Bleedingfrog
1211
90
48
Nov 13, 2016 5:04 AM
Bleedingfrog
1211
90
48
tomhark
this only works overseas.
Bleedingfrog
National Guard and Army 11B can handle it state side.
3YearsaLurker
Those aren't just protestors. They're rioters.
Leithreas
Feel the same about the Malheur protesters?
captatio
Y'allqaeda
Justalobstercowboy
another 4 dead in Ohio
MyCatLikesToFruitcake
From?
Justalobstercowboy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCS-g3HwXdc
Somethingswrongintheneighbourhood
God damn, reference game on point
Chawzilla
Neil Young for the win.
choicebutts2
StaleMeme
WhitePhoenix
It's not bait if you agree with it.
cloudless9
I think, in certain cases, the National Guard could totally shut down riots
Bleedingfrog
*should
cloudless9
Aside from them being able to shut down unlawful protests, it would give those guys something to do
Bleedingfrog
Something other than protecting the wifi
cloudless9
That's only the Air Force. We're the ones designated to protect cyberspace
HolyCringeLordBatman
So Kent state all over again?
DontEverMoveHere
That's up to the criminal rioters.
HolyCringeLordBatman
Did you just attempt to justify Kent State? That's a new low.
DontEverMoveHere
You mentioned Kent State I didn't. My supposition is it's up to the present day criminals to make the choice about where this goes.
VresiBerba
You're aware that protesting is protected by the 1st amendment, right?
WhitePhoenix
Protesting is. Blocking roads, rioting, and causing propery damage to your OWN NEIGHBORHOODS is not.
OrionRed
Not quite the broad statement you may think it is.
Dipstick58
Civil protesting is, shutting down roads and the such is not.
VresiBerba
Naturally, but you're not protester if you're shutting down roads, then you're a rioter
Justalobstercowboy
Sauce?
Dipstick58
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-protesters-legally-allowed-to-block-busy-streets-and-highways
Justalobstercowboy
oh, Quora, the blind leading the blind
Dipstick58
You have anything to prove the claim is wrong?