word.

Jul 7, 2016 4:30 AM

justsomeblandguy

Views

44769

Likes

1632

Dislikes

374

I am afraid of ghost...busters remakes

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

v

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think it'll be funny, but it's not like anyone's TRYING to replace the original. It's just a reimagining

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Unwatchable "she-make."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Oh you've seen it have you?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Something makes me think they changed the cast to females just to appease some gender equality thing, and I think thats utter bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

Im all for gender equality. Age, race, religion, sex etc all equal. Just dont change a classic to pander to it

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm excited about this movie. I'm a huge fan of all the comedians in it and remakes happen all the time.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 14

The Charleton Heston Ben Hur has had rmakes of it and its a remake.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Same. I was alive for the first Ghostbusters, consider it one of my favourite 10 films. Still excited for this one.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Wait, someone is trying to convince me differently?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

And no matter what any SJW tells you, you're not a bigot/mysogynist/sexist if you hate it.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

Well you might be. I'm sure there will be a wide variety of reasons people hate it, some of them will basically be sexism

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

This movie will be garbage.the simple hypocritical nature force feeding stereotypes makes it impossible for ration person to take it serious

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

"Ration person to take it serious"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I just watched the original. Uncanny!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I watched it 2 days back, for the first time in about 20 years. BRILLIANT.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

who caaaares

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wow thats some terrible cosplay on the top.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

First one is just Bridemaids with proton packs

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

This movie can never be as bad as the GIJoe abortions from a few years ago. Chill out and pirate it.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

At first I thought the top image was just cosplay.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Like most new movies, I would pirate it before I spent any money to see it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Having to have an opinion on whether a fantasy group of SNL alums fighting ghosts should be all Male or all Female is hilarious. I love it!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

What I'm annoyed at mostly it's a reboot. Why not some sort of sequel?!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How is it a reboot? The trailer says 30 years later, it doesn't pretend the other films didn't happen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Well in all honesty I haven't viewed the trailer. It's what I've heard in interviews and such.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is a reboot. Google is your friend. They apologized for the 30 years ago trailer thing saying it was misleading

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That trailer was playing at nostalgia and talking about when the 1st movie came out not the events of the movie. It is 100% a reboot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly don't have a problem with an all-female cast. My problem is that it's going to be another shitty remake.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why is it a competition? Can't we appreciate both for their merits?

10 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 30

Yes

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why does it have to be a competition? Can't the new one just suck on its own?

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 8

Have you seen the trailer even? Bad joke bad timing, i expect that for the entire movie

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 12

Crisp Rat is right. My thoughts exactly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ghostbusters wasnt even that great, bill murry is just a god among actors.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what is there appreciate winston an upstanding well spoken everyman or Patty a slang talking standard black movie stereotype force fed to us

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Are they really gonna make you sit and watch it, pry your eyes open like A Clockwork Orange?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

naa I just have to endure the shit show media buys for the next month. you are the person who wont get those two hours back in your life.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

On the one hand, her use of ebonics does reference that stereotype, but her actions through the trailer are less than stereotypical. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

On the other hand, I've spent more than two hours I can't get back listening to wining children like yourself and it's getting really old.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Implying that the new one has any merits...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well it does have 3 leads that are current or former SNL cast members. Just saying.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, and SNL has been trash for well over a decade.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So basically this movie is nothing but a cash grab. Going to go see civil war instead because I finally have time to do so

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Yeah because endless superhero movies where nothing actually happens are, in no way, a cash grab. Also, it's called the "movie business".

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Fuck off, Civil War is good, crashgrab or not

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, "real".

