Quite a publicity stunt.

Jul 3, 2016 3:44 PM

InformativeWalrus

Views

54281

Likes

1651

Dislikes

74

My dad had a bumper sticker"Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them here" And that's why I've always been an organ donor

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 19, 2016 9:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

no you don't, you just have to be fairly freshly dead, i think the rule of thumb is 24 hours? though it might be closer to 12

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I donated a kidney to my brother 32 years ago...you're damn right I'm an organ donor...in life and afterlife.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Be car-ful what you wish for.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I am/was a biker. I donate to air ambulance and am a donor, cus it'd be awkward if I got air lifted and didn't pay a penny towards it. (2-

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

2) they don't get any funding from the government. And If I kick the bucket it'd be a waste to chuck my body out the window.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I you refuse to donate, you can't receive any organs either, that's how it should be, makes the choice a lot easier.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That would actually be fair. The system should be opt-out instead of opt-in in that case.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly.. If you consciously opt-out, you will not receive any benefits (unless you're medically excluded, then it's out of your hands)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

smoothest recovery ever

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Come on now... your telling me they don't just take our organs anyways. Who would know? Anyone asked to see the organs in the casket

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

oxygen pumping through for organs to be viable, it's not like they can turn off the machines wait for family to mourn then turn it back on.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

now other donations like tissue, bones & joints. Likely quite a few shady dealings but they also aren't high in demand or life dependent

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plus that hole is way too small.

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 4

The car will fit in nicely when it's cremated

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably just really deep

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean, wouldn't dropping it in nose first damage it? You'd want a fairly shallow car sized hole.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He's burying it. Why would it matter?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Who wants to drive a dented Bentley around in the afterlife (and does heaven have valet parking?)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's heaven. You don't walk in as a grinded up pile of meat, you come in as you truly are.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The car will go in the hole vertically, as if he died from an accident by driving in to a ditch and went through the front glass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some people believe u still need them in the afterlife.. Kinda weird.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not terribly weird. I'm an organ donor and I have a belief about wholeness of remains. It's why I wish to have what's left of me in a tomb

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact, it was not buried.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like i've absolutely destroyed mine thus far and am afraid that i'll give them away and then they'll die from a heart attack day 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you're a donor with bad parts, they arn't going to put them in someone else. they use your body for education instead.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I tried to be an Oregon donor...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently you're not allowed to give away a state when you die.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I already have the paperwork filled out. Organ donor then the rest is to be donated to science. Cremated and returned home when they're done

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As deep as the cars grave

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, he's not wrong

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rich want the poor to donate their organs. As seen in many SciFi movies.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

So we’ve always just been obsessed about what others do with their own bodies huh? Incredible

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because socialism. Make a market for organs and we will have plenty.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 18

You're so fucking stupid, i have no clue how you made this comment.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let's see. High demand. Price controls set to zero. Large shortages. Sounds like socialism to me.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Or maby supply is low because most organs are needed to live. The same problem is in the US and everywhere else. Its not a socialist prob.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can't sell them because the government controls the market and set the price to zero.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What are you talking about? i don't give a shit about that part... The second part is the most stupid thing i have ever heard.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If people could get paid for their organs there would be plenty available.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The fact that you cannot see the biggest flaw ever in your idea hurts my eyes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Through human trafficing, even donating a kidney can really change how you live, so most would not. As well as you know needing your heart.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't that what doctors, emts, ambulance drivers call bikers?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sometimes, but only as a joke (dark humor) They are there to save lives, they couldn't live with holding back any treatment or effort

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've always heard that they will be less inclined to save your life if you are in critical condition so they can get them body parts.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I heard that they won't medicate you too much or shock you too many times if you're a donor. They won't "try" as hard to preserve the organs

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why would they care less about you than they care about the person who gets the new body part?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Untrue. Emergency personnel could not live with that decision, we do not play God. We only intervene and do our best to avoid death.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think that it should be an opt out system, instead of opting in. The people who have solid reasons for not donating would opt out. -->

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 8

I wouldn't even require solid reason. Many people (who don't want it now) wouldn't even want to be bothered to go somewhere to opt out

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone else would be a donor by default.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 3

yep. we are lazy. best to have a donor by default system.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This is how it works where I live. You don't really need a reason to opt out, but you do need to do paperwork, so most people don't bother

