This will never get old.

Mar 21, 2017 4:43 PM

largefarva99

Views

24873

Likes

1325

Dislikes

469

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Really because I was over this election crap when it was actually happening.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 20

When we realize he wasn't lying about it being rigged, we just thought he meant the other direction

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's still accurate in the way of losing the popular vote, and he still thinks it was rigged.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

I take issue with her sign. It is rigged and we are all losing...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He never said it was rigged in Hillary's favor, that I heard. Only that it was rigged.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

well... technically he did lose

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Let's not be Russian to judgment

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Well, at this rate, neither will the average Middle Class American.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah cos this scenario really worked out for you guys didn't it. Fucking idiot.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 11

I'm pretty happy

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

Then you're definitely a fucking idiot

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Is it really so hard to believe that a reasonable person could disagree with you politically?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's funny because it was rigged the other way

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

When he's impeached, it will.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 17

Trigger me timbers.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16

Cool. Moving on from that, Trump is destroying your fucking country.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 13

So fighting the corrupt govt of a country is destroying it... Sweet summer child. drudgereport dot com.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Yeah, he is. But then, so would Hilary. Just in different ways.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 16

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

This is just perfection

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Gotta hand it to the guy - his troll game is beyond epic.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

@sarah - can we get a delete button on mobile for when comments bug out and double post?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta hand it to the guy - his troll game is beyond epic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha true

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speaking of things that aged poorly:

9 years ago | Likes 350 Dislikes 17

He fucking knew.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, like a month later it became reality ha

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Beat me to it...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You've got nothing to laugh about. You're only highlighting the stupidity of the American electorate, who voted/elected Trump!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

If only that was a joke...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hahahahaaaaa

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

Wish I could have a beer with that guy sometime.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

By around 3m votes right?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

San Francisco and New York by themselves produced 3M more votes for Hilary Clinton vs Donald Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you actually checked, you'd find you really are losing ,comrade

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

We make fun of her for being wrong, but she used "it's" and "you're" correctly. I like her.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Jesus Christ, will someone tell these people that politics isn't a team sport.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 12

If it didn't have teams, it would just be a bureaucracy. And then the "independents" wouldn't be able to look down their noses at everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

We're not sure that it isn't, though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Election coverage sure made it seem like a sporting event.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still correct though. Wasn't rigged, but now everybody is losing.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

I don't have an answer, but those are cat ears.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I sure am glad the totally not corrupt and "no time for vacations!" Donald Trump got elected instead! фантастика!!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

What does the Russian part mean?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"fantastic"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 23

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

*v

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's not about the election, dumb-ass. It's about the possibility of a adversarial foreign power entrenching themselves in our government.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 14

like … saudi arabia? china?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yes, a pox on both their houses. That doesn't really absolve Donald Trump though, does it, & his ties with Russia are far closer, it seems.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right. Through the election.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But no one worth listening to is saying "Hey, if we can prove Trump is aligned with Russia then Clinton will be President!" is my point.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This image is literally about the election

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're safe now, China and the Saudis have lost a lot of control here now that Clinton and pals are out of power.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Much like the children that used to be dependent on Medicaid.

9 years ago | Likes 377 Dislikes 32

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

I think you meant ACA, but that's okay. It's not important to be accurate as long as you're enjoying your liberal circlejerk.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

The ACA raised the Medicaid level so people who weren't poor enough could get help to buy insurance most republican states didn't allow it

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

it reimbursed extra medicaid during a window, then ended it to leave the states to make up the difference-unfunded mandate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Um.. Trump didn't cut Medicaid?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 24

Thank you. It's up to the states.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

Whoosh

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

S use me, Trumps budget has $880 BILLION in Medicaid cuts. Google it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Maybe people should stop having kids if they can't afford to fund their health... now awaiting the wave of angry, logic hating downvotes.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

What good does this viewpoint do for the millions of poor kids alive who had no say in the families they were born into?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Admittedly, very little. However, it does give us a good reason to not make future risks.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

True, but policy has to be made to protect and serve citizenry that's already alive.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate to say it, but sometimes it is necessary to take losses in order to cull an unstable dependency.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I only downvoted because of the dick comment at the end

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Well, at least I'm good at hockey. So I've got that going for me.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

You realize some people/family become poor AFTER they have children. Sustainable income is not garunteed.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm willing to put money on the idea that this isn't the majority case.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm not really entirely sure how the American system works but why would you just not insure your children?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Medicaid is given to children who's parents can't afford insurance

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I tworks like this: Big Gov (loved by the left) and Big Med (loved by the right, and left) conspire to loot all your cash.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kids covered under medicaid are low income.I insure my child through my work insurance (runs about 500/mo for her)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I hope you have a low deductible at that price.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Only 13.5k. Total bill is about 840/mo for the three of us.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's double my deductible, and more than triple my premium. =O

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much do you earn? Someone earning £40k in the UK (av income for UK family) 2013ish would only pay £1800 in taxes for the NHS

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I see. Have they given any statement as to what people like that should do or is their stance just "tough titty"?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Stop being poor...

