He isn't regarded was one of the world's top propagandist of all time for nothing

Dec 17, 2016 12:35 AM

Ventura2099

Views

76906

Likes

1563

Dislikes

79

I like that people are arguing about the origin of a meme depicting mass propaganda in the comments here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think you're referring to the Head Chef of Proper stanza, Steve Gaburble.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That title is a bit of a mess.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

regarded was one

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the deal. You're either a leader or a follower. Since most don't want to be leaders, you choose who to follow. Make the choice.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

@boobcat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you can tell something is propaganda. It isn't working the way it should.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*on you. It may work on millions of other people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gee, I wonder what you're trying to say...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Goebbels

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dear all: Goebbels wasn't at Nuremberg due to being fucking dead. Goering did say this, but it was horseshit then and still is now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How is it horseshit? That's how propaganda works. We've seen it repeatedly.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We're seeing it today.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, we are.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not from the Nuremberg Trials. From Goebbel's diary.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The grammar police have arrived. The future is past tense.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wat th hek z gonna on here?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do the words not ring true? Don't care if this is a quote from Ricky Bobbi.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Meh, History...we are doomed

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 17, 2016 7:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's how propaganda works.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Goering was commander of the Luftwaffe... Goebels perhaps?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Chief of propaganda was Joseph Gorbels

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 6

Gobbles

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Grobels is in Glasgow

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Goebbels*

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I think you mean Joseph Gerbils

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Joseph Turkeyman

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Turkey Stuffingjosephman

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No wait, Turkey Stuffingham the second

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's bad enough that it's true, but it's even worse that it still works after everyone has heard this. Our history education really sucks.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Absolutely true, lack of education nearly always being a part of the game plan of governments/regimes like Nazi Germany.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Eh. It's less a lack of information, and more that patriotism and nationalism are both very strong social forces. Every country has lots of1

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

people with all sorts of different views. To bring all those people into an organized polity where everyone, at the very least, buys into 2/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the idea that they're part of a broader country is really difficult. Germany in the 1800s, for example, required a massive nationalist 3/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

movement to create the country we know today out of numerous little princedoms and fiefdoms. Or look at pre (and post) revolution U.S. 4/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

where colonies (later states) saw one another almost as distrustful foreigners. 5/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Honestly I'm surprised this post wasn't downvoted to hell as it normally is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump is for peace and Prosperity. We voted right. WarHawking Obama and HRC, we dodged a bullet.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

Boots on the ground against ISIS is peace? Crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could have had Bernie, we donked up

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The way he completely rolled over for clinton soured him to me.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think you meant 'as'... I starred at the title for too long trying to make sense of it.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Lol it confused you for that long?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Auto correct

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

More like auto incorrect.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think you meant "stared"... I stared at your comment for too long trying to make sence of it.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I did. I also think you meant 'sense' it briefly looked over your comment and noticed that.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yah, my bad. Also I think you meant "I"... I briefly looked over your comment and noticed that.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

God dammit, I give up. lol

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Aw, I thought we were doing it on purpose... but then I forgot to misspell something in my last comment... :. \

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

SS delivered.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Luftwaffe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you're thinking of Goebbels.

9 years ago | Likes 281 Dislikes 6

Gerbils.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Why aren't you voted higher? Let's remedy that.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Goebbels should be considered one of the evilest masterminds of all time. His teachings are used everywhere by bad people to convince masses

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has done a terrible damage to modern society because he taught a way of messing with the society's mind to do whatever they want.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree. Definitely Goebbels

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Can someone explain this to my friend?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

1/3 Yess that could be true. Seen as that Goebbels was the minister of propaganda and he was very productive and quite succesfull in it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3/3The quote is in fact his but he was not the greatest propagandist in the world or even of the Nazi's.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't quote me on this, but I believe the quote should be attributed to Joseph Goebbels instead of Hermann Goering

