Leader of an Army

Jul 7, 2018 12:19 PM

GeneralShepard

Views

218329

Likes

6729

Dislikes

85

That's a goat. I would know.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

what if the sheep are being led by a giant orange douche bag?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

But. An ARMY of lions would shred the sheep and the ONE lion leading them.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not if the sheep leading the lions ordered their retreat or surrender. Look at the Battles of Issus & Gaugamela for the historical context.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I meant it quite literally. Animals you know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That isn't an African proverb. It's an old European one usually attributed to Alexander the Great, which he probably never said.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Even if he didn't personally say it, the quote was most likely a reflection upon events at Alexander's Battles of Issus and Guagamela.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"A good leader can bring out the best in bad followers. A bad leader brings out the worst in good followers."

8 years ago | Likes 402 Dislikes 0

Is this opposite day or the day of opposites

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...our current political leadership seems to be the latter.

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 11

Neato

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeh,but that leader sheep is a bad dude!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"It's a lot easier to make nothing out of something, than something out of nothing."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're probably playing XCOM 2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

An army of sheep with squadsight snipers and ghost-armoured alloy cannon assault sheep can do a lot of damage.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You don't realize how much damage they can do once they get mind controlled

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

what about a goat in chagre of tigers or a squirrel in chagre or chickens

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

A velociraptor leading a herd of tyrannosaurs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're asking the real questions

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I’ll take the squirrel and chickens.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If the goat can get the chickens organized enough for targeted attacks, I'm voting chickens hands down.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1000 lions without proper leadership would easily turn on eachother for a kill and it could devastate itself pretty easily

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OHH SHEEEP! Here come the lions.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Taking figurative speech literally . . . the oldest IQ test . .

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The message is a lot more truthful than the literal phrase

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A humble leader that invests in his troops/peoples strength, versus a leader that keeps his troops/people weak to feed his own strength.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Leaders are leaders and warriors are warriors. The skill sets are completely different.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Almost every army in history consists of ranked leadership. You're saying Alexander wasn't both leader and warrior? Napoleon? Khan?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Someone is going to eat the sheep, then they'll be led by a lion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a sneaky feeling the lions and sheep aren't actual lions and sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You aren't butterflies, you are MURDER FLIES. .... now let's see what this; cocoon can do.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's very different when you're talking about a literal sheep vs. a metaphorical sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, yes. African leadership. So many good examples. Oh, wait...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

African Proverb? I'm not buying it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're being led by a sheep, you're not a damn lion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah...this ain’t an African proverb.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is literally the dumbest fucking proverb.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 14

Not at all. Battles throughout history have hinged upon the decision making of leaders. A small, weak force can win with better tactics.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No I get it, I get it. It's just a really bad analogy lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It’s all about the leadersheep

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There might be a reason why that goat got the promotion over Lion Joe over in marketing.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I get what the proverb was trying to say but yea any sheep that controls lions is one hell of a sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 1009 Dislikes 6

I agree

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not baaaaaad

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Yeah, meritocracy was a real game-changer! It's hard to see, with hindsight, how we didn't see that. But still we struggle with the concept.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Since when have we been in a meritocracy? Bosses still focus on promoting those who do the most bootlicking.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I didn't say "true meritocracy" just "meritocracy" & that's largely correct. Yes, still: "workers unite!", but it's not a feudal system

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most english-speaking people live in countries that make more effort towards being a meritocracy than has ever been done before, and

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

those same countries are continually making slow but sure strides forward toward that goal. Maybe not today, or even this decade, but

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We keep pushing forward, so that our children, and their children, may live to see the dream we held. So is it perfect? No. And it won't

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or maybe the lions are just a bunch of pussies...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also while it works metaphorically, yeah no 1000 lions still trump 1000 sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That was the point of the post, but yes

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

the problem in military is that the private lions do not elect the lieutenant sheep...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Andrewsarchus was a precursor to sheep. They could lead the army.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell Sheep probably.

