899 pts ยท December 18, 2012
No.
The real Marcela Rodriguez is into chemistry: https://www.researchgate.n">guez38">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcela_Rodriguez38 & http://www.fcq.unc.edu.ar/node/361
No, I was more amused by your hate for liberals. It tickles me with joy to see the right and the left fighting amongst each other.
"Managerial control of his businesses" is not an asset, but if you're going troll me with this delusion find at least ONE article in support
I'm a libertarian. But believe whatever you want. I don't care who you hate, I'm just amused that it consumes you.
Saying he divested anything at all is false. He divested nothing at all.
He didn't reduce any of his assets. Putting his sons in charge of managing his equity is not a reduction or divestment. You're lying.
He didn't reduce any assets at all. Placing someone in charge of managing his equity is not a degree or form of divestment. You're lying.
When you say Trump divested anything at all you are wrong. He divested nothing. I don't care about the other topics you want to discuss.
By definition he didn't divest anything. I understand you want to focus on other issues, but when you say he divested anything you are wrong
Assets are resources with economic value that can be reported on a balance sheet. And by definition Trump did not reduce any his assets.
Yes, and Trump didn't reduce any of his assets. He merely put someone else in charge of managing them. Management is not an asset.
You said earlier Trump divested. That is 100% wrong. He didn't divest anything at all, not in the slightest. That's all I care about.
It's not: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asset.asp When you say Trump divested any portion of his assets or business, you're wrong.
You presented as evidence for your argument. And it proves you wrong. You have nothing but your own fantasy-definition to go on.
By your logic putting a broker in charge of managing a portfolio is a reduction of assets. It's not.Managing power isn't an asset, equity is
The methods of divestment described in your article... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divestment#Method_of_divestment ...prove you wrong.
Trump hasn't "reduced" his assets. He still has just as many assets as he did before he was president.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divestment#Method_of_divestment
"Reduction of some kind of asset" literally means selling or forfeiting equity or shares in an asset. Trump didn't do that.
No, it does not mean a reduction of "power". And it doesn't say that anywhere in that article. It's no longer having equity in an asset.
That Wikipedia article clearly indicates that divestment is selling assets or businesses. Trump didn't any of that. Read your own sources.
He did't divest at all. Putting someone else in charge of his equity isn't any kind of divestment. Divestment literally means selling equity
Nope. It's literally the definition of divestment, so when you insist that he divested in any shape or form you are flat-out lying.
I'm not arguing semantics. It's a flat-out lie to say he divested his business. He didn't in any shape or form. And that's my only point.
But if what you were saying were true, simply hiring a stock broker would be the equivalent of asset reduction (but it's not).
"Reduction of an asset" is the sale or disposal of assets specifically. Putting someone else in charge of his equity isn't asset reduction.
That Wikipedia article confirms Trump didn't divest his businesses. He didn't reduce his assets, and he didn't sell his existing businesses.
Wrong. Divesting a business means selling equity in that business: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/divestment.asp
No, he didn't divest at all. He puts his sons Don and Eric in charge of his businesses, but he still retains all the equity.
I'm pointing out that he didn't divest his businesses, and saying he did is false. Nothing more, and nothing less.
The real Marcela Rodriguez is into chemistry: https://www.researchgate.n">guez38">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcela_Rodriguez38 & http://www.fcq.unc.edu.ar/node/361
No, I was more amused by your hate for liberals. It tickles me with joy to see the right and the left fighting amongst each other.
"Managerial control of his businesses" is not an asset, but if you're going troll me with this delusion find at least ONE article in support
I'm a libertarian. But believe whatever you want. I don't care who you hate, I'm just amused that it consumes you.
Saying he divested anything at all is false. He divested nothing at all.
He didn't reduce any of his assets. Putting his sons in charge of managing his equity is not a reduction or divestment. You're lying.
He didn't reduce any assets at all. Placing someone in charge of managing his equity is not a degree or form of divestment. You're lying.
When you say Trump divested anything at all you are wrong. He divested nothing. I don't care about the other topics you want to discuss.
By definition he didn't divest anything. I understand you want to focus on other issues, but when you say he divested anything you are wrong
Assets are resources with economic value that can be reported on a balance sheet. And by definition Trump did not reduce any his assets.
Yes, and Trump didn't reduce any of his assets. He merely put someone else in charge of managing them. Management is not an asset.
You said earlier Trump divested. That is 100% wrong. He didn't divest anything at all, not in the slightest. That's all I care about.
It's not: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asset.asp When you say Trump divested any portion of his assets or business, you're wrong.
You presented as evidence for your argument. And it proves you wrong. You have nothing but your own fantasy-definition to go on.
By your logic putting a broker in charge of managing a portfolio is a reduction of assets. It's not.Managing power isn't an asset, equity is
The methods of divestment described in your article... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divestment#Method_of_divestment ...prove you wrong.
Trump hasn't "reduced" his assets. He still has just as many assets as he did before he was president.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divestment#Method_of_divestment
"Reduction of some kind of asset" literally means selling or forfeiting equity or shares in an asset. Trump didn't do that.
No, it does not mean a reduction of "power". And it doesn't say that anywhere in that article. It's no longer having equity in an asset.
That Wikipedia article clearly indicates that divestment is selling assets or businesses. Trump didn't any of that. Read your own sources.
He did't divest at all. Putting someone else in charge of his equity isn't any kind of divestment. Divestment literally means selling equity
Nope. It's literally the definition of divestment, so when you insist that he divested in any shape or form you are flat-out lying.
I'm not arguing semantics. It's a flat-out lie to say he divested his business. He didn't in any shape or form. And that's my only point.
But if what you were saying were true, simply hiring a stock broker would be the equivalent of asset reduction (but it's not).
"Reduction of an asset" is the sale or disposal of assets specifically. Putting someone else in charge of his equity isn't asset reduction.
That Wikipedia article confirms Trump didn't divest his businesses. He didn't reduce his assets, and he didn't sell his existing businesses.
Wrong. Divesting a business means selling equity in that business: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/divestment.asp
No, he didn't divest at all. He puts his sons Don and Eric in charge of his businesses, but he still retains all the equity.
I'm pointing out that he didn't divest his businesses, and saying he did is false. Nothing more, and nothing less.