Not all heroes wear capes

Mar 9, 2017 1:14 AM

chiefholla

Views

438923

Likes

10983

Dislikes

463

Not all heroes wear capes

I used to work in this Barnes & Noble! Store 2862 in Glastonbury, CT. Surprised that this happened there in this relatively quiet town/store

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He sure showed her.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 3

If you're the kind of guy who destroys books that sends a message in itself. He should be taken to court

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

This man is no hero.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, he now has to pay for them, giving her money and funding the printing of more copies and even the making of more content. You go!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think that's a really hot picture of Kim Kardashian, and I don't have time to put it on a puffin.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well she does make money off of being desirable, it's normal for you to find her attractive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's still vandalism. just because it's something you dont agree with, doesnt make it right

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 15

Tywin lannister?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Excuse me, but what is a selfie book?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A collection of selfies, I assume... Never saw one and I hope to keep living without seeing one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my god,..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any publicity is good publicity

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't say how he destroyed them, ahhhhhhmmmm I right?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

The pages were sticky????

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I figured out what you meant way too fast. Now I'm sad.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He poured red ink on the pages.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

People spend an unreasonable time getting mad at the Kardashians.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

According to the guy he doesn't hate Kim, he just doesn't like the "smut" (his words) she puts out for kids to see.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was not aware that such thing like a selfie book exist

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The photo kind of suggests 'miserable cunt' as well. Doesn't surprise me he'd try to destroy other people's property he doesn't like.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

this happened in my hometown this guy was drawing with lipstick all over them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd love to see the reaction if a black guy went into a bookstore and destroyed a bunch of books. This community is the worst.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

You wouldn't be seeing the (literal) dozens of comments calling him a "hero", that's for sure. Destruction of private property during

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

a protest of police brutality? "THEY SHOULD BE IN JAIL!" A man destroys a bunch of books? "WHAT A HERO! LET'S PAY HIS LEGAL BILLS!"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you, the shit drives me nuts.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's not a hero. He committed a crime. It's pretty simple.

9 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 23

"Nothing goes over my head..."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Not to disagree, but the definition of "hero" is subjective. For many, Che Guevara and/or Pablo Escobar were heroes.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

He's giving his subjective opinion here.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

They used to call these playboys and they showed more and had more women in it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Does she only publish selfie books because most of her fans can't read?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

It's probably a combination of that, and fact that she has very little else to offer the human race.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I sometimes wonder if there's anything interesting or deep going on in her head, despite the apparent lack.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe. I'm more of the opinion that [nothing of value would be lost]: http://imgur.com/fpFN9gO

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imagine having so few problems in your life that this is where you wind up...

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

I know.. a 'selfie book'? Fuck the Kardashians. They're famous because Kim K made a sex tape.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

They're famous because some failed R&B artist betrayed the trust of a young woman and she made the best of her situation.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hahahaaha. She let him film it. She posed for it. She's a dumb whore.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're obviously a child. Consent to sex with your partner does not give them future consent to distribute (for profit) your sex tape.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Although I hate the Kardashian celebrity train I do respect the marketing people driving it. They've made a fortune out of literally nothing

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Have to agree. They created an empire off of very little, that has to earn respect.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah, Kim has already made the money from it. This just results in lost money for the book store.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

Nah, he turned himself in, so he's gonna end up paying for the damage.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

This is their retribution for buying into that sort of shit and still calling themselves a bookstore.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Good. Maybe they'll learn not to buy bullshit books any more.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

I'm guessing since new book markups are often pretty high the bookstore probably only pays production costs for the ones that don't sell.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vandalism isn't being a hero. It's being a cunt.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 19

Can you vandalize trash though?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Username... SOOOO relevant

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

You don't destroy books, whatever the reason is. If you're upset with the shit that gets printed, write better ones.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

To be fair, any book is better than a photo book of Kim Kardashian selfies. Yeah, even Twilight.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I would read neither, but I reckon they both exist for a set of reasons, not all obvious.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or to save on postage, just don't buy the book :D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's a hero for destroying books? What? What is happening here, Imgur. Are you guys okay?

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 7:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I see. So you're going to decide what is a legitimate book, and what deserves to be destroyed? Where have I heard that before? Hmmm.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 7:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's a book. It has a binding and pages. What's inside of it might be repugnant to you, that doesn't change it's legitimacy.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

No seriously tho it may look like a book but it isnt. This is a stupid argument.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Can you imagine how scary that was for the 16-year-old behind the counter? Some crazy old dude just starts destroying stuff?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

All while calling Trump a Nazi too.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I can understand his hatred, but yeah, destruction of property is a dick move.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Well, I'll challenge you even further. What could possibly make him hate her that much? Why does he care about her that much?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Has he made a statement regarding his hatred for her?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You just said you understand his hatred. Did you forget? lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's far too many people on this website who are fine with both literal and figurative book burning because they "don't like the content"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But they call politicians they don't agree with "Hitler." Yet they fail to realize that Hitler got the German people to burn fucking books.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Though I agree burning books is fundamentally wrong.. To be fair, that isn't the worst thing Hitler did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it isn't. But it was a step into him ascending to what he became. It's about control and that's what's truly frightening.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People buy books containing nothing but Kim Kardashian selfies? Fuck that's sad.

