I wonder if I need a drivers lovende to operate a selfdriving camper

Oct 20, 2023 5:50 AM

BythepowerofPlank

Views

101924

Likes

1586

Dislikes

32

Talk about creating solutions for problems that don't exist

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

nice, you need twice the power and add a very cool uncertainty about how well it works to do the same job

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What could possible go wrong! (Everything. Every. Damn. Thing.)

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The blight of shareholders. Companies have to come up with stupid new shit all the time to show shareholders that they're making efforts to grow. It's why so many companies come out with the most daft shit that nobody wants and then disappears into the ether after a few years.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just because you can do a thing, doesn't mean you should do a thing.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So why would I buy something that will costs the same if not more than a base model car when I already have to have a car to take me to the same place the trailer is going? Shouldn’t I just save money by buying a vehicle large enough to take me and the trailer there.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I predict that his will be used by wealthy a-holes to send the "tug" on ahead to secure prime parking/camping spots.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A textbook example of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#1 OK I googled it and it seems to be actually a thing. But why? Seriously what's the point of having that? It makes no sense to me

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I could see it being a self driving thing in the future, but but a wifi thing lol

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't a van just be easier at this point

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

It should be called The Big Tow

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And then add a chain for safety, like with the airpods and their added strap.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I’m pretty sure Toyota factories have already designed robots that tow palettes of materials, or parts, etc., sans driver.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've been to the Volvo truck plants. They have robots driving around giant engines and transmissions. It's super-cool.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From the mad scientists who replaced buttons and knobs on dashboards and replaced them with crappy touch-screens....

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Touchscreens are more profitable for the manufacturer to charge you to replace when they break.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'll play devil's advocate. A large number of now popular inventions probably sounded this boneheaded before they were realized. Including the car that runs on thousands of mini controlled explosions.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because adding like 50 more points of failure to something simple is a brilliant idea.

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

You’ll find this in the Rules of Aquisition, specifically in the Book of Late Stage Capitalism.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're the one being paid for repairs when that shit breaks, it's an excellent idea.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

hahaha repairs. Buy a new one

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is something I saw that they had planned to implement with truck convoys. Was that Toyota too? If it actually worked you could have one driver take charge while the others rest, which would allow for quicker deliveries. I'm not holding out hope of seeing anything like it any time soon.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It really it true. With sufficient development any attempt to improve transportation will become trains.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A driver at the head of a long chain of heavy loads? might have a hard time on the highway, why not put it on rails and call it a train?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And rest times aren't so big an issue on trains when the thing can be manned entirely by people doing regular hours along the route and swapping. But I think the idea was trucks could hitch onto the convoy and leave as their routes required it and save the drivers from having to stop when the tacho demanded it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just use intermodal containers.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never heard them called that before. I dun lurned a wurd.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 240 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Helluva day, isn't it?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Probably the most terrifying thing about that movie

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

The funniest part of the movie.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Most terrifying part" That movie was pure hilarity.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What movie?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The Godfather.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Total Recall

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The opposite of "I completely forgot".

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Ah yes, You Partially Remebered! Good flick.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Taxi Driver

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The way he whistled the Norwegian national anthem.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What's wrong with Robert Picaro?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

His D fell off

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Possibly the greatest thing. It's how Verhoeven let us know not to take the movie too seriously. If we're in a world that has a Johnny Cab up front rather than space for additional passengers it is a silly future.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I don’t think anyone took it seriously from the start. Still one of my all time favourites

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

more terrifying than the effects of someone trying to breathe in martian atmosphere?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or pull a golf ball through his nose

