MRW The UK Prime Minister has a working parliamentary majority, but calls an election anyway because she thinks she's going to crush her opponents to bits, and then the results come in

Jun 9, 2017 7:22 AM

EricFromAccounts

Views

184120

Likes

3770

Dislikes

148

MRW The UK Prime Minister has a working parliamentary majority, but calls an election anyway because she thinks she's going to crush her opponents to bits, and then the results come in

Election gamble leaves 'strong and stable' British PM anything but http://reut.rs/2rHqVWu

'UK election ends in hung Parliament' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/election-2017-40171454

+1 for the George of the Jungle gif!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is that gif from?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The 1997 George of the Jungle movie

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't blame me, I voted for Ali G.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very subtle way to get a brendan fraser reference in there I must say.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Tories actually gained votes than last time, but the electoral system is borked like that.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

*More votes, rather.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Our government was a mess before and it's still a mess. It was not stable nefore

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've stopped laughing now she is trying to form a govt with the DUP. NOW can we start taking constitutional reform seriously? guys?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

That film is a damn treasure.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what you're saying is that I shouldn't start with the sea slugs? Got it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Greedy bitch gets what greedy bitch deserves. Hopefully jimmy krankie will STFU now, thinking she runs the whole UK.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Meh, the re-election was because she had such good polling after supporting brexit, she figured "Let's get a massive majority and 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

- Destroy privacy laws while we're in charge". Good job May. Good job.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Won't that result in a disadvantage going into brexit negotiations?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Probably but at least it still isn't Corbyn at the negotiating table

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He looks like a better negotiator. May cannot face a debate at all. The only thing she will ever get during negotiation is pity.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you watch any of their in-House interaction, she is miles better than he. Also, he gave away all his leverage months ago

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh, hey, exactly what happened in Australia.

9 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 3

Nowhere near to this extent tho

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently somebody cooked a shrimp on the barbie...but in the United Kingdom

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Fck I want shrimp right now

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Obligatory "its a fuckin prawn mate"

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Yeah cunt! (Aussie for mate) Not to be confused with Yeah Mate! Which means we think your a cunt...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Disturbingly that was my first thought.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

May got complacent, Corbyn promised to pave the roads gold with his imaginary pot of money. Both of their parties were pretty stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Corbyn provided a fully costed manifesto which raises corporate tax slightly to levels which are still lower than most capitalist countries

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Corbyn promised the young free things, and the numbers of the voters were boosted due to the Brexit shock. 18-25's best turnout in years.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

it's usually the old who get free things so nothing new there

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not in this country, being a pensioner in the UK is a battle everyday. Cobryn enticed the young with free tuition, benefits and other "gold"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

May took the risk of completely ruining the Labour Party with this snap election but imo she completely fucked it with the manifesto and (1)

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

A few other comments the party made. But if she gets permission to form the coalition with the DUP maybe she'll turn around I don't know (2)

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

As much as I don't like Corbyn I'll give him credit for believing what he says and turning around the public opinion of him.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Also, credit for fondling the breasts of a senior party leader.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally 100% how I feel about Corbyn.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The DUP are the most batshit right-wingers in parliament. They tried to ban swings on Sundays to stop kids having fun instead of praying.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

See I wouldn't have generally liked them, but when an Imgurian calls someone batshit right wingers, I have to like them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Read the second sentence of my comment.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Read the first part of my comment

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

That's not really something to be proud of. Dangerous thinking there.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So... if you saw a neo-nazi march advocating ethnic cleansing you'd be compelled to support them?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I won't. But you showed your hand by equating right wingers with neo nazis

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I'm not going to lie I don't know much about them (hence why I said I don't know) but so far I'm not sure what to think of them ATM.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're climate change deniers and anti-abortion (abortion is banned in N.Ireland except in rare medical circumstances). Hope that helps.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Does a bit I have a feeling this coalition if it goes ahead is be received 50/50.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost forgot - they're quite anti-LGBT as well.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Good thing the DUP will be a very minor partner then.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No they didn't.......seriously?????

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Admittedly it was overturned in 1965. But a little history lesson never hurt noone.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And I thank you for it. What a bunch of mentalists lol

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She's now forming a coalition government with a racist, terrorist sympathising, anti-same sex marriage political party. She is a twat!

