Introducing: Governing Goliath

Jun 11, 2013 1:59 PM

Can we get a Scumbag hat?

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

TIL imgur is full of Republicans.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

With short memories.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is so true it hurts...

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.

13 years ago | Likes 436 Dislikes 11

Neither should fear each other.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

When people love the government, there is our Glorious Leader of North Korea.

13 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Hahahaha

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you know the people don't fear the government of the Glorious Leader and feign love out of fear?

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

haha, you're funny. You die a traitors death now. Goodbye.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Ha Ha, Glorious Leader - I am out of your reach. Even your puny missile will miss me.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.

13 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Yes. At this rate it seems it is inevitable.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even here in Canada.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

New American revolution.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vote Libertarian or exacerbate the above problems. Both major political parties are to blame here, both this administration and the previous

13 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

I like how they stopped being Conspiracy Theories, and now it's just legit Conspiracy.

13 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

What is a conspiracy if not powerful people getting together? Is that so hard to believe? Powerful people aiming for more power? Believable.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The loaded term 'conspiracy theory' is simply applied to a question or opinion to enable one to dismiss it without thought, and to ridicule.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're so right! I always hated that. (Also hi NSA agents, you guys having a nice shift? :D )

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

LOL, I suppose there might have been enough trigger words in my comment that a "Hello" is warranted. :)

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Some quote by someone else that's been used 10 times today in similar themed posts because it's easier than developing an original thought"

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I hope you all realize that Government's aren't corrupt, People are. It isn't hard to find the corrupt politicians.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Considering this is the Capitol Building, I would agree that our members of congress are not doing enough to reign in Executive power.

13 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

They were all aware of it and approved it. lol.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Have you not heard of checks and balances? He can't do anything without go ahead from congress.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You haven't been paying attention to the growth in executive power since Andrew Jackson's administration.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Take a long look at his list of executive orders, his private dealings via "Fast & Furious" and his drone strikes/Kill list.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Considering how many executive orders Obama has signed, that is straight up bullshit.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Checks and Balances only works when each of the branches actually fights for power with the other two. Judicial and Exec. have been winning.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except issue Executive Orders, which is a pretty big 'except'.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Scumbag Senate?

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just a reminder, these are the people you elected. I'm ready for down votes.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Depressing, but correct. Although in some places, it's just choosing who gets to screw you over. Spider Jerusalem was a PROPHET.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you do not like what the government is doing, do something about it: run for office, write your rep, tweet obama, etc. Just do something

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It'd be fantastic if it were that easy. And if you tweet something Obama doesn't agree with, he'll probably throw you in prison.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My theory is that no matter how good hearted you are by the time you make it some where to make a difference the system has corrupted you

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that may be true, but at least it's an attempt to be more productive than complaining on the internet

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(2) because b*tching on imgur, reddit, and facebook isn't going to do diddly-shit

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're totally right, but the problem is what to do? Politicians are thoroughly compromised at best, if not outright traitors. (cont'd)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3 ever give that impression it's because they have to. The only politicians worth a damn are MAYBE some local-level ones. Maybe. Very few.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 Corruption is endemic in the system as a whole, it's the culture. Your congressman doesn't care about you, neither does Obama. If they...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm unelectable, my rep doesn't read or care about my letters, and I don't have twitter. What do i do??? (seriously though.. wtf can we do?)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel completely powerless in this system.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then they have already accomplished one of their goals.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Common misconception: America is a republic, not a democracy.

13 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

A seemingly broader misconception is that it is one OR the other. I presume the US is both.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the concept of checks & balances is flawed. the judicial branch can never hold legislature accountable since its the executive branch that(2

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

appoints judges in the 1st place. in the end, politicians & interest groups have full control, regardless of constitutional limits. (3)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People who say this are idiots who add nothing to any conversation. America is both a democracy and a republic. Shock its complex (1/?)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You must be a liberal, right off the bat throwing insults.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

system of government cannot be boiled down into a single word. Just as America is both a country and a nation it is both a democracy (2/?)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and a republic. Even if it were merely a form of republic and not a democracy, would pointing out the semantical error really add (3/4)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

anything to an intelligent debate about any important issue? (4/4)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're supposed to be republic, but it's tempting to conclude republics can't be sustained. all constitutional limits break down over time.(1

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correction, America is supposed to be a republic.

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Was gonna say...

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Go on, I'm listening.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every government secret has a classification limit. Most are forcibly declassified in either 25 or 50 years. (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I don't have a 2/2, just wanted you to click.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Lol +1 for making me click. Also it wouldn't be good if every single classified document was made public for the entire world to see...

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yep. I don't think people know this. There is a reason for classification and it's not because the govt wants to hide things from the ppl.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I get real tired of ppl bitching because of classification when there ARE very valid reasons for it.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I couldn't believe people got mad when Bush lied about WMDs in Iraq. I mean come on! How else could he have manipulated a country into war?

