Dec 13, 2015 1:58 PM

Views

583245

Likes

12843

Dislikes

1044

Or it's not a perfect analogy and you can get special boost but still have more disadvantages overall due to things outside your control

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 17

I'm a white male, why didn't I get rich parents??? Fml... This game has a glitch

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But things like BET, women only gyms, etc., are much, MUCH younger than the inequalities between races/sexes

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 10

But Blue Shells will hit yourself if you're already 1st place. And wouldn't lightning bolts just fizzle if there's no one in front of you?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This man is making the important points.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is just a mess. It's a nerdy, pedantic extension of the metaphor that isn't even correct

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 11

The whole point of the post is to show the metaphor isn't correct

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

I'm new here. But if I'm following correctly, posting something that attracts the white vote will get me to the front page? Noted.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

imgur bought into gamergate and all that jazz real hard

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah let's oversimplify racism!

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 15

There are men's only gyms though...

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Gay bars with weight sets don't count.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Are there? I've never seen one. But I've seen lots of women-only gyms, and men's country clubs sued and forced to take women.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

i dont think there is the same market for male only gyms, most men want women at the gym.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YMCA

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

It's co-ed and has been for a long long time.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Herp derp

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In my experience they're super rare compared to the female-only gyms. And very few co-ed gyms have "men's only" hours.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think I'm on the wrong website. I've never played Mario Kart.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hold up. hold up. Please acknowledge that this response is saying that white, cis, males are better than everyone else. That seems messed up

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 9

haha that's SJW logic though. just change the word privilege with supremacy

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Actually he explicitly says he doesn't believe that and is just twisting the analogy back at the guy

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I think people confuse nepotism and cronyism for privilege.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a brown guy, I don't need free money, help, or scholarships. I just want to be treated like an equal in everyday interactions.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Are you?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

By some people yes, by others, definitely not. Depends on the crowd I'm around/area I'm in. That's why I want to move once I can afford it.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Not to be ignorant, but wtf is a cis?!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cis is Latin and it means the opposite of trans. In regard to gender, it means you identify as the gender you were assigned at birth.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

goddamn there's a lot of racists at this site

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 12

Racism and sexism: now called social justice.

10 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 76

Now? It was called that when Charles Coughlin came up with the term Social Justice back in the 1930s. (Spoilers: He was a nazi.)

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 16, 2016 9:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1/2 The most amazing reply I saw to someone asking "what of whites being persecuted by blacks in in power in Africa then" was...

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

It's sad that I've seen several people argue that exact point... with that exact wording... I hate this planet.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

A bit more than that, really, since that's more or less what our actual fucking laws are. Yeah it pisses me off.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

The idea is that if you are on the top of the social hierarchy you don't need the same protections. It's not a hive mind it's a logic.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 32

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 16, 2016 9:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

But if a group is in power what you are referring too affects them less on a wider societal scale, this has to be thought of in groups 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

The idea is that if you are on top of the social hierarchy, then you don't need the same protections. It's not a "hive mind," it's logic.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 32

2/2 "Blacks can't be racist against them, because the whites are foreigners and don't belong in those countries". The double-think is real.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 8

+1 for double think. Just finished 1984.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I tend to define "SJW's" as people who have their hearts in the right place but use shitty methods to achieve their goals.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Check out Sargon of Akkad on YouTube, I think you'd like him.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Already subed to him along with Armoured Skeptic and Shoe0nhead

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well, there you go! Then give HarmfulOpinions a look, he's neat too! :P

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah fuck you and your slightly inaccurate analogies too!

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 13

What's up, racist ass Imgur? Haven't seen you in a while. Was beginning to think that you had fucked off.

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 29

It never leaves, just escaped usersub due to Reddit shoving it here.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Not this shit again.

10 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 12

Trolls and psuedo intellectuals

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Which will be the name of my autobiography.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Privilege would be starting 100m ahead of others or be able to destroy/silent others with given unfair assets. No, wait, wat..

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 19

in the mario cart world, privilege is, aftertaking everyones controllers for the first race, getting to start first in the next

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

And then complaining that you have them their controllers back eventually, what more do they want?

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It frightens me so many people upvote this idiocy.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

There is a difference between equality and equity. We need to make things more equitable to help those at a disadvantage be on a more 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

even playing field 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

How about helping poor people instead of people based on their skin color? That'd be much nicer IMO.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

They should be helped. Statistically in some places people of certain races are more likely to be below the poverty line so they aren't 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

completely separate issues.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I think they are separate issues. A rich black man is better off than a poor white man. It's not about his ethnicity, it's about money IMO.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'll never understand why this site tries so hard to not recognize white privilege..

10 years ago | Likes 180 Dislikes 93

Because it's used to tell people to shut up and not participate in real discussions.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Maybe it's the direct implication that no white male ever has to work for anything?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 12

Wait, there's a place where I can live free and clear of bills and have everything just given to me because I'm white? Where is this place?!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Because "check your privilege" is used to mean "your opinion is invalid". In that context, 'privilege' deserves no respect whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I'm sorry that that is your experience, but hell, hating that phrase is FAR different than denying the privilege that some people have

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Life is hard. It's harder when you whine about who is more privileged.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

White privilege is like being pretty damn tall in a room where everything you need to lively decently is represented in cans (can of job 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

opportunities, etc) is on an unusually high shelf. The shelf designer didn't think anything was wrong with the shelf when he made it a 2/

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Long time ago, but there are more people fighting to reach that stuff now. Now there's an authoritative super tall guy telling the other 3/

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Tall guys to wait their turn, the short people make ladders (sometimes ladders given by AWG), & the super tall dudes are left waiting. 4/4