8 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Black Phillip!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats definitely a hell sheep in that picture there. It's either Baphomet, or close

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That’s Satan’s left hand man

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I tried to find it but couldn't fast.. In one of the older Terry pratchett books (strata) there is a nice quote about a small person >

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

> leading an army off a boat that would fit so well :(

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Got some big old lion ball on that sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe this quote is usually attributed to Alexander the Great.

8 years ago | Likes 1603 Dislikes 4

Wait, you mean to tell me a quote on the internet has a dubious and debated attribution?!

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yeah but historians agree he was a lion so obviously a bit biased.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Alexander the Goat*

8 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 4

They tried to associate him with Amun the goat god just after he died

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still fits

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

The Greatest of all time. Alexander the great. Why Yes Bro it sure do

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

To give his enemies a false sense of security and superiority when they encounter his goat led army of lions, yes.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Upvoted you to 666. I feel so accomplished.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He DID conquer much of Northern Africa...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Well, I wouldn't really say he conquered it. He marched into Egypt and they basically surrendered to him and declared him Pharaoh.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only Egypt, which lets be honest, isn’t really that much of North Africa

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I always heard Genghis Khan

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

That would be an odd comment for him to make as lions are almost entirely African. I would think the tiger more geographically fitting.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I heard that in the wrath of the khans

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Khaaaaaannnnns!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was he in Africa when he said it?

8 years ago | Likes 446 Dislikes 3

I bless the rains there

8 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 8

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 5

I like your reaction so much more than my comment.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Did he know Trump?

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 248

few years too late maybe

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Yeah mate Alexander the Great and Trump are good buddies. Wtf are you talking about?

8 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 2

Tremendous friends. The best of friends. They made friendship great again.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

Frederick Douglas

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

*Douglass

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure they were drinking buddies if I remember correctly.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

this is why no one likes you

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 3

Literally what relevancy does Trump have here?

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Downvoting political shit like

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

"I believe this quote is usually attributed to Alexander the Great." -- Oscar Wilde.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was from Alexander the Pretty Good

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

naming my dog alexander the good.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I found it in my copy of "Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day". Always thought that was an odd choice by the author.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did Africa appropriate it? More importantly, why is it important to know about the origin of an idea or statement? It’s either good or not

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Origin can offer meaningful historical context. Look up Alexander's Battles at Issus & Gaugamela and you'll know what I mean immediately.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And most often a quote is simply some wisdom that applies to all context and needs none.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What did he do that was so great?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

(2) Bactria, and India to the Indus River, created Hellenistic Culture (combining the best elements of the places he conquered), and built

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He made a lot of people cooler

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Commander at 16, King at 20, put down a Theban revolt and settled the Greek city-states, conquered Asia Minor, Syria, Egypt, Persia, (1)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude conquered half the world never lost a fucking battle and all this by the age of his mid 30s'...

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

(3) dozens of cities to allow the flowering of said culture, the most important of which was Alexandria, Egypt. This city alone housed the

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(4) world's largest library, museum, botanical garden, zoo, and the Pharos, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. All by age 32/33.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was one of the first leaders to make use of propaganda, so a lot of what is said about him should be taken with a grain of salt. Fact.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Other than that he was a great strategist and stuff

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Other than that? I'd say the use of propaganda would be part of strategy, don't you think?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Political strategy, yes. Not military strategy, which is what he is generally praised for, but you have a point.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good use of the word fact to make a fact of the fact that your fact was fact.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I had some space left. Fact

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fact

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Your statement is fact filled

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He trademarked "Alexander the Great" So no other Alexander's could use it.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The first known record of anyone actually calling him that is from over a century after his death.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Be a stratetic and tactical genius and have a lasting influence on western warfare for millenia. Also murder. A lot.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Well, apparently the conquering was kibda his hobby, and his ruling skills were lacking. Also, dysentry.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Don’t forget the lovin’ of the youthful young men.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

