Dark City, underrated sci fi

Jan 3, 2024 12:36 PM

chonarocky

Views

66651

Likes

752

Dislikes

26

#sci_fi #dark_city

“I found a way out!” *jumps in front of a subway train*

2 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 2

Last time I watched this it was on Apple TV and it played the theatrical cut, which ruins in the movie in the first two minutes.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I fucking love Dark City.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I love this movie so so much. Absolutely perfect use of William Hurt being despondent and weird, Jennifer Connolly being being alluring, Rufus Sewell being handsome and confused and Kiefer Southerland being an evil scientist.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure Dark City is under-rated; it's regularly listed as one of the top sci-fi films of the 1990s

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just commented on a post about event horizon about this ;
I feel like people are using "underrated" incorrectly instead if using "underviewed" or "unnoticed"

dark city is rated very fairly by fans

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wasn't a huge fan of it but only bc of the genre more than anything else. Otherwise a very unique film and worth at least one watch

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Avoid the theatrical cut if possible. If you can't avoid it, mute the movie until you can see the pocketwatch. Much better experience.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Matrix got all the credit back then but this movie and the Thirteenth Floor were awesome hidden gems, which came out around the same time as the Matrix

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The 13th Floor was great, true! And the Cardigans video clip for Erase/Rewind had a scene that wasn't even in the movie, IIRC

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mr. Book

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Such a great movie!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did anyone figure out the Easter egg game on the dvd? Dear Imgur, am I old?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A movie with a 76% critic and 85% audience score is not "underrated".

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It might be if the vast majority of people have never *heard* of it. Ratings are by those who have. I'd never heard of this movie until this post.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Really liked this! The subgenre is known as “Technoir”, a mix of sci-fi and film noir.
Check out the movie that started the trend, “Alphaville” (1965). It is equally good and you can find it for free on YouTube

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shut it down! Shut it down FOREVER!

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

I say this anytime I shut something down.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One of the all time best

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

THIS. SO. GOOD.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of my favorite movies!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sleep...now.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Underrated? It's certified fresh on rt and has a 75-90% everywhere else. Even Roger Ebert gave it a good score when it came out so it's not like it was critically panned at the time.

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

It's underrated because most audiences didn't see it and most people still don't know about it.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

That's not what underrated means. If it was critically panned, then yes it would be underrated, but it wasn't. It was poorly received in 1998 but it's not like people don't know about the movie today. It's in literally everyone's top 10 sci-fi list, it absolutely is not an underrated movie lmao

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

ive been saying this also on a few threads these days. Underrated does not mean what ppl have been using it for

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people today use "underrated" to mean "it deserved more praise than it got" or "a lot of the criticism it got was unwarranted". They don't literally mean "the object in question received ratings lower than it deserved by official or professional raters". You can disagree on the word is used, but as to what people meant by using it, I think there's little to be argued about concerning this particular film.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Ok great, neither of those definitions apply because it wasn't panned by audiences or critics, less people saw it than the matrix which is par for the course for a sci-fi film in theaters. You're looking for a word that means "more people should have watched this when it released" and "underrated" is not that word.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Underappreciated, if you feel like being pedantic.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Brazil 1985, also a highly underrated steampunk movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKPFC8DA9_8

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

jennifer connelly's boobs!!!

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

more enthralling than her supposed jazz singing in this movie

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which cut did you watch? They dubbed her in the botched theatrical cut, but she actually sings herself in the director's cut, which works brilliantly in the context of the story.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Obvs. the wrong one. But thanks for pointing out. Wouldn't take much for me to forgive her though.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh...YEAHHHHH...... it is one (1) of My Favorite 'Dark' Sci-Fi movies!!!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No more Mr. Quick.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Watching this movie at a young an impressionable age is what got me interested in Philosophy.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I was 10 minutes late to the showing, and it drastically improved the movie.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

They fixed this in the director's cut.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yeah, I got that copy. Such a better film for it.