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Because people like to feel like they did it all with no help because they're special and smart. Privilege doesn't mean they didn't though.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

Because it doesn't exist....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ugh

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I know... It's tough

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know... It's tough

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Notice how almost all of them are straight white males? (And I point this out as a straight white male)

10 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 36

Almost like this site is primarily visited by white males...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm a white guy too, I just care about my fellow countrymen and women

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

Me too. But unfortunately, many of our demographic think everyone's lives are like theirs.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Being sick of bad analogies and lectures doesn't mean we don't recognize it.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 13

If you think its about being lectured try having friends who are afraid of the police just because of their skin color. then you might care

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 12

No one is claiming we have it worse. This is the shit I'm talking about, no one has said anything to that effect (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Yet you are still taking it upon yourself to reprimand us for it. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Which friends and where? as a brown man living in predominantly white and ethnic neighborhoods. no fear from cops.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I thought "white privilege" some BS only young liberal college students believed.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i don't believe in white privilege I believe in socio economic privilege that hurts minorities but i don't think ones race matters anymore.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

considered exotic. Like on the show master of none, if there's 3 indian guys in the cast, its instantly an indian show -2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

regardless of the content of the show, its automatically tossed into the niche market bin. -3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it does, it different contexts, for something is predominantly white its normal. When something is predominately something else it's -1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the fact of the matter though would be the other way around n a country like india which is perfectly fine because indians are the majority

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

correct, but if you were to argue that there's indian privilege in India, how much of a fight do you think you would get?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to negative stereotyping,i think some demographics are more easily negatively stereotyped than others.Some arent always representing a ppl-3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i think you picked a poor example because it if was how i said in india I honestly would not care about that and understand why it is that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it know it doesn't sound like a huge deal on its surface, but it does extend beyond that in different scenarios,specifically when it comes-2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because most people here are straight white dudes who don't like having to face the fact that it's an advantage, simply due to history.

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 30

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 5:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Who is actually insulting you though? And as a white guy, I can take a bit of racial humor because I'm not oppressed nor a lil bitch

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Are you actually insulted or do you only feel that way because you expect it to be meant as insulting?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I'm never actually offended and more like "lol are you actually trying to offend me, you petty fuck?"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obvioulsy there are a lot of douche bags who actually mean to insult you, but most don't do that.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

how is being white an advantage in life?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Because we won the world the last time someone could win the world.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

what does that even mean

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then the British empire took power creating America, Australia and controlling numerous other countries such as India. Then America Cont.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Declared independence. Became a global power along with Germany and the rest is a history of world wars. That's what it means.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

12-14th century Genghis Kahn enslaved and controlled most of Asia and Russia.15-17th century the Spanish empire was in control. Cont.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the negative connotations I dispute. Yes, it's better to be white in a white country. Why is that meant to be a problem?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 29

Because why should it be? There's nothing actually special about skin colour that should afford you greater opportunities.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Shouldn't=/= doesn't.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because a country belongs to its people. If those people are white, it follows that being white is a pre-requisite.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

lolol after our discussion I see you write this lolol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What discussion?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

so you recognize that it's there but you just dont want to do anything about it because you're white and its going well for you?

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 16

people, it's unjust to then come along and demand they open it to everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 17

That is a ridiculous thing to say. Chinese citizens are chinese just as black americans are american citizens...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Citizenship is a spurious concept. A piece of paper does not change who and what you are.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

I'm brown and it's going well for me. AND I'm in utah and not LDS. So yeah, the victim complex is annoying. #Iamnotavictim

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

Do you complain about Chinese privilege in China, or Jewish privilege in Israel? When a country is created by and for a particular group of

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 21

Holy crap. Seriously? You're delusional.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

more than one third US is non-white, so not really a "white country"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It was built and founded by white people. A few disastrous demographic shifts caused by irresponsible gov't policy do not change that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Wow. Let me guess, you vote for donald trump

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Wow. Let me guess, you assume everyone online is American.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

No one "votes" for Donal Trump yet. There's nothing to vote for. The election is like a year away.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The concept of "White Entertainment Television" is just an act of revenge and pettiness against black culture.

10 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 38

That's the point. Because a lot of "social justice" in recent years is just revenge and pettiness against white culture.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 28

So the response to it is to be petty as well? Don't think so.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There already is "White Entertainment Television". It's called "Television".

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 35

Television isn't exclusive though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Also it would be called WET TV

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

White Entertainment Television Television?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Damn just realized.... +1 for the username

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well there's already a WE TV and it's short for Women's Entertainment TV. It's like this weird mix of reality tv and law and order reruns.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

or mAYBE the analogy doesn't work.

10 years ago | Likes 331 Dislikes 60

It does if you're a naive tumblrer that has yet to enter the adult world.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Or play Mario Kart

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Is that not what this is saying?

10 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 5

It's like he didn't read it or something.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's exactly what this is saying. Literally started with "One problem with this analogy", not idea.

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 2

yep. I'm selling 10-foot poles in case anyone wants one.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It works perfectly.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 53

I don't know about perfectly but I don't think most analogies are supposed to be completely perfect

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, to be far, even from a white, middle classed male, I find it hard to argue with the basic logic of the analogy.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Omw to go get a blue shell tatoo

10 years ago | Likes 818 Dislikes 15

Yeah it uhh.. Symbolizes like equality and shit

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pics or it didn't happen

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pics or it didn't happen

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've got one too! my wife and I have matching Player 1 and Player 2 tattoos. Mine with the blue shell and hers with super stars. :D

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do it

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Now everyone are going to ran away from you.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Username checks out.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

All your base are belong to us.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Tattoo* (sorry, not sorry)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Already have one! It's spattered in blood and has an inscription along the rim of the shell that reads "I'm coming for you".

