Rekt

Sep 13, 2016 10:26 AM

yaotzin

Views

458267

Likes

24690

Dislikes

554

Separation of church and state goes both ways.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

it's supposed to at least

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Umm potato chips

10 years ago | Likes 1242 Dislikes 18

I'm eating some as I read this post :/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But on pretzel day? Well I like pretzel day.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Stanley Hudson is my spirit animal.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shouldn't this be a Kevin gif?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be more appropriate

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IKR they're called crisps

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

Fuck you Britain

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Fight me

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We already did and won

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You'd just cry after I threw your tea in the harbor

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

why cry? what is a harbour if not a giant cup of tea?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to read Bastiat's Parable of the broken window.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

What is seen eclipses what is not seen. Reading selected works right now.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. Orwell, 1984.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

http://bastiat.org/en/twisatwins.html well that was interesting.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TIL if i have much more monies i can fix my window, buy my new shoes, buy a new book, instead of just fixing the window.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I have never met a real person who thought space exploration was a waste of money

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Lucky

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I unfortunately have. People don't realise that space shit advances everything else at the same time, as well as being really cool

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've had long talks with my mom about why this is important. She was raised in super-Catholic-school Barbados. Science isn't a thing there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a space-buff friend who thinks manned space flight is overrated. I don't entirely disagree with him.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probes, however: FUND THEM ALL.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a good thing. It means the people you know are worth knowing.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What happens to all the resources that get burned upon leaving earth do we ever recover it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When they talk about resources they mean monetary. Everything that was burned or launched was payed for on earth, back into our economy

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have. With this same mentality: "what good did it ever do ME? I've never directly benefited from the space program!"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Unless you're talking about No Man's Sky

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Savage

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shots fired (but no other players can see them)

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Hello, even if i agree on religion and military, i also think ressource consomation (fuel mainly) on space program is a "waste"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Until we build another way, rocket fuel is the only way off this rock

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

well, destroying this "rock" by trying to get off isn't the greatest of ideas

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The fuel used in the space program is hardly destroying Earth. Not even REMOTELY close.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

well, technically i don't think the whole rocket is green, and you are correct; however their is waste by participating in the system

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I have, but I'm an aerospace engineer so it might come up more often.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

I have a few aerospace friends I'll have to ask them if it happens to them too. Do people confront you about it?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People aren't usually confrontational so much as they just don't understand the purpose. I've definitely been asked why It's worthwhile.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

For me the major increase the survival of the species long term is reason enough to spend infinite dollars haha

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Because space is cool" is totally a legit reason. And we'll keep getting cool shows about space on Netflix

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can you explain taxing churches? Because from what I understand, churches don't have a reliable source of income apart from donations, 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

I know a lot of PEOPLE who don't have a reliable source of income. BUT THEY HAVE TO PAY TAXES, ANYWAY.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

People aren't an organization, and most people that don't make much money get all or more than they paid back in tax returns.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Ever heard of super churches? Churches that operate like non profits should remain that way, but for-profit churches are cheating.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

There is a church down the road from me that is bigger than a JUCO and requires your credit report and tax forms before joining...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

2/2 Most of which go towards helping others? Tell me if I'm wrong, but I'm just curious.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Until you see churches so large they have credit card terminals and jumbotrons.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, pretty sure you're 100% right. Churches are non-profit religious buildings, and so there's no logical reason they should pay taxes.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg John Oliver proved virtually anyone can start a church & claim tax free status. enjoy.=)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Not always. Anyone can start their own church and ask for money...and do whatever they want with it tax free. It's bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

Anyone can start their own business, church, organization, etc. But making it successful is extremely hard.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No one would give money to a random church without them preaching or helping their community.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

#scientology

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

you can stand on the side of the street and ask for money and do whatever they want with it without any additional tax. Is that bullshit too

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lets forget about all of the hospitals that the govt relied(s) on the Church to build.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 7

I dislike megachurches and what they stand for but as a christian whose 50-60 people congregation barely gets by, taxing them would probably

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

kill the church and community. A lot of what we do is put into the neighborhood and is really selfless. Taxing churches would hurt the

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

little guy but not stop the people getting rich off of religion

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

would feel lit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't make sense to tax a church anyway as every member already paid taxes. It is their donations that would get taxed again.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a tax was levied there would be deductions for charitable work. Only churches who are pocketing and not using the money for good works

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But look at how taxes affect corporations. These kind of laws dont affect people who dont play by the rules. The smaller churches would hurt

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Do you like CT scans? MRI? Wireless phones? This and much more came to be because of technology developed for space exploration.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're gonna need all that space money for your hospital fees and burn ointment prescriptions.

10 years ago | Likes 279 Dislikes 7

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Sad but true

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Nah, just let him burn up on re-entry. I'll look for the flaming streaks of his corpse in the sky tonight...That was funnier in my head.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1)Not to be that guy, but why Jens inferred the pic meant the money was literally sent to mars instead of what it states as a waste of $$$$?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because when you spend $100 billion on something, the people who got paid that, still spend that 100 billion in the economy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was hyperbole. The syntax is ambiguous, the words are text-only with no inflection, and context is everything.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2)then use it to jump into their rebuttal?? Legit curious!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Much confuse

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Not sure how it helps us people on Earth". The post implies that no benefit to people on earth is gained by doing the rover launch.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jens is explaining that despite the rover leaving the planet, the money goes into research and the local economy. So it's not a "waste"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Logged in just to UpVote.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The advancement of technology and pursuit of the development of the capability to get off this rock is not wasted money.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is arguably one of the most important things we can do since we know that extinction events happen fairly often. Humanity had no future

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

as a one world species or even one solar system one. It is insane that we don't have a system to protect from impacts from space.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We we do technically have several volunteers and there is a portion of public money reaching them , but it should be so much more. /agree

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good thing the 60 trillion dollars we've spent on the "War on Poverty" has worked out. Whew!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The government spends over $600 billion on welfare programs for the poor.How is that going to help us get a remote controlled buggy on mars?