And subsequent std and death

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

He got sick and died in the span of less than 2 weeks. Which STD is that deadly? He got sick from a regular disease or was poisoned.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He was Greek, yes.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Don't let the ancient Greek hear you say that though

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Macedonian*

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It makes sense that a famous leader said this, as it grossly overestimates the value of leadership :)

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

(1) I might be inclined to agree with you, but if you look up Alexander and Emperor Darius at the Battles of Issus and Gaugamela, you'll

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) immediately understand the context and relevance of the quote, and also its significance in terms of his command style and tactics.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Consider the time - news travels slow, communication taking place with horns and flags. An indecisive leader could and did ruin campaigns.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Consider an Army of Lions, Facing an Army of sheep. 3 lions take out sheep-army leader, 3 to 1. Lion army then eats sheep army.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I said that the the metaphor over states the value of leadership. Not that leadership has no effect.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In the metaphor, sheep and lions refer to the temperaments of men. If we want to deal with the animals, we should say they don't form armies

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sums up a lot of why Africa is in the state it’s in.

8 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 25

Having a hard time drawing the parallel to 'whites coming in a fucking everything up'.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Damn man, no chill in that comment

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

How so?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Cultural emphasis on physical ability and machismo nonsense rather than technological advancement or education is my guess.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Colonialism fucked up lots of things but but Africa today is it’s own responsibility and worst enemy frankly. Mindsets there are medieval.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How does it sum up colonial exploitation and Cold War support for dictatorial regimes?

8 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 43

And lack of resources

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you think those are the primary reasons many African nations are such hellholes, you've never been there and are ignorant of history.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Different conversation.That proverb predates colonial intervention & sums up a delusional & forever unorganized philosophy of small thinking

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 8

A proverb that probably isn't African sums up how all African cultures act and think?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

How does commenting on the importance of good leadership represent small thinking?If they'd said Winston Churchill said it all would applaud

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

Usually they say Alexander the Great said this and everyone applauds. When it's attributed to Africans it's immediately dumb. Hmm.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

If you believe that those are actually the main reason Africa struggles you’ve never been there and talked to them.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 14

True. I’d love to know more about it though

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why? What did they say to you?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

They have several internal factors that interrupt their progress. At least in Kenya. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I.e. It’s actually amazing to see how much simple education about how to properly bring goods to market can transform individual lives.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You need less leadership when you have sheep-crushing jaws and 3" long claws of your own.

8 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 2

*leadersheep

8 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 0

Why does this not have more points?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

* fewer

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 33

You might be right but "less" sounds better here. Just my opinion.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Lol, no not at all - you're definitely correct and I was being a reverse grammar Nazi

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I saw what you did up there. Sensible half chortle.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Leadership is not something you can count. "Fewer leadership" is grammatical incorrect, and just sounds fucking dumb. Dumbass.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Fuck. I meant grammatically. Dumbass.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Username checks out

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

This would explain why the various African Military have been so dominant.

8 years ago | Likes 1136 Dislikes 22

Not the Democratic republic of the people's liberation army!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

TBF, the Zulus were pretty bad ass. They fought well against Brits even with a massive technological disadvantage

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuckin hell lmao

8 years ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 1

Like in the Battle of Omdurman

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

VENGEANCE FOR RHODESIA

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Yea they shouldn’t be allowed to use sheep in war

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But pigs lit on fire, thats ok

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But you can use sheep in Warcraft, Explosive sheep to be exact...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is like shitting on ancient Greek philosophers because Greece is in the tank now.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

Yes, but africanier

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As opposed to all the other times in history where tribal Africa was doing great?