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I agree, but bodily autonomy prevents it from happening. It could become a slippery slope to abortion becoming illegal in some places.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I don't see how the two are related at all?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In an opt-out system people are assumed to want to give up (part of) their body for other people, even when they haven't made 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 a conscious decision to do so. Pro-lifers could use this bodily autonomy breach to take the choice of abortion away from people.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I work in donation and that's how it works for some tissue. Unless specifically stated non-donor, we ask the family if we can proceed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I almost wrote that exact same thing. Glad you got to it first. At least I'm not the only one who believes this

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes, this should be the bare minimum

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That´s how it works in Austria.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only down side of this is undiagnosed transmittable diseases or wankers not saying that have something that could affect the recipient

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd assume the medical staff test for many things. We have opt out-solution now, before that the opt in system was "make it known that you 1

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

wish to be donor." Card in wallet was enough, or just saying to somebody before you die, there was no control for that. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's a good reason to opt out? This is a real question, I can't think of one

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hello, perusing random: I have diabetes, which should automatically disqualify me as a donor; I want to, but all my organs are affected.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HIV, CANCER etc I'm a donor but a lot of reasons why u should if u know u have something that can be past by blood

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Religions preference is really the only one I've ever heard of. Some people just don't want to be opened up and had things taken from -->

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Their body. Some people think it's disrespectful and disturbing the corpse and because of that it might have an effect on their afterlife-->

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Another reason might be medical problems, like hep c or hiv or some other thing that could be transfered to the receiver. I would hope -->

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is thorough testing so it wouldn't really matter if you were a donor or not. They wouldn't use diseased organs for transplant.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some people are also worried that being an organ donor might work against them if they're unconscious in the hospital.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Good point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except he can sell his Bentley for a lot of profit. Can my wife sell my organs after I die? Why am I expected to give them away for free?

10 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 56

Nah, Bentleys and rolls royces depreciate pretty quickly, you can pick one up for about 10k, a decent one for 20-30.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

well yeah you can sell them for a lot more than that car and you can save lives too

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#justcapitalistthings

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because what you may be giving away for free may be the most valuable gift another could receieve

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Don't care. I would rather gift my family multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars to guarantee their future first.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He's not going to profit from selling his Bentley after he's dead, genius. And because it's helping someone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If the poor could die for the rich, they'd make a good living.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Martin Shkreli?

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

Do you know how much organs go for? That would set my family up for years. Why should I not want that after I die?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Do doctors do the transplant for free?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Doctors make a ton of money off of organ donations, so I think they do.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They do it for free because they get a lot of money for it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, yeah. You donate the organs, they cut you open. You don't pay them anything, and they make money. Organs are expensive.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why should someone have to pay for an organ they absolutely need in order to live from someone who is dead and cannot use it anymore?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because your body legally belongs to your next of kin. Why should they not benefit from the sale of a very expensive asset?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

if organ transplants were free you'd have a point there, but it costs about 1 million dollars to get a new heart already

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what's so wrong about wanting to make things easier on the people you leave behind by getting some of the profit from that?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well the black market will take them if you selling them, just saying

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't be silly, only *doctors* can make a profit off your organs when you die.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

Because you're possibly saving a fucking life

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Sure. So? My family could greatly benefit from that sale, and I care a lot more about helping them than some anonymous organ recipient.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i think its just nice to give your organs to someone who needs it to keep living. you're already dead. Throwing money into this is greedy

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Do you not have a family to provide for? What happens to them after you die? Why would you not guarantee a huge sum of money for them?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean, I wouldnt rely on the sale of my organs to sustain them after I die.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What'd you pay for your organs? Nothing? Oh, and how many lives can a Bentley save? Cone on now.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Cause creating such a legal market would create an ethical dilemma. Also, making it easier to sell organs would make it more "worth it" (1)

10 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 6

for people to steal your organs. And finally, organs are that expensive cause people don't generally donate them. Supply and Demand.