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

'Terrorist sympathising'? As opposed to what, Corbyn the IRA sympathiser? Or Sinn Fien who are LITERALLY former terrorists?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

So are the DUP, albeit Unionist terrorists. (N.I conflict is very messy)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

That's a large part of why this is such bullshit. They're doing EXACTLY what they were claiming Corbyn did.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I honestly believe she did it because she couldn't handle it anymore and wanted an out. Anyone could see the country was divided, you 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ don't be a politician for as long as she is and not be able to read the climate

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where are you from to have such competent politicians?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a brit you fuckmuppet

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but seriously, where are you from?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She is going to make a coalition with anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage Northern Irish. To be 100% honest, is this a good thing for Labour?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I can't see how that's a good thing for anyone :/ Except the DUP.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The UK hops 1 inch left, and the government LURCHES right? If the Libs do a Macron and/or Corbyn goes the Full Bernie, 2022 will be insaaane

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"full bernie"? Corbyn is further gone than Bernie ever was. Social democrat vs democratic socialist

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I wonder how many Conservative advisers are picking up their P45 this morning

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

When is May getting her's?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what is a P45?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Is it like a paper saying "You are shit-canned so hit the bricks"?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the form that says "this person paid this much tax in this year to date", therefore stating they don't have a job anymore to pay tax on

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the same as a Pink Slip. You get it when you leave (or are sacked)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Can we inception this idea into Trump's head next?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Trump is shooting himself in the Foot...it's going to be rocky but hopefully in two years he's rendered irrelevant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and if not its back to canada for my family. Still ashamed ppl ever supported him in the first place, let alone still supporting him...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So she has now gotten in bed with DUP. There goes science sexual rights women's rights and oh yeah the climate

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Chin up, it's very likely there'll be another general election this year

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

welcome to america! oh...wait...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wow for once the fp isn't focused around the USA, huh neato

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More like Theresa DisMay, amirite?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

May has fucked it, in bed with the DUP while the main attack on corbyns campaign was his 'affiliation' with the IRA and other terror groups

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 7

Yeah. She's making a pact with religious extremists so she can claim to be Strong And Stable. No way does she get re-elected in 2022.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 8

Don't underestimate the stupidity of people

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Partly because she's not going to last 5 years as PM. Either the tories will oust her or the government itself will fail sooner than that.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm impressed if she makes it to 2020. And by that I mean twenty past eight tonight.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

for sure, probably the best result for labour in realistic terms, 5 years from now the gov will be very weak and wobbly

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

She will most likely still win, but thankfully won't be as powerful and be able to push stupid policies through easily

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 5

She did not win. Her gamble severely weakened her party, forcing them to ally with some other party rather than having the majority.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Won't be able*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and now we get to see her joined with the DUPs. happy days :/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She didn't, they fucked up a 30 point lead with all the media backing them, now she may be unable to pass anything without help from others

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

"with all the media backing them" Did you watch the actual elections? The BBC, Sky and ITV were jumping with glee over the fact Cob wins.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

She also said she would resign if she lost 6 seats but I doubt she will.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

'media backing them'? Nah, media was screwing everyone in the name of salacious scaremongering in order to sell papers & eyeballs.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Well that's a given, but all the major national papers bar one or two all had headlines this week saying "Vote May or disaster will strike"

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe she should go see a doctor :D

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Every side of every election claims the media was "for" the opponent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How likely is a team up of labour and SNP ? That wouldn't be too bad right?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't think it would do well sturgeon has said in the past if she teamed up she'd try and take over if I remember. I also doubt corbyn

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Would stand up to her much.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not sure what makes you think Corbyn wouldn't stand up to her. Sturgeon more recently said she'd consider a progressive alliance with Labour

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The reason isn't well founded I'll admit I just can't shake the feeling she'd walk all over him. Like I said it's just a feeling.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahhhh well at least if it does end up back in may's Hand then at least it'll be harder for her to do stupid stuff.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While I am more conservative than labour I agree with you, some of what she's been saying has put me off

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a) Labour have ruled out any "deals" and b) it still unfortunately wouldn't be enough. Even Labour plus SNP plus Lib Dems wouldn't be enough

