Neil DeGrasse Tyson thinks that every intelligent person should read these 8 books.

May 19, 2016 10:13 PM

ThisGirlWhoPlaysGames

Views

112100

Likes

7560

Dislikes

538

the_more_you_know

what a pretentious asshole

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It will take you a sweet minute, but I would suggest Atlas Shrugged as well. Also Alas Babylon isn't half bad and is a very easy read.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"The complete, self-important douchebag's guide to literacy"

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 11

What about HGTTG? It literally has THE answer in it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Correction, books that every person should at least read once in their life time not because some celeb sci-guy read them.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

Is that not exactly what he's saying? Where does he say "you should read these because I did"?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Plato's Republic and if you haven't already, Fahrenheit 451

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Don't forget "The Call of Cthulhu" by H.P. Lovecraft, to learn that 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I feel like he hasn't actually ever read Wealth of Nations. He certainly hasn't read ToMS, in light of which his summary makes no sense

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

I'm not sure Tyson understands the meaning of the arguments made in the wealth of nations...

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

All mankind should seek neither conservationism nor progressiveness, but Enlightenment.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I feel like every intelligent person is smart enough to know what to read to expand their knowledge and don't need suggestions.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

I think suggestions are fine. I just ignore the editorializing unless I really trust the recommender's analysis or subject area knowledge.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

hardly. you dont aquire knowledge in a vaccum.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I disagree, I consider myself intelligent but am sometimes paralyzed with indecision because I get stuck trying to chess plan out each path.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But do you at least know which genres you like or which topics you want to delve in? Thats enough to get you going, the indecision will pass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No mein kampf? Such a let down.... XP

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Don't forget Animal Farm, one of the classics imho.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not at all the lesson of The Wealth of Nations. Jesus. Have you read it?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Its.a.fucking.joke.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9. Interview with a Vampire (public library;gas station audio book) by Anne Rice, to learn how to hide your ego in a false veil of intellect

10 years ago | Likes 252 Dislikes 24

Savage

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One vampire book I will read

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I watched the movie, does that count?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ayyyo this guy

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why don't you guys like Neil?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

people always bash me on here for choosing a non-STEM field. why is Tyson's bashing so special?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of the things people do on the internet would make them social pariahs if they did it in person.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Honestly, there are only 140 characters available here.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

:/ He may not be the BEST scientist but he does try to educate the general public...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Narcissism basically sums it up

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

When you read these 8 books just right http://imgur.com/J26Ku7N

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The Bible is fascinating. People have been trying to control or destroy it forever and it's still there in its pure form.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Well, pure-ish.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Wasn't there meant to be a gospel from Mary Magdalene that was expunged?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Not trying to be contrary, but if you look into the oldest manuscripts found, it really is uncanny the accuracy of current texts.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The process of collecting the books of the bible was highly selective but you're right. It only became THE bible once they were collected :D

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What's so uncanny? Why would they be much different? Hasn't happened with other ancient texts neither.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well, it actually has. Early manuscripts of the writings of Homer, for instance, have far mare errors from repeated transcription.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Alright, fair enough, but still hardly surprising. Homer is a.) 1000yrs older, b.) hasn't been copied all the time

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Art of War is about avoiding killing as much as possible

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

He and that science guy twat are insufferable pseudo know-it-alls.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 12

seconding that1

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark: Carl Sagan. Guns, Germs and Steel, Jared Diamond.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

➀: ooh can we make this a thing? yes yes, of course. fuck correcting all this glib-ass bullshit Neil DeDiscount Sagan spews every other week

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

➄: so if you really wanna tear Discount Science Man down forever, just keep nonchalantly rejecting his bull by deferring to better shit

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

➁: cause clearly he feels perfectly entitled to it no matter how many times he fucks up, speaks on a subject he knows absolutely fuckall

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

➂: about with absurd pomp + airs of supreme authority, etc. why? cause he's vain af. but there's one thing vanity will never get him, the

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

➃: grad school drop-out who always say himself as an entertainer, and that's *anything even close* to a body of work like his idol sagan's.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*saw

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

➅: sagan already said or wrote about it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Huh. I think you really dislike DeDiscount. :)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a pompous view of the Bible

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 21

Religion is very much exactly that. Want to know how to think about a subject you find uncomfortable? LGBT? Bingo Lev 18:22, done.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

The Bible is not religion though, the Bible is a book

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

To be honest most protestant Christians see our faith as a relationship with the creator of the universe.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Cool. But what are you saying in terms of this discussion thread? Can you elaborate a bit pls? Thx

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He's saying the bible is Christian religion, it says it right there in the book. See? Easy peasy. No room for argument or pesky thoughts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He also tells you that SpaceX would never go to Mars on a privately funded mission, yet they're launching one in the next transfer window...

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Hmm yes, shallow and pedantic.

10 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 17

I feel that this list insists on itself.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ironically, this list tells you what to think...

