Gens are everything

May 20, 2020 9:37 PM

beyondbeliev3

Views

120817

Likes

3526

Dislikes

68

Gens are everything

#amazing #cool#facts #mildly_interesting#science_and_tech

Talk about quarantining.

6 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

As an American, it’s hard to imagine having that kind of personal history in the area you live. Pretty cool

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't millions of people be living relatives?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm curious if the family ever left and came back...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also, this led me to research cheddar cheese. A quick googling shows it was in fact invented in Cheddar, England.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Let me blow your mind about Champagne, Black Forest Cake, and Ebola.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

History teacher shouting 'This is my history, this is my town' like someone out of Braveheart.

6 years ago | Likes 927 Dislikes 3

Really says something about the place, or the family having not moved for 300 generations

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I guess he's received a substantial inheritance.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I couldn't help but read that to the tune of "this is my rifle, this is my gun".

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Genes*

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thought that was Harvey Keitel for a second

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Imagine 300 generations of people not leaving your home town. Oof.

6 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 3

Yeah but they all boned, so... congrats on the poon, brah?

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Mmm... it didn't require all of them to stay, just one per generation long enough to mate.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Maybe it's a really nice town.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It'd have to be. Imagine telling someone to fuck off and accidentally insulting 3 members of your family in one go.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mind you, that WOULD be useful.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally everyone with European genes would be related to a European from 300 generations ago...

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Not this closely though.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A tough lineage... because we all know, it ain’t easy being cheesy.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Guy on the right looks like a cross between actors David Warner and Robert Englund.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They should totally put the DNA of all these old skeletons in 23 and Me. I'd love to know my relationship to them.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Super duper great grand dad has one hell of a tan for a Brit.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thats extremely British. This man wins every pub Brit-off. Cant be more English than this man. He won't brag though, cause thats not Britisg

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay, neat, but serious question: how is there not enough genetic drift over 300 generations to make knowing the ancestry impossible?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah. If you share half your DNA with each parent, you’ll share 4.9x10^-91 going back 300 generations...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You share 99% of your DNA with all humans. You share 90% with a banana.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Recently?!! This happened in ~1998!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The 90s was only ten years ago though

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's right

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good point. I was born 20 years ago, in the 80s

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why is Cheddar man black? If he's from England, or really any cold climate, then he is FAR more likely to be white.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Q: Why is he Black? _ A: Because science. ~~ Thank you.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've done reconstructions on both. They don't have strong evidence for what skin color was that far back.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First humans in Britain was 900,000 years ago. This Cheddar Man was only 9,000 years ago. The skin color should have adapted by that stage.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I'm black yo"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I visited chedder once. Cheese and there were goats chilling out on the cliffs....that's what I saw..

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn! I thought it was amazing to have traced my family tree back to the 1500s.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You should respect me, i'm 1/16th cheddar man

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And the rest? Is it too horrible to mention or is it all Gouda?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This guy's skin color makes Nazis so mad lol

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

"If you disagree, you're a nazi" sounds like fascism to me....

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

All I said was that Nazis really hate that a native of the British Isles had dark skin 80,000 years ago

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've read plenty of posts from dyed-in-the-wool Nazis about this exact case and boy do they get pissy about it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, calling people Nazis because they disagree with you is not at all what Nazis did. They were more into putting those people into camps

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well arnt we all related to people that lived 9k years ago?

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Statistically, yes. E.g. most Europeans are likely related to Charlemagne, but having evidence of that lineage is something else entirely.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're all related to different somethings that existed millions of years ago! MAGIC!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but finding a direct ancestor 1/2 mile from where you live is pretty cool. That's like great x 360 grandpa.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

What do you mean by direct ancestor? Everyone alive is either his ancestor or not.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Like...your grandparent is your direct ancestor, but your great aunt/uncle is not a direct ancestor, but still and ancestor.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

An ancestor is someone from whom you are descended. It's not the same as a relation.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you go back 9000 years theres no difference between aunts and grandparents. Imagine the multitude of paths you can take up the

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

continuously splitting family tree.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

iirc, he wasn't a *direct* ancestor, just a relative. Still pretty cool.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, well that's less exciting then. Damn

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think it's still exciting. I'm related to President William McKinley, and even though he was a bastard I think that's cool.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes that's true people are always on the move

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 198 Dislikes 0

Gneurshk

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That’s a human person

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That could mean different things.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hey can you hand me that rock over there?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Paint? Ffs, they've provided a photo taken 9,000 years ago. What more do you want??

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Recently? The cheddar man was excavated in 1903.

6 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 6

Yeah but dna wasn’t tested then

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but DNA testing is relatively recent. Fortunately they were able to extract DNA

6 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

Yup. He and the man Targett were found to have a common female ancestor. This was discovered 22 years ago.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Misplaced modifier. (Relatively) Recently the DNA was linked to descendant, not recently found skele. Let eat, grandma vs let's eat grandma

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The model is just another example of the idiots in academia today.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 12

They based a lot of it off of DNA. Including skin color.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Not exactly debunked, since current models are limited, and DNA is 10 000 years old.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Paywall

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jul 8, 2020 9:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

why'd they make him black?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because they truly don't have a clue what his skin color was.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part of the ongoing political assault on the English people and thier culture.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

while simultaneously a microagression slight against the primitive blacks. triple points

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yes - I didn't get that, but you're right.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

;)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They even gave him the patchy beard of an African.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Researchers made the model dark skinned on a lark, iirc.

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 12

Your comment was made on a lark. Researchers make models based on *checks notes* research.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's almost as though some research isn't peer-reviewed and is of very low quality, you doofus. https://blog.insito.me/slicing-cheddar-man-d

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's almost as though some research isn't peer-reviewed and is of very low quality, you doofus. https://blog.insito.me/slicing-cheddar-man-d

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They didn't, they based it off the DNA.

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

Paywall

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Do you have another source that isn't behind a paywall?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's ... not debunking. That's acknowledging the reality that models are built using inference and the consensus of best available data.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Until a …

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Apr 24, 2021 1:33 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1/ Obviously, you either don't understand what you're reading, or don't even have access to the full article. Turns out I do:

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

3/ Next time you want to wave the "debunked" flag, start with getting your facts straights, you massive buffoon.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

2/ "It’s not a simple statement of ‘this person was dark-skinned’," says Walsh. “It is his most probable profile, based on current research"

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Studies show that humans started developing a pale pigmentation around 8,000 years ago. Its a pretty safe bet he would be dark skinned.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

It is weird that pale blue and green eyes existed with the dark skinned inhabitants before lighter skinned people arrived. Interesting.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

What studies?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Michael Jackson did it in one generation

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

My university sociology teacher lectured that it takes 50,000 years

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

CITATION NEEDED 8,000 years is a very, very short time ago. You are very likely wrong.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

?1

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A quick google search comes back with a estimatiom between 125,00 and 65,000 years ago, when we began migrating away from the tropics.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Estimation* , 125,000*

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"we"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah....we humans.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For Cheddar Man at least.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not exactly debunked, since the DNA is degraded and current tools are limited. Besides, environmental factors should be considered.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Paywall

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"May" being the operative word in that headline…

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sorry, its not a study, it's an article.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And it talks about migration, not that people started developing lighter skin, a process that took place a lot longer ago than 8,000 years.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5