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It also would have fewer seats than the Conservatives have alone, so I can't see how/why it would happen. Most likely is Tory/DUP.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Which is unsustainable. England's voters move three inches Left and the government moves hard right? They'll get massacred in 2022.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I mean they did get the most mps, so I don't quite think that is true.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's the Tories only option at the minute, lib Dems and snp have ruled out any coalitions

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why she called an election. She WAS the prime minister? Why decide "I'l hold an election.. then run for prime minister!!"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

She was attempting to catch Labour off guard. It was a cynical political move.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Took the risk of eliminating the competition and drive them into the ground, didn't work because corbyn promised a lot in the final push

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Okay makes sense, so like to get more seats in parliament?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly can't remember but I think one of the reasons was she wanted to ruin corbyn politically and to throw labour into disarray once more

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just remembering it was also because May/conservatives wanted a stronger more unified givers

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you American? Our system is differnt in the UK. The PM can call a spontaneous election, which they usually do whn they feel they can win

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also means that the PM is much more beholden to the support from their Party, more likely to suffer a coup. A Donald Trump wouldn't 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No I am British, that's just what did not make sense to me. If you are the prime minister already, why hold an election then run for PM..

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You mean why hold a General Election when you're already in government with a majority? I want to be clear on your question

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It just seems an odd form of self sabotage, I understand she wasn't voted in as she stepped in when David left but, she is still was the PM

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well i'm unsure if she had a majority, honestly i don't pay closest attention but yeah why hold an election to run for PM when she is PM 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So she ran because she believed she would increase her majority, she thought she'd get more tory mps. She would want that because 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically, Labour was falling apart and May was the only politician with a positive approval rating. It looked like a sure thing.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Then came the manifesto, with its plans to reinstate fox hunting, remove the pensions triple lock, and regulate the Internet

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile Corbyn was promising the Moon (might as well have, we could get there ourselves for less than Labour would borrow)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Basically, May took a sure thing and messed everything up.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I still can't believe how bad she fucked up, tbh. How can you accidentally piss off so many people and not even think?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

As a Brit, this is exactly how I feel today!!!

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 5

Can I ask you something? In America, we have regularly scheduled elections. Do you guys just have elections whenever the PM feels like it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's every 5 years, but a sitting PM can call an election early if they think they can win.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She thought she could win another 5 years with a bigger majority, instead of having just 3 years before the next planned general election .

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So calling an election will 'reset' the clock so to speak? Theoretically a party could just call election after election?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Parliament has to agree to an election, the PM just triggers it. But yes, it resets the clock.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As another Brit, thank goodness for the NHS. They stitched my split sides for free.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*high five mate!*

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Likewise, honestly the political landscape of the world right now is a laughing stock.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised she didn't learn from Cameron failing a vote that wasn't needed just to get some recognition or the likes.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The Tories are in a downward spiral/nosedive and we'll see further labour gains because of the shitshow. Expect another GE within 2 years!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Same. I'm laughing so hard at the current state of UKIP too.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Poor Nigel. He must need a drink.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Poor US, if he carries on buddying with Trump. Good riddance.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Didn't you hear? They're going to replace Labour! /s

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How well hung is the parelment?

9 years ago | Likes 579 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 16, 2019 11:42 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yuge

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

One of them is called 'black rod'

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hung like a goddamned horse.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Huge. Over six hundred dicks, too.

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hung enough that a good portion of the population are going to get shafted by it...without lube, I might add.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Asking for a friend

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of them is called 'black rod'

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HUGE! Like 3 1/2 inch floppy dicks!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your typo makes this even better

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hung enough to fuck even itself!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They have armadillos in their trousers...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like an elephant

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently a record number of female PMs were elected this time around, so take that how you will.

9 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 1

MP's, friend. We can't have more than one PM, that would just be silly.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I guess all the ministers would have to battle it out, and then the winner would become the 'Prime' xD

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd love to see May, Corbin, Sturgeon, Lord Buckethead and Mr. Fish Finger battle it out deathrace 2 style.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/signed* :D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MPs. You mean MPs right?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes, it was a typo. I meant MPs

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey these days females can be hung too

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 1

Ah ah, ah ah, dude looks like a lady. Or is it Ah ah, ah ah, lady looks like a dude?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@IPegOnTheFirstDate Case in point.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure, just look at ISIL.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 12, 2017 6:00 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm an idiot please help

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does it hang to the left or the right?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately the right. And it's not a strong and stable dick either, one prone to failing in the moment.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

A weak floppy dick that needs some viagra

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It needs some red pills from the left, I hear Corbz will sort that out

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like my girlfriend... Just kidding I don't have a girlfriens

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pushing rope eh?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

May's campaign and manifesto: Anyone who isn't a high earner with their own home and private healthcare can GO FUCK THEMSELVES.

