favor of the accused, Banks wouldnt have spent all that time in jail

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If she testified in court and lied on the stand, that's perjury, a felony? Wouldn't the real vic be able to file a civil case against her

9 years ago | Likes 970 Dislikes 4

Perjury is a *criminally* under enforced crime.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also filing a false police report. though, depending on the area theyre in it's likely that the statute of limitations has passed on both>

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

>as far as I can find there arent any that go beyond 5 years, and this happened at least 6 years ago.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There SHOULDN'T be statutes of limitations for that...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So the SoL is 5 years on screwing people over? I suppose it's no coincidence she confessed just after it passed eh?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it wasnt just after it was at least a year after, but yeah.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He can file a civil lawsuit against her.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The girl was paid 8 million or so settlement or so by their school for failing to protect her. The school is suing for the money back 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But she claimed that she is broke and can't pay any money back.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is a situation where "Debtor's Prison" makes quite a bit of sense. But, you know, only because of this one case, and one person.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The problem is most DAs wont press charges, because makes real rape victims less likely to come forward, it's a shitshow all-around.

9 years ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 10

Not if you were my DA. Rek that bitch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is a stupid assumption on behalf of anyone who makes the claim.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So we should let men get sent to prison and have their reputation destroyed because of crazy bitches? Nah

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 8

Scuse me? The only people who would think twice about coming forward are the liars. Bogus argument.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wouldn't it simply discourage people from purjury?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The DA has nothing to do with it if it's a civil case, no?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Correct. DAs prosecute criminal cases

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I was talking about the perjury aspect, the da has nothing to do with civil, but civil would only award money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah they can file a civil case but she won't go to jail or anything.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right, but they can fine the shit out of her and force her to make payments to the victim for, hopefully, the rest of their life.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is there any proof it makes real victims scared of pressing charges? Because that sounds like bullshit to me.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Feminist Make-believe Excuse Book 5th edition, page 103, 3rd entry

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

It is bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I'm not going to start a research project at work, but take a look at the reasons rape is underreported.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

It opens up for the risk that if a guy cant be proven guilty, can she be prosecuted? 'Cause rape convictions are hard to get in the first1/?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

She can only be prosecuted if it's proven that she lied. All I propose is that the already-existing law be enforced.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Place, and a trial is hell for most victims of rape, so it will be difficult to get victims to press charges if they risk having a case2/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Against them afterwards, cause they couldnt prove it beyond doubt or w/e. If we are only talking about cases Where its clear cut that the3/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And get what? 8 years and his future back?

9 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 31

How many people do you think she's hurt between then and now? I'm betting on a high number.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Justice

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Justice and $. You can get a lot in reparations and emotional issues from being inprisoned. Might be enough to take care of himself

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He should get to rape that girl imo

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

...wtf is wrong with you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I agree with you, it's super fucked up. But I kind of agree with the rape idea guy too. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it just seems fair to me, maybe you disagree? no need to be rude

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's fair??? For someone to get raped???

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's like saying murderers should walk free since victims won't come back to life. I don't get your logic. No sense of justice?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we should really just make them pay a small amount weekly to the victim and eliminate prisons all together. That sense of justice?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

What??? That statement makes no sense. Justice for him being imprisoned for a crime he didn't do. What are you talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And how does a civil case do him justice?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Make her spend time in the said prisons or pay small amounts weekly.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You don't go to jail in a civil case, and what amount of money gives him his life back? Millions? Unless she has that, it's pointless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

We can never un-murder people so prosecuting killers pointless. This logic is awful- the point of punishment is deterrence, not vengeance.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

We don't prosecute murderers in civil court either. This logic is awful.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Tell that to OJ.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was tried in criminal court

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ha! Fair enough. What type of court do we prosecute perjury in?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Seriously?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That seems unlikely. Is it your belief there should be no consequences for having such a profound and negative affect on someone's life?

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 3

No, I'm saying unless she's a millionaire, a civil suit won't get him shit except more wasted time and money. It's criminal

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

I think he/she is just saying that while going after the woman is an option, at this point, it is too little too late

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

Not really, she should be punished for knowingly ruining someone's future an wasting years of their life.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

That's like saying it's pointless to convict a murderer because the victim is already dead.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Amen

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

True for him, but she serves to be punished, and it certainly sets a precedent

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

We in America have taken this women can do no wrong thing a bit too far, family courts and shit like this need to change.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3