10 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 10

*philosophy dude* What if we used the poor to explore Mars???

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Asking the real questions

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Or, why are we not sending poor people to Mars yet?

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Send them to the moon!

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

+1 <3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think that was one story points to Total Recall, that Mars was inhabited by working class poor indebted to a company with a monopoly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Asking the important questions

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some of those welfare programs will support young children who might get a shot at becoming an engineer and putting robots on mars.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because the medicaid treatment for one of those poor children might save their life and they could become a world renowned engineer

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

The history of science is full of people like Fraunhofer who were impoverished but got a leg up and contributed greatly to science

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

And many scientists who have known quotes akin to "I owe my creativity to not having to worry about putting food on my plate."

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's even more full of poor people who died due to malnutrition or lack of medicine and never got to contribute in the first place!

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I'm confused. Are we supporting spending on science or not?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It prevents the NASA engineers from being late to work because they couldn't get through the starving desperate children on the street.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Corporate welfare is 1.5 times that of domestic "conventional" welfare. Look it up.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Does it include building weapons systems the military doesn't want?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. That's just corporate subsidies vs welfare, foodstamps, public housing, etc. Corporations take far more tax money than the people do.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why not end corporate subsidies AND welfare? Why not make people actually be responsible instead of subsidizing their poor decisions?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because some people are disabled. Because sometimes investing in business is also a good idea. I'm arguing the extent of the latter.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much exactly is one hundred dollars billion dollars?

10 years ago | Likes 834 Dislikes 18

dollar dollar bill...ion.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 1

Tree fiddy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$²100,000,000,000

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Man, if I had that much I could pay off Half of my student loans *sobs into bank statement*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3.14

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All the Monopoly money....ever

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You can't put a price tag on that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Roughly sixty billion double dollars

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just enough to catch a humanoid typhoon!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At least 3.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 whole marijuanas

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Not according to my guy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

whole? no fucking way

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Pfff I can get 1 and a half Marijuanas for that

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not four

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remember that pile that the Joker set fire to?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's kinda like a large medium pepperoni pizza.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1x10^11 $^2.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About Tree Fiddy

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

5/7

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

numbers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

100 billion squared

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

100,000,000,000 one dollar bills

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well if they're buying parts abroad from airbus, rolls royce or something, technically the $ is leaving...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's put it this way: That's enough money to buy every person on earth one sandwich and soda each.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A little bit more than Vash the Stampede.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

13 times the speed of light

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least 12

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Well, you're not wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stop, thief! My idea! Its been stolen!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What does a million dollars even buy today it doesn't even buy a million dollars!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Easy peasy. One billion, one hundred dollars. Did you not take basic addition in maths? :P

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

actually, it would be one hundred billion dollars squared

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How do you even pay for something in dollars squared?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You get an intern to cut the notes into the right shape.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

About 4â‚©

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Dollar dollar bills yall

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To put it in perspective, Bill Gates doesn't even have 100,000,000,000 dollars.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two parsecs

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So six of those should be enough to bullshit your way through the Kessel run, right?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aha!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or about $4.5^17 Vietnam Dong

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The exact amount you can get out of an ATM machine.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's dollars one hundred billion dollars

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

More like one hundred billion dollars dollars.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm going 101 Dimmidollars Bob.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"Depends on what you want" - drug dealer, probably.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Roughly seven signed pictures of Neil DeGrasse Tyson wearing a bunny suit

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

$$60 billion dead or alive

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

About 25 billion + bags of potato chips.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

About three fiddy.

10 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 15

You had one shot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was hoping for this comment.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

30 speed

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

LOL

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You win

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

too late...pls stahp

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something something reference

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

About 7 salmons

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

About 5

10 years ago | Likes 380 Dislikes 4

About tree fiddy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

At least

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe a little more.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3.5 is the best I can do bud

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

You ain't fooling me, LOCH NESS MONSTER!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a buddy who is an expert in Mars Rovers. I'll have to get him to have a look at it.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I'm afraid there's no market for Mars Rovers at the moment

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

It'll be sitting in the shop for awhile, best I can do is .25

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 out of what? ....maybe 6.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Let's give it a 5/7 and call it good.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Not as good as the dark knight.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meh if both numbers can fit on a white board they're practically the same number

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sound like my astronomy professor

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is taxing churches such a big thing?

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 11

Coral Ridge Presbyterian in Ft. Lauderdale would pay about $218,000 in taxes a year to the county.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Fraud, lots and lots of fraud. There are several half a million dollar homes in Detroit that are tax exempt for religious reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

That would be a state property tax exemption, the issue at hand is Federal tax exemptions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for the clarification.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fine, tax churches. Then deal with what they're entitled to as a result.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Removing entitlement doesn't create more entitlement. They'd be entitled to the same BS an average tax paying entity gets.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Why is separation of church and state such a big thing?