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, this is a Goering quote, Goebbles is just the one who actually did it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not that versed on Nazi quotes. I was just explaining the other comment about it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/3Though he wasn't alive at the time of the trials (killed himself after the fall of Berlin)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or faked his death and moved to Argentina.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The quote is correct, and correctly attributed, but Goering wasn't the Nazi Minister of Propaganda.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

... the funny thing was the experiments they did trying to prove him wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which experiments?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Millgram Experiment, Stanford Prison experiment, all those scientists searching for aberrant brain structures and the study of Phrenology...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not following you. Weren't both of those experiments controversial because they seemed to show that "evil" as you put it, is (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

found in the heart of every man? In addition, I don't understand how any of this is linked to phrenology (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were really trying to prove the opposite.... and had very disturbing findings about how close evil really is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... all of them trying to prove that evil can be found in some malady or deformation of the mind, rather than in the hearts of every man.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel this is how Trump got elected. Mixed that with selling ideas people wanting to hear vs what's actually plausible and voila.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 14

Definitely a bunch of fear mongering, yes - immigrants, muslims. But also because he was the only candidate promising real change.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

(Not that I agree with it, personally I think he's a horrible choice which will lead to some really terrible stuff, worldwide.)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

People dont want millions of muslims & illegal mexicans entering. Theres no middle ground - its open free for all or someone else: trump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

The thing is looking over the things he said after he became PE he clearly just said a lot of things just to win. I know any president 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 does that but hear me out. He's acknowledge multiple times (drain the swamp incident, send her to jail thing, etc) that he had no real

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 intention on doing it. He just new it was a good seller. Truth be told I didn't like Trump at first but now I realize he's brilliant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 He played on what people felt and what sold rather than what he knew was actually plausible and he fucking won. That's genius if you ask

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump blatantly lied to you, saying "your life is terrible because those other groups of people." All his promises meant nothing to him.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Trump got elected because the Democrats took the rust-belt union workers who used to be the backbone of the party for granted.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 21

I'd say there's some truth in that and 140 characters isn't exactly the best way to fully elaborate but long story short: Hillary lost, he 1

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2 knew what sold (not what was actually going to happen), It was different for a change, and people who thought they had no voice have one.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Why are you downvoted? Also, why did she ignore WI and M? Because she took them for granted. You cannot just expect people to vote for you.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Furthermore, you just cannot ignore, then admonish voters when they DARED vote for Stein or whomever. People's votes are NOT your propriety.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

The same places trump was campaigning like crazy in the last days of the election. And people are suprised that hillary lost.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Why not both?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

If the election was effected by the Russians how did Hillary win the popular vote? Selective espionage/mind control?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

I don't follow your logic? They're not gonna be able to get 100% of the votes, they just did what they could and hoped it'd be 'enough'.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If Russian hackers have more of a say than the candidate nominated that speaks volumes for the candidate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Saying we have Intelligence that links Russia to the hacks is one thing claiming they influenced the election is another. I still 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Its how demos are trying to start a war with Russia currently. OH THEY ARE ATTACKING US! TRUST US ON THAT! DON'T BELIEVE THE FBI! BELIEVE US

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 16

And if you believe that Clinton/Obama want a war because Putin said they want a war, then you're believing Russia over the US. Why is that?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Then we have the fact that Clinton just wants a scape goat so her investors don't take their money back

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

I don't trust putin, I trust the FBI's statements. Clinton was majorly backed by media and Defense contractors who make bank on wars. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

What FBI Statements?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

FBI was against the findings of Russia hacking the us for months only after they've come under fire by the press/put in secret meetings (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

was there a reversal. No evidence was given by the CIA to the public and FBI's proof is still in the public (points to internal DNC leak)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

If you believe that Putin hasn't been attacking Europe/US with cyber warfare to make them weaker for Russia's gains, you're in denial.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Its a serious accusation to make. Where is the proof? CIA refused to share theirs with the ODNI while FBI has been transparent with findings

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

The CIA is still actively investigating the entirety of this, but the point remains that they are certain of this. And if you want to sit