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Picture or it didn't happen

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

SHA-BAM! Proof! http://imgur.com/sRnhPfE

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

That's badass man.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Badass yo.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can i see??

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of course! http://imgur.com/sRnhPfE

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That looks so amazing!!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

privilege is when Mario is the best racer because he grew up with rich parents who bought him karts and race lessons.

10 years ago | Likes 251 Dislikes 20

Or because he's white

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 25

Go ahead and try to tell the white people living in trailer parks how much more privileged they are than you.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I'm white and I wasn't being serious but just because someone has it hard doesn't mean nobody has it harder

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Intersectionality says that both class and race disadvantage people. Poor blacks and whites are both disadvantaged but blacks somewhatmoreso

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Naww. Money has nothing to do with how life gose for you. It's all about your skin color. Said the homeless white guy.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Most white people are not rich BTW. Most of the important differences cost nothing. Finish school, work 40 hours or more, no kids til ring

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mario doesn't even have parents! He was brought in by the stork and raised by Yoshis. It was a fun game.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which isn't his fault, just his circumstances.

10 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 20

Not his fault at all, it's just saying that often times advantages exist for some people

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the key that those of us with privilege could better understand (and those who b*tch about it could better communicate/express).

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 5:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Noooooooooot really. If my parents could afford an expensive tutor, and another's live in poverty, should I offer to take a lower grade >

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) < just to "level the playing field", or should I take what I, regardless of individual circumstances, earned?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 5:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

But if you're in a race, it's about using your advantages to win.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not his fault, but that doesn't mean he can't help fix the disparity.

10 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 23

So he should hold back on purpose and let the others win?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

Let's remember that we are talking about life in general, which is not a race like Mario Kart. You can help others without "losing".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't mean he can't- also means he doesn't _have_ to. I see nothing wrong with taking pride in being King of the Hill.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

If you know you're not winning fairly, even if you're not the one rigging the game, taking pride in winning is pretty shitty.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

If you aren't breaking the rules, you are winning fairly. Having advantages isn't unfair by default. Cheating is.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How would he go about "fixing" this equality?

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 11

Try to help others have the same opportunities he had?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

That's a nice sentiment (that I agree with) but was asking for something specific

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

But giving his current competitors advantages isn't going to retroactively negate their childhood misfortunes.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

There's no such thing as a perfect analogy.

10 years ago | Likes 952 Dislikes 49

(other) relevant xkcd http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/teaching_physics.png

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

At least in the game, they're all subject to the same first-place disadvantage.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

But there are ones that don't actually say the opposite of what was intended.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

they're like women, then. There's your analogy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's like a thought with another thoughts hat on.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Analogies are like sandwiches in that I'm making one now. ~ https://xkcd.com/762/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel like the lecture hall trash can one comes way closer, though.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

That's a pretty good analogy except the people at the back are mad at the system instead of waging class warfare at the people in front.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The hmm?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The ones who made it from the back of the room were the ones who yelled "Kobe"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Found the CS GO player.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Let imagine an analogy where the logical form between the subject matter and analogy is identical...

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

And there you have a comparison between an item and itself, generally.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

"This thing is like... itself!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can a thing only have an identical logical form to itself?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we're saying strictly identical, I would say yes. Analogies can work if you don't carry them too far, and it ends up being -

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

- "This thing is like this other thing, except in the ways it isn't at all like this other thing."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the analogy doesn't take into account is that life isnt a race solely based in your skills, but also on other peoples acceptance of you

10 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 21

Also luck. In fact, mostly luck.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You could argue that players of certain wealth/sex/skin color just have faster cars than everyone else. Maybe lightning bolts aren't so bad.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bingo.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Is handling people not a skill? Why are they called social skills then? Do we call people awkward neckbeards for not having what's not real?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

Note: This comment was like 200 characters and it lost a bit of its sanity in the process of being shortened.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Men of above average height are more accepted than anyone, regardless of color. Should we fight for height diversity in the workplace?

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

You deserve Waaay more upvotes. +1.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ya this is true.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It doesn't matter if your first or last with a thousand blue shells if the employer won't let you play the game, solely based on ignorance

10 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 15

It almost seems like this analogy is both 100% correct and 100% wrong at the same time.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

All analogies are fundamentally different in some way. Otherwise they would just be the same thing.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Asshole wouldn't play unless I let HIM be Player 1, fuck

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't let someone play the game soley based on thier ignorance...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is little evidence that most industries discriminate against anyone based on race except when it comes to white males, who are (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

ethnic groups or genders and don't hire certain people based off stereotypes and exclusion practices. However I might add, that in your -5

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

such a thing is hard to actually prove without a confession or paper trail of discriminative comments,one of the things people look at are-1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reflects its surroundings.Still not a great way of telling but it's one thing sometimes people look at. While i'm sorry you lost your job-3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the number of qualified diverse candidates in a specific region vs the diversity make up a specific company to see if it somewhat -2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/2) less valuable because they don't contribute to diversity quotas and aren't qualified for specialized funding opportunities.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I am sure that will get me downvoted. I was also in support of affirmative action until I lost a major career opportunity for being white

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The problem is that you think you 'lost' something that was owed to you when no such thing happened.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How do I know? Because the lab PI told me that I was a perfect candidate, but the black female I was competing against was a minority and...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

opportunity, the same happens in reverse. The same way you were told it was because of diversity, people over-hear comments about certain-4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. The first post really doesn't explain privilege as well as many people think it does.