That opening really feels like the studio demanded it be done.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of how Brazil has multiple versions, too. Like the studio mandated happy ending version.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's typically the case. Producers get involved and want movies explained. They did that to Bladerunner. The director's cut removed the opening narration.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not just a feeling, that was a last minute change imposed by the studio because they were afraid people wouldn't get it by the time the plot became obvious

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I saw this right before matrix in the late 90s and thought both had very similar concepts, even though they are obviously extremely different. Great movie

2 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 0

I remember someone on here saying “Dark City walked so that the Matrix could run”. It definitely feels that way.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I recall reading that Matrix resused some sets and props from Dark City.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the article, interesting read.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After watching Dark City it seemed very likely that inspiration was taken in the creation of The Matrix. I think it’s awesome when I can see creative links between projects through the ages.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The Matrix also took ideas from Proyas' previous movie The Crow.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oh cool, I have to check that out!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dark City came out in 1998, Matrix in 1999. I doubt they could watch a movie, take inspiration, write a script, film, edit, and get it out in a year. Much more likely both films had some overlapping sources of inspiration?

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The director's cut is easily in my top 10 movies of all times.

2 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 1

Yep this movie is in my top 10 sci-fi movies of all time well the directors cut is. Not to say the original isn't good also.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same. This is one of my favorite films. Director's cut is definitely a step up.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am excited to watch that version. My GF got me it for Christmas.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’ve seen the movie but I don’t know if it was the director’s cut. Any big differences?

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

If the beginning started with a voice-over or text explaining the premise, it wasn't the director's cut. The director's cut is the better film, in many ways, but also because it preserves the mystery of what's happening instead of spoiling it immediately.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Director's cut is... darker? Like it was color corrected to be darker. It also cuts out the opening narration, it also rounds out some relationships a bit better and shows John using his powers a little more. I dunno, it just makes for a better movie IMO

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Is it longer? I think the main thing I didn't like about the movie is that the second half wraps up too quickly. It does a fantastic job in the first half in building up this mysterious city, then the second half is like "yadda yadda yadda, the good guy beats the bad guys, the end"

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Needed the pacing of Equilibrium.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Just a wee bit better overall.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Cutting out the opening narration is good, it actually spoils the plot of the movie.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Good movie, aptly rated. If people could stop calling things they like underrated, that'd be great. You could record a donkey farting in a tin can and someone on youtube will call it underrated, guaranteed.

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 12

A donkey farting in a can is significantly more unique and rare that just a video of a human farting. Ive seen random videos of people farting, as have we all at some point, no interest in seeing another. But Ive never seen a donkey fart into a can. I cant rate it, having not seen it, ill have to without my review, but it seems more than plausible that a donkey farting into a can WOULD be underrated.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Seriously roger ebert gushed over this movie, it's box office was terri le but just about ever movie nerd out there has heard of it cuz of ebert

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm there with you. But I believe they mean it's not as widely popular as it should be, not that people who see it think it's bad.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Virtually all sci-fi fans know about this movie and like it. Does it have what it takes to become a pop culture staple? Obviously not. I don't think it's underrated.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Link please

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well that's because a video of someone trying to get a donkey to fart into a can, would likely be legitimately funny. Please remove the stick from your backside good sir.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

That stick is there for a reason. You mind your own backside.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Who hurt you?

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

Anime fans I'd wager.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It was Johnny Cash with American III - Solitary Man. Such underrated album.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

?1

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Underrated comment

2 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Underrated comment

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Come on. The correct term, as confirmed above... Is "underrated tin can donkey fart"

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I saw them open for Pearl Jam in '97

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Folks also need to stop saying something is objectively "Shit" when they didn't like it. I saw a kid call Endgame "shit". He was wrong.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Wait - is your problem with "shit" or "objectively"? I think we can subjectively call things shit.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Objectively shit. Acting as though your opinions are verifiable reality and anyone who likes them is provably wrong about -opinion- and -taste-.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I thought Endgame was shit (all Avengers movies actually) but that's just my opinion. My kids love those movies.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You literally heard him say it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct, but I aslo literally saw his mouth move, as I was in the same room. He was trying to be cool and edgy. I pointed out that he was 9 when Iron Man came out, and wasn't even born when studios started taking comic books seriously, so his point of reference was wildly flawed.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feelin it

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0