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

it was someone Russian, and someone powerful pulling the strings. And Putin has already done this in several European nations.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So provide some evidence that it was even a Russian. All I here is half of our intelligence believes it was Russia.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

there and say "Putin is telling the truth, the CIA is lying", then think about how insane, and how borderline treasonous that sounds.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

How treasonous is it for the losing party to claim the election was rigged and offering no proof?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

And it's not a serious accusation to say "I trust Russia over the US's intelligence agencies?" We know enough info as is to know that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No I trust The FBI and their groups more as they've given all the evidence they can to the public CIA keeps hiding it all and says TRUST US

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Matters not whether theres a wall there, its whether adequate systems & policies r in place. Sanctuary cities are ridiculous criminal havens

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

I agree but the point I'm making is notice how his rhetoric changed. He practically went from "Yeah I'm going to do this!" to 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

stepping out, ill reply to you in few hrs. pls dont reply to yourself .to read convo i have to click your name. do this >

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

"Eh it's not that bad or that big of a deal." Honestly I'm not even upset I'm impressed. Previous presidents don't own up to it like he does

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Because he's suffers from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder and literally thinks he's a god, he can't *not* brag about duping voters.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

< like this and person sees all notifications & replies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Fair enough but I'm essentially done. Trump supporter or not just look at how he's changed his message so drastically and see what I'm sayin

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sorry for late reply. I understand your point & i agree with it in part. Of coursed its embellished. i dont think going after clinton>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you say we are sold on a lie. Absolutely not true at all. His election is best thing for the western sphere in a long time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3< immigration policies for starters. Enough kowtowing to islam.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then again, sometimes there *IS* a clear and present existential threat to a country and you'd be an idiot not to be for neutralizing it.

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 13

As long as neutralizing doesn't mean killing, I am all for that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like Covid! Plenty of people choose not just to ignore it, but willingly spread it with no care for others!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the acception of propoganda :]

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

Did you mean "acceptation?" Do you mean the prior commenter is "accepting" propaganda as true

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The problem is in how you react to some other country following THEIR propaganda. Should France have never gone to war when invaded?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The Russians in world war 2?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

History is much more clear than anything we will personally encounter.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Of course. Just stating that it does occur. Difficult to sift through what we are shown by the media though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

neutralise? hell we elected it

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 8

I don't know many Americans that spell neutralize with an 's.'

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think spelling it with a Z looks weird. Both spellings are considered correct. Im definitely american

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The only thing I dread for the next four years is the left melodramatic hand-wringing. Lets make the safe spaces nice and quiet children.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

I would be somewhat distressed if abortion is banned or gays face forced electroshock conversion therapy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

None of that is going to happen. You're just proving my point.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah it's not like you have people in some of the most powerful positions in the country who wants to push for that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Fuck you. The only thing you'll see these hands do is flip you and your fake president the bird.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I didn't vote for him but that doesn't make you and your ilk any less annoying.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

You are funny. It's annoying to care about things? Fuck you who ever you voted for.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Yea! Like Russia! Hacking our election! Hacking HRC!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

If you're more outraged by them hacking than you are about what was in the emails you never cared about a clean election to begin with.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 28

EXACTLY! Typically the dems and their media hacks don't think they did anything wrong. The truth got out about their unlimited corruption

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's obvious the emails were hacked, faked and given to WL! If you dont believe it you are LITERALLY HITLER!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For all I know it could have been a puss ed off tech savvy Bernie supporter who was pissed she fucked him over.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No you've got to get with the narrative. It was the Russians, WW3 with the Russians is preferable to a Trump presidency!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nobody is saying they weren't hacked prove who did it before creating an international incident!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*If you're more outraged by them hacking than you are about what was in the emails you have read the mails. There is nothing in them

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The emails hacked showed why they lost. Had they nominated Bernie he would have wiped the floor with Trump. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Abstained*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I said from day 1 the only way I would vote for Trump was if Hillary won the nomination. I would have obtained if Bernie won. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4