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

ISIS. Crusades. Spanish Inquisition. Holy Roman Empire etc...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

The free practice or lack thereof is (supposed to be) extremely important to the US

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Because otherwise it gives people more incentive 2 violently fight each other. Separate & the state becomes a neutral ground 2 hash out prob

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The state becomes a neutral ground? Because there is only harmony in our political state. Unsure that last sentence is at all true.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Neutral ground != harmony. The championship field is neutral ground but the teams just sit around, braiding each other's hair.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 29, 2016 11:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

When our lawmakers continue to pass legislature based upon their religious beliefs the separation of church and state isn't even real.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Separation church/state doesn't mean that lawmakers must exclude beliefs in passing legislation. Regardless if beliefs coincide w/religion.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You can pretend that two centuries of court rulings disagree with you, but that's not intellectually honest.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disagree with what?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm even religious and I still don't see why churches aren't taxed. However taxing them isn't suddenly gonna solve the debt crisis like 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

So religious people should get taxed twice because they have group meetings 2-ish times a week?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love how I get downvoted just for saying I'm religous, riiighht

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i see you're just glossing over the three replies that actually explain why you got downvoted then, in an attempt to start a firefight

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Those are respectable disagreements explaining why. You don't get down-voted by people with respectable disagreements.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's the whole reason for the downvote system - for people to disagree with your statement. It's not a hate crime to downvote something.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't it just be taxing money that is already taxed though?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, that is literally what it would be. Double tax on anyone religious.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh.... you do realize that it's a charity and a nonprofit.... everything gets put into charitable work in 1 way or another. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

there are some cases of abuse, which I detest, but it is far from the norm. (Other nonprofits have the same issues..)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Tell that to the Catholic Church.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I was talking about Protestant Churches, but the Catholic Church corruption peaked several centuries ago and was largely due to secular 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the most charitable organization out there? You must be thinking of preacher churches

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Some crazy people like to claim. The majority of all church's make jack all so there wouldn't be anything to tax besides property

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Thats not true. Many churches have lots of money, earning interest. Also, lots of funding go through churches for various things.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So while you could make money off of preacher church, regular church's do so much charity it wouldn't even be taxable

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Preacher churches make money, those are few and far in between. Real churches like catholics and Mormans make very little money and do 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

A lot of charitable work, so their money wouldn't even be taxable. Catholic and Morman churches are the majority of all churches

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

My church has most of its money going back into the community, through programs for youth, community service, disaster response. Etc.

10 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 11

So the money spend on non-religious charity and community activities stays tax exempt, everything else is taxed.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The problem with that reasoning is that churches will still have to keep their buildings running and pay staff so the taxes on even just 1/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

for that will take away from charitable work they could otherwise do with the money that gets taxed. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Everyone that attends a church like this seems to be an expert on their church's finances. I find this to be highly unlikely.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I've been to churches with a congregation so small, a tax would choke it and make it close.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If they had to pay taxes, then we would essentially disappear due to not being able to pay bills.

10 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 9

Charitable donations would still be tax exempt.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Atheists and groups united on non-religious agendas would also appreciate the opportunity to put money into their communities.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

There's plenty of secular charity/community groups to donate to. And if there aren't then they're welcome to start one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously. But they have to file. Churches don't.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then it closes. Welcome to capitalism. People vote with their money and ridiculous claims shouldn't be funded.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily - if their books were open to the IRS you could assess how much is spent on charity and tax the rest of it accordingly

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Yes necessarily. MuCulloch vs Maryland - the power to tax is the power to destroy

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Ever been through Nashville, or anywhere in the Bible Belt? Church "corporations" have literal skyscrapers. It's insanely profitable.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 10

Those are the exception, not the norm

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

I seriously doubt that any more. 50 years ago maybe.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Then perhaps they should be the exception to the tax rule as well

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

I wouldn't say exception but rather an anomaly. In comparison to the number of churches, it is a very small minority.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Who is we though? I'd say there is some people who would like for churches to disappear but regardless, charity is not exclusive to religion

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

He is not saying charity is exclusive but many churches do in fact give to the community.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Much more common though. After all, look at hospitals, they were mainly started by Christianity.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Started? Without even going there, I'm talking now. C'mon guy, because I don't believe the exact same things as you, you think I dont care

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Question: how public/transparent are church financials? Because it seems like megachurches would be great laundering opportunities.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most churches are non-profit (not including megachurches). They only keep enough money to pay the bills, the rest goes to charities.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

For scale, a median church size is 75 regular attendees, the median yearly offering is $1100, and the median pastor salary is $31,000.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Median yearly offering per person, in case that was unclear.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Meaning that they would pay little, if any, tax due to charity exemptions. So why not have the tax exists. The churches that are truly >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

non-profit would see very little effect (so long as the tax code for them was written correctly) and churches that actually turn a profit >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

would have to pay tax on that profit. While I realize churches that turn a profit an exception (not the rule) the ones that do turn quite >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

big profits, like megachurches. And they depend on public services, like firemen, public roads, subsidized energy costs to exist, so they >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is false. On average only about 13% of a church's income may go to charities. No evidence that it does, only that it MAY go to it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

85% of the income goes to internal operations of the church. about 2% typically goes toward overseas missions.Very little goes into charity.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No, that's what the 13$ is.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Citations above if you're interested.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The 13% for charity is actually cited as 13% that may go back into helping the community, which covers those things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You're asking for a citation, and then you give an anecdote. You're new to this aren't you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I do not have the most recent studies, but here are the ones I used for an article I wrote in 2011. I doubt they've changed that much.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Anyone fact check any of this? Or are we all just jumping on the Jens wagon?