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

tee hee

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

oh good this again

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

The ghostbusters franchise:

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

well, Lego Ghost Busters was pretty good, until they started making the new film into sets, and even put the characters into the game

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hollywood: No your not get up

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When Cameron was in Egypt's land...let my Cameron gooo.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh my this is so important.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I love how people seem to forget that it's not a gender flip. It's a retelling. In a way they're the real ghost busters too. Just 2016 ones

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

It's more of a reboot. Different plot with familiar beats.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a gender flip, which isn't progressive at all. "Women can do everything men can... 30 years later!" is awful.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Totally a gender flip for the sake of pandering to the public. if it was a retelling they could have just added 1-2 women and been good.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You know, they could've avoided a lot of shit if they had just made a sort of new recruits in 2016 Ghostbuster movie instead of a reboot.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I've been saying this since Day One.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and, you know, had good jokes.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"*stereotypical black comment followed by deep laughter*" isn't absolutely hilarious to you?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not really

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what this is, the trailer clearly mentions that this is 30 years after the last group

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

They through that in for nostalgia but even the actors say it is a reboot.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

30 yrs since the original movie was made.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But everytime this is spoken about articles and people and even ads have said it's a reboot. I'm confused. :S Even Wikipedia says reboot.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yep, it has even been mention the original Ghostbusters make cameos as different characters

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is definitely a reboot. That trailor just threw it in for nostalgia. Even Melissa McCarthy was confused about why it said that.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They are also talking about doing an all girls Oceans 11. Not that I'm a fan. It's just a really lazy way to go about creating new content.

10 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 9

All male version of Sex and the City. Let's fucking do it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clooney's Ocean's 11 wasn't exactly new either.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Clooney's Ocean's 11 was very different from Sinatra's. Doing a remake is tricky: Not just in name only, not shot-for-shot.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well yeah no shit. Hollywood remakes stuff all the damn time. It's no more lazy now than before just because they're switching genders up

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I want to know why we cant have an all girl Magic Mike

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They did. It was called "Dancing at the Blue Iguana" or "Striptease". Whichever.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lazier than constantly rebooting Spider-man and Batman?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

that's what i'm saying. those movies are mostly lazy and derivative but i don't see this giant swell of hate and rage against them

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You would if they made spider-man a woman for one of them.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What is it called when you take parts and give them to someone based on gender, if it was white actors it is whitewashing, so...Cuntwashing?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

For anyone offended by the word, it is a word get over it. For anyone offended by my calling women cunts, I'm not it is just those who take1

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Using established roles like this is a joke that does not represent women better it just uses feminism for profiteering.3

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

A job that they only got because they have a vagina. Don't get me wrong, women need to be better represented in cinema but doing that by 2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

It's all lazy. Why do they keep making sequels

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Money! Simples. Unfortunate that people just go watch anyway and don't vote with they're wallets.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At the same time as Oceans 11 already was a remake from an old rat pack movie. A remake of a remake, fucking hell.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's stupid. And I'm a woman so I'm 'allowed' to say that; I hate gender switching established characters.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

I'm a lady and I agree. I hate this big push for it in Doctor Who as well to change the main character into a chick when 50+ years a dude.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I feel like it would be a death knell for the show, it would be unbelievably disappointing.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

depends how it's done.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't always have to be a cheap gimmick like GB and O11. I think the newer Battlestar Galactica series did it well, for example.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless its cosplay!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree with you there. ;)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I also hate it. I don't mind if a character or two get changed to different gender or race, but all of them, HELL NO!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Well good for you. I think it's interesting

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Different strokes for different folks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Originally said by sir Ronald Strokes of Cambridge. He was a famous cat breeder with an unorthodox attitude too petting.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am reserving judgement until I see it.

10 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 18

That's so immature of you

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Watch a reviewer you trust, or get a friend's opinion of it. If you watch it, they get your money even if you decide it's terrible.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Finally a sensible perosn

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The trailer I saw on YouTube looked shit but the trailer I saw when I went to the cinema the other day actually looked pretty good.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its just a really long SNL skit.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm in the minority but I always found the first one to be just pretty good. That said, this new one looks pretty bad.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I found them to be not great at all

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Same here! I was really disappointed when I ate human shit and it turned out to taste as bad as it looked, but at least I reserved judgment.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, judge it by its cover like you're supposed to

10 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 8

yes! this is imgur, after all!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah!!!! Rabble Rabble Rabble!!!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Same. I don't get why people do that. Could be a great movie.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 21

From what i've read in comments: "How dare they change an all male cast to an all female cast, it's not right and I hate it"

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

That's not it. All the trailers and footage so far look bad and unfunny. But hopefully it isn't a good representation.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

the problem is that if it is shit i don't want to give my money to it, you can see how that can make this an issue.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 7, 2016 2:04 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's the issue it's Schrodinger's movie it is both good and bad untill I can form my own opinion. and I DO want to form my own opinion.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

for the love of god don't pay money to see it. if you do, they win.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 17