9 years ago | Likes 751 Dislikes 47

people who will be affected most by her government: "better vote for her, she knows her stuff innit"

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

So she's an American politician in disguise?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

"Vote for the conservatives if you don't rely on public services."

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

So,same as Trump

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Well, that's what the media said, the manifesto read a bit differently.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

While I didn't vote conservative I did read their manifesto and... That isn't really what their manifesto was about at all...

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

And their campaign was more just propaganda against the idea of a Corbyn and Labour government

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Worked in America

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

More "If your old and built your budget around our heat subsidy, fuck you, it's gone. Oh and we're copying China's internet.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We call that Paul Ryan in the US.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And attacking corbin

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

*Corbyn

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True dat

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's literally what every conservative party anywhere ever does.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And then for anyone then missed; "BTW the DUP is joining us. Fuck your civil liberties, fuck the gays, fuck unwed mothers, fuck fuck fuck"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the problem with that? Why should I pay for other people? That's stealing as I don't agree with giving away my money to them.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 6, 2017 12:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

yes I have tried, didn't like it. I refuse to pay for fucktards that don't want to work. As long as you have an honest job, I will help.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically unless you don't use and haven't used any government provided services you did agree.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think nearly 50% of my wages to tax is too much. And then ofcourse the 20% VAT on whatever you buy as well.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like in America the tax rate is on a tiered system.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it isn't like that. Taxes won't be raised for lower income and that's better than raising corporate tax and driving them away.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

And Corbyn's FUCK ALL THE RICH PEOPLE SO I CAN PAY FOR EVERYTHING I PROMISED, UNTIL THE RICH PEOPLE LEAVE (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 14

AND THEN EITHER CANCEL EVERYTHING I PROMISED OR FUCK THE POOR AS WELL SO I CAN CONTINUE TO PAY FOR IT

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

You clearly don't understand his concepts whatsoever

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

He has said multiple times he would pay for all of his wondrous plans by borrowing and taxing the rich. What exactly am I misunderstanding?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Pretty much eh. Sadly most of the population cant see that

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

As a german: We too accept British refugees

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I can only speak Spanish (badly) how quickly do you think I can learn German?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rather quickly if you really try it.The languages are somewhat related to latin while spanish is closer to italian &german closer to english

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is literally what every person without a job says. Get one, your attitude will change.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 17

I have a job

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I swear this interchange happens so much "it's clear you don't have a job cause you want poor people to live" I have a job" "wat.jpg"

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My family are high earners who are more than happy to pay higher taxes so long as the vulnerable and unfortunate are looked after. Morals.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They can always volunteer extra money. But they won't because they know it'll be squandered.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except the part where you've saved to buy your own home and they take it to pay for healthcare

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

So who the fuck were the tories appealing to anyway?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No-one this election. TM's Spads made a really shit manifesto

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whereas the feckless who've spent all their money on Sky TV and fags get it for free

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Then fuck off to Kansas if you want to see what happens when you attempt to rely solely on tax cuts to fuel your economy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

... Fucking what? National Insurance is income based, nobody has ever lost their house over it. And nobody in council housing owns a house

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oops - should have said Social Care rather than Healthcare

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 10, 2017 10:55 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Economic science denial is just as bad as climate change denial.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Corbyn is attacking austerity. Which means HE'S the one in tune with accurate economics. Not May.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Labour presented a fully costed manifesto. Conservative did not

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I don't think anyone is under the illusion that everything will be free...but at least he is moving towards a higher quality of life for all

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

As an economist: AUSTERITY is defying economic sense. That's the policy which caused Greece's GDP to shrink 30% in five years.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 8

Gotta say that as a computer scientist, I do not consider your occupational title helpful, since you consistently get everything wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

That's like me saying computer scientists can't be trusted because all games are released buggy nowadays.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not quite; I can fix the bugs. You cannot fix yours.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You mean paying your debt? Only spending the money you have? Obviously that's insane

