.

Jul 25, 2016 8:16 AM

phuNkii

Views

105000

Likes

3018

Dislikes

182

Thats why evangelists say "yeah you would, because you totally actually know already in your heart"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I like scaring the crap out of people." -Priest

10 years ago | Likes 495 Dislikes 3

"I like putting the fear of God in 'em."

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

"You may have ended up somewhere worse instead." - Priest, probably

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

"Because I was told about it when I was a kid so now I want everyone to be as miserable as me."

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"told about"? I think you misspelled "brainwashed" there.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

TIL that priests are evil for sharing hell with billions of people

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Missionaries is(are?) one of few things that aggravates me with religion. Keep your faith to yourself. If I'm interested I'll seek you out.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's deep.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Doesn't this ignore the point that virtue is good for its own sake, not just as a means of reaching heaven?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 was recently looking for this!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Appropriate term is Inuit.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Even the fucking Eskimos know it's bullshit ha ha ha ha ha ha

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

because

10 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 5

Oh the accuracy of this GIF.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is very theologically unsound.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Thank you. Your answer is short, accurate and doesn't try to qualify certain beliefs like people above. +1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But still funny.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True. Unfortunately, most people take it too literally.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's why it is so important to shoot missionaries on sight.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because I'm sure the Inuit were speaking fluent English prior to being told the first thing about Heaven and Hell....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

using "eskimo" needs to stop, for more than one reason

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

why did this get a down vote?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Becoming a martyr is like a direct ticket to heaven for priests, right? So if I kill one, isn't that a virtue I'm doing him a favour?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because it's difficult to the detect in text form and this is the internet, I'm just joking and in no way advocating the killing of priests.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like Rosko's Basilisk. Also, sorry for telling you about Rosko's Basilisk.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Of all the things that 1) did not happen, and 2) get theology completely wrong, this is one of them.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Romans 1:20 http://biblehub.com/romans/1-20.htm

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I guess if it's said in a book, it must be true!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The Law brings about wrath, but where there is no Law, there also is no violation.-Romans 4:15 Dammit now im all confuzzled.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it says it in the book that the priest is supposed to have read... whether or not you believe it to be true thats just reading comprehension

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I asked my dad this question. He said people who don't know Jesus are unhappy. Even as a kid I knew this was a bullshit answer.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Good point.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 6

Did some research: Apparently the Christian response is "It's impossible not to know about God - the evidence (his creation) is all around!"

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Cop-out response "How did you not discover the laws of physics? The evidence is all around!"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

So basically, a cop-out. It doesn't answer the question at all.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Most religious doctrine resorts to cop-outs in the face of logical critique.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Sort of. Hard to explain in 140 characters, so I'll try a multi-part response and anyone can DM me for more information. 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Typically, the response hinges on a shared sense of morality. Most cultures, throughout history and around the world, have had a moral 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

code that doesn't differ too far from one another. We all understand that evil exists, and tend to have similar definitions of evil, and 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

that "good" is preferable, and tend to have similar definitions of good. Christians believe this points to God "imprinting His law on (4/?)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's all a huge mess that we tend not to discuss. I don't mind leaving it at that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a Catholic, I agree. Fortunately I am OK with mysteries. I don't have to know everything.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what makes us different. But that's okay. Because diversity is key to survival.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The priest I've meet say yes, he would go regardless. To justify the push to convert (money n power aside) Yet another reason its all crap

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't need to go to church. I'll just read this every week as it's reposted to the front page.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't he technically go to purgatory if he didn't know?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There's no such thing as purgatory listed anywhere in the bible.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe not but it is addressed in the catechism of the Catholic Church and he is talking to a priest.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Catholic addition because converting Pegans were worried about there loved ones. So depends on who you talk to

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, not technically.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, this is nothing more than a joke. Scripture clearly points out that ignorance doesn't gift immunity.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Law brings about wrath, but where there is no Law, there also is no violation. — Romans 4:15 I call it Schrodinger guilt.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Context. Paul is speaking of the OT Law, which is obsolete because of the grace we receive through Christ. I was referencing Rom 1:18-25.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's both OS, or just OT depending on the sect. and then there'res sects that don't uses Pauls stuff and it just gets messy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funny, but the priest lies.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yup: For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

understood from what has been made,so that people are without excuse.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So, an otherwise virtuous person who has never heard of God goes to hell? Seems fair? No, in fact the answer is that it doesn't serve...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..religion to admit the logical flaw. If those who haven't heard of God went to heaven, there would be no reason to expand the business.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not according to the Bible

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What bible are you reading.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

?*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I always wondered if hell applied to all sapiens. Or pre-cavemen stages in our evolution. Like when did hell begin? According to religion it

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Has always been around, and heaven, so then all stages of human evolution are just walking around up there? It's one of my major issues with

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Religion. It's doesn't match with reality, and lack of parameters makes things just messy if you think about it for too long.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They deny evolution. Problem solved.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Not all of us.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell is for if you refuse to be with God, so I guess any being with a rational soul capable of rejecting God could go to hell.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But what if you didn't know about God? Or the Christian God? Or you followed an ancient religion that does out long before Christianity?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

all have a conscience that helps us to be good people, if we're willing to try. Apologies for the length. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Did you ever read Narnia? There's that bit at the end where the good Calormen dude winds up in heaven, even though he never believed in 1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the Narnian God, so something like that. Rejecting God is usually something we do by our actions and the sort of person we are, and we 2/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Isn't what Xians actually believe, though. Doctrine says that yes, they go to hell *even if they were never told about God*. Seems fair.