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That is the worst. The eyeball popping out thing was just damn funny how silly it looked.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lost wifi signal. Now there's a terrible accident.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As someone who hauls trailers 85% of my very long work week - why are we messing with something that already works really well?!? And is incredibly easy! This is just so, so dangerous.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well first off, you're using logic and reason, and that's not what we're basing shit on anymore apparently. Second, now instead of selling them a tow hitch, you can sell them a $10K towing device that also, needs it's own maintenance, it's own tires, etc etc.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I could see the use of such a vehicle within a fenced area where someone need to arrange a lot of trailers and want to walk around with a phone to do it. But I have a hard time seeing this being legal on the roads in many countries due to safety reasons. I also see no sane person that would add a extra vehicle where a lost connection mean you turn and it doesnt.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

what happens when spectrum goes down ..or att ..isnt a toe hitch cheaper ..lol..wtf no thanks you

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is a tow hitch cheaper? Sure. But cheaper is not what execs are shooting for. They want more money.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 2

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the better half for sure

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man, i want this one with the audio

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Surely the main problem with this is needing another engine/drivetrain?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When are we going to get something practical like the wireless showerhead

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

A wireless showerhead is the least smart idea I ever heard. What if someone steals it, leaves it running all the time, and runs up my water bill?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

and adding insult to injury, then they could call you to ask if your showerhead is running

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

hell i could see a use case for a self-hitching trailer/car. get within like 5ft then hit a button and it does the work. then you just lock the hitch and go.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A local cheese seller here has a motor on their market trailer to help park it, and I think that kind of idea is better than a separate thing for it since you can still attach it to a car that can tow it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like the docking rings in modern spacecraft.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was not aware of spacecrafts participating in this sexual activity.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It gets better. They used to have male and female parts. But during the Apollo-Soyuz mission, neither the Americans nor the Soviets wanted their spacecraft to be the passive female receiver. So an androgynous docking ring was invented.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I bet this newbee doesn't even have the wireless garden hose from home depot

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Oct 25, 2023 5:07 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

the tesla powerwall offers wireless power up to 100' away

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm all for technological improvement, but how is this any better than a physical connection to the car. Lets say you have some small car that can't tow the trailer you want to tow, how is this thing going to have enough torque to do it for any length of time?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

My guess, that's the whole reason its wireless. It can accelerate slower and leave room to brake safely. I doubt it will be able to pull anything like a 30' camper, but even the ability to pull an ultralight camper or a utility trailer with a small 2-door car would be pretty handy. For instance, I would love to trade my Trailblazer for something with better milage, but I live in my camper for work and it's one of the smallest vehicles that I can safely tow with.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I watched a video about this, it has nothing to do with towing a trailer. This image is very misleading. The first car was "towing" a second car. Basically the second car was automatically following the first one.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I checked out the video and it looks like they were just prototyping the tech to see if it was functional? I'm guessing it's just a first step in a long development process, because otherwise it looks completely useless as-is.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah the idea of wireless towing isn’t very useful, or at least very niche. But the concepts and ideas that can grow from this dalliance could be interesting.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the towing power of a segway?

2 years ago | Likes 492 Dislikes 5

Think the size of an engine block with wheels, as that's where the power is.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The stopping power of one of those little toy popcorn vacuums for toddlers…

2 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

I mean, my trailer does most of the braking…but yeah this is still a dumb idea solving a problem that no one has.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean 95% of the trailers I use have no brakes at all… if we’re bringing single anecdotes into this like it matters. 🙄

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not for the road, but imagine one that grabs the hitch and places the trailer right where you want it no matter how tight the fit.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They already have those. Trailer dollys.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

powered and automated?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Powered yes, automated I'm not sure. Automating would be difficult I imagine due to lack of sensors/visibility on the other end of the trailer.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be the only safe speed and option!

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Most of the world has towing speed limited around 80km/h due to undersized car + unstable trailer layout they chose so this might be fine.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A horse drawn chariot can probably do 80km/h if you feed them enough speed in their oats.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's possible for enough towing power the bigger problem is the stopping power.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's like a tugboat

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Electric motors are very powerful these days, brushless technology has really transformed them in terms on torque and reliability. Power isn’t the issue, it’s the energy source. It would have to have the same battery, or at least the same capacity as the car so the travel distance is the same, and that isn’t going to happen because it would be very cost ineffective, and the hitch would be massive. Even wireless charging wouldn’t work because the travel distance would be massively decreased.

