wafflesdidit
15727
525
9
https://www.dworkinsubstack.com/
Jun 24, 2026 3:28 PM
wafflesdidit
15727
525
9
https://www.dworkinsubstack.com/
cousteau
Been some time since I got a booster. Guess it's time for one again. Thanks for the reminder, T.
glovelyday
duktayp
No science, only bibble https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTZjMDliOTUybmRmMGRtMWw5bzNwcHE1OHp5aWwyMXR1anR6b2JyZHo0eDB6dTBrdSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/l0Iyb3HA8Tr1qOYog/giphy.gif
hanginwiththecoolkids
They're not trying to trick smart people into believing in science. I'm sure JAMA Network Open has a big circulation in trailer parks. /s
psmith00
the Regime wants to take us to being able to diagnose and determine treatment by reading the entrails of slaughtered animal. the rich will be able to afford higher quality diagnoses by using larger more expensive animals. poor people will be using wild caught pigeons.
SortOfAverage
Instead of the truth, couldn't the fucking regime be burried.
HolyFreakingToast
GOP battling against science and common sense and decency.
YpsilantiRomani
https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1ZjA4YmtraTV1MndjYmZoYXdrMDV0MzJ5ajVqZ2dtYTVhdDVobDAwYiZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/clotJg9IqBitMcRJ61/200w.webp
ThailandExpress
Resistance1000
Those of us who knew vaccines work won't change our opinion of vaccines or tRump. Neither will anti-vaxxers.
DrewK98
They don't care. I'm not saying they don't believe it. They. Don't. Care. They have talking points, they agree with the people they're told to agree with. End of conversation. Anything after that is just fucking with you for funzies.
cousteau
Can't ever not upvote scientific and academic research. Hell, I'd upvote this twice if I could. Good on you, Dr. Bhattacharya.
foreverinchains
The Streisand Effect strikes again.
cousteau
I'll make sure to get a booster this year. Out of spite.
paynoattentiontousernames
Whats it called when someonebis caught doing bad shit, is stopped from going through with it, but theres still no consequences
DocWats
The usual.
evildadunit
scary vision repeats
DutchBoeremeisie
Dude, this is all AI written.
keebs63
Really doesn't seem like it. Are you saying it's AI because there's an emdash?
[deleted]
[deleted]
DutchBoeremeisie
The "journalist" uses AI to write their texts.
wafflesdidit
I cited the journalist from Substack and you can verify for yourself that it’s not Ai
DutchBoeremeisie
I saw the link, thanks. I verified for myself that the person generates their stuff with AI. If you like, I can give you a point-by-point explanation on why this is AI.
mithiwithi
Let me guess: the article weighs the same as a duck.
wafflesdidit
Why don’t you message Scott Dworkin yourself on Substack and he will reply and tell you that it is not AI writing his articles
He writes them and whatever process he uses to edit them might be the conversation we can have
But I feel like you’re trying to discount the entire article or the entire post because you think that AI might’ve been used
Now that makes me wonder who did you vote for?
DutchBoeremeisie
I didn't vote - I'm not American. A quick perusal of my comments (and earlier posts) should show that I'm anti Trump. I said in my earlier comment that I didn't doubt the veracity of the post.
While I am anti-Trump, I am also vehemently anti-AI, regardless of the message. I do not need to message Mr. Dworkin, thanks. Because he will either confirm this is AI or lie that it isn't.
Rink257
AI should not be used to come up with the ideas or context, however, it is bi crime against genuine creativity to help you edit, spell check and site shit that needs to be cited, which AI can help me organize my own work.
It's being used and owned and unregulated by people we can't trust, who are trying to make it drive our cars. It's not AI, it's how we mis/use and/or abuse it.
zellar2020
Why are you outwardly being a pain in the ass for no reason than to just pitchfork and torch about AI.
That kind of main character I'm always right syndrome is a bit toxic.
mithiwithi
Or he will tell the truth that it's not AI and you won't believe it because you've decided that it couldn't possibly not be AI because you are a magic oracle that can 100% detect AI writing.
wafflesdidit
Ask Scott Dworkin on Substack
an0therthr0waway
indeed it is. The subject appears to be legitimate though. https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/121896
wafflesdidit
No it is not ai
Its from a journalist on substack
Cited in the description
DutchBoeremeisie
Oh, I didn't doubt that. I just object to the way the information is presented.
wafflesdidit
I just screenshot the articles and post them on here to spread the word.
He intentionally writes them short and sweet into the point because people have the attention span of a fruit fly.
wafflesdidit
Yes, human beings can actually write without using AI
Scott Dworkin does not use AI
DutchBoeremeisie
Sorry to be the bad news bear, but he does.
Forensickle
What do you think AI writing was trained on?
It didn't invent em dash usage, it was just trained on a specific style of easily accessible writing that used it heavily, like say, journalism
wafflesdidit
Dude, ask Scott Dworkin on substack.
Debate the substance or gtfo my Imgur.
You’re toxic af, and I will ban you.