10 years ago | Likes 395 Dislikes 48

and by things like this i mean non-detailed, half-serious analogies that obviously dont go into depth because theyre at most a paragraph.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't explain it at all. It's a weak comparison.

10 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 5

Thank you. This doesn't really explain anything to be honest, just looks like a collection of really, unrelated examples.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

My reaction to the reply part of the OP:

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

There's a lot of reading material on the subject, and yet people always choose things like this to base their arguments against.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the response further confuses things. I get what they are each saying, but not in relation to each other.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Understanding privilege requires a 4 year degree marxist fuckery with a minor in Closed historical systems fantasy and myopic dialectics.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Don't mock my feminist dance therapy degree shitlord

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

"We want fairness, but only for us!" -them. One should not foster exceptionalism when seeking equality.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 20

Who is 'them'?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

The people in the first post about the analogy. Obviously.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's like that comic that tries to blame men's issues on society's hatred of women. It's sexist bullshit, men's issues aren't actually 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

women's issues, not everything is about women, jesus christ. Why the hell do so many people approve of that drivel? 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

I prefer the oversimplified analogy that 'privilege is like playing the game of life on easy mode.'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya, because we should lump all white people together. Because all white people are doing fantastically well and aren't poor

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

Thats not what white privilege means.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

Of course it isn't that would completely invalidate "white privilege" I mean maybe this is to do with wealth or class crazy thought

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Are you familiar with intersectionality?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am genuinely interested in these issues so yeah I have read up on it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/2 I read the article and still claim bs. None if the points that this author made about that essay ring true to me and I further find it

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2/2 offensive that just because of my skin color I am lumped in with 200 million other white purple in the US as if we are all the same.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Right, BUT because I am a middle class, white male I have more privilege than President Obama's daughters...right?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Well no because over the aggregate of white people".....shut up Meg and stop pigeon holding me to a stereotype for your political gain!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It explains affirmative action; the response is just naive idiocy that falls back on the tired old "well if I'm in first it must be skill"

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 19

Affirmative action? You mean literal legally enforced racial / sexual discrimination in the workplace?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

Doesn't affirmative action benefit white women the most?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Tell me, if you correct a measurement for error, is that "discrimination"?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Honestly I don't understand at all how that sentence fits with the situation.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you're saying every assessment of people is 100% perfect and infallible and not subject to discrimination at all.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

TIL that acknowledging the disparity of minority groups is sexist and racist. Thank you, Captain Buzzwords McRubberAndGlue.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

My understanding of affirmative action is hiring quotas. As in, requiring a certain number of employees are a certain demographic. If 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

good applicants fitting that demographic aren't available to hire, it means you are being legally enforced to choose WORSE employees 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

in the name of equality. That is precisely ANTI-equality; equality of opportunity, not of outcome. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm gay and my brother says shit like "why aren't there straight centers". What's a good way to explain privilege?

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 13

I think the best explanation is that there ARE straight centers: Every therapist or counselor ever works at a 'straight center', because /1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 9:59 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

worse. It would make no sense to make center catering to straight people because society already does that. /4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

people problems gets you socially shunned, assaulted, fired thanks to at-will employment, inept or maliciously wrong medical care, and /3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's always been acceptable to talk about straight people problems. LGBTA crisis centers exist because in many places, talking about gay /2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell him something like "Because straight people don't need them. Feel free to start one, no one will join.". That said, it's not privilege.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

They do need the same sort of thing though. It's just that psychological services is already equipped to handle most straight people issues.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The way social justice is headed, I don't think that will be true forever.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Slippery slope fallacy. Try not to engage in it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

fundies said gays will give paedos rights, muh slipry slopz, and now? Paedos pushing for respect and rights on the coattails of gay rights.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When was the last time a straight person got murdered for being straight

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Explain that some people get special privileges like being able to go places other can't for stupid reasons like being black or straight.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

The sad thing is that this whole "privilege" bullshit is all made up. As a white male, I cant't go to India and except privilege, can I?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Although it just seems like I've stumbled upon another troll. If you aren't one, please start thinking before typing a comment

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

With regards to that, straight is the norm. We don't really need that extra support because it's accepted from the get-go.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably because privilege in this sense doesn't exist. How about India, China, or North Africa, do you think white privilege exists there?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

Shockingly, a largely Western community will talk about Western countries for their examples.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Even then, if you look at any neighborhood that is habitated by a nonwhite majority, do you think white privilege exists there?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But if you're white you're not likely to have to go to those neighborhoods if you didn't want to. You could essentially ignore them.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Considering that merely being white in Asia is enough to get you randomly offered jobs, yes, white privilege does fucking exist there too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Got a source for that, or just anecdotes?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Source: Lived in Asia. Was randomly offered jobs everywhere i went. Or here: http://www.cnbc.com/id/37759560 Yes, it is very much real.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That kind of automatic preferential hiring only applies to whites, and mostly just to white males. Yes, privilege is a very real thing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I fucking hate the cis thing

10 years ago | Likes 2175 Dislikes 219

If only we had another word for

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't hate cis people, they can't help what they are.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you have against Computer Informational Systems?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had an sjw call me that, I look and act like it but I'm actually trans, felt good to shut her down.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I know what you mean. It's a bummer when you realize that yours isn't the only experience that matters...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love it. The cis had the coolest fighters of any faction

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are liars traitors and puppets for the Sith

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the ironic thing is, it's used as a tool of prejudice when the user assumes they know the bio sex and gender of the target. My sex (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

happens to be straightforward. My gender is, to borrow from Ron Swanson, "epic and private". (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Be trans then.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Aw man don't say that, the confederacy of independent systems loves you!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I always think of star wars

