33300 pts ยท May 11, 2017
You can come up with the best plan in the world, but if it isn't implimented properly it won't matter.
We should say "Good, now grant them full equality under the law."
What other country had half unwilling to put on masks and an infection % equal to ours...and turned it around?
Harm done by continuing forced lockdowns goes up the longer they last, the cure can't be more harmful than the disease.
It affects the effectiveness of spread prevention measures and what first steps have a chance of getting congressional approval.
Different initial conditions, may require different approaches. IMO the US is a vastly different problem, especially getting compliance.
Other countries have massive social compliance, different infrastructure, different authorities, and didn't let it get as bad.
Indeed, there's a really weak sense of civic duty in the US, and monied interests are entrenched deep. Change will be hard and long fought.
The US doesn't have public health care for one, and half the country doesn't trust advice to wear masks, of course copying won't work.
You left one religion to be attacked by the religion of intersectionality.
No other country fucked up like we did, metaphors don't work.
You can't pay people to stay at home if they're part of essential services. That means no stuff to buy with the money being given out.
It's harmful to shutter the distribution of food and living supplies. Fund testing so we don't have to guess who does/doesn't have it.
If the US acted earlier, we might have more options, but it was mishandled and other country's options won't work in the same way.
I'm not a slave to wall street. Open Trade and Open Boarders is far right big business welfare.
I'd be all for that, While I think Mcconnel goes too far with immunity, there should be protection against bad faith lawsuits.
No shit, natural disasters suck. What's ur magical solution? Mom+Pop stores closes forever, or people manage their own risk during a crisis
You work at your own will, unless preventing from making a living by the lockdown orders....needed or not.
Leave science to the scientists and policy to the people elected. Best of all worlds, elect more scientists.
You're being lied to and caught up in political spin.
You got me, I don't have links. Now what?
Usually Fauci agrees, but only after a month or so. The raw data are pretty messy & so too are all of the prescriptions that come out of it
so treat my take on things with that in mind.
places were it seems its just people trying to cover for their own mistakes, like Trump and the CPP/WHO. I don't have a list of citations
I'll show you my research paper if you show me yours. I'm not an expert, I read what I can and do my best to filter out inconsistancies &
Yes, and to all other sources as well. Always be wary of ulterior motives, apply skepticism to all.
The more technical, the less room for spin there is. I'd probably trust the name or mechanism for an enzyme that aides in virus reproduction
You can come up with the best plan in the world, but if it isn't implimented properly it won't matter.
We should say "Good, now grant them full equality under the law."
What other country had half unwilling to put on masks and an infection % equal to ours...and turned it around?
Harm done by continuing forced lockdowns goes up the longer they last, the cure can't be more harmful than the disease.
It affects the effectiveness of spread prevention measures and what first steps have a chance of getting congressional approval.
Different initial conditions, may require different approaches. IMO the US is a vastly different problem, especially getting compliance.
Other countries have massive social compliance, different infrastructure, different authorities, and didn't let it get as bad.
Indeed, there's a really weak sense of civic duty in the US, and monied interests are entrenched deep. Change will be hard and long fought.
The US doesn't have public health care for one, and half the country doesn't trust advice to wear masks, of course copying won't work.
You left one religion to be attacked by the religion of intersectionality.
No other country fucked up like we did, metaphors don't work.
You can't pay people to stay at home if they're part of essential services. That means no stuff to buy with the money being given out.
It's harmful to shutter the distribution of food and living supplies. Fund testing so we don't have to guess who does/doesn't have it.
If the US acted earlier, we might have more options, but it was mishandled and other country's options won't work in the same way.
I'm not a slave to wall street. Open Trade and Open Boarders is far right big business welfare.
I'd be all for that, While I think Mcconnel goes too far with immunity, there should be protection against bad faith lawsuits.
No shit, natural disasters suck. What's ur magical solution? Mom+Pop stores closes forever, or people manage their own risk during a crisis
You work at your own will, unless preventing from making a living by the lockdown orders....needed or not.
Leave science to the scientists and policy to the people elected. Best of all worlds, elect more scientists.
You're being lied to and caught up in political spin.
You got me, I don't have links. Now what?
Usually Fauci agrees, but only after a month or so. The raw data are pretty messy & so too are all of the prescriptions that come out of it
so treat my take on things with that in mind.
places were it seems its just people trying to cover for their own mistakes, like Trump and the CPP/WHO. I don't have a list of citations
I'll show you my research paper if you show me yours. I'm not an expert, I read what I can and do my best to filter out inconsistancies &
Yes, and to all other sources as well. Always be wary of ulterior motives, apply skepticism to all.
The more technical, the less room for spin there is. I'd probably trust the name or mechanism for an enzyme that aides in virus reproduction