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

Curiosity cost $2.5b, defense budget is $618b a year (about $2,328,082,191 every 33 hours, someone check my math). He's pretty close.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

By the way, the way I calculated the 33 hour number was ((618 billion)/(8760 hours in a year))*(33 hours)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even if Jens was completely wrong it wouldn't stop the sentiment of the picture from being stupidly short sighted.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Also, the majority of Nasa's spending comes from donations. Most of what it gets from the Government is spent on day to day operations.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

That I didn't know. Seems a bit sad, but it also doesnt surprise me.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't know how he could have calculated how much tax revenue churches would provide since they aren't required to disclose their profits.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It would be miniscule and no where close to that. Besides preacher churches most churches are charitable organizations that would hardly 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Get taxed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Aaaaaah. The ol' church tax bandwagon.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

The church my family helped grow from 5 people to over 1500 actually helps fund local public education on a pretty large scale...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's sad how many people don't know what churches actually do.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

rip off people who need the money more than them in many (not all) cases, spend money they do take in less well than a non religious charity

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you have facts for these claims?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About the church tax thing - you do realize that one major corporation that doesn't pay taxes would be way more than almost all churches...

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

apple

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Shocking, but wanting to tax churches and wanting major corporations to have to pay their fucking taxes aren't mutually exclusive.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

For some reason it's always "churches are tax exempt" but these major corporations that have the tax breaks that you voted for are getting

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Away with criminal theft of the American tax dollar. But yes, lets tax churches where the average citizen lives.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

No, actually the corporations are legally moving to countries and the government allows it. Don't like it, ask for change.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm willing to bet anyone that wants to tax churches also wants to close corpoarte tax loopholes as well.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This guy actually really bothers me. Churches are nonprofit and the money they "make" are all donations. They should not be taxed. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

doesn't bother you that pastors in mega churches make millions? religion interferes with advancement of science, and should be taxed.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

...it doesn't interfere with the advancement of science, rather stupidity of ignorant individuals who refuse to use their brains do.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree megachurches are a little different with their pastors earning $147,000 on average. They aren't being pastors for the right reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How in the world does religion interfere with science in the modern world? And since when is that the basis on what should be taxed?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also yes, the military spends a lot, but they are the best military in the world and it's a price worth paying for the best protection.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I'm pro military but it is bloated. Every govt. program is bloated - cut every one by 10% and use the gadrillions for great civic causes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The first guy is delusional about how taxes work. The second guy is delusional about how church taxes works. End of story

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

All the same guy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

All correct until the tax exemption thing. People really don't understand how taxes work and how little taxes their would be on churches

10 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 11

*there

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

i've seen people write "there" where "their" should be a lot, but rarely the other way

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Mhmm, does this guy want minister lobbyists? Because that is how you get minister lobbyists. Separation has to go both ways.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

A lot of people forget the 'no taxation without representation' thing that started this whole crazy America experiment.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Property taxes would be the big ticket item. These little 12 pew churches surrounded by 40 floor highrises.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not knowing enough about it to angrily side with you or the FB commenter, cab you explain or point me to something that does?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Alright so when people think of churches they seem to think of Big for profit preacher churches where the preacher asks you to plant a 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seed of faith [1000 dollars to help him buy his new mansion]. While these churches do make the most money out of all churches they are 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Very few compared to catholic churches and morman churches which actually do charitable work and get very little income.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Right, and they would pay little, in any, tax (as they could file exemption against the charity work that they do) but we would still be >

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They should at least be required to disclose their finances like every other charity.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah their deductions would be massive. Idk why people get so hung up on it

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

Because murdering an Evangelist is apparently illegal so I'll just take their money instead.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Reddit echo chamber tells them this should be a thing, so they say it without critically thinking about it.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Because taking away tax exemption wouldn't hurt the big churches but would choke the smaller ones. I've been to churches that if they --

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

-- were taxed, they wouldn't be able to stay afloat. Small town, small congregation.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

church ain't a business to stay afloat. and priests can work too

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

No but the buildings require maintenance and utilities to pay.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

isn't it a percent? would affect big churches more than small churches

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Consider: One man makes $25k a year, another $50k. Each pay $23k to live. If they were taxed 20%, only one could afford it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If there was a bag of chips I could get that donated half the money to a space program I'd exlusively eat their product.

10 years ago | Likes 6546 Dislikes 12

Difficulty - the donation chips are made with Olestra and taste like Cheddar Cheese and Cher's asshole...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem with that is the chip company sets a cap on the size of the donation, so it's '25% of all proceeds up to 5 million dollars' >>

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After 5 million, they no longer have to donate anything, but can still use that as advertising to drive up sales. Sick, twisted, world.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is technically possible for private citizens and corporations to donate directly to the NASA budget... this isn't out of the question.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As much air as they put in the bags you could probably survive a while in space

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the organization that sells them could be "International Taste Station"

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

In my opinion, you have won the internet for the day!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not "Terrestrial International Taste Station", in short "TITS".

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fucking brilliant combo there! +1

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This just in, Elon Musk starts new chip company

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I don't how long you'd live just eating potato chips but I'd be interested in watching your descent into madness.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Gotta have a 24/7 live cam for that. I would be able to take my eyes off the screen.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Be a smartass and have only baked, low salt/low fat and drink lots of water and it's feasible, isn't it? Chips are technically potato...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is where my potato eating survival knowledge is highly lacking I'm afraid.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SunChips donate half the money for a bag of chips towards their goal of sending someone to the sun. At night time, of course.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just don't bring them into space! https://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/blogs/lists/39.png

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Watch out, they're ruffles!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If someone crowdfunds this company I will support you. As long as a significant portion goes either to NASA, or just space/ocean exploration

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ocean Exploration - that could be whole new branch of the company

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Finding Cthulhu or your money back*.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Refunds will be split evenly among all surviving investors when the stars align in 2347.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The amount of upvotes on this comment is an excellent argument for why space exploration could be done with private money