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I still don't understand it lol

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hate people like who who whine about it. As so many people on this site say "get a thicker skin"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't call cis people things

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I collect words, and I hate it. Where'd that nonsensical term even come from?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

You collect words?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Science

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

10 years ago | Likes 968 Dislikes 9

Stealing this for future use...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HAHA

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I just broke out laughing while having terrible diarrhea so thank you

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Evil Laughter*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha cis

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lawl

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why can't I favorite comments

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Well if you click the link there's a favourite heart under the image you can click.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not for mobile, or at least my version of it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know rogered is mild British slang for fucked/shagged, right?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

yeh cus i'm british, but its also what the droids say in star wars.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"Fuck, Fuck."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Eh, I'm actually okay with it, so in general discussions, you don't have to be say "normal" but the using it as a slur is annoying.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I hate that people assume that straight white men are better than everyone else and that they need to be brought down to give other a chance

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Why would you hate "cis"?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not bad in theory but it really regularly is sad with such spite that it's almost becoming an insult rather than a neutral term.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 7

Cis is like straight. It's just a term. Off the internet, not one uses it as an insult

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 13

Not true.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

"White cis male" is used as an insult quite often, actually. Especially at feminist rallies.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 16

I get called "Cis" all the time as an insult. Especially by women, yelling at me for being a man and how I oppress them by having a ween.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

Yeah sure you do

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Whenever I hear cis or trans, I always think of organic chemistry...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I usually stop reading the article if the author uses the term cis

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 14

it literally only means not-trans. just like 'heterosexual' is opposite 'homosexual', 'cisgender' only means the opposite of 'transgender'

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

I fucking hate people who think that "cis" is bad but don't have a problem labeling trans people.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 26

It's certainly an unnecessary term.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I assume your preferred terms are 'normal' and 'abnormal'?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Can't we just choose to identify as normal and not cis and they can't mad because that's just how we identify ourselves?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Normal would make other abnormal, which tends to be labeled as bad in our society. So not that good. Your stupid helicopters aren't a thing

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm so happy it hasn't presented itself in my real life world yet. I'm 31, and usually communicate with my age or older. Dodging that bullet

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

"...German sexologist Volkmar Sigusch used the term cissexual (zissexuell in German) in a peer-reviewed publication..."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The terms cisgender and cissexual were used in the 2006 article in the Journal of Lesbian Studies and Julia Serano's 2007 book Whipping Girl

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...after which the term gained some popularity among English-speaking activists and scholars."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The term originated in the 'real world'. As opposed to, i'm guessing, the internet, which wouldn't make the word less valid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a straight male. Use as many descriptors for yourself as you want, but leave me at that. Don't give me another label I didn't ask for.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It just means youre not trans what's the big deal. No1 is forcing u to self identify this way or to write it on forms, it doesnt affect you.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've been in this cis debate before and it's just toxic. Why do I need to be labeled as "not trans", when that is the norm?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Idk what you mean by "this cis debate". Wtf is the debate. Should a word thats exists for decades still exist? smh

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why aren't you against the word straight for the same reason?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why do we need more labels for the same thing? It makes no sense, especially if the majority of people either don't want them or don't care.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Normal doesn't have the same definition as cissexual.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are 4 Categories: Male, Female, Trans, A. Most people are male or female, not tans or a. So yes, it is "normal" to not be trans.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How do you even pronounce it?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Hey, whoever downvoted me, thanks for being negative toward someone trying to better understand the concept. You're a real winner.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing it's the "even". Gives it a different tone. But it's the same as in chemistry

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cyst with out the t

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok that's what I assume.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a female I find the whole modern feminism thing embarrassing

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 20

Some women have been against women's rights since the suffragists and beginning of feminism.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 16, 2015 2:27 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Tbh trans issues call under the social justice side of intersectional feminism. Any jargon you don't understand I can explain if you want.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This isn't a feminist issue, it's a transgender issue.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Trans women can be feminists and feminists can be trans inclusive tho. Theres intersections.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Never implied it wasn't, but when you're talking about trans people you wouldn't say "it's feminism" just because some are feminists.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's falls under the concept of intersectionality though. I wouldnt say "it's feminism" about anything. Its not that simple.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As you should if it went for the CIS the Galaxy be a much better place there wiping have been no empire and aldern would still be there us.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I miss the days of things being normal without this trans, genderfluid, otherkin, spiritually enlightened yet atheist nonsensical BS.

10 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 49

I miss the days when foxtail buttplug wasn't a gender

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

You and me both

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

Spiritual but atheist isn't nonsensical. Atheism is just a lack of belief in gods. It doesn't mean no religious beliefs whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Isn't religion kind of defined by a higher power/god? So wouldn't a spiritual atheist be an oxymoron?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Spiritual to me is closer to the ideas of mental balance through meditation than a religion since meditation can be atheistic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Thats a legitimate question BTW, not trying to be an ass

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you want more philosophical views you should check Sam Harris' book "Waking Up: A Guide to spirituality without religion".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, we've labeled pretty much everything else under the sun; if we've labeled every landmark on the human body, why stop short of the mind

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

In my day we didn't have a pineal gland, we just had brain bits and had done with it AND WE WERE FINE ABOUT IT

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Um, trans people have existed since humans have existed.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 31

And we laughed at it back then too, for the same reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

Yeah, if you look at the ancient mayan civilization, youll see thier fur suits and mlp plushies they left behind.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 28

Then, they had no resources. Now, we do. We've always existed; our social constructs are the things to have changed to allow us openness.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They didn't have animal fur?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That's not transgenderism, you cock womble...