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Diesel trucks have been using electric for years now.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Go back and reread the first word of what you just typed.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh! We could run a wire to it! And to ensure the wire doesn't get damaged, we could put it long a rigid metal bar that hooks at either end to the respective vehicles!

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

By the time this could happen the power source could be solar. Promblem slolved.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

a solar panel big enough to directly power a motor strong enough to pull that kind of load would be fucking massive. you'd probably have better luck with a sail

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did you not infer from my purposely terrible spelling at the end, that I am making a funny?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

apologies i am in the hospital on pain killers, i read it as perfectly normal words

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did not. One extra letter is not on par with "I can haz cheezburger"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nothing I see says it would be electric! It could be like a two stroke with a forklift weight on the wheels, motoring along.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My comment was related to the Segway comment. Which are electric.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The biggest issue is the thing towing it would have to be close to the weight of what it was towing to be able to stop it. This is usually why you need a bigger truck to tow bigger loads. My half ton would move a big load down the road. But have a lot more trouble stopping it than a one ton.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I could see that being at least partially mitigated by a brushless motor not just braking but actually switching into reverse to actively slow down a load. Granted, it would have limited effectiveness and run into its own set of problems like increased dependency in wheel traction and increased energy drain, but it's not a totally insurmountable obstacle.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I mean, a 2000 lbs force still has trouble stopping a 20,000 lbs trailer no matter how it stops.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure, but the point is that a force trying to move it in the opposite direction will be more effective than a force simply trying to get it to stop. To throw out random numbers, you might need a 1 ton truck to effectively stop a 1 ton trailer, for instance, but you might only need a 2/3 ton truck if it can throw it in reverse to brake even faster without obliterating the transmission.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No is doesn't. A semi tractor (the truck part) weighs around 20k lbs, leaving 60k lbs for trailer and cargo. Trailers have brakes too.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The big problem isn't the trailer having brakes it is when you try to stop all your weight shifts forward. The trailers weight will remove pressure off of the front tires. Cause less traction limiting breaking power. You could give a one tom pickup the same horsepower and torque as a semi but could never haul the same load safely.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

True (the one ton part) but weight on the tow vehicle axles isn't the issue with it. A gooseneck trailer doesn't unload the front axle. If it did, it would be a problem for semis as well. No matter how you try to justify it, a semi trailer is 3x the weight of the tractor, it would have the same problem if that wasn't considered in the design. The same applies here. An internet sketch is not a buildable design plan, the weight of the tow vehicle isn't an issue.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 320 Dislikes 4

they can charge a monthly fee for it

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Electric cars have a hard time towing for some reason.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Any car could be used to tow. Imagine you need to rent a trailer, you wouldn't need to get a car that can tow. Just use your normal car.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If only they made rental trailers that could somehow be driven themselves. We could give them funny names like pickup, van, truck, box truck... could you imagine?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you not read my comment? This is a alternative to renting a van, you just rent the vehicle because maybe you have a disability, or your in a country that counts vans as a different car class. It's a neat idea. Just because we already have a solution does not mean it's the best. We had a way to make toast before toasters but toasters made it a lot more convenient. If I can just drive to the trailer rental. Put a little thing in my car and I have a trailer following me

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

George Bernard Shaw is wondering why when RFK always credited Shaw with this quote in his speeches, it's now credited to Kennedy.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And Shaw wrote satan as saying that so I’m not sure why we’re so stoked on that quote