10 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 17

But that doesn't result in a setup for a "witty" anecdote with a Magical Noble Savage telling Whitey off...!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you live a virtuous life yet have not had the opportunity to build a relationship with Christ, it's just as if you were a child I believe

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but "virtuous" by what code? Any spouse-sharing society is automatically out, for instance. Or any with a deity not obviously = God.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Polygamy is accepted in the bible.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on the denomination. Catholic Doctrine allows for virtuous pagans.

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 1

Mormons believe you can't go to their version of hell unless you have an absolute knowledge of god and then still deny him.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And there's been, like, 3 in history. But unbaptized babies, nope.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Although they don't go to Hell either.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

While its disputed whether or not they go to Heaven, it's Catholic Doctrine that they definitely do not go to Hell.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Depends if the denomination believes in 'Original Sin' or not. Most do (Roman Catholic and most Protestant sects) some don't.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was unaware of any remotely mainstream sects that didn't believe in OS. Kinda hard to reconcile anything else with "died for your sins"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah only the Mormons spring to mind. Maybe also the Quakers? Not sure; not an expert, just an atheist with a catholic education.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe the Bible says that those who never heard the Gospel will be judged according to their conscience.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

According to catholic doctrin, Jesus died for ALL men, so unless you reject Jesus or his views, you are saved. As long as the person 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

in question would have desired baptism had he known about it, and God. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

But how can one desire what he can not know? and if he would if he knew, is there no harm in telling him?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't know what living in the galactic age is going to be like, but god damn do I desire to.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, I am NOT a theologian, but I assume that God would know when the person dies whether he/she would have taken the baptism, IF they 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

had known about it, and god during their life. It's a rather a question of IF they would have desired it, if it had been possible. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like CS Lewis' explanation, that Christianity is like a roadmap to heaven. You can get there without it, but it'll be a lot easier with it

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

...so those without the map and failed to reach the destination are punished for eternity? Doesn't seem too fair imo

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

If they had no way to get the map then we believe thats taken into account. Regardless, everyone has their conscience to give some direction

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Reckon guidelines should be crystal clear when the end result is either eternal bliss or eternal damnation don't you think?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're already crystal clear; the main teaching of Christianity 'love each other as yourselves' is nothing new at all. You don't need to 1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

have faith to know that cruelty, lying etc is wrong. Faith and prayer strengthen us to be the sort of people we already know we should be 2/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Cathos believe they will stay in limbo.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe 900 years ago we did. We don't believe in limbo anymore.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My mother was thought that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Makes sense. For generations it's been mostly a cultural concept, but Benedict XVI formally refuted the concept.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure that's only the Evangelicals.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For Catholics, a non-believer is still capable of sin (murder, theft, etc.) Natural law (laws which can be known by reason unaided by God)..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... still applies to all humans as humans, even those in a state of invincible ignorance of God. They can't sin by, say, blasphemy...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

because that knowledge of God. But they can still sin against each other, and if Christianity helps them not do that it's a net + for them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is one of my favorite arguments against organized religion

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The bible tells us that none have an excuse because God is evident throughout creation, and that His law is given to all not a few.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

The world is an amazing place, on that we can agree. But saying that must mean there is a god is a bit of a jump.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I'd argue that a very, very large percentage of people, past and present, believe in some kind of creator. Not a big jump for all of them

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yes, because the number of people who believe something clearly has a direct impact on how true it is....

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's clearly not what I said. He said that just seeing the earth wouldn't make people believe in a creator. Which it does...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

By that logic, many indigenous Americans are saved because they believe in a spiritual hierarchy, headed up by one omnipotent spirit.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

As a Christian who is not the judge, who is to say that they are not?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Certainly not me. But I'm atheist.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's certainly nothing wrong with having different beliefs! Thanks for your input!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. General revelation of creation shows enough evidence of a creator that they have no excuse. It is Christians' responsibility to share

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

So no evidence is enough evidence to have no excuse? That's a bit harsh.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The special revelation of Jesus Christ.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

"General revelation of creation shows enough evidence of a creator that they have no excuse." N'awww

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

would they go to hell even if they didn't sin?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of god"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

that means nothing to me.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It means that it is impossible to lead a sinless life and whether it be original sin or our inability to do right none of us can be with...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HA, well that's bullshit, it's perfectly possible to live a sinless life.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

...God except through Christ

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0