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think this suffers from the 'awareness' fallacy. Just coz people are willing to click a button doesn't mean they'd support it meaninfully

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't even care if they're good. If I had to eat munchos just to give money to NASA I would

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I like Munchos, wtf?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Samr

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really hope @nasa notices this and decides to go through with it all thanks to an Imgur comment

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If only we could explore the space they left in the bag of chips then nasa would save millions.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've been donating all the money I pay for a humble bundle to wikipedia, maybe we could pick nasa as a charity instead?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

red bull funds nasa.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe on the back it could debunk the space pen BS story. Or am I the only one who likes light reading while eating chips?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like, to the exclusion of all other food?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. For science. Maybe they can make some kinda supplemented superchip so I wont die too quickly, or they can use me to test human limits?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If they made the percentage of air in the bag up by funding science I'd be fine with having %50 less chips.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would certainly do this!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone just had a billion dollar idea

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sign me the fuck up for some space chips

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if they tasted horrible, I'd still do it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I care too much about flavour for that. Nasa still needs to learn to cook.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had to read this so many times to understand. Now I agree.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me too

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, it's a good idea. BTW, are they sell astronaut's meal? I think it would be good to eat when hiking

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can get MRE equivalents produced for the consumer market at like 1/3 the price.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I upvoted this post and your suggestion because the idea is good. I also just recalled that my parents did NOT buy a $1300USD microwave 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 but did buy when they dropped to $600, so I hope some of that $$ helped get Neil to the moon.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brb

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a bad idea, I've been wanting to do start a twitch channel so I can donate a percentage of the tips

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

why is your comment 2nd?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$100 a bag. Get your space chips here.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I helping by drinking Tang?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haven't I seen this comment before?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Houston we have puns,

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Half the bag is just air [space] anyways. They can donate the money from that half.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can but they are Phyllis Diller's Used Dildo flavored

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i'm pretty sure it'd be really dry

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you could stop eating them and donate the money instead :))

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool idea. Nasachos or something. Im a bit buzzed btw

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

That's a good name though. Easy to say, catchy, and unique.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Buzzed Aldrin?? AHAaaaaaaa

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should do that more often, then

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Part of a healthy launch....................*takes another bong hit*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's a good idea. Serious question though: What would be the cutoff? 40%? 25%? 10%? (I don't think 50% would be possible w/o overpricing)

10 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 0

Whatever % of air is in the bag. It would make me less mad about every bag of chips I eat.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As much as the % of fucking air in the bag.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Without that air in the bag, you'd be popping open a crispy bag of crumbs

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I can't argue against that, but the air to chip ratio seems a little skewed.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's nasa, inventers of the upside-down writing pen, I'm sure they could find a way to maximize the crisp to dead space ratio.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Russians will just put the chips in a tube then?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, I actually thinking I'd pay up to double for the product because space is awesome. Realistically I think 10-25%, fantastic and do-able

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 0

If they put the price up 25%, and then donate half that amount to the space programme, they'd be taking a 37.5% cut on revenue per packet.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not donate the price of a bag of chips everytime you buy a bag of chips?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Because it's not automatic and therefore harder.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I'd pay 50% extra tops. Unless they were super tasty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on the markup. I remember reading that a 57g bag of lays is about 50 cents to produce (before distro, etc) so if they 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Aimed for a lot profit (ha..) and sold a bag for like, 2 bucks, you could send $1 per bag to NASA. And they sell about 200mil a year....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

low profit* bleh

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An luxury tax on chips to put money into the space program in order to increase domestic spending would adversely affect dip sales. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

The French Onion Dip Manufacturers would have to lay off all their workers. Governments don't create wealth, they only move it around. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So you're saying that sauce companies would see a dip in sales?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I assume you're being ironic?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the premise here is private donation from one company, not broad taxation on a category of product.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What about the Mars candy company?! They could get in on this too!

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

That would be a genius marketing move on their part

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Why has Mars foods not done this already?!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mars is a privately held family company. They bathe in chocolate and shit on solid gold toilets.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

One of these facts is not like the other

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So....they might benefit from a little positive publicity?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

...as it is clear they don't need the revenue.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They are history buffs, they donate to historical sites like colonial Williamsburg in Virginia

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hmmm...I do really like Colonial Williamsburg. That's my historical Disney land.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rightfully so, that place is a blessing to have still with us. I've been there a few times, probably going to visit this year too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Legalize marijuana, tax it and the money goes to NASA. The program slogan would "Get high, so we can go higher"

10 years ago | Likes 1133 Dislikes 7

spaceweed

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do you work in advertising? If not, you've missed your calling my friend

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

605th up vote here. You sir either work in advertising or should!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Close, I am a Steadicam operator, I film the ads, I don't write them though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And thanks for your upvote.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except those marijuana taxes already in place are going to the schools :P at least in WA

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

So they can cut the budget from other tax means to support local contractors and garbage collectors? /s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Argh! Fucking useless!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get high for higher education?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This needs more upvotes, it needs to be higher in the comments!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I went to a pot shop in Bellevue that had a deal where Microsoft employees get 15% off... I'm pretty sure there's a joke there somewhere.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

'Goes to schools' Yea sure, like all the lotto money.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Colorado collected so much that they had more than the schools could use (at the time).