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 3

Why an ethical dilemma? If I have them I choose to sell them to a particular person I think deserves it. Yes rich may have more access

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 24

Because if it was legal someone would kill you and take your organs to sell for profit you twit.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

PS. this can be exploited. "You're poor and can't provide for your family. Kill yourself, give me your lungs and I'll give money to them"

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

What an amazing opportunity

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Exactly, poor people would die waiting for an organ that no one donates cause why donate when you can sell while rich people would just (1)

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Simple. Just cap the price of the organ. Insurance companies will gladly pay for organs as long as the cost isnt astronomical because...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...getting a transplant over with quickly is cheaper keeping someone alive on a waiting list. A cap of $50k might be a good deal for both.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

buy them. Should we prioritize who lives and who dies based on personal wealth? Is ones life more important and sacred than someone else's?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Yes.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

I'm pretty sure your value to society determines your place on the donation list, stateside. Please prove me wrong, Imgur.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

That's exactly what happens now. Who would get a heart first? Bill Gates or Bill from Accounting?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it? Because there's a guy named Rockefeller who got his sixth heart transplant recently at age 99. But his wealth is mere coincidence?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because helping humans is the right thing to do? You don't need them

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Right. I'm helping my family by providing them a significant source of money immediately following the loss of my income.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We clearly have different opinions... I don't think human organs should be valued like that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the most retarded thing I've read today. You're DEAD. Your organs mean NOTHING TO YOU.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 18

1/2 Commonly respecting wishes for your body after you are dead helps strengthen the concept of personal power during life. You wouldn't

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's still their body. they get to choose what they want to do with it. (seriously though, all a gov't would have to do to have 90%+

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There is nobody that would qualify to "their" in "their body". The person is dead, only corpse remains.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

organ donations from its citizens is to make it so you have to opt out of organ donating)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

People who died and left their families with large amounts of debt could use their organs to help pay down that debt? Maybe?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

This^ I want my funeral to be covered and my close family be taken care of for X ammount of years (whatever my stuff is worth) by whoever

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So take out life insurance. Or save some cash in a box.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Harvests my guts (government/private practice/whatever)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The monetary value would mean a lot to my family after I'm dead. Heart, lungs, kidneys, and liver are about half a million dollars.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

How much are they worth to the person who actually needs them?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hopefully a few hundred thousand dollars, because the organs aren't theirs until money changes hands. Someone will be waiting to buy them.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its only worth that to people who have disposable income.Tthe poor might want to pay that price but have no means. Way more poor then rich

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and it's a bad investment, most organs only last 5-10 years after transplant. So loans wouldn't happen

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and not to mention lots of diseases and viruses are missed in initial screening. congratulations you got a new heart and hep C

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 apply the logic in that statement to your financial property, another personal power. I don't see why I can't apply this counterexample.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey you, piece of shit, get your head out your ass and think about your husband, wife, family, .. who could maybe use the money. Asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm the asshole? You're the on suggesting my family should hawk bits of my dead body to the highest bidder. Classy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't get why people aren't Organ donors... like what do you need them for if you're dead, irritating

10 years ago | Likes 507 Dislikes 15

I just cant be fucked to fill out all the paperwork associated with it. Streamline the process and im in

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Bang me, eat me, grind me up into little pieces, throw me in the river. Who gives a shit? You're dead, you're dead!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think most people don't like knowing their loved ones were cut open like a frog in science class, despite the benefits

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

it's an extra checkmark on a form that most people are filling out quickly. It should be an opt out not an opt in system.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I feel like most people lab more things unchecked rather than checked on such forms

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I knew a guy that was an edge lord that just didn't like helping people in general

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's sort of like fucking with a corpse in a way. I think of it like that but I'll still donate my organs when I'm dead, well I want them 2b

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

For me, it's the moral and ethical question of the human body as a bag of spare parts. Even in death, that's a line not to cross.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

I don't get it. You're dead and you could save someone else's life. They are no use to you anymore

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Right. Also, would be kinda cool to live on in someone else.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Some people suspect that doctors won't commit as much to saving them in the event of an accident.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Completely untrue. They don't even know one way or the other until you can't have meaningful recovery and then they ask your family. Rn

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Well its on your License here if you are

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey, I am an organ donor. I'm explaining why some others aren't. Conspiracy theorists are immune to facts.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not like you're being wheeled into the ER, they look at your donor card and... wheel you into the "other ER"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are some religious beliefs about wholeness of the body after death, you know. Though I believe I will be unwhole in the beyond, I am-

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

still an organ donor. I could always die young and relatively healthy, with some organs intact.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup, also don't get people who do that for religious reasons. I mean your beliefs die with you, and saving someone else should be worth more