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

Ok, government debt is NOT the same as you owing money on your microwave.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unless you believe in Keynesian economics (which I would argue is foolish) it is not that different at the end of the day.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TY for exposing your hilarious ignorance of how taxes and debt work! I gotta show like six other Imgurians your comment, don't delete it K?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

https://mises.org/blog/sorry-krugman-austerity-good-economy to suggest economics is a hard science is simply foolish

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think you are failing to see what happens when certain assumptions behind economic theory (Keynesian in this case) are not held true (1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are can be numerous reasons for why stimulus measures which worked to fix the great depression don't have to work every time (2/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Corruption, low productivity of labour, low competitiveness of the economy, inability to collect taxes. Greece had all of this problems (3/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh shit's fucked up over there too? Glad it's not just us.

9 years ago | Likes 243 Dislikes 7

All of the British children are being kinda belligerent atm. Canada is just so mild that we don't notice

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

It's like we want some of all that media attention Trump gets and for all the wrong reasons.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know how you could've tell Trump was going to win? It was looking at the political global climate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They may actually be in danger of losing their universal healthcare. It's interesting to see the opposite side of the debate.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Our healthcare isn't as fucked as yours to be fair. But current PM would like it to be.

9 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 3

Privatization doesn't mean we get America's healthcare system. It just means a few things would be handled by private health organisations(1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And payed for by the government. It's a cheaper quicker way to get the same result without making the nhs larger. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wonder what it'd take to unfuck your internet/privacy laws. Didn't seem that great before the current gov't but now it can't be much worse.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

None of that was really a topic for most voters yesterday.Public service funding, Brexit negotiations & care for vulnerable were top issues.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I know a few people who's deciding policy was her stance on the internet and how it's run

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Why? I honestly don't get why people want others to go without.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Some people are just bags of dicks

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

agreed

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did she graduate from the Hillary Clinton School for How To Lose An Election And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff Good Too?

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 13

Hillary Clinton School for How To Lose An Election And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff *Bass Ackwards* Too?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

She was doing the trump not the Hillary ... I wish the orange turd would do this

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

No, she did a Hillary. So utterly convinced she was gonna win she simply didn't give a fuck anymore.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Aye, she technically lost the election, but she'll remain as PM. It was Cobryn, and every other party, who lost.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

US citizen here; Why does she remain as PM if she lost the election?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, because no one else won basically. The UK has several parties in parliament and the conservatives lost the least.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ohh ok --ty

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 3

Context?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

May wants to change Hunan rights laws because she wants to use approaches towards capturing/identifying/punishing suspected terrorists which

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are currently big possible due to said laws.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your sentence doesn't sound right. Also you're lacking a lot of detail there. What changes? What obstacles? Why? Why?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And this is why human rights laws are a joke. If those charged with enforcement can just change the law, is it really much of a "right"? Sad

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

*any* law can be changed, if people don't like it they can vote against the party proposing the change. It's a basic principle of democracy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all countries have this ability though. I wasn't just speaking of the UK.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, don't take it out of context, now. She's on about known Terrorists with known affiliations to extremist groups. Imo, she's right.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 28

That's not out of context at all. It's exactly what she was saying, she doesn't care about human rights if it's for a group she feels

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Doesn't deserve them, like Islamic terrorists. But that's the whole point of human rights, they are supposed to apply to everybody

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

What about them though? What is she proposing?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There's human rights laws that prevent people from being arrested from knowing to be dangerous, but not actually doing anything. ->

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

-> Meaning, if a Daesh terrorist is known to be living in the UK, and has plans to do something illegal, we can't legally arrest him. ->

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

And there is no way that a government could abuse the ability to arrest anyone at will with no evidence just by claiming they're a terrorist

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

INB4 she's the Senate.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There is nothing in the HRA that prevents the arrest of known conspirators and no government should control its own human rights laws.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

We don't live in a socialist, soviet shithole, mate. Many of our politicians are corrupt, but not at that level. If you think that's an ->

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

-> issue that will happen, you're delusional, mate.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Username, folks.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Lol - like the DUP she's relying on to make a majority?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Aye, and just like Cobryn who supported the IRA.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

By supporting, do you mean entered into peace talks with - that led to the Good Friday Agreement, and the end of hostilities?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3