Smithway
8813
296
70
May 1, 2017 5:00 PM
Smithway
8813
296
70
garrett53
Hillary knows best, she was under sniper fire once.
Peregrine2976
All politics aside, I'd rather die in a war than lose my e tire family in a war and live in, alone.
OMFGWhatHaveWeDONE
ginro
One would argue that living without the ones you love is worst than not living at all.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Smithway
ditto
unclemeat70
Identity politics at its finest.
regretthisalready
"Marriage is always between a man and a woman" -H.C.
leechdemon
Man, you're right - guess I won't be voting for HER in the 2016 election!
Smithway
same
Caprin
Great example of hypocrisy in accusing "snowflakes" of intentional misinterpretation for outrage. Clearly means LIVING victims, not dead.
bobthebuilder707
It doesn't work that way either cause a father can lose his son and so on.
Iamblaine
I take it the constant attention on clinton is a bad attempt to deflect how shit the. Actual president is?
Oobiewankadoobie
Honestly don't even watch the news how is Trump shit what has he been doing?
nitoureal
They're both pieces of shit, and we can mathematically prove it
iAmNotArobotUsually
Just saying, Hillary hasn't looked like that in quite some time.
Smithway
every time I look at her I just see a lizard person who hates humans
DNJANinSFL
You have to understand that from her point of view men are just tools to be used so the woman are victims and now left to do everything
Seanspeed
That's not what she was saying at all. But hey, ignorant circle jerk has gotta go on.
DamnedAustin
Wrong!
DNJANinSFL
Of course not; the men are all dead so they don't get to count anymore, so really the woman or survivors are the true victims
DNJANinSFL
Sorry sarcasm doesn't come through so easily... But this is a Sarcastic Post!
DamnedAustin
Wrong!
UrKungFuNoGood
so a murder victim isn't a victim? TIL
DNJANinSFL
According to Hillary, no the victim is not. She is saying the victim is the family and friends of the one who was murdered
ThatRaccoonGuy
Yeah, Clinton was poop, with her only selling point whatsoever being "Not Trump".
Seanspeed
You can really tell who wasn't paying attention and got their news from Imgur and Facebook.
DoughnutJimmy
And vice versa...
Smithway
I thought it was because shes a woman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJq3H1dlnk
ThatRaccoonGuy
Yeah. That's some dedicated effort to have a worse campaign than Trump.
DamnedAustin
Another (willful) misunderstanding of what is being said. If two men are dueling and one of them is shot, you wouldn't call that person (1)
Seanspeed
Yea but her emails!
DamnedAustin
a "victim" of a shooting. If those same two men are dueling and one of them shoots a bystander, you would call that bystander a victim. (2)
DamnedAustin
Civilian women (and children, and men) have been casualties of every war in modern history. (3/3)
Smithway
Its pretty clear cut what she said
DamnedAustin
Yet you still don't understand.
UrKungFuNoGood
Hardly ne1 here understands identity politics is so completely in control of their lives they'll defend quotes like that ONLY 4 their team.
DamnedAustin
I call 'em as I see 'em.
UrKungFuNoGood
Maybe you can start a petition to change how people report "murder victims" since the people murdered aren't actually victims?
NoFather
It must be hard to cling to ridiculous things she said in 1998 when Trump has said ridiculous shit every day since.
HalphPint
/a/hr4wn
darthheyburt
Oooooo deflector shields up!
Smithway
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDrfE9I8_hs lol
Strostkovy
I don't understand the downvotes. I love that video.
worldsokayestspeler
I mean, we can make fun of both of them. OP never said Trump was smart. Or anything about Trump for that matter.
waitwasthatreal
Every human says ridiculous things all the time. Bush, Obama, Hillary, and Trump all do. Trump has a thing about ensuring everyone hears him
maniacalmacaroni
To say that the things that the 3 of them said were as ridiculous as the things Trump says is absurd. Not everything is subjective.
waitwasthatreal
First, how ridiculous a statement is is subject in itself. Second polling people would also be subjective. To get an objective measure you>>
waitwasthatreal
Would have to create a ridiculousness scale and then comb through all of each of their statements. So yes it is clearly subjective. >>
waitwasthatreal
Additionally my point is that we hear more of trump's ridiculousness because it is covered more and he tweets it himself often.
maniacalmacaroni
Even if we just looked at it mathematically, I'm rather certain that polling would show that Trump's statements are more ridiculous and more
maniacalmacaroni
Frequent, and more people think so.
NoBagels
You know it, I know it, everybody knows it