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Neat, so the actual tax funding didn't have to do anything, just like when they put money to schools; cut the same amount.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nope, you obviously have never seen the gov at wotk. You can always spend more money. Salaries, technology, books, arts all cost money.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I just made an account so I could up vote this

10 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 4

That's a good reason. Cherish it, you might have signed up for... more difficult ones.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome aboard dano37.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Worth it

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Lol, I'm relevant.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the fold.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Most excellent Mr Dano

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Welcome to this weird website where everyone reposts things and comments the same jokes. I LOVE IT!!! (you'll fit right in!!)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I made an account just to up vote this

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you already have 123 upvotes?! I'm going to start saying "I just made an account so I could up vote this"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's actually genius. A little too subversive for the average consumer, but really clever +1

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ill smoke to that !

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Colorado is already richer because of that. Politicians are wondering why they didn't do this sooner they're just rolling in the tax $.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, $996 million in 2015

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We need more funding to rescue Matt Damon from Mars. We need to get more kids smoking pot, ASAP"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That would aggravate the NASA physicists so much since "up" doesn't even mean anything in space. Let's do it.

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

True, but the enemy's gate is down.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The gates are open!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes, however height does exist in space, since it is distance from the ground

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So *technically* does that mean that "up" is just distance from earth in every direction?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's the distance from whatever you're going to or leaving from.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the distance from whatever you're going to or leaving from.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

well if i was floating in space I'd probably say someone above my head was 'up' from me, but I wouldn't do that with height

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

. this is my destiny

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

this is fucking gold, i tell u. .

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Holy fuck thats genius.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Already goes to education in Colorado I think. Which would be my first choice.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Educate new rocket scientists, so we can go higher. My slogan still stands. And I'm high. GO NASA, GO SPACE, GO SCIENCE (the real kind)!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AND GO EDUCATION! LEARN COOL SHIT, STAY IN SCHOOL, DO DRUGS. (just marijuana, don't touch the other fucking shits, they will fuck you up)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just like tobacco settlement money would go for roads and health care? lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh that's fucking good, my man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Love it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I like Turtles.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which makes me think, we need turtles in space. A turtle in the ISS would be the fastest turtle in the universe!!!!!!!!!!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And they could call them Spacechips...

10 years ago | Likes 3316 Dislikes 3

Two words: Homer Simpson

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're 1701-D-lichous

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

This some Stir Friday-level shit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or they could bring back Asteroids

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Eat Space chips, fund spaceships!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I shall eat them in my spacepantz

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And try not to make a space mess

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where is the Kickstarter?!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You. You there. You're a class act, I like you.

10 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 3

Someone get Bill Nye on this, he has an imgur account

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Name of this account?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Found it! @planetarysociety

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That Spacechip fries very fast as well!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spudniks

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck you all I'm TM this all rights reserved

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

0_o Perfect!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damnit. For a moment I got excited thinking of "vacuum packed for freshness!" labels, but then remembered that's other foods, not chips. : /

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@Planetarysociety plz???

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I smell a start-up! And chips. Fuck, I'm hungry.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That name may be misleading to a few

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even better: NASA buys out Sun Chips; rebrands to Galaxy Chips. 'Donates' most of profit to space and deep sea exploration.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

Or Sol Chips

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They'll have to send the Sun-Rover at night though, right? -I used to be a blond guy.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Bonus: Every bag of chips has a smaller plastic bag in it that has a tiny rock from space

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I relevant?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We should also get Old Navy making space pants that half the money gets donated to Nasa. Peter Dinklage can be the spokesman.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Will they have shocolate spacechips? My dad has an accent that makes him pronounce "chocolate shake" as "shocolate chake" so for me, this

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Was a very funny comment.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He some kind of Hispanic? Because that sounds similar to a friend of mine

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol yeah. His dad was half mexican and spanish, mom was Ute indian

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well shucks. That's a fun combination.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...now with 50% extra empty space in the bags.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it were a work satchel you could call it the Space Case.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

?1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spacechips, taste the galaxy.

10 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

The taste is out of this world.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

chips as big as jupiter, and as many as the things inside saturn's rings. but in just one bag.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And the dip is called the Milky Way, right?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

AND NASALSA. I FORGOT NASALSA.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And Alien mash aka guacamole!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Got a friend here who doesn't understand what Spacechips is, and I can't seem to explain it to him. Anybody wanna help?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 18, 2016 7:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

thanks breh. My friend totally gets it now and says to pass on his thanks

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lego like set made from 45 record inserts http://shop.monkeybusinesssports.c">ps.aspx">http://shop.monkeybusinesssports.com/space-chips.aspx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VZtXmZFed4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So.. You eat chemicals?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Are you seriously trying to imply that you don't? Care to share what mystic immaterial substance you live on? Might solve world hunger. '-'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look at his alias/username.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His alias is "eatchemicals"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they were Cheese Balls, we could call them Spaceballs... don't worry, I can leave on my own

10 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 3

What about Pizza the Hut! They should get in on this!

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

are you leaving for the store? i go with ya i wanna get some spaceballs

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Heh, good one. I am coming with you

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Are we having, the sex? Yay!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No homo! NTTAWWT.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GIVE THIS MAN A PROMOTION

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And we need favourite comments

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's... That's not a bad idea.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Imgur's marketing team is great, because it has thousands of employees that get paid in fake points.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Spacechips! The Official Snack of Spaceballs Everywhere!

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need context for this gif, because there are few things that would get a reaction like this from Ron Swanson. Id guess breakfast food

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats it. @nasa get this shit done.

10 years ago | Likes 844 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

@nasa pls

10 years ago | Likes 395 Dislikes 1

@nasa do it!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

@nasa plzzzzzz???

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

@nasa pls

10 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 4

@nsa please

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

oh shit, they've gone dark on us!

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

No not them.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Lemme snack

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@PlanetarySociety plz!!?