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah i hated it when everyone bitched about Watergate

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow. My mistake let's tell EVERYONE about strategic troop movement and the identities of spies. My bad. Rose colored glasses and shit.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Gross... I never suggested such a thing. http://imgur.com/BtEepuj

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do we know they declassify everything like theyre supposed to?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate Obama. But I honestly believe that all this would exist if Romney had been elected. Left, right, it really doesn't matter anymore.

13 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

This is something we're watching all around the world, the power doesn't distinguis from sides, only hears about money...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I feel that a majority of the people voted for Obama to put a STOP to these types of abuses and now they feel betrayed.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I doubt many people are blaming Obama alone - it's mostly about a systematic growth and abuse of federal government power.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too right, that's why we must elect Rand Paul in the upcoming election and nobody else. He pisses off republicans and democrats alike.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

THANK YOU SIR

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He had my partial support until he said he supported domestic drones.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Truth

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd be careful putting your trust in any political candidate, remember they didn't get where they are by pissing people off.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks, Obama.

13 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 27

Bush started it Obama continues it - repeal the Patriot Act

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 13

Except that he can't do anything without the approval of Congress?

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 19

He had 2 years with a democratic controlled congress...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And the Patriot Act was passed by Bush congress. Your point?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

fast and furious

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Oh bullshit, 3/4 of his policies have been executive orders that circumvent Congress. The whole system needs a clean sweep reboot.

13 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

And the Patriot Act was passed bu Bush congress. Your point?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*by

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

13 years ago (deleted Nov 30, 2015 7:54 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Obama has ordered 400 drone strikes in 5 years. Killing 3 Americans. Bush ordered 50 drone strikes in 8 years. Fuck Obama

13 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

What exactly do you suggest thanking Obama for?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when the government employees are more concerned with their own wants over the needs of the people

13 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Agree, but unfortunately that's entirely natural. Self-interest is a normal human characteristic. Free mrkts render self-interest harmless.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Its a symptom of career politicians. When politicians had to make their living outside of Washington they had our interests more in mind.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know what I just hate? I hate that, as a ideological supporter of big government, I have to watch the government get big in the exact

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

opposite it should be

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1984.

13 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 5

Sales of 1984 by George Orwell are up by 129% this week on Amazon.

13 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

We're 30 years late, but we make up for it in ways Orwell could not have imagined in his worst nightmares.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

mixed with a bit of Huxley.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Seen that before. I think it's turning mostly Huxley, but elements of 1984. Perpetual War (Socialism, Drugs, War etc) and heavy surveilence.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Interesting but both are right to a degree. Orwell feared TV monitors imposed by government. In reality, it's potentially worse (more)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) Instead we all carry cell phones with mic, camera and GPS that's constantly connected to a network of our own choice and pleasure.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, it's 2013.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I forgot imgur is incapable of grasping obvious jokes.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think you understand what insider trading is...

13 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 12

TLDR: the company who was hacked by teens, has now had another leak, cashed in on insider info, freely wiretaps the world's data.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chaney and Halliburton - classic!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congress, if it were a trading group, would outperform every other hedge fund in existence.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't know if you've been following the news...

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Last I checked the government does not do stocks.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, technically speaking, an individual doesn't have to be a part of a corporation to perpetrate insider trading...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a politician reveals information to you, which may affect an industry, and thus stock prices, that is not currently "insider trading"

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Politicians are solicited for, and providing, information regarding upcoming bills and legislation by traders hoping to predict movement.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sign is unclear. Those in Congress can use their knowledge of upcoming legislation to buy/sell--an act that is illegal for private citizens.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So yea high level intel staff run the leaky companies that siphon off the world's intellectual property. Already busted for insider trading.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh almost forgot, James Clapper was bumbling Booz Allen's CEO at some point. James today was defending the right to secrecy for his company.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It makes sense in a very broad use of the word. Many influential people in washington have investments in companies that tend to (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

benefit from certain laws (2/2)

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

There are laws in place that freeze some of these assets while they're in office, but yes, they need to go, much, much further.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as been stated that's not insider trading but just being an ass hole

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

that's self dealing

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"former Air Force officer hired by Booz Allen, who on his first day of work brought with him “sensitive,” non-public information"

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was wondering the same thing. I even thought, the term was used for something different.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its when you buy stock or invest in a company using privileged information (i.e. the will buy out a company in a week)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's close, but there's a pretty precise definition, and it's not just buying. Dumping securities on inside info causes lots of trouble

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry for the 6hr delay, do read "Edward Snowden not Booz Allen's first leak problem." @ politico.com

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahh, I was not aware of this. However it does not mention that the government said it's ok. I also might have missed it (skimmed it at work)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think that you understand that politicians use their position and information to make illegal trades and further their wealth A LOT!