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because magic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One rational reason I've heard is from people saying they don't want a regular trading market for human organs making shady things happen.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My baby girl would have spent 30 days in the NICU hooked up to machines dying instead of in our arms at home. There are very valid 1)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Reasons to choose not to donate. The process is hardly talked about for people who die a slow death and it changed my opinion on donation.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

people are scared that if they are donors and in a life/death situation that they will let them die for healthy body parts

10 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 4

I'm sure that's a really small possibility but even so at the point a doctor would make that decision you must be leaning towards death

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That rumor is so fucking stupid. Maybe in the jungles of Fuckistan where the mad king rules, but not in a civilized fucking country.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Just another case of someone hearing some stupid rumor and making life or death decisions.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Exactly! Hippocratic oath, anyone?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That shits optimal yo.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Emergency workers have absolutely nothing to do with organ harvesting. HIGHLY flawed logic.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

This is why I'm not a donor, parents told me this when I first got my licenses and it has stuck w/ me since.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's actually why I'm not a donor. Iowa can't get over that fear.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 15

Well, if it helps, EMT's will actually try to keep a donor's heart beating longer, to keep their organs viable, increasing recovery chances.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

emts dont check if youre an organ donor, all organ donors come from death at the hospital.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*I (not Iowa)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Seriously?! That's not how those decisions are made

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

I know, but I can't get over that fear. Believe me, I'm trying.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 8, 2016 4:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not quite so simply, but in essence. Body parts are only good for so long, so people have to make resuscitate vs organ harvesting.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The trauma doctors aren't even on the organ transplant committees. They deliberately separate them to avoid a conflict of interest.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

So how are people dying waiting for hearts and a guy named Rockefeller is on his sixth at age 99? Money makes no difference until it does

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Well, no one knows if you need them after death in any sort of spiritual capacity. The unknown unsettles people greatly.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I feel I need to put a disclaimer on that statement: I'm not saying there is or will be, just that it cannot be proven either way 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

and, should a time come when it can be proven/disproven on grounds of discovery (science is great) people would be more at ease.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

lol, that's the problem with belief. It ignores evidence to the contrary cause it's faith without evidence

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just because science hasn't proven something yet doesn't mean it won't. Plenty of things were discovered that were thought mystical prior.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I've told my friends I should be gutted like a fish, organs, veins, eyes, hell even the fat if someone wants a badonkadonk implant.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I don't like people that much

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ikr. Steal my face when I'm dead too. I don't care. I'm gunna be cremated because coffins are a waste of money.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because they're mine.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

its cool if you dont want to but i think of them as old toys/clothes, better they get a 2nd life than buried.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Owning people and stuff, if she could sell your organs she might have an incentive to kill you

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Pride... most people don't want to know that there organs are crap from a lifetime of bad choices & and would likely be binned.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

You do know to be an organ donor you say "Yes I want to be an organ donor" and that's literally it.......

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

drivers licence was just that. health card/insurance asked 4 questions that had me wondering. live donation or blood really lays it out

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah when you're splattered they don't care as long as it has a little <3 on it. They check your records and organs pretty thoroughly

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

my primary reason is all my health issues. also there are people with religious and respect reasons

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

In other words for healthy people; no reason.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Respect?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

yes, a lot of cultures find taking organs without permission to be disrespectful

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Respect for the dead, it's apparently rude to some that you're removing their loved ones' organs

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm an organ donor! I've donated 7 hearts, 4 lungs, 10 kidneys, and 13 spines. No one ever wants the spines :(

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Lol +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lived in England for a while, so they're afraid my organs have mad cow hiding in them

10 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 2

They can test shit like this

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least you're not welsh, their sheep have other things hiding in them

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Actually this is a common misconception. You may still be able to donate your organs but not your tissues. You can not give blood though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same. Makes me mad I can't even donate blood. I haven't lived there in 25 years, pretty sure I would know by now if I had mad cow disease

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They can test shit like this

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually this is a common misconception. You may still be able to donate your organs but not your tissues or blood.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But organs are tissues

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I had lived in Germany in the 80s and have been told by workers at LifeSource (the organ transplant center in MN) it's ok to be a donor

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am a registered organ donor, filled it out when I got my dl. But just assumed that when the time came if the restriction was in place 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

still that they just wouldn't take them. Glad to know it doesn't affect organ donation. Still pretty dumb about blood donation though 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0