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You could be a female dog in a white males body, so in a way, yes it is. Lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

Wow. It's so sad that there are this many people who think that only SUDDENLY there are gay, bi, trans, etc. people. DERP.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 13

It's almost like people realising what they are, and telling people, helps other people to realise what they are.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Waaaaaat?!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I know they were there, I'd never judge. But there's so much more of it now. The internet allows all to be heard. Sometimes that unfortunate

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Sorry to inconvenience you by being different and not wanting to have to hide who we are.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

But that IS a judgment. This might be difficult, but try to imagine what it's like to be one of the people you're talking about.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

otherkin and trans are just not the same thing. the fact that people lump them together to dismiss trans activism is ridiculous. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

It would be like saying "I miss the days when things were normal and men weren't attracted to other men or to dragons or plants" 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

As if being attracted to the same sex is the same as being attracted to a plant, which it is not. same goes for gender- otherkin is bs 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Whats wrong with trans? I'm confused

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

I think it's just the way people feel the need to label everyone which separates us.Well, I hope so. If they think any of this is new then..

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

'cis' is used like 'hetero' so that the only opposite for 'trans' or 'homo' isnt 'normal'. because trans and homo have existed... forever

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

There's no need to name it. So many damned names. It's not necessary. Just be what you want and enjoy it.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Why are you so bothered by neutral names and labels?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's not the neutral aspect that offends me but the amount. It's baffling. Just live how you want to live, have what surgery you want to

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dude or chick who had surgery because that's medical and he needs to know.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

become what you want and be happy. There is no need to define every persons existence. Except to a doctor. Tell him your genetically a

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a guy, who doesn't know what a cis means, what does it mean ? Is there something like those people who claim to have 4 genders?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

"Cis" just means identifying as the gender you were born with.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism cis is the opposite of trans in latin. it isnt SUPPOSED to be used as a slur

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Cis is a psychology term in origin used to classify people that are comfortable with their birth gender. It's the opposite of transgender.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So, like, shouldnt they just be called normal people ? Normal as it used to be like from the very human beginning.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Normal is subjective. There are loads of normal trans people and abnormal cis people. Cis is a more specific description.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

At the very beginning, they reproduced, thus it was normal. Trans isnt normal by any means, but we arent jusging them, but if we say that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Words comes from Latin. Used in chemistry cis/trans molecular structures. Also used similar to straight/gay. Cis isn't an insult it's the 1

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

corresponding word to trans. In this case a cis person identifies with their own gender, compared to trans who don't identify with 2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the gender of their current body/sex. XY mutations and intersex conditions are rare very but possible in large populations over time. 3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In a modern medical setting you treat everyone, no matter what their gender/sex/body/chromosomes/DNA etc... is 4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All cis means is that you are of your birth gender. literally like saying "you have brown hair".

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But it isn't an old world, right ? Since I haven't heard of it before, only heard of it once, and it was said as cis-scum ._.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's relatively new but it doesn't mean an insult, and yes, but that is the scum that is offensive, not the cis thing. kinda like how white

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alright, thanks ! I don't think I will be using that word anytime soon, but I know what it means now haha :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

isn't offensive, but if I said white-scum it is, cis as a word is merely descriptive! :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know. Have you seen this season of South Park? Or the episode where Cartman pretends his trans?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

dis gon b gud

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's on Comedy Central right now.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Haven't watched in a year or so. I'm guessing this season is really good then?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This season is spot on about PC/social-justice-warriors and cry bullies

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Yes i fucking love south park

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't even know what it means and at this point I'm too afraid to ask

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cis is short for cisgender, which is the opposite of transgender. If you're not trans, you're cis.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that's fucking stupid. Also thank you, you're the dogs bollocks of knowing things I don't

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plenty of people misuse the cis thing, even more misuse the trans thing. It's descriptive, but using it to judge is fucking weaksauce.

10 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 12

"Im going to hate you for how you were born before you can hate me before how I was!" Thats how I hear that word. Its very sad. =/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Dude so does the Galactic Senate.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It sounds like an insult at this point.

10 years ago | Likes 564 Dislikes 35

It's used as one in certain circles. Of course, not many people take it seriously

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"How dare you be happy with who you are!"

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

pretty sure its entire intent was to be a pejorative.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ive never heard it as anything other than an insult really...

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

get off tumblr then

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I've never heard it outside here, and tumblr through here

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well there is a real world out there with people who use it as a neutral word to describe people accurately. I'm cisgender. Deal with it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

What is cis anyways, straight?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It apparently means that you are not transgender. Aka normal

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

not normal. you could be cis and a total wacko, the point is that cis simply means you are your born sex.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

gender* not sex :) my bad :p

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

thank you. I honestly had no idea!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone is born their sex...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's just a describing word. If trans people are expected to be okay with being called insane why is cis harmful? It's just a word.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The only reason this word exists is that it bothers some people to use the word 'normal' to describe people who are in fact normal.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It's just a word. It's not even a negative one. If you can't handle cis then why is it ok to call trans people fucked up and insane?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I've misled you, accidentally. I didn't mean that as an answer to your question 'why is cis harmful?' It's not harmful, it's just a synonym

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They are all just words, its how they are used. Any negative meant term - regardless of actual word usage - is never okay.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I disagree onthe "never ok" part. If I tell someone they're a cockwagon, and they're being a cockwagon then its ok for me to call them on it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Which is true. I don't condone insulting people because of things they can't change. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Let's all be kind.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I disagree onthe "never ok" part. If I tell someone they're a cockwagon, and they're being a cockwagon then its ok for me to call them on it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Call douchcanoe out on their actions, 100%. Judging them on skin color, gender, etc. Thats being a douchcanoe.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel like the word itself just sounds like an insult. I didn't know what it meant for the longest time and it just sounded negative.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They complain about people using their identity against them and then turn around and use people's identity against them. Hypocrites.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It usually is. I've had a lot of people call me a "cis asshole" for disagreeing with their anti-heterosexuality campaigns. I'm trans. :/

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

LOL, the irony burns!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Same. It's really stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wow, the stupid in that situation hurts

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've pretty much only heard it as a slur. If I see it, I can guess the rest of the statement will be against the person that is "CIS"d.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Please inform the uninformed re: cis

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Very generally, "trans" means "across" or "separated from" and "cis" is the opposite (near, with, unseparated from).