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

@planetarysociety please Billy boy the science bro do it for

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

@planetarysociety please Billy boy the science bro do it for

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Being a Google know it all its cool but sometimes you gotta roll on their own ignorance.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if the chips cost more or were of slightly lower quality/quantity to offset the expense?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe they could decrease the margin going to a space program to 10% or so to make the chips more reasonably priced.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd pay extra but not for low quality.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Legalize marijuana, tax it and the money goes to NASA. The program slogan would "Get high, so we can go higher"

10 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 4

Genius!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Logged in just so I could give you an Updoot!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And you get an upvote! -Oprah

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're going to tax medical marijuana? Check mate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nice

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah what has NASA ever given us? Other then artificial limbs, home insulation, hearing aids, velcro, smoke detectors, solar power. . .

10 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 1

A chance to explore cool new places! A hell of a lot better than sitting on your ass, wondering what it is like out there!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

...world stability via nuclear retaliation capabilities.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Nah, that was a separate military program that predated NASA.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*than

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Integrated circuits, which led to the computer and/or cellphone you're using...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Velcro was invented by a Swiss engineer who was inspired by burdock burrs and how they stuck to his dog's fur. I'm fun at parties.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Damn! At one point I knew that too! Internet point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What did NASA give us other than the microchips we use for most/all modern electronics?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...and you know, gps which is pretty much directly behind on the techtree line of the modern revolution that is Pokemon Go!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also an important part of the nuclear launch detection network.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brought peace?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Whatever, I can get all that stuff at Home Depot.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You forgot Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They gave us the Aquaducts... and the sanitation...

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Alright but apart from those what else?

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The roads!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

UNDYING DEPRESSION

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Tang!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If churches lost their tax exempt status, most would close quickly. Which might sound great to some, but they do a ton of charity work.

10 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 20

They definitely need tax exempt status to do charity work. Jesus couldn't have done any kind of comm. service w/out a church building.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 22, 2018 7:33 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Also worth noting, they can also just exempt churches that bring in less then X amount of money per year who have less then X number attend.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As I understand it, the average church would get 501(c)3 status, the little bitty ones might struggle a little, and megachurches? Rekt.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not as much as they would have you think (charity work).

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Religion isn't the only provider of charity.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Perhaps we can invent a way to not tax charity work.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not sure why people argue for this when the money donated is after tax dollars anyways

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's an income. Income is taxed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get that but it's an income that has already been taxed before

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Company sell stuff. BAM VAT. Company makes a profit. BAM tax. The remains is paid as dividends to shareholders. BAM tax.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They would not close. Too much money in it. At the same time the amount of money that ends up in charity work is a VERY poor percentage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

You do know there's not just giant mega churches, right? They don't have much money but spend what they have on the community

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was, before becoming an atheist, a member of the finance committee of what you would consider a minuscule church. I stand by my statement.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The smaller the church the higher percentage of money that goes to the preacher and education materials.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

multimilion dollar mega churches with credit card terminals and jumbotrons.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I'm totally cool with only taxes churches that rake in serious cash. I don't think small community churches are taking advantages, only

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yea pfff, charity work for ur mom prolly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

There are several countries in the EU that levy some form of tax against churches, they still have churches.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Not as many as they could. Starting new churches would be very difficult too. My church keeps many of the small churches in our state open

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True, but I feel like NA would need a sliding scale of taxation, like more tax for bigger ones and that would get complicated and difficult.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to say it'd be wrong to tax certain things, but it would most likely not work in an 'ideal' fashion and thus the most vulnerable (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

businesses/persons would be affected far more than the things that really SHOULD be taxed. If that makes sense. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. But it's also not any different than how current tax codes impact individuals and businesses. It could all use an overhaul. =/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as well as churches around the world, from Europe, to Africa, to Asia

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think they don't have as many churches as they could because the rate of atheism/agnosticism is much higher, and even for those claiming >

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

a denomination, the rate of active practice is pretty low, statistically. At least in Europe. The countries that you're church is helping >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are likely in Eastern Europe (which needs help in a lot of ways), not Denmark, Germany, etc

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a christian, I'd prefer that no church get a tax exemption. I'm not looking for the approval of a group that can't differentiate 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

between a suicidal cult and a group of people building a hospital. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Easy to say when you're not on the elder board trying to raise money to fix your church roof.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While I understand the desire for money, it isn't at all about money.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, you just sound like someone who doesn't understand real world financial pressures, but is trying to sound profound on this matter.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not about money, but the desire to scrape by at any means to keep the church afloat, including utilizing whatever tax exempt you can.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you exclusively learned about christians from imgur you would know they are horrible people who do nothing good for anyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

surprised to find this comment here.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guys Churches are a non-profit. They live off of after-tax donations. So why just churches, why not all nonprofits? Take all the taxes back

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

This is my argument as well. Are we going to start taxing donations everywhere?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because churches are not just non-profits, they are pushing an agenda through their non-profit status.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I guess you're not a big art fan, huh? Nor a fan of helping the poor and old.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

But...lots of churches help the poor and elderly

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the problem isn't churches in general, the problem is in the insanely profitable super-churches.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

2) churches and the community through projects.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My former church brought in ~$16M annually. ~$1.5M went into operating costs/etc, the other $14.5M went to charity work. There aren't (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

many non-profits that give 90% to charities. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would agree with you that they shouldn't be that profitable, the churches that bring in excess should be giving that money away to other

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Which is why I believe this tax exemption should only apply to churches that bring in more than a set amount each month. Mega churches.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I may have worded that wrong...only small churches should be tax exempt, giant million dollar churches should pay.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why should there be a tax on them at all? The money has already been taxed when earned by those who contribute. It's just people pooling $.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

By that logic any business should be tax exempt. Income tax has already been paid, right?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Exactly right. Around the globe, governments have instituted multi-level taxation, and most people don't even remember pre-income-tax days.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Government's got a good thing going, right? They make money when you make money, when you spend money, and when you die.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also, they make money. As in printing it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am not even remotely religious but I am all for tax exempt churches. If you took that away the churches that actually do good in the (1)

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

community would quickly close and those abominations called mega churches wouldn't even slow down.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Losing tax exempt status = immediate loss of at least 30% of all charity work in the US. Yea, that'd be great!