I know someone involved in the production (not one of the actors). I don't mind seeing her win.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God forbid anyone exchange money for a couple of hours entertainment.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

there are way better movies to spend money on then a soulless cash-grab.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like you somehow think Hollywood is all about the "art". It isn't, it's about making money.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no shit sherlock. you didn't break any new ground with that statement. but there is such thing as not rewarding bad business practices

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not because I don't want a remake at all I want a sequel

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

It is a sequel. It's specifically being billed as such, just without any of the same characters.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nope. It's an AU.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? That's the opposite of what I'd been told.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I blame Sony's marketing. Original cast is returning as different characters.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not a sequel, in it's universe the old one never existed.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'd been told different, but I could be wrong

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well maybe, but I've been listening to Collider videos, and they have been saying it's a reboot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Melissa McCarthy herself said it was a reboot and was confused why the first trailer played it like a sequel.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You were NEVER going to get that. Ask Bill Murray why he consistently refused to make GB3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dan Aykroyd considers the game to be Ghostbusters 3.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of people agree. But Murray has CONSISTENTLY refused to make more, and it's a good franchise so why not carry on with new people.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It could have have new characters I just want it to continue the universe of ghost busters instead of retelling it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun fact. There has been a review embargo placed on the movie until the day of its release. Just like Fan4stic. The only people allowed 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 297 Dislikes 11

Are the public going to be fooled though? People have been complaining for months about how shit it looks. I bet it will do well due to..(1)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

People going in expecting it to be garbage, wanting to confirm it. But a ticket sale is a ticket sale. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Honestly my real life friends and family are totally psyched about it and are fans of the actors in their other projects. BK1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Imgur is the only place Where I see people talking shit about it. BK2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

2. Those are termed: whores.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 39

oh noes, you shamed those without integrity. The whore-or of it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yup.. their opinions handed to them and paid to write them.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Seriously are there any REAL filmmakers out there?]

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 21

Independent films shown in film festivals can be good. They might not be too, but such is life.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Integrity is incompatible with hollyqueerwood

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 19

This new word has much power.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That may be the single worst attempt at a portmanteau I've ever seen.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

just stay with hollyweird

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kevin Smith. He only makes $5 million movies, that no one else ever would, because he'll always make at least that back, and is having fun.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

He tried the Hollywood directing thing and it made him quit movies, until he decided fuck that, I'll make cheap movies.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This is one of many reasons I totally respect Kevin Smith. I don't always like his movies (esp Jersey Girl) but I'll always pay money to see

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun facts should be fun.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

And yet everyone on the Internet seems to have seen it, because they all have a verdict to deliver on it.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

I've never tasted shit, but I'm sure it'd taste bad, and won't be tasting it to confirm. Here, the trailer and promotional material stinks.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

By far the best response to this line of thought.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, how dare I suggest anyone go and see the movie rather than base an opinion on around 5 minutes maximum of footage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, plenty of people won't be seeing the movie, hasn't stopped them from banging on about it constantly though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just don't get any of the hoopla about it on either side. If people want to see a fantastic all-female horror movie, buy a copy of the 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Descent. If people on the other side want to attack feminism, there's probably more serious targets out there than a dumb comedy reboot 2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

either way, I'm tired of hearing about it, and hope it bombs because I hope all shitty reboots bomb. 3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, they're going to keep making Batman, Spider-man and The Avengers movies until the end of time. I fail to see how this is worse.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's objectively not true. I literally just got back from the press screener. It has an embargo until Sunday which is super normal.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is called the Hollywood Strategy and they use it when they know the movie will suck. Embargo reviews, hype the hell out of it, hope 1/

10 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 4

enough people go see it in the first few days to recoup costs before reviews and word of mouth crater sales. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 1

In video games you sometimes get POST launch embargoes

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only time I've ever seen the embargo being used for a successful movie was to curb spoilers for The Force Awakens.

