Regardless of the manufacturer, there's little evidence that partial automation systems prevent collisions or save lives, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found.

Aug 12, 2025 3:24 AM

MenloPart

Views

5576

Likes

234

Dislikes

4

https://www.axios.com/2025/08/06/tesla-autopilot-verdict-safety

Some fuck stick at work mentioned using a swasticar…. No worries it only kills children

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rubbish, with near 1m kilometres driving experience, autopilot (which is assist with adaptive cruise control and auto steer for lane keeping) is much less tiring and much safer than manual driving. The exact speed for duration is impossible with the foot. Once lane keep and speed is automated (with manual checks and plan b ready with hand on steering wheel at all times) attention can observe more things like traffic behaviour, erratic car drivers and preparation for driving actions.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

#I5gpj06

1 year ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

“Chilling”

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I always find it baffling when Telsa autopilot is in the same category as Waymo. From what I understand Waymo has full responsibility for their cars, drive themselves safely, and can get remote assistance when needed. Telsa drives itself and switches to the driver just before impact, saying it's the drivers fault. I hope that Tesla has improved enough to make their robotaxi safe because Elon has overhyped things way too often.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The moment I get hit by some horseshit self driving car will trigger a significant change of personal ambition and shift of focus in my life

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This actually strengthens Tesla's case for FSD, since this accident in 2019 had the idiot drunk driver pushing the accel down while reaching for a phone on the floor IIRC.

FSD eliminates the #1 safety problem, idiot drivers. Someday.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

That picture should also have AI hands

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$200M of the damages was punitive:

Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, $129 million in compensatory damages plus $200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33% of the compensatory damages, or $42.6 million. Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67%, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh no! It has to fucking work!?

1 year ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

"We can't lie to our customers and endanger people's lives without consequence!? I thought this was a free country!" :/

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

A lot of the fault of Tesla is that they kept saying that it was full self driving.

1 year ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Ironically, I liked an earlier version before it started trying to do the whole drive. I knew what It could do and couldn't and would use it as such. Now I have no clue, I don't use it anymore, can't trust it because it feels... random... when it will fail.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have driven a couple of rentals for the last two weeks because some plastic connectors wore out on my car... and I broke off the radiator neck nipple.
They have lane assist and other nanny features, which don't work consistently, and sometimes steer me into concrete barriers, semis, etc.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why people are stupid enough to give away fun things like driving, painting or writing poetry to a fucking set of wires and chips.

Like all those idiots whose goal is to get from point A to B in the shortest time possible. Long forgot that driving a car used to be a passion and an opportunity to enjoy views, discover places.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Driving is a terrible example to put alongside “painting” or “poetry” since you can do those activities while traveling….if someone else is driving the car or train. This is obvious.

Although driving CAN be an engaging self-rewarding expression/behavior (myself i love the game Forza Horizon), it isn’t only that and doesn’t have to be that. It can just be empty sitting time commuting if a person wants to do something else like read.

“I don’t understand” —OK I recommend trying think + empathy

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last time driving was a passion, people spent Saturday nights cruising down the boulevard as a fun date night activity. I love a good drive in the countryside as much as anyone else, but I live in a city, most of my driving is spent watching for kids, pets, or idiots who are going to cause my insurance rates to go up due to their actions, and avoiding them. Which means no time to enjoy views or discover places. I would love if I could just get driven from point A to B without that stress.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

isn't that what public transit is for?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Where I live driving is cheaper and faster than public transit. Maybe if I lived in a very dense city like NYC then it would be different, but I don't.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most my driving is to get to and from work. It's an obligation, that is all. I don't want to waste what little free time I have commuting to and from work. If an AI can handle the driving for me so I can read a book or something, then that would be great.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Driving fucking sucks. The answer though isn't more cars, it's fewer.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

This is true with the exception of go karts and also some stretches of the 1 and/or 101 in California.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See a school bus stop sign test: https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1lb4cs7/self_driving_car_fail_to_stop_at_stop_sign_and/

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

lets be honest, many regular drivers might show the same in exactly the same scenario. Would have been nice to compare it to regular cars..

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

"it fails the same way as a regular driver so it's ready for the road" is not quite the "Hooray" you think it is.

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Heh, in some other post about the percentage of LLM chatbots lying a guy defending it “so they only lie (best case) about twice as much as people”, lol then it isnt suited for that kind of automation work, simple.

Point is these machines are supposed to be better than the obvious mistakes (which a machine should be easily be able to spot) humans make. If it doesnt, its trash, badly made, bugged, deployed/marketed wrong, whatever, there is no sanewashing it

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was taught that there is no singular more illegal thing you can do on the road than ignore a school bus' deployed stop sign. If you think that this is representitive of what you would do in that scenario, please turn in your driver's license to the DMV today.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You mean they aren't allowed to run over dogs and stray children?

1 year ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

only convicts and hobos, like the alligator in Simpsons

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They might have to pay a fine if they murder people with their negligence. Scary stuff

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

A few that's one one thousandth of one percent of one locations profit for one day. If even that

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Heres a link that doesn't require a paid subscription to read more than the first paragraph:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/autopilot-verdict-deals-tesla-black-eye-threatens-musks-robotaxi-ambitions-2025-08-05/

1 year ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 year ago (deleted Aug 13, 2025 3:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's nice.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

no paywall here as well…

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I loaded the entirety on my phone and laptop without logging in.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow $240 million is a lot. I wonder why it was so much more than the verdict against the driver if the driver was found at fault.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You are right! Since corpos are legally people, they should be subject to the same fines as people! /s

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh I was wrong, that was the verdict against the person. The corporation was only found 1/3 liable. I didn't realize hundreds of millions was a normal verdict.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0