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You see "trans" in many compounds, e.g. transsilvania (beyond the forest), while "cis" is mostly used for gender and chemical compounds.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ie cistern lols

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, different roots. PIE "kista" (woven basket) led to latin "cista" and greek "kiste" (chest, box). It's cognate with "chest".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they use it as one

10 years ago | Likes 284 Dislikes 18

Anyone not on tumblr does not

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Anyone not on tumblr don't know it's a term.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 10

Not true. I've never been on tumblr but my trans/cisgender friends use it to describe someone who is not transgender on a regular basis.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Sweden's vice prime minister blamed "white cis men" for most of the world problems in a speech... Public TV/radio hires a group called 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"the equality group" to find new employees, which specifically looks for non-cis people for almost all openings. Not just tumblr. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's because the majority of the time cis gets used it's in a derogatory way.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not? I thought it was. Well I suppose that proves your point

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Amen, I'm sick of this overly PC crap.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 15

cis is opposite trans in the same way hetero is the opposite of homo. its not an acronym and not supposed to be a slur. just a descriptor

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

It must be nice to live in a world where being inconvenienced by other people's suffering is one of your biggest problems. ROFL

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

SUFFERING?! Really?! By being mislabelled?! Wow.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Does the crippling dysphoria many trans people face amuse you, chucklefuck? Are you just a funny man, racking up the lulz? Forget you.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

SJWs: "We need to fight the idea of labeling people by labeling people as many different ways as possible."

10 years ago | Likes 257 Dislikes 42

This is exactly what I hear when I see this shit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Humans are obsessed with labels. We identify and codify everything we come into contact with, plants, animals and other people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is there a difference in the types of labels? Please explain your views.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HAHAHAHA! WELL SAID.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 9

That's BS. The reason for the word "cis" is so that people don't say "normal" to refer to people who aren't trans. It's the same as 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 34

Why we have the word "straight" to refer to people who aren't lesbian/gay/etc. It's so you can speak clearly about a group of people 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 15

Straight is used because it is a synonym of normal. Normal from normalis meaning "made according to a carpenter's square"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're right, there should be a better word for it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't change that it is what they do. I don't agree with what you're saying so you're a "insert name here". 99% is the vast majority.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Thus it would be appropriate to call them "normal" as that is the norm. If you're offended by that, you're just insecure to be frank.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you aware that people use the "it's abnormal/unnatural" argument to justify violence against trans people? It's insecurity to 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

complain that the word "cis" is an insult, but it's more than that when people are talking about using "normal" for cis 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Without implying that they are the right ones and everyone else is abnormal 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 12

Down vote if you will but so little of the population is trans that not being trans really is statistically normal

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

irrelevant because what's really at stake is whether society should accept trans people, and that is hindered by ideas of what is normal 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

See wheatleygone's response above. Basically, you're technically right if you consider anything uncommon abnormal, but the point is 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

How many labels are there? Cis, gay, lez, bi, fluid, pan, ect? Spoiler: it's over 50 and none of them were invented by straight white guys.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

False. Lesbian was first used to refer to homosexual women by Algernon Charles Swinburne (straight white male) in the 1866 poem Sapphics 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you picked the common ones and decided to elaborate on those instead of 99% of nonsense labels.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

straight white males at that time) 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And solidified as a term for homosexual women in medical literature by 1925 (spoiler: medical literature was also written by 2/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And many labels, such as homosexual, were coined already by straight white males and subsequently replaced by terms those groups preferred4/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Such as gay 5/5

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The problem is though that we should just see each other as people and not care what they do with their genitals.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or how their genitals identify them. No men, now women. Brains driving meat sacks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If only we could! Sadly I don't think society is there yet. In the meantime we need language that accurately describes gender and sex

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it's such a fucking nasty word. It's almost an insult now.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was about everyone. Maybe some trans people use it as a general insult, but it really is more about that specific issue 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Real women, and the trans activists used the phrase "cis scum" to insult the radical feminists. People took it out of context and thought 2/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think part of the problem is that there was an in-fight between trans activists and radical feminists about whether trans women were 1/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok,so it is an insult?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But only for that situation?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hate to break it to you but gender dysphoria is a DSM-V diagnosis. Literally "abnormal psychology". There are XXY genotypes but it's rare.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 14

Not more than by actual pathology. Also note that gender dysphoria has no organic cause, and is treated by letting people live as their 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

desired gender, rather than by actually making the person cis 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I am aware that gender dysphoria is a DSM diagnosis. So was homosexuality previously. The DSM is affected by societal norms as much, if 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

While you are correct about the use of cis, the fact is: SJWs label EVERYTHING. Which isn't necessarily bad, but hypocritical that they 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Fight to be infinitely inclusive by making hundreds of exclusive groups (cis/trans/demisexual/genderqueer/ambiguous/straight/gay/etc etc)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Except queer, genderqueer, genderfluid, nonbinary are all terms that imply ambiguity and aren't homogeneous.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There are hundreds more that subdivide those categories. And more are being made each day.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Found the SJW

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 5:51 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Case and point. Where did I ever mention that I didn't like / was scared of trans people? Fucking self-righteous SJW.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What does "cis" stand for anyway?