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Honestly, you give and you take. Also, I live abroad, so none of this applies to me, so I'm perfe - *Drone strike levels house*

13 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

And if you are a dead adult male after that strike you are automatically labeled an enemy combatant, no questions asked.

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Also, suddenly your kids weren't there when it happened, and didn't exist.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember the Patriot act was passed under the Bush administration people

13 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 25

True, but even political leaders are now stepping forth to warn that some of Obama's policies abuse the Patriot Act.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so what? This isn't about bush or obama. The increase in the size, power and abusiveness of this government is a trend way bigger than them

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So him resigning it into law should hold no water when he, the current president, is scrutinized after he promised to be different?

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, I am not posting out of partisanship. Both parties facilitate the growth of government.

13 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I know I just want to mention it to the people who believe Obama is personally doing this

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Is this really about the size of the government? In my opinion this liberty infringement is not the same as a larger government.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And renewed under the Obama administration, don't forget.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Obama has been MORE than happy to keep up all of the old bush policies: Drone strikes, Gitmo, surveillance, etc. That's "Hope and change"??

13 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

He literally held a vote to close Gitmo, it was congress that refused to appropriate the funds to close it!

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

But... I don't... Wouldn't cost MORE to keep it open?

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, I mean put aside the funds needed to close it. It wasn't a cost efficiency problem, they didn't want to close Gitmo.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No not when you consider the cost to build a new facility and transport all the occupants. Critical thinking is hard.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He also must be the secret conspiracy why Tebow got signed by the Patriots

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Obama has ordered 400 Drone Strikes in 5 years, Bush ordered 50 in 8. Obama gives 0 fucks for his constituency or his "Hope/Change"

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Obama is a communist, a totalarian, and is going to destroy America, so you should have a picture of the White House

13 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 17

They are complete opposite political ideals. The Soviet Union and other 'communist' states were not so. Communism according to Marx is 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

plenty more. Obama is is just as bad as Bush imo but then both parties simply blame the other so they can continue doing what they want. 2/3

13 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The Patriot Act which has caused all this was passed by Bush, the whole Verizon thing also started with him, along with Guantanamo, and 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

What is your point? Obama gets excused because the other guy did it first? Wrong is wrong.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Read the whole thing bud. I want to see all of them held accountable and I personally am waiting for the revolt when they reach too far.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We need to actually hold them accountable rather than just blame the other party, because it does absolutely nothing. 3/3

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

All power to the working class. Stalin and Mao hid behind the title of communism to create totalatarian dictatorships that oppressed 2/2

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In theory that's what communism is, but as far as I know a true communist state has never existed, even though that's what most people 1/2

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

around seem to want, power to the people to the point where government won't intrude on our lives. Yet it's become something nobody 2/3

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

understands and throws around at people who they don't like in politics simply because the SU hid behind it in the Cold War. 3/3

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Congratulations. Republicans = Small government, Democrats = Big Government. So to all you liberals, you have no right to complain.

13 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 27

Yay black vs white thinking! So long as they keep us fighting with eachother, they keep running to the bank with all the money.

13 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Yea, simplifying matters to this level is meaningful. If you expect reps to actually reduce govt once elected then I think you're naive.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

[As a conservative] It's not that black and white. There are areas (Nat. Security, Mil., Bus.) where the Republicans are ok with big. (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Democrats are always accused of being pro-big government because they support more spending on social programs, relief funds, etc.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except G.W. Bush started the PATRIOT act...

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

13 years ago (deleted Jul 27, 2022 3:12 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Anyone has a right to complain if they disagree with the events taking place, regardless of their political leanings.

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Not true... Some of the largest expansions of Govt occurred under Republican admins. They just talk the talk. Libertarians are 4 small govt.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin, used to play people off of each other and give the illusion of freedom and choice.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 Anything outside the 2-party system is ignored, marginalized, or ridiculed by the press, owned by the same interests as the politicans.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At this point I'd say both parties are more than happy to have government grow.

13 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I can agree to that statement. Though, Romney was more "less government" than Obama is/was.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I agree with that. It's just hard to reign in any bureaucracy. Like all superorganisms they grow unchecked until they exhaust all resources

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But do we really know that? Look at the disconnect between candidate Obama and President Obama. Campaign trails are often paved by lies.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Regulating what I do with my body and in my bedroom = small government. Got it.

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

Government shouldn't be regulating much at all. Meaning, what you do with your body is not their business AT ALL either way, for or against.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not forcing me to pay for your bad decisions = small government.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

No but using the government to make me pay for it is big government. No Republican is using his power to make gay sex illegal or anything.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Making me pay for defense spending and oil subsidies = small government. Got it.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

not agreeing with oil subsidies, but national defense is pretty much the biggest single duty of the government.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You're on crack, heroin, speed, meth, and coke if you think we need to be spending as much as we are.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1