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Capitalism

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Money of course

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the most anticipated military inventions in the recent future is the Loyal Wingman, a unmanned military aircraft that follows a manned aircraft semiautonomously. It can be anything from a dumb drone that carries more weapons for the pilot, to an autonomous system directed to engage a specified target. Of course, the keen-eyed might notice that military equipment by definition already carries an inherent risk. And the sky is fairly empty, while the road is not. Toyota might not be aware.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You might be onto something there. Maybe the real market Toyota is anticipating *is* military. Their export Hilux are popular with some folks, and they already make the BXD20 for domestic military use:

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Domestic now, but terrorist in a poor country later

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tech bros gonna tech bro

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because whatever happens, it'll be really funny

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

federal law has set a max vehicle length and max vehicle weight, therefore 1 human driver (the expensive part of the vehicle) can only deliver XX tons of product. If you can have a robot follow the human intelligence, now you are doubling the number of tons delivered per driver-hour.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, I certainly hope they can do better than merely human intelligence.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not relevant. Gov/Unions/Karens aren't going to allow 100ton vehicles to be driverless.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't think about whether or not they should.

2 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And it's not even gonna be able to do it that well if it tries to go up or down a hill. Cause either it'll find a slope it can't go up that you're able to go up easily. Or it'll be unable to stop itself from going down hill because of the weight of the trailer.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Towing and hitches destroy cars. They're very difficult on transmissions and add a lot of extra workload for tires, brakes, and other wear and tear especially if the vehicle is not equipped with a tow package. It'll make the vehicle last longer if it ever worked

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

So what you're saying is, towing wrong is very hard on vehicles. Like, vehicles without tow packages. Vehicles that shouldn't be towing. Non-towing vehicles. Kuzco's vehicles.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

By replacing towing equipment on the vehicle with a small vehicle with a towing package. Back to square one, except an additional engine, tech, and complexity.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe if you dont know how to tow and are using an incorrect vehicle. All the problems you listed will still exist for the drone, except now you have two engines, two sets of tyres, unnecessary tech and complexity.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

And a ridiculous amount of chance for failure. I wouldn't trust WiFi for ANYTHING critical. It is not a trustworthy protocol.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

WiFi fails several times a day, every day.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Many steering columns nowadays are wireless, too. No direct connection to the wheels. It works whether or not we like it or not.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

On certain Infiniti models that all have a back up mechanical system for when it fails. It's more failure points and more cost for zero advantage

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you have any more info about this? Because as far as I know (at least in the EU) the steering wheel MUST be physically linked to the tie rod. I can't imagine any sane country would allow anything like this.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A drone is more replaceable and can be better designed to withstand the wear & tear. Getting it to work correctly seems like far too big a task for current tech, but in theory there are clear benefits to it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

1: we don't need more replaceable tech waste. 2: why not apply that engineering to the vehicle and make the one unit better instead of 2 crappier units. What are the clear benefits? Because so far it seems like unnecessary cost, additional emissions, additional maintenance, insurance, risk and probably licencing too. It's a bad move all round when you can just have a tow hitch installed for a couple hundred bucks

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1: I agree, but the way Toyota is actually developing this tech is to tow other cars. A towing unit is conceptual, and could be rentable for example, when you're renting the trailer. 2: Like I said, they are developing it car-first, with towing units being a conceptual potential design.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

now give that drone a power supply beefy enough for it to match the range and power of a car, without making said drone the size of a car.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It only has to be the size of the car's motor + power supply, though, doesn't it? I think people are jumping to conclusions based on a completely early-stage R&D project.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

In what way would the towing drone be better than the towing vehicle? Any developments in towing tech for the drone could just be implemented in the vehicle without the extra danger of failing wifi connections.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And it is, Toyota is developing this car-first, with towing units being a potential concept. But the separation of the towed vehicle means the first driver can drive normally, since the dynamics of the vehicle don't change. Adaptive control in two different points is more robust, and adaptive distance enhances safety. Collisions to the towed vehicle don't endanger the towing vehicle. It's conceptual, but development is complimentary to other safety features so it's not "wasted" R&D.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0