Definitely not sorry

Jul 31, 2016 9:36 PM

bringbackthewalkman

Views

49345

Likes

1558

Dislikes

392

If you bike on the road and blow red lights, slow down traffic, or bike on the highway (????) to hell with you. The roads were honestly built for cars.

I get that bikes can and should be used for transport, but you are honestly no more important than car drivers. I am more than fine sharing the roads but I'm tired or seeing bikers blow through lights or biking on a highway..

I take side streets if I'm biking. No reason to block traffic . Some bike riders are complete idiots.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Has anyone else ever been tailgated in a bike lane? Still, I do agree with you, though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The other side of the coin: don't pass a cyclist on a road without a shoulder if a vehicle is approaching in the other lane.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As a cyclist, I couldn't agree more. I fucking hate it when douchers interpret, "share the road" as "ride wherever the fuck I please."

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Exactly! You can't pick and choose which law you want to follow, when you want.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why do we upvote this shit

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I run a red light all the time where I live. Because it's after midnight and it doesn't sense a bike at the intersection and no walk signals

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But I'm just here taking a nice stroll at 5mph in a 35mph zone. Fuck you, haters.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I work in a area where a lot of bikers/triathletes live, and I can say that most of them (not all of them) are ass holes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If there isn't a bike lane on a 4 lane (2 by 2) road, it's safer to bike towards the middle of the right lane to claim it.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Not doing so encourages cars to try and overtake you, which could result in you getting hit, and dying.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

All of that being said, follow traffic laws fellow bikers. At least stop for reds and Idaho stop at 4 way stopsigns.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even though I know it's not possible/feasible, it would help if more roads had bike lanes.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It's something they're working on pretty hard in my city (Toronto). They started adding bike lanes on a major DT street just this morning.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's feasible. People need to break this mold that cars are the only way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I commute to work on my bike to save money on public transport (2.75 per ride now.) Cars need to signal. I pay attention to that, too.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depending on where you live bikers have different rules, including some that let them 'blow red lights' in certain circumstances.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

There's a lady that does this from lexington,ky, where there is an abnormally large emergency lane on a major roadway with a 55 spew limit

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

She's been the subject of a lot of debate in town and says she can't ride in the emergency lane because of gravel on the road. Fuck her.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Drivers and cyclist break as many laws as each other, it's a human problem.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

#bikelivesmatter

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Gross oversimplification. Drivers go a little faster than they ought to and follow more closely than they should, and some don't signal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most cyclists I have seen ignore *all* stop signs and traffic lights and I'm sure they would speed too if it were possible without having a

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

heart attack. Between going 5 over and blowing through traffic lights, guess which is more dangerous?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 Many stops exist only to slow drivers, not because there is heavy traffic, and it is impractical for a cyclist to restart every few blocks

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they treat stops as yields because they have lower speed, negligible stopping distance, and 100% visibility.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck you if you park your car in a bike lane

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 9

As someone who will never bike to work, fuck yeah!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Dear OP, in the New York drivers manual, it says that bikes have as much priveledge to use the roads as cars do, and they must follow rules

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Oh I def slow down traffic, I'm not in good enough shape to pull a constant 45 so fuck me then

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

If you're doing that in rush hour? Then yes. You're a rolling lane closure.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's one thing to slow down traffic a little bit so they can safely pass you. It's another to make it impossible to safely pass you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Downvote? Seriously? I was saying he was fine doing what he was, he wasn't being the kind of asshat we're discussing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you don't bwlieve cyclists should be able to bike on the road, you're clearly not fine with sharing the road.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

Pretty sure OP means he hates people who ride in the road and don't follow the rules not all people who ride in the road