9 years ago | Likes 878 Dislikes 25

Friend of mine got one as a gag gift for Christmas.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ugh, modern culture is so gross! People are obsessed with instagram. Can't unplug! That's why i only look at KimK's selfies in book form.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 3

I work at a barnes and noble and nobody bought any of the ones we had in stock, thank fuck. the crime is they were made in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 2

I'm really glad to hear that

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Why did management even think ordering them in was a good idea?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Couldn't tell ya. management makes a lot of dumb decisions. Part of why we're struggling tbh. It's not just cuz amazon cuts into our market

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The sad thing is someone at B&N management bought them and will lose money on them, not a Kardashian. She already got paid.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Serves management right for thinking selfie books would sell in the internet age. They deserved to take a hit for a dumb purchase

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You're right. It's only hurting the B&N. That being said, I can hardly blame the guy. He probably saw them and his vision just went red

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Kardashian family is still alive in 2017? That's even sadder. http://imgur.com/fpFN9gO

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Sadder still is there is a Justin Beiber look-a-like, even sadder they have been charged with 900 child sex offences apparently

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HA losers. I go to my local library for Kim's selfie books

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We get all manner of vapid books like this in the charity store I work at. These books are worth nothing, they usually get thrown away.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People getting their dumb selves arrested as a slight to someone who will never give a shit or likely even hear about it? Fuck that's sad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She does have a nice pair at least

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 23

Why do you think this whole thing happened in the first place?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honey, in my porn, boobs aren't made of plastic.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

...of butts.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just as well she's released this book then, isn't it. I mean, it's not like there are pictures of boobs on the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She started her "stardom" as a porn star. Give it a google.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 10:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's been said that she allowed its release so she'd be noticed, in the same way Paris Hilton was.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

No, she made a settlement. Legally it could only be released with her consent, some people's dignity has a price.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I call that intelligence. If it's on the internet, it's on the internet. She just decided to make 5 million instead of nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

its already been revealed that her mom actually orchestrated the filming and release.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

That family really is fucked up... like on some Springer shit.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If that's true, that is fanfuckintastic. I would love to meet them all some day. If only to punch each one in the face.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

You spelled absofuckinlutely intentional for personal gain. Wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

+1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish I could upvote this again because I almost fell off my seat with laughter.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't like fake tits, or fake ass.

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 7

Must be lonely on that pedestal. ????

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 22

I'm going to bet that Kim Kardashian doesn't care what you think

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

Or fake people.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

Or fake fakes.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't that make them real?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I found them in the photography session while looking for real photo essays... sad!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

While I get the joke, I can't help but think about how it's the book store eating that cost, not the Kardashians or their publishers.

9 years ago | Likes 1400 Dislikes 10

Also feel bad for people who want a Kardashian selfie book, bc they won't find one. And bc they're people who want a Kardashian selfie book.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If it's only misdemeanor level charges, he can likely get away with fines without jail.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seeing as how publishing works mostly on royalties and not like standard products, the publisher actually will be eating that cost.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya cant he just destroy the Kardashians instead? Its not like she wont just make more selfie books.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! wait...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Having worked in the industry, the publisher and distributor eat the cost. Retailers risk little on books and magazines.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not that I disagree... but could you kindly direct me to the gofundme for his bail and legal costs?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Or you could just google it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Due to the odd way that the US publishing/bookstore industry works it is likely that the publishers would take the loss, not the bookshop.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As a guy who's worked at a Barnes & noble I can assure you that those damaged books will be sent right back to the publisher for a refund.

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

I hope they include the selfie books that weren't damaged too

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, that's about 5% better I guess. Only 5%, though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any book store sellings atrocities as this deserve to pay.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They make royalties on every copy...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Any legit book store that carries that garbage deserves to lose the money!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The store's choice to sell them, no?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Stores don't carry products that consumers don't buy. I'd say fault is on the Kardashians who make it, and the people who purchase the crap.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now if we could somehow destroy the master files and the manuscripts, that would be actually worthwhile.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

...I remember a D&D game my party did that for all the Twilight novels in the multiverse... Well, it magically destroyed every copy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Did you roll a critical, or was it just a simple win?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Critical failure to find a good book in the Infinite Library, which holds one copy of every book in existence, each representing all (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

copies of the book. Then they burned that one, and actively searched for all the others. (2?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this is always the problem with these "prank" videos even if someone isn't directly hurt. I'm always like "man, now some poor guy (1)

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 2

Agreed. Welcome to the land of maturity. Boo. Lol

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

whose job it is to clean up/pay for this mess is going to have a shitty day". Really not cool. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