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

Given the number of "likes" on YouTube trailers, I'd say word of mouth already cratered the sales. And I put likes in quotations bc the 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Maybe that's why they need to embargo reviews? I've never seen a film being hated on so much before it's even released.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Happens a lot when people remake a "classic" because people get sentimental about the original.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

last time I looked up the trailers, the dislikes outweighed the likes

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

currently sittinng at 261k likes to 916k dislikes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And sexism will be blamed; cash in on the over-the-counter culture of people who will enjoy the movie out of ideology, like Atlas Shrugged.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

I actually think it looks like it might be funny. Not the original, but maybe worth watching.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 20

This is the boat I am in. I'm hoping its good but the review embargo seems really fishy.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It looks like a late-night Netflix surrender watch. Too bad, because Feig & McCarthy's Spy was a great send-up & deconstruction.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

This is also very common with gaming reviews. Not just the big games too. Source: I'm an editor for a game website

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Anyone with half a brain knows video games reviews are all untrustworthy. They haven't been honest since the 90s

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You see the thing with MOST reviews is, is that they are an objective opinion still. Yes there will always be sites (ign gamespot) that will

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Get paid or be dishonest about the game. But the smaller ones like us are very genuine as there's little to no money in it for us

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yah, I tend to trust the smaller reviewers, and the user review that look like something i'd write. if it's something i'd write, it's prob

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still don't trust smaller reviewers. Tucking tail and giving good reviews to pander is still a valid concern for me. I use lets plays

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How often to the games with review embargos turn out to be really good, or not full of bugs?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's different with each game.the bigger games tend to have more bugs but I try to look around them at first. Unless the game is unplayabl

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've seen a lot of embargoed games that are good. I have never ever seen an embargoed game without a lotta day 1 bugs.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Embargoes aren't bad by design, rather they are good. A review embargo is supposed to prevent the review from being rushed out 1/4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

trading accuracy for being first off the press. Setting a date that no review can be released before gives time for a quality review 2/4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which gives the game a fair shake and helps the creator, reviewer, and consumer. Problems arise 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hearts of Iron 4 was a big release in the strategy genre. Was pretty good even though it was embargoed

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've had indie games that had an embargo like firewatch. That games was fantastic. But because of the narrative driven core.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They wanted reviews to come out with the release as not to spoil.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yo, work stories bruh

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There's not much to tell though. It's not my main job. We don't get paid. But we write news, vlog, review. We are growing though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By we, I mean the guys who write news after their day job. Like me. Our boss who is running the company pays himself through ads on our site

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically press companies hired by gamedevelopers pay us to advertise. It does suck when our review isn't positive though but money is money

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Got a friend working at a game review site. It's clear they only let reviewers who show a positive interest to the game to review them.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You have no idea how many times Ive not gotten press copies because our ethical policy basically reads "we aint gonna suck your cock"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which might make you go: 'well duh' at first, but if you really think about it it's making all reviews super biased.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good thing is the companies themselves dont have any power over us. I know I've always been honest but I'm not denying it doesn't happen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to see it early are the ones who can be counted on to give good press no matter what. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 251 Dislikes 6

Only thing worse would be the video game "post launch embargo" but this is fucking stupid

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Well fuck them and that movie even further off.

10 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 4

We had gamergate... moviegate soon?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9.5/10 -IGN

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

"Horrible, unwatchable. Filled with terrible everything and should be avoided at all costs. 9.5/10 IGN recommended."

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

"Too much Water"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Are you sure that's its just because of people prejudging the movie based on the gender of the actor

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 57

Then wouldn't some good reviews before release help alleviate those thoughts if they actually existed outside a tiny subset of the internet?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Look, i would be just as appalled with a remake if they cast larry the cable guy, tyler perry, adam sandler and kevin james, shit is shit.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

At first that's what I thought but no, the movie looks like it's gonna suck regardless of which gender stars in it

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"I don't know if it's a lady thing or a race thing but I am mad as hell" is qoute from one of the trailers. in the trailer one of skinny...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

jumped off a stage and crowed surfed while the heavy set black woman jumped off and they let her fall.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think it's because she's much heavier to hold up than a skinny girl... But that's just me.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Have you seen the trailer? Fuck genders. A shit movie is a shit movie regardless of whether the actor has a vagina or a dick.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2