Guise

Aug 7, 2016 9:56 PM

This guy for president. ALL child molesters deserve an unceremonious bullet between the eyes and an unmarked shallow grave in the wilderness

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He shall be know as... The Kid-Diddler Killer

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

I'd wanna read the transcripts of the case against the rapist, but if he was guilty? Fuck em. Nobody who rapes deserves to live.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So, you don't need to be convicted of anything, just charged with three things? He would have demanded the law protect him from lynch mobs.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vigilante justice is what we should base our civilization on rather than the rule of law. No, wait...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

If he's saying one of the kids was the son of his friend I think it may be safe to assume an id was made ? I'd call that guilty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Insert "I guess" meme here

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was expecting a joke.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You have to think that over time if this hadnt happen, his point of view and behavior could have lead him to hurt himself or others

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The real life punisher

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Frank? Frank Castle?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

THE Frank Castle who disembowlled a man in a forest and used his guts as tree ornaments?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what about the family of the guy he killed? What if that guy was innocent? Do we condone the killing of this man?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What if a big, blue goose landed on your shoulder?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you rape someone else or harm a kid you deserve nothing less than a bullet in the head. Possibly a rope if we're feeling patient.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

He sounds angry. I have no opinion about if he was right or wrong to exact extrajudicial killing in this case. But he was angry.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

his name is Oregon?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I knew a guy who shot the molester of his 2 year old niece the day he walked out of prison. He did 7 years, the molester did 6 months.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

holy shit you sick criminal commentors. Vigilanty justice is the cowards way out of doing the right thing, you are sick in the head

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 21

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Aug 18, 2016 2:56 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

vigilante*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

If the guy truly is guilty of molestation but will never face charges, what is the right thing?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Well, he's innocent until proven guilty. Vigilante justice just undermines the reason for having a justice system in the first place.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Matt Murdock

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is what I fear will happen to me one day. The Justice system is failing so many people because of how long it takes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And how little it almost always accomplishes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

did the right thing, no question.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

Exactly. Hands down. If you harm a kid you get a bullet in the head.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Oh, there's a few questions

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

And you know his victim was guilty how?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe, just maybe there was a legit reason he wasn't being pursued. Vigilante justice is so dangerous and fucked up. This is still murder.

10 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 18

Which is why he was in jail

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oh yes, cause we can 'rely' on 'maybe' situations.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Then again, maybe he was like the guy that just got drafted to the Atlanta Falcons. Maybe the guy was caught in the act but had money.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

People cheer this kind of behavior until it's them or their's unjustly accused. Suddenly the law must run it's course...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Assuming the "facts" described were accurate...3 cases of molestation and no charges..."suddenly" wasn't a factor.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'Suddenly' referred to the accuser's change of attitude when the shoe is on the other foot, not the commission of the crimes...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok got it, "suddenly" in your hypothetical construct with imaginary characters. In this actual case, not so much...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure just kill whoever you deem deserves it and we are quick on our way to becoming somalia or some other disgusting place like that

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

That's 1st degree murder...why is he out of jail?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Are you questioning an image paired with text on the internet? The pinnacle of accuracy and honesty?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

An old friend of mine did 6 yrs. for murdering the man who molested his girlfriend's daughter... walked up to the guy and shot him. Dead.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I disagree with the guy, but I admire the fact that he is not pleading to get off without punishment. He knows he did a crime, and owns it.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

While I obviously don't condone molestation, this kind of vigilantism undermines the foundations of a just society, especially one that 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

Places such emphasis on the presumption of innocence of the accused. While I sympathize, his conviction and jailing was correct

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

From what unreliable tone he has the gentleman doesn't seem to think what he did wasn't wrong. He just feels like what he did was right too.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On the contrary, a society which would allow an individual to rape 3 children is unjust, and undeserving of being labeled anything else.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

We only know one side of probably twenty different sides of a story. And it might be made up anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A just society will punish those who violate others and the law, but only in such a manner than it first establishes beyond a reasonable 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

*that* it first establishes

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Doubt that the accused is in fact guilty of the crime. Vigilantism holds no such promise of protecting the innocent. Only burning 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Judgement for those whom it believes guilty. As such, a just society cannot tolerate vigilantism in any form.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I understand why people support his actions, but ultimately we don't know if the victim was even guilty

10 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 12

I bet that kid knows...

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

Kids can be extremely unreliable witnesses. It's horrible but their testimonies can be very skewed by what they think they see.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

I agree.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as someone who was molested as a child: go fuck yourself

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're only unreliable witnesses in court, while the defendant's lawyer picks apart the argument of a child who doesn't even know how 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The judicial system works

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See: satanic panic

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What does "widespread panic of satanic ritual abuse" have to do with this?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A large part of the panic was about schools for young kids. They ended up giving entirely unbelievable testimony.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

only guilty people die of murder... if they were really innocent the body has ways to shut down dieing...

10 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 5

Igetthatreference.gif

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

An innocent person doesn't let things like being murdered happen to therm

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Dieing" really? How does that look right to anyone?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The justice system is fucked for cases like this. People shouldn't be able to get away with rape. I'm surprised the jury wasn't more lenient

10 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 24

People are still innocent until proven guilty. For both sides.

10 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 3

dude got less than 20 years for 1st degree murder. that's fairly lenient

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jury nullification

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Shhh you aren't supposed to know about that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I read it more like the molester was awaiting trial out on bail, but that was taking too long.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you read about Dylan Roof getting his ass kicked in prison?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

And the guy that kicked his ass got enough donations to cover bail.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

He "escaped" during lockdown so Roof could go shower. Which I think means they let him out lmao.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"wasn't more lenient"? You mean "wasn't more strict" right? If not, I don't understand what you mean.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I think he meant the jury prosecuting the guy who killed the rapist, and that they should have been less strict with him.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

AAh, thanks! Makes sense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The justice system responds poorly to people taking the law into their own hands, for better or worse.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

For better.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly - only the state gets to used the death penalty, and only for certain crimes people are convicted of. For better or worse.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As someone who use to work for a supervisor who most likely had paranoid schizophrenia, I am glad those decisions are done by the state.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As am I, but apparently not everyone on Imgur thinks Oregon man up here fucked up

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can understand why he did what he did, and quite frankly a hundred years or so ago I would have most likely supported him.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It sincerely bothers me that people are so ready to throw in on emotion rather than reason.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We should guys like this as cops

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Words are hard huh?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Man I don't even mind being downvoted for that. I must have been drunk. What the fuck was I saying?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's weird for some reason I don't understand the burden of proof is much higher in rape cases that any other kind of crime

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because a lot of the time it relies on heresay.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol, hearsay?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, hearsay. Sorry.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's not the hero we want, but the hero we need.

10 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 36

Well shit, he's the hero I want.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

I certainly don't want or need him, at least without more information and evidence.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Exactly - if only we'd use the death penalty more often, we wouldn't need guys like this to do it for us.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 18

Uhh... the guy had not been convicted. It had nothing to do with the death penalty, but seems like lack of evidence.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean, I read it as though this guy was out on bail and was awaiting trial for a long time, but regardless, he was accused of diddling 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

In fact, I don't know why we don't have the death penalty for all child molesters. I mean, if this guy deserved to die despite the 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

lack of evidence, why aren't we killing the ones who do have enough evidence to be convicted? Put them all to death. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

kids, and he deserved to be slaughtered like the demon spawn his was. I applaud this man and think he shouldn't have gone to jail. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Yeah, accused of, not convicted.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Poe's law. A ton of early comments were jizzing themselves over how awesome this guy was, and I vehemently disagree

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1