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Considering that slowing down traffic is enough to get a fuck you from him, I don't think that's the case.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"Slow down traffic" usually refers to cyclists who insist on taking up too much of the lane, making it impossible to safely pass.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I bike to work through Manhattan most days. I stop at 90% of lights, specifically all 4-way intersections. I do my best to follow all (1/?)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

laws, but I hit 20 or so T-junctions with one way streets that make no sense for even the cars to stop at. I know I should stop at all (2/?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

of the lights, but sometimes it just don't make no sense. I should note these are basically empty one ways. I hate bikers who don't (3/?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

respect any of the lights. They give us a bad name. I try to do my part, and I know that sometimes I fail. For that I apologize.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if you refuse to make vroom vroom noises!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How about you fuckin motorists stop parking in the bike lanes?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

And also to every other driver not following the laws (speed, signalling, following to closely)

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

But if another car hits you while driver is being an idiot, their insurance pays. A biker being an idiot and runs into you...you pay

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You didn't mean that "all due respect" part.

10 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 11

With all due respect, FUCK YOU LASSANNN

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm guessing the second half of that phrase was silent... "with all due respect [which is none]"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

On the contrary, @OP meant exactly as much respect as was due.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Which is still, slightly more than drivers.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not a whole lot of respect due here

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure he does. It's just that the "due respect" that they're due is precisely "zero".

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cars kill people. Bikes don't. Stop complaining.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

A car coming to a screeching halt for a bike running a stop sign nearly caused me to run into it on my motorcycle. So yeah, it could have.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Getting hit by a bike can still kill you.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Anything can kill you so your argument is invalid.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Probability, statistics and risk assessment are a thing, your counter is idiotic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The Darwin Awards beg to differ ;)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the Darwin awards are for single incidents, which puts the probability and risk for the population at next to nothing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Statistics are recorded only when they can be so all records are inaccurate when causes of death are concerned.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lack of infrastructure for cyclists isn't the cyclists fault, but the (local) government's. Consider working together on getting it sorted.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

Yes because going through red lights is totally the govs fault for not making it clear enough red means stop

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

I'll never understand why the design is get up to 40 for 1 min just to wait for 1 min at a light. Just make 20 whole time with roundabouts.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

How about the cars stop parking in the bike lanes, and I'll stop running reds.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Of the two, running red light or a stop sign on a bicycle is more likely to get you killed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The red light yea, that's nuts. But a stop sign? Not so much. I only stop if there are cars around me. If it's totally empty, I don't stop

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too many blind intersections around here. Nearly got into an accident on my motorcycle because a cyclist blew through a 2-way stop.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fix the big problems first, then focus on getting them to behave.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I forgot how motorists don't break traffic laws ever.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Motorists don't habitually run red lights or blow through stop signs like certain bad apples in the cycling community.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They do regularly break other laws, though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And that gives cyclists an excuse for putting themselves in situations to cause accidents and get killed?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude! I nearly killed someone today because they thought it was convenient to follow pedestrian laws while biking

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

As far as I can tell from this thread cyclists are assholes if they follow car rules, pedestrian rules, or think they get their own rules.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Hit them. They won't make the mistake twice and you won't be held accountable.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

Lol are you an idiot? If you hit a biker you are fucked. Especially if they are hurt. Really really stupid advice. What, are u fuckin 12?

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

In the U.S. (maybe not all states, but at least mine) if they aren't walking in a crosswalk they aren't pedestrians, you don't have to yeild

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on the country. That why in the states we call them "accidents." Nobody has fault in an oopsies.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In Toronto , unless it's glaringly the bikers fault, the motorist is boned.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well you're welcome to run over bicyclists or pedestrains maybe while drunk here in the States and do like a year, tops.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sarcasm is lost in text, it seems.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Sarcasm is hard to pick up without hearing people's tone.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This isn't a confession

10 years ago | Likes 398 Dislikes 6

True, in another news, I clicked tour username by accident, you have a pony obsession, I shall follow you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it ever really a confession?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know in Florida, bikes are considered vehicles. So they're supposed to be in the road, but no-one cares.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Irrelevant; Your statement does not make this post a confession.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same in California. Yet traffic laws aren't followed. As a cyclist who follows rules, they're made so we don't get run over. Plain & simple.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I like you