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Don't buy an I-Phone.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Grab bootstraps -> Pull

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

"what about the children" is sophist bullshit. poor kids are covered

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So all these other people are lying about the ACA?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 12, 2021 10:19 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

then*, and also if you believe that, you're an asshole. (But if you're just repeating what the GOP believes for clarity, that's okay.)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I'm an asshole for thinking that if you financially support a behavior people will be more likely to exhibit it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The health insurance is one thing but in general you shouldn't be having kids if you can't provide for them. That's just common sense.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

So have thorough sex ed (NOT abstinence only), easy access to free contraception, and abortions. But... the right doesn’t want those either.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

it's funny because trump bitched about rigged elections but if anything they were rigged in his favour.

9 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 60

I can tell by your spelling of "favor" your opinion doesn't matter, ya hoser.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 12

He has been accusing pretty much everyone of exactly the things he does and has been doing, and has done that the entire time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Classic misdirection!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ka-kow

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is like how people who cheat accuse their spouses of cheating on them.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I mean define rigged. Media was clearly slanted against him. But that's democratic, even if it's disingenuous

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The media could have just stuck to legitimate criticism of Trump, but they overextended and made themselves look bad.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And in the process gave undecided people a reason not to vote for Hillary or the media

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

False equivalence is how we got here. Trump did more dumb shit than HRC so the media covered his moronic exploits more.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah, they tunneled on superficial "deficiencies" more. Which is the main reason he won. That and people sick of status quo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no no, he said they're only rigged if he lost!

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 9

Quite literally he said "If I lose this election, it was rigged". Which he knew for sure, because Russia rigged it.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

he still believes they are rigged so nope

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In Colorado (IIRC) he just had the state handed to him and he pointed out that none of his followers cared no one got a chance.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, he said they were rigged, hard stop. But he'd accept the results if he won. He still says they were rigged because he lost popular vote

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

To say that I'm gonna accept the results ONLY if I win is extremely paradoxical. A rigged election cannot produce ANY legitimate winner.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He says that he won the popular vote if you don't count the millions of illegal votes (that there is zero evidence of).

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

No. He said "If I lose this election, it was rigged.". Direct quote from his departure from a rally (I believe in Texas).

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except they weren't rigged.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 23

Don't you remember the millions of illegal voters who stole the popular vote from Trump?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Yes. They were

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 32

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Compelling argument. I see you put a lot of thought in your reply. Cuck.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 16

Ok, your claim is complete bullshit on every level. You source will inevitably be a crappy conspiracy theory site backed by more bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

*Checks off 'cuck' on alt-right conspiritard bingo*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There's nothing to argue here. You're just retarded.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Anyone who doesn't suck Obama's cock gets a downvote

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 17

Nice coping method your got there

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Aww thanks ;)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

rigged, no. Unduly influenced by propaganda efforts by a foreign power, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

cnn, nbc, nytimes, washington post are all american … well, mostly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't follow.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

influencing the election

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They how do you explain the elections of hundreds of Republicans in down ballot races? Those influenced too?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

There is evidence of Russian tampering down ballot too, yes, but Replublicans actually lost seats overall.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Source.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I mean gerrymandering is a legal way to rig elections. So they were a little rigged yeah. But all elections have been soo....

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Those have no impact on the presidential run.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

It does in Maine and Nebraska. They do it by district actually. And while direct impact may be small having a mainly republic congress has

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

source?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Common sense? Electoral college votes are divided by state, not congressional district

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The...fact that Congressional Districts are for Congressional elections only?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

a large impact on the presidential election, and part of the reason that congress is so republican is gerrymandering.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

individual states draw their own districts, not congress

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

lol to this getting downvoted. maybe people think that republicans were engaged in gerrymandering on the state level. playing the long game

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No joke; it went down like -3. It's an objective truth - we vote Statewise in the US, not by Congressional district.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1