My friend's parents owned the plumbing shop that the Jackass dude took a shit in. The show did not clean up or compensate them in any way.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Bunch of cunts.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 10:46 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well, I'd tell you to call up A-Ball plumbing in Portland and ask them, but they went out of business a few year ago.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, that sounds about right. Same thing goes for all those Vines of people spilling their coffee everywhere or whatever, it's a dick move.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2017 3:15 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They ran out the door and never came back.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it were a library or a private local book store, sure, I would feel the same. But this is Barnes and Noble, they can take the hit.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 18

I agree that it would be WORSE if it were a small independent store. Still, just because they CAN take the hit doesn't mean they deserve to.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but it's Barnes and Noble, not your local book store.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Regardless, money that goes to covering vandalism is money that's not going to the people who are a part of that business.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For some people Barnes and Noble is the only one that's stayed open.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Barnes and Noble put them out of business.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes and no, people don't read as many books, so there aren't as many stores. B&N has much more than just books too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So that means, if we all do, bookstores who sell that shit will stop or go out of business? Count me in.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

No, it doesn't mean that. The only real way to control what a business sells is to not give them money for products you don't want.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, they are still a business. Not their fault people are buying stupid books if that's what allows them to stay in up and running.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Ok, then punishing the store for stocking the dog shit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

I'm with dragonflyby, stores don't stock books that consumers don't buy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah. Economics dictate what they stock; supply and demand. If they make more $ off of a Kardashian selfie book than something else, that's -

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

-what they're going to stock.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel like this is a perfect analogy to "Why we can't have nice things": Sentimental, emotional or rebellious people destroy things --

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

--without realizing that it's a complete 3rd party that pays the consequences/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

To be fair, if they eat that cost they might not make the mistake of restocking it.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 24

I'd argue that it's not the fault of the store for carrying a product people want; it's the consumer's fault for supporting crap products.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So you think it's fair to go and destroy wares in somebody's business cause you don't want them to carry that ware? Why not just not buy it?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Not how "to be fair" works as a qualifier. She's not saying it's fair, she's seeking understanding without letting ethics introduce bias.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

If you buy it, they'll restock it so more people will buy it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you can destroy it yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, he turned himself in, so he'll probably end up paying the damages.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They chose to sell them. They're just as responsible.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Book stores send back damaged/unsold stock for a refund from the publisher. I hope the old man is ok, as this sounds like mental illness.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sure he forced to pay for damages, worth it if it keeps one child from turning into a narcissistic brat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Voice of reason right here folks. As much as i can't stand the Kardashians is not up to me to destroy shindig that's not my property.

9 years ago | Likes 269 Dislikes 6

I enjoyed your use of the word shindig, +1.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Property is theft

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Eat the rich

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You wouldn't download the concept of property rights, would you?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Did your phone autocorrect *shit to *shindig? Or do you regularly use shindig like that?

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Shindig. Now there's a word that deserves a return. Along with cattywampus.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cattywampus totally needs to make a comeback!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would love to say that i meant to use that word in this instance, but i didnt. In fact i want even going with shit.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I think the word i was going fir was "something"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I love me some firs

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Makes sense. *nods coniferously*

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's a good word. Think I might start using it more often.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

shitdig?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think my shins should be involved in any digging. They're a bit flabby today.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is a great word. I usually refer to it as a party. I think the man who destroyed those books was having a ahindig of his own. Llol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good luck! I've been trying to bring 'hootenanny' back for ages now...

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Right. Even if it was the Kardashians suffering from this, someone doesn't lose their property rights just because you don't like them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My username is close to being relevant

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Had no idea that destruction of private property made you a good person

9 years ago | Likes 286 Dislikes 39

Get your common sense out of here

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

It's only good when the destruction is of someone the hive mind dislikes or vice versa. It's stupid

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Stick up your ass

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Apparently it is if the person it happens to is hated for no other reason other than "I don't like her, so nobody else should".

9 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 21

DAE not like Beyonce/Kardashians/Kanye/Trump/Obama/Killary/etc

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 14

It's not that we don't like her, it's that selfie books are stupid and that old man did something we would've liked to do

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

So if you dislike something, you should go out of your way and destroy them, even if that thing didn't belong to you?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of course not. People just feel that this sort of thing serves the "selfie book" "justice". I know it may sound a little ridiculous but we

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We all have flaws. Never said we should. That's why this man is a "hero". Because actually doing such thing is not a polite thing to do

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"I dont like this thing. No one else should"

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

It's just a stupid human emotion. We all have flaws

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sjw

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

Pointless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's that the thought of a selfie book is stupid. Who the fuck likes the idea of that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Irrelevant. Don't fuck up shit that isn't yours and isn't hurting you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You would like to destroy private property that isn't yours?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really. I worded it wrong. People are so hostile

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Real Gran Torino man. Eastwood is proud.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Destruction of private property

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 5:59 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That would be a rather ridiculous argument to make.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Imagine porn being available next to classic books. Would you be shocked if some angry housewife started ripping up hustler magazines?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i would say she needs to be arrested or fined if she did it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 29, 2017 3:53 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

As a person who can't get a car yet I didn't think of that....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

its at a store waiting to be sold, thus the private property of the store.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even public spaces are paid for by private individuals like you and I.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0