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks. It's more for our safety. Cars have metal shells, bikers (and motorcycles too) just have our bodies and stuff. If we crash... :(

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not a confession, just bitching.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe he hit a biker recently because of this?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That would do it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a cyclist I agree with everything except "roads were built for cars." They were built for transportation. If there is a bike lane, (1)

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Stay in it. If not, stay close to the shoulder and don't be a douchebag. But that goes both ways.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'll agree with you there. I hate things like "car lane" "fast lane" being used when they are "lane" and "overtaking lane" here.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hate seeing bike riders not stop for lights / stop signs.

10 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 4

For lights yes stop, but for stop signs? It is incredibly hard to stop and start all the time, and honestly there isn't the need.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When driving I will stop at a stop, when biking I'll stop if there's a car,I check. It's a lot of effort to get going again 20km in the bike

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Why? Cars don't even stop at stop signs, and they are dangerous to others.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speaking as both a guy that bikes to work every day and someone that has hit a reckless biker breaking a red light in my car, it's a 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Red light sensors won't pick up a bike, and stopping and starting is a lot harder to do on a bike. I don't think a full stop is necessary.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

As a cyclist I take full responsibility for my own safety (no-one else does). If I think I'll be safer going on red, I go on red.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cars dont stop at stop signs eithwr

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Srs. About half the ones in my area that I go through are "rolling stops" for most people.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet give cyclists grief for doing the same thing. Most people don't care about "safety" they just want to be first.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate almost getting hit by cars every time I bike because they cut me off when it's my turn

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

In Idaho they are not required to come to full stop at stop signs or red lights. "proceed safely" is what the law says.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

This. It's been proven that it's safer for bicyclists to yield at stop signs and red lights.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cyclist almost hit me, with me clear on the crosswalk. He saw it come on/me starting to walk in time to react so it was a clear decision.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He was turning right on the side I was, so he almost side swiped me to boot. I actually had to jump back out if his way, the prick.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But at least you've never been stuck behind a bicyclist on the phone when the light turns green?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

Ofc not, after I rev my engine they start to go.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

This HAPPENS? I pull over to use my phone 'cause I'd be scared shitless someone would hit me otherwise.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes. I've seen it

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lights yes, but stop signs are often put in to slow drivers in low traffic areas and are extremely impractical for cyclists to follow.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

When drivers lean on their horn because I creep through a stop sign we arrived at at the same time and we're the only ones there... yeah.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll slow down at an intersection, but the time/physics involved coming out of a full stop put me more at risk, so I'll avoid stopping.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

People fail to understand this. We don't simply push a gas pedal and go. And still have to deal with the impatient asshole behind us.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Same here, my main priority when biking is to stay out of everyone's way and make it home alive.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yep, I see a car, I avoid it. I'm commuting but also exercising. Terrifying how many up votes these comments always get.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That is to say, I give right of way to whoever has it, be it crosswalks or other cars. Only after checking do I glide through.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

You can get a ticket for that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll take my safety over a potential ticket for laws that police never seem to enforce on bikes. But yeah, there is that risk.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

spectrum. Bikers that dont yeild to cars or go slow at intersections are reckless. A complete stop at an empty intersection is impractical 2

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Yeah, it's impractical for cars too douche, but it's important and it's the law.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

Pushing the peddle down is far different than peddling back up to speed from a dead stop, Idaho stops should be the norm for cyclists.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Coming out of a full stop on a bike is /more/ dangerous, jerkwad.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

And picking up momentum after a full stop is the worst part

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're such an entitled little douche bag. You are why drivers hate bikers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I'm not being entitled, I'm being safe, for both of us.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I suggest you actually commute 20-30km a day on a bike before complaining. Bikes go slow enough to be able to yield at a stop 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0