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

look up the kingdoms of Mali, Songhai, Timbuktu, Nubia, Kush, Congo, Ethiopia, Benin and the city state of Kilwa.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All Arab states or classic examples of being the tallest midget. The exception possibly being Ethiopia who traded extensively with Europe.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They ruled the world until the world actually found them. Just like the Amerindians.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Africa? Ruled the world?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Did you...not get the joke?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you know Africa wasn't just a bunch savages in the prairie or jungle until Europeans rolled in and took it over.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The non-Islamic African nations were pretty much what you are describing. The outcomes of the colonial wars made that very clear.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

that doesn't say much about social or governmental systems. Only that they were military inferior.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

the capital of Congo was described by a dutch explorer in the 1600s as having cleaner and wider streets than the Netherlands.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the exceptions of the Mali empire and the far eastern coasts, Sub-Saharan Africa *were* effectively just tribes of randos.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the Kingdoms of Benin and Congo were pretty dope,

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was also the Wolof Empire and several others. You can look up a list on Wikipedia.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

WAKANDA WOHOOOOOOOOO

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Not sure why blacks think it’s a boon to be depicted as backward savages whose only source of tech they got by accident.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

General Jack O'Neill would make them change their staff weapons for a weapon of war though. ;)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just have to aim for the rope

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look up Shaka Zulu.

8 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 16

Ah yes, the man who said written language served no purpose.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The topic was military might, not other elements of his personality, which was brutal and short-sighted dominance.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The man shunned all forms of technology. What happened when technology met his people?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Objectively he had the strongest and most effective pre-colonial African military. Of course he had some issues that lead to his downfall.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Shhh! The 14 year olds of Imgur only get so much weekend screen time, and they need it all to be racist edgelords.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 13

? Shaka is a well known person. He's known for uniting alot of Africa then ruining everything once his mom died.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Look, just because your high school football team went 14-0 and won the state title doesn't mean they can compete in the NFL.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean the guy who made a country out of tribes then killed his own people when his mom died?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look up the British Empire.

8 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 8

Belgium bitches

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I mean, I'm with you, but look up Carthage.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Carthage developed from the Phoenicians, who were from the Middle East.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But they were in Africa, and thus an African military.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every civilization faces its ruin in some way or another, does that diminish its accomplishments?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

Yes

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

No, but the Zulu got cocky and thought the Brits were too weak after the Boer wars. It was an error in judgement on their part.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yea, but also the brits has massively superior technology and tactics. I’m impressed they even put up that much of a fight at all.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look up dickhole fingering

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I'm good, but thanks for the offer

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No thank you

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Look up Isandlwana

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

Ah yes, 10-1 odds in favor of the Zulu. Quite the strategic victory...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look up Hiroshima

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Look up Alderaan

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Oh shiiit , serve returned

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

Look up

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

Look up rice farmers....

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lol I love that stupid argument

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ooooooohhhhhh

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They never got Ethiopia

8 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 6

*Assyria

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

ww2 disagrees

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*whispers* but they never got Thailand

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

That's not correct. Before World War 2, Italy conquered Ethiopia. Britain liberated them from Italy as part of the fighting in Africa.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Tell that to Italy

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, they got the government. The tribal peoples kicked Italian ass left, right, and center.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Sauce for those who don't get it - https://youtu.be/xuCn8ux2gbs - 15:41 specifically for proper introduction

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That was pretty neat. Thanks for sharing!

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Godamn that was awesome

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Italians never got anything. Send in the brits or the frenches for results.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Italy attacked with planes, tanks and plantains and still couldn't break the Ethiopian lines.

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 7

They did break it. I've played enough HOI4 to know that.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except for that time when they did and ran the place?

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

With the Germans doing all the work for them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Except the Germans were sending materiel to the Ethiopians

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Plantains? Like... Bananas?

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

plantains != bananas

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Plantains = musa and banana = musa

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean if planes and tanks don't work, I'd probably say fuck it and throw fruit at them, too.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Hehe

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Knock knock, who's there? It's europe

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

Ethiopia Fended off Europe during the colonial days

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Until pizza pasta lasagna garlic bread arriver

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Knock knock, open up the door it's real

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're not getting the point. The current potus is a clown. You do know that nobody in this world is impressed by threats of the US anymore.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 153

Must be weird to live in world where everything can be linked to Trump in a single jump

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This may schock you, but not everything on imgur is about the current USA Administration

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

Lel Everything you Americans post here is about you. When you have a holiday day imgur is unbearable. So it's very much your fault

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

Wow I am German, but yeah I am sure you are right and its somehow my fault...