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If only charity work was tax exempt.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You're right but I bet a lot of people would donate less in fear that it would go to the government.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If people paid taxes and government ran as it should, there wouldn't be a need for charity towards people in need.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Utopia doesn't exist. Government is always corrupt.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yep. My church has built a hospital in Honduras, built a dream center here for homeless meals and mental/health needs, gives away school

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Supplies to kids who need it, does laundry drives for the homeless, donates more to ministry than it takes in for the church, I could go on.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

All I hear from people is "but churches should pay taxes" even though I've never been in a church that isn't open about their finances and

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Hasn't given way more than they take in. There's definitely corrupt churches but if you're actually following the Bible, you're a charity.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Where is your church?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, I've been to some churches located in populations >5,000 people so the congregations are small. They can barely keep afloat sometimes

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 5

Yes. I know many people hate Christian churches but for the most part they do important work in their communities. For example my church <<1

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 8

has an after school tutoring program which helps kids in schools who don't offer that, which is most of the schools in the area because <<2

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 3

of poor funding. Access to tutoring is a huge step up for most of these kids who come from economically disadvantaged families that have <<3

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

been stuck in a cycle of poverty for generations. There's also support for domestic abuse victims, food for the homeless, and help with <<4

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

(2 hours later) medical bills. Our church came out and took out trees and built a driveway for my dad after he had a heart attack so he <<5

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

What about the non-Christian churches that also benefit from tax exemption?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Nonprofit guy here: its also worth noting, that the only ones that would close would be low income churches/mosques/synagogues who don't 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

2/2 have the money/expertise to navigate complex 501(c)3 laws paperwork.

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

because increasing taxation is totally the solution to all of our problems.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

"If we tax religious tax payers twice, we'll have more money" -the guy in the post probably.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's more about WHAT you tax and WHO you tax. Why not an exponential tax curve? Richer get taxed more. That's why it'll never happen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only thing that solves is the inability of Congress to cut their waste and spending.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

DECREASING taxes is the CAUSE of all of our problems.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Are...are you serious?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The put back into the economy bit is the best part, people seem to think we load the money in the rockets

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

There's a bit of Bastiat's broken-window fallacy there.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, you can legitimately question the enduring value of these investments compared to for example infrastructure or housing projects.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True, but the real issue is defense spending, it's unnecessarily high and the real issue when it comes to the misappropriation of tax money

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The DoD has about $8.5 trillion of spending unaccounted for. The Mars roverr is pocket money in comparison.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The more space stuff you do, the more innovation and technology you stimulate, not so with housing really

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like Jens, he seems to be the kind of guy I'd loe to follow around at parties just to hear him rekt people.

10 years ago | Likes 1229 Dislikes 46

He could try with me. :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I knew a guy like this. He had a smartass informative comeback for just about everything.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

He's dead now...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jens is a pretty cool guy. Eh comments and doesnt afraid of anything.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Did you just assume my gender?"- Jens

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

But he uses bad arguments :( One is unconstitutional, Nasa came about because of military (more military = more NASAs) and eating chips?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 22

All he has to say is NASA is one of the few organizations where money in brings in enough tax dollars to pay for itself

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

The scientific breakthroughs have created many many jobs and improved quality of living of everyone

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

How is making churches pay tax unconstitutional?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

MuCulloch vs Maryland - the power to tax is the power to destroy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I need a friend like that XD

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

am I the only one around here that thinks "jens" is a woman?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Seeing as Jens is a Scandinavian male name, I doubt it, but y'never know

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

This is the premise of Eurotrip all over again

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interesting, in the US and other places... "Jan" could be short for "Janice". '...the more you know', I guess

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is the dynamic upon with my relationship functions, he rekts people, I giggle.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

love*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Rekt is past tense" - Jens

10 years ago | Likes 672 Dislikes 3

This is gold

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rekt.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's actually usually a past participle

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's a lotta adverbs. Rekt (wrecked) is only a past participle if the wrecking continues from past to present tense. That's uncommon.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? No. "Rekt" is typically short for "he/she/it was/got rekt," in which case it is a past participle. "He rekt his car" uses past tense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can't infer extra words & call it a participle. In "get rekt" it is a participle. "Rekt" is not.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It most commonly occurs with crummy passive voice, like "have rekt"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Classic Jens

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

New meme alert

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

lol

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Classic Jens

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was having problem with wreck, rekt, was leaning towards rek, but that just sounds wrong. Jens, what's the correct term?

10 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 2

I would go with "watching people get rekt by him"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i've seen and used rek a few times, so it's cromulent

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

SHOW ME WHAT YOU GOT. Sorry, read Cromulon

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It really embiggens one's vocabulary.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Why are you following me"? - Jens

10 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 1

rekt

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

Haha classic Jens. So guys, what're we doing for Thanksgiving? Wanna set it in stone? And also, Christmas? Plans? ..Anyone? Jens? New Years?

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

This was fun.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0