Conor McGregor found guilty

Nov 22, 2024 5:47 PM

sirbinlid

Views

36176

Likes

686

Dislikes

12

https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/1122/1482355-conor-mcgregor-nikita-hand-court/

Frump will parden him. After all, all his choice have some form of assault charges.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Now what, next president?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is not a guilty verdict, he was found liable in civil court. Would be great if this was a criminal case, but this only means he was found found liable for damages, no criminal convictions on the record for this unfortunately.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately I doubt the amount of the judgement particularly hurts MacGregor - and his lawyers will probably still fight actually paying it. They always do.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He's an egotistical cunt, he's hated enough in Ireland as it is but now that he's been declared as officially being a rapist on national TV it will damage him personally no end.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fuck Connor, fuck Dana White, fuck the UFC in general. It's mindless entertainment run by scumbags... Same as the WWE.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huh. Sometimes it's the person you most suspect.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now he will do what other convicted rapists do... run for office or fight some youtube person

2 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 3

It looks he's doing the latter actually.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

£250,000 pounds is nothing to him considering he made $33,000,000 for his last fight.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

€250,000.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean shock, C Mc G is a piece of shit

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

No way... Utter assholes pretending they're doing it only for show are utter assholes?!?!?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About as shocking as finding Matt Gatez has a preschool in his phone as Pizza Hut

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Why is this guy not in jail ?

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Because he's famous, has money, and is white

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

Don't have the crayons to explain

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Because this was a civil case.

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Wow, the guy who assaulted an old man in a bar for refusing to take a shot of his shitty whiskey turns out to be a piece of shit? I'm shocked.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Too bad it wasn't a criminal conviction. He could have gotten a "proper twelve" for that.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck CM. He had always been a piece of shit. The way he acts was never an act to get seats sold. He is 100% piece of shit.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't his sister now engaged to a relative of the old man he punched? Both future brother in law and old man belong to an Irish cartel? 🤔🤔

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Enjoy rapist being found guilty and being punished because those days are LONG gone if the rapist has more wealth than you. Hey, more of you should've voted or not voted for Trump. You get what's coming as far as I'm concerned at this point. Over half the population is women.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

"should've voted or not voted for Trump" might wanna rephrase this...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For years I've been seeing Brock Turner, the rapist, now I'll see Conor McGregor, the rapist. Let's not forget it.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Just for a quick update, he's been going by his middle name Allen I believe. So he may also appear as Allen Turner the rapist.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Good to know, also interesting that while he changed part of his name, the rapist part stuck.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His initials are BATTR. Battr-up!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is one of the reasons I actually don't like  "statute of limitations" in the United States. I understand the goal is to protect from possible prosecution when evidence isn't available to exonerate them anymore.

But in the other hand, there is a definite lack of evidence for the prosecution too, and it feels like this only exists to protect the rich and famous.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Great. Now trumpfs is going to offer him a cabinet position /s

2 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 4

You joke...but...

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And now Jake Paul will want to fight him

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Can we stop mentioning these fuckers and supporting or engaging with the companies and media that get money off this trash shit?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jake Paul has already asked to fight him. https://www.si.com/boxing/jake-paul-conor-mcgregor-mma-fight-mike-tyson-win

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

How are they ever going to decide who is going to be the heel?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I’m sure there’s a reason, but why is this civil instead of criminal? Statue of limitations or something?

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

The Director of Public Prosecutions determined that there was insufficient evidence to meet the standards of a criminal conviction, so it would be a waste of time and resources to pursue a criminal conviction. A civil case can be taken by a private citizen, and the burden of evidence is not as high. So Nikita Hand decided to take that route, and won.

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

*statute, ffs

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Don't be hard on yourself butt, we all make mistakes.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

*bud, ffs

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I saw this on national news here in Sweden. We don't do these separate rulings, so I'm wondering what happened in the criminal case.

2 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 1

See gallowglacht’s comment below- basically , there wasn’t sufficient evidence to reach the higher burden of proof for a criminal conviction.

2 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

Thanks. Yeah, the burden of evidence in a civil case is much lower here too.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thx Type17, here's a link to that comment /gallery/vFSG5qB/comment/2429505467

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

As we dot have this here, how would that work regarding criminal records?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0