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Triggered

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

I mean you’re correct about that, but it is a bit of a non-sequitur

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"There's a time and a place for everything, and this ain't it."

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Youre the guy at the restaurant thats like "yes, i would like the filet mignon, medium, with steamed veggies, and fuck Trump".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

All the dumdum's here need need to understand metaphors. What I'm seeing: v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You seem fun at parties

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 5

he seems like the one friend you tolerate but try to hide from him when you're doing something

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Dude how did you even get to this subject? Like if anyone is missing the point here, it's you amigo.

8 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 4

What are you even getting at? No one is impressed by the threats? So far he called the bluff on NK and on Russia when Putin threatened to

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 10

retaliate if we bombed Syria again after their latest chemical attack. The trade war is just a pissing match, not a threat.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

And everyone else is getting soaked.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Jeez, you're damn right we are and it sucks.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who even mentioned Trump?

8 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 5

I should've lead with 'for example...'

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 31

I don't think anyone has ever lived rent free in more peoples heads before

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A sheep is leading a nations of lions. Nobody in the world is taking the USA seriously anymore.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 61

Look, I hate Trump and his unhinged lies like everyone else. But you are off on a tangent people can't follow. He is a sheep leading sheep,

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

with a few wolves in sheeps clothing mixed in.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

you're calling US Congress sheeps, I wouldn't go there. They just are following orders, you seen what happens when they don't follow orders.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 15

Who's scarier to be in an elevator with, a short tempered moron with a gun or a calm well reasoned individual with a gun?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The well reasoned individual with a gun. Duh

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or check the trade war. European Countries, China and Russia are all hitting the US back. This would never happen under Obama or the others

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 59

I don't know what they placed tariffs on but remember, they aren't extreme consumerist societies like us. Those vendors can just lower >

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

< their prices here to compensate for the tariff loses and the American companies still profit. Something that other countries can't have.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

EVERY economist predicts higher prices to the American consumer. But you do you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Harley Davidson for example. And what happened, Harley Davidson will open shop in Europe. Less manufacturing in the USA and offcourse jobs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

v

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Um. Threats or not. Still the biggest and strongest military in the world by far. Everyone better hope it doesn't get kicked into gear.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

It’s not that I disagree with you but I have no idea why you’re talking about this

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Like see the Iran deal. The USA chicked out but the G6 is still upholding the deal and will hit back if their companies will get boycott.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 53

It's pretty much done. Roshan hasn't gathered enough support being that Iranians are mad at him for trusting the US, the Treasury has made >

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

< a very simple statement saying that dealing with Iranian companies will end bad, and that Iran is demanding extremely one-sided >

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

< economic relief in order to keep the deal with European countries.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No one is disputing what you are saying. They are disputing why you are saying it. We aren't talking metaphors here.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think we read your comment the first time.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Clown though he may be, that's driven by his pragmatism. Also every fuckin body and their brother are scared shitless of the us. More below

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

The fact China hasn't attacked yet should tell u that as they have about 1.3 billion people to our 325 million. We are more advanced than

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Anyone else in the world, and they know that. We are top dog, and will remain so for the foreseeable future. MERICA! FUCK YEAH!!

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Chinese GDP will be larger than ours and increasingly so in the next 5 years. We will have to spend a >% of GDP on defense to keep up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All that to say, I’m a proud American but we are facing serious problems and it doesn’t help to have a distracted man-child in charge.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which means our national debt will get worse and the public services should feted by govt as well, which will increase inequality

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Increased economic inequality coupled with a lack of normality in politics means internal social and political strife.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0