10 years ago | Likes 993 Dislikes 62

Eh looks to me more like a directory to some influential writings to help you make your own educated opinion, or at least understand these i

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty obvious you didn't finish this list.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well dont tell me everything you believe in came from your own thoughts...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm not religious but the bible should be read anyways to get the many biblical references in our society and culture in literature.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it tells you what to read and why you should read it.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This list tells you how to think, not what to think. The list only tells you what to do.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Thank you.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

no motherfucker, you form your own opinion based ob the books.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Exactly.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Thinking is not the noble readers Forte...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No - he's telling you what you'll learn. What you choose to think or opinion-ate on the subject is still subjective.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Example: you can LEARN about the story of Adam & Eve and still think it's bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, black science man could never push his belief structure on anyone!

10 years ago | Likes 270 Dislikes 17

"Science man."

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

This made my night.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I think the point is more that these help you understand how others think, making you more conscious of your own choices and education.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Less what to think, more how to think. None of the descriptions point to a conclusion, just an end.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 29

A lot of people get the "what" and "how" confused with this topic lol

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

pretty sure some were being purposely obtuse.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Well, that too! Haha

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The bible tells you how to think though, so the argument is still the same.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

That's an extremely narrow and uncritical reading of the bible.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

tell that to the numerous sects it's inspired.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

But it tells what you are supposed to take from each reading, rather than letting you take what you will. Especially the Bible one.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 8

nobody reads "the art of war" to learn cake recipes. they read it to learn how war can be an art.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

books whould have a description of what they discuss, so i know i'm getting a book on what i want to read.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Seems more like hes listing the contextual reasons for giving them. Like the bible example, scholarly readings take effort even w/ disbelief

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 18

But when you give me a book and tell me what I should learn from it, are you not telling me how to think?

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 11

Not if the conclusions you reach are your own. He did not claim right or wrong for any of the books, even the ones he'd disagree with.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 19

What? The bible is extremely interesting when studied as a piece of literature

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yep, so are many other religious texts. That was largely my point, that he's at least encouraging people to look for themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

This. Good books, but get your own lessons from them. Art of War for example is not about killing.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kind of wondering why tao te ching is missing :o I guess that'd make it 9 books.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I beg to differ, some of this books are opposites from one another, I think what he says is don't be afraid to challenge your beliefs/ideas.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I dissagree, it's your own decision as to what you take from these books. For example some might see as to why the bible has such inpact.

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 10

my thoughts exactly.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

He is literally saying if your smart, read these books. Now here is the lesson you should learn from reading it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I was commenting on the fine gentleman his opinion on these books telling you how to think, not on the Scientist his thoughts on the books.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ahhh, got it, I must have misread. my apologies.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No worries.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'The Shortness of Life' - Seneca The Younger, 'Man's Search For Meaning' - Viktor E. Frankl

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I love "on the shortness of life". It's so beautiful.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nestle a little '.' in here.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is pure ass. Ass with mustard sauce. Stinky ass with mustard sauce and tobassco.

10 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 35

For real, fuck this dude

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

Tobasssssssco. Assssssstronaut. "KENNNNYYYY!!!!"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How so?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Because he tends to come off as hypocritical. Not to say he is. Just sounds that way slmetimes

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Haha just your poetic description gets you my upvote.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pot calling kettle black?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 15

But Neil is already black.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*African American. Pot calling the kettle AFRICAN AMERICAN.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Oh great......now i have soda running from my nose and down the from of my shirt....and my phone is sticky! ....thanks Obama!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was raised a catholic and the Bible taught me more about being compassionate than this nonsense, particularly in the New Testament.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 6

The bible is still an important book to read if you want to analyze literature and recognize patterns in story telling throughout history.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Srsly. The Bible, where people routinely have questions, don't trust their superiors, so go seeking answers from God themselves? That Bible?

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

PREACH

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

i was raised Protestant and immediately left the faith once i DID sit down to read the Bible.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Bible has a wealth of interesting paradoxes and golden parables of right conduct in amongst the bull and "Blizzblazz begat Himham" &c.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed--ask any pastor or youth pastor (I was raised Christian) about what you read in the Bible and they will gladly talk to you about it--

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

My point being that reading the Bible doesn't make you believe things just because people told you to--it raises even MORE questions, and--

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

many Christians will agree that it's healthy to be an independent thinker. My youth pastor loved it when we had questions.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This is in fact official Catholic teaching: the Bible reveals transformational truths, not a series of propositions.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

And as a Christian I agreed wholeheartedly with that. I just know that in my experience I've had SO many questions and been confused a lot.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You won't gain very good insight. With the Bible and maybe a couple others, you actually have to study it in order to understand it. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 12

Without studying it, it seems ridiculously dumb and hypocritical. Studying it gives the opposite view. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 9

That's the problem with this post. A lot of books here have a greater comprehension level required than many can devote in one read-through.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Exactly! Non-religious here. The Bible is a masterwork. I've studied the Old Testament extensively in Uni - full of dense meaning.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Agreed, the original message of the book of James is hardly comprehensible in English. It's actually a great read in English, but different.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

That's another thing. Proper research also means looking up the Greek and Hebrew. I.e. "though shall not kill"="though shall not murder"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*thou, autocorrect got me

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0