The Stratolaunch Carrier Aircraft Rolls Out of Hangar for First Time.

Jun 1, 2017 1:26 AM

That's a huge bitch!

#Stratolaunch #Planes #News

The sunovabitch will fly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amazing.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pilots spend half the time in the air waving at each other and making faces to the other cockpit.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

F-82 twinmustang? It's21centry

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My Dad had worked on that project for years.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This'll make the divorce settlement easier

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember those huge styrofoam gliders we would get as birthday presents? They would usually last an hour before nose-diving into the street.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

What does it carry?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She's built like a steakhouse but she handles like a bistro.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like that ship from Start wars that was in Cloud city

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stratobitch

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

upvote for having the explination in it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What could possibly go wrong with this flying nunchuck ?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How is this gif even related to... ah, I get it now. Heh. +1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i cant wait to see it become a camper

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Bet it turns on a dime

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy shit, it's Bigfoot!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Turkey jizz?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are there 2 sets of pilot/copilot, or just one on either side?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

One side would be pilots. The other side could be payload/launch control.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

One pilot, three copilots. Or seven, maybe

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So 37 pilots, give or take 60 pilots?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Eat you're heart out Howard Hughes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm no aircraft expert. But why? What's the point of it instead of single hull?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In the center will be a rocket that will release and deploy satellites. Easier and cheaper than using normal means of launching satellites.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of a snake with two heads

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What could it possibly be used for?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A spaceship is attached in the center, carried into the atmosphere, and launched. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

OMG thats amazing, you should have done that as the post

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It seems that you are correct.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Turn into camper

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Lol gr8 1. Heers upvoat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

When you just go fuck it in kerbal space programm

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I literally flew this today on my PS4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ridiculous

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

Okay, I get the whole rolling shutter thing but why are they "out of sync" like that? The props don't change speed

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's a common affliction called floppy prop, happens as planes get older

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's like the Bespin dual ships, which I though made no sense. But here we have a real one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why are the elevators not connected? Wouldn't a little torque snap the mid?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As an architect… Damn son look at that hangar!!!

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 3

No worries. That's the engineers' problem.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Calm down, Ted...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was going to say, the building is more impressive.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.... really? Can it fly?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Look at that span, unsupported along that wall, that's frigging impressive. And no columns because that thing has to fit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The plane is practically the same size, shaped like something a mental patient drew, and can literally fly. In the sky. Fast and high.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And while it is impressive, it essentially only exists to keep rain off of the FLYING LAUNCH PAD FOR THE FUTURE OF SPACE EXPLORATION.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So.....what material would be able to support itself over that distance with the roof and lighting all on it?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Long span bow trusses; what is more impressive are the spans of those wings, which must support the plane, cargo and resist dynamic forces.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Source had a photo where the trusses are visible: http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/17/22/1496253795-strato-leaves-hangar1-website.png

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep, trusses look to be at least 10 feet deep, and the top and bottom chords are arched for further span capability

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, even disregarding the distortion and perspective the truss looks at least one and a half human tall, so >10 feet is a good guess: 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Why you say my name!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I DON'T UNDERSTOOD !?!?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aerodynamically speaking, that would require an amazingly strong bridge between the two to survive even a moderate problem.

9 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 8

just like your parent's marriage

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude, do you even know what aerodynamics is?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Carbon Fiber FTW

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No way is that made of carbon fiber composite. Carbon fiber composite has no fatigue data.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty sure those fuselages while they look big and heavy are probably very light and empty compared to the wings carrying fuel and turb

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Airplanes are still heavy af though, I bet that fucker is a good 300 tonnes empty.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats very close actually, good estimate.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Doesnt need to carry that much fuel either i dont think; it takes off, launches the next stage, and lands again.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Space isn't that far away, and it's easy getting there. Its STAYING there that's the hard part.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it carries fuel for a 2,000km ascent, and presumably a 2,000km return trip.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That what I was thinking. It seems to make sense to me to connect the rear together with a solid wing.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I'm sure there's a good reason they didn't. Those engineers are smart folk.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There is. It has to carry something between the fuselages.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like a P-38 Lightning.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When you hate your copilot and just need some extra space

9 years ago | Likes 349 Dislikes 1

What is the point... other than taking up a lot of space, what is the great benefit?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a custom job for Finnish airways.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

The fuselage on the left side of the plane is empty and unpressurized

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

So why have it?

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Because why the fuck not

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To launch satellites

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing to carry extra fuel without overbearing two wings

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To have somehere to put that copilot you hate.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Otherwise the plane would be all right.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This guy gets it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For the jews

9 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 6

Internet, everybody

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I understand why they have it but at the same time i question the need for windows

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They're painted on.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aesthetic

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0