10 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 3

Normal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oddly, I thought it meant "comfortable in skin" - and it mostly works.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

transfat and cisfat. if you aren't trans you are cis

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the opposite of trans put in place instead of the word "normal"

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

They get really pissed when you use the word normal. They get even more pissed when you point out that average on normal are same

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They really aren't. Different connotations.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Confederacy of Independent Systems

10 years ago | Likes 346 Dislikes 13

Was going to comment the same thing, and I'm glad someone else did for me

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Star Wars? Roger Roger?

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

Roger Roger.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Every time someone asks, there's someone who uses this exact same joke.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I don't think that's exactly a bad thing. Valid opinion though

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't know if it's a bad thing, but it bugs me when someone asks a genuine question, and the top-voted response is a troll. I'm a buzzkill

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Comfortable In Skin

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Straight people who are better than everyone else (according to this analogy)

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

According to Tumblr, it means "worst people in the world, ever."

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Comfortable In Skin - as in being "comfortable in one's own skin"; no gender confusion.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

actually, that's a backronym. just as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism cis JUST means not-trans :]

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Computer Information Systems

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It doesn't stand for anything. It's the opposite of "trans" and it's just supposed to help describe the experiences of transgender people.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 18

Yes it does. It's Latin for "on this side" as opposed to trans meaning "on the other side": Gallia Cisalpina "Gaul on this side of the alps"

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

"Standing" for something in this sense would imply it being an acronym, which it isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that makes no sense, how would it it describe experiences of people.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

i need to look into this a bit moe

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

professorsquid means it's just there to differenciate between people whose sex and gender match (cis = "same side") and people whose sex >

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's Latin for "on this side" as opposed to trans "on the other side". Rome had two provinces Gallia Cis- and Transalpina, so one part was..

10 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 3

Well, I do believe I've fucking learned something. +1

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

on "their" side of the alps, one was on the other side of the alps.

10 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

Ahaaa. Thanks

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thank you. Geez. I know it just entered popular vernacular in the past couple of years, but it's not like someone made it up.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nice! I'd wondered that myself. I just assumed "cis" was some transcended tumblr meme.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A lot of people do. It's actually used in some scientific fields as well. I've always heard it used to denote the regular or standard...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reaction to something, as opposed to an unusual reaction or interaction with whatever you were doing. So it's funny when people get mad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a doctor professor doesn't understand it what hope do the rest of us have?!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't trust a doctor professor that couldn't spell professor

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Computer Information Systems...I know, I majored in it in college

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

I know too! Cuz I dropped out of it in college!!!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1.) Cisgender people are people whose current gender identity matches the identity assigned to them at birth. It's a Latin prefix, and I

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2.) believe YourDailyAnagram does a good job at explaining its origins; see their comments above mine.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a ridiculous word concocted in the 90s by feminists. For real.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Wow they sure did a whole bunch of organic chemistry then.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Of course the prefix was around before then you cum guzzling twat.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh my God. Using the PREFIX of 'cis' in front of 'gender' was done in the 90s for the first time. Read a goddamn book.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You seem awful bitchy. Surely more whiny than any feminist I've met.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I only know from organic chemistry

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

I identify myself as methane and I'm offened by your volatile comment

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

ayy cis-trans isomerism

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I hate organic chem.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't forget your E/Z isomers m88

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

don't say that word I might start crying

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's actually the same cis and trans as the organic chem prefixes

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Chair and sailboat?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Cishet scum" usually meaning "idividuals who are comfortable with their gender and heterosexual in nature and I find them disgusting"

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 21

In context it's generally more, "non-queer assholes don't know the problems queer people have, fucking scum"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

"I'm also a feminazi who hates men and Christians and believe all people are blah blah blah I'm an idiot and people suck except for me"

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 19

This is really spot on. Have an upvote.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Did I miss anything

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

I don't know if you're serious or sarcastic

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What does the "-het" part come from anyway?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's short for heterosexual.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gotcha

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Transgender means your body and gender dont match. Cisgender means that your body matches your gender. Usually used to mean "Not trans."

10 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 6

So a normal functioning human being

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Why does there need to be a label for that?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

The same reason we use "straight" instead of "normal"

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's unnecessary since "man" & "woman" already mean body matches gender. You add "trans" to show when it doesn't.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

The point is to make it clear when you mean a non-trans person, since you call trans women and men women and men as well.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 26, 2015 11:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 1:18 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 14, 2015 1:18 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not sure why this is being downvoted. It's very informative. Thank you!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No. Cis fats have a cis "angled" double bond. If you have a double bond, you can't have an saturated fat, because you're missing two H's.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ok, that make its clear for me, thank you.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Oh you mean 1st place?

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 3

And your prize is a blue shell!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The only problem is if I'm in first (straight white male) I could get hit by a shell and still be in first

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Normal*

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 36

Which implies transsexuals are "abnormal"...kind of why people try to use the "cis" label in the first place. Seems fair to me.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

Statistically trans people are not the majority, nor near equal in number. Which, by definition, makes them not of the norm.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

THEY ARE ABNORMAL! That doesn't mean it's not ok to be trans but it's not freaking normal.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Except cis has become a label of extreme hate. Sooooo

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Exactly just call it normal that's what it is.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 19

As if anyone is normal. We're all just sacks of meat and mental misfires that only avoid killing each other because we try to be normal.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1