281 pts ยท December 18, 2015
Chances are there were no burns on her sister-in-law either. Most people die from smoke inhalation in fires.
So even your example doesn't fit your description.
And an unconfirmed bomb threat also has a significantly lower punishment than a bomb exploding and not even killing anyone.
That is a hypothetical, Not the definitive as stated by Wolfsleigher.
Wrong again i'm afraid.
And miners dont? Salespeople don't?
Until a little over a century ago? Are you western or something? Europe and North America is the only continents where it kind of stopped
In large parts of the world. Yup.
So does mining. I haven't seen mining illegalized
And there are plenty of places where it became *worse* after it became illegal. But nobody gives a shit about that.
That would *ONLY* be true if these were immovable objects, not autonomous beings, or if they didn't move for an ambulance. No ambulance seen
Translation: When you can't give a source ad hominem
I 'don't think you got the "normal" in question here.
I meant tinfoil hat. Google it if you are in effin doubt.
That's *why* they made that law.
And *legally* you are responsible for anyone using your WiFi (yes, they made a law for that purpose)
*looks at door awaiting Spanish inquisition* also The woman is still there, browsing.
Aaaand? You just proved my point.
This is the source for the suicide rate drop.
I believe this http://pubmed.gov/20220861 is what you are looking for.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed">2947672">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947672, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180205
Contradiction.
Dichotomy again.
Yes, that is the quote. So what I said was *not* obvious to you, or you wouldn't have said what I quoted.
Anyone with half a brain can see it. Except you, because you are too invested in your conclusion.
Apparently not "Considering I never said ALL women experience it"
No, they don't. You are just so set on a conclusion that you can't see what is being said, just your conclusion.
First error in your reading: The "all" in question is not "all women", but "all women who report 'sexism'"
WTF? Your reading comprehension needs some work.
See what I mean by your dichotomy issue. I'm not saying *ALL* are fake, I am saying that *Not all* are real.
Chances are there were no burns on her sister-in-law either. Most people die from smoke inhalation in fires.
So even your example doesn't fit your description.
And an unconfirmed bomb threat also has a significantly lower punishment than a bomb exploding and not even killing anyone.
That is a hypothetical, Not the definitive as stated by Wolfsleigher.
Wrong again i'm afraid.
And miners dont? Salespeople don't?
Until a little over a century ago? Are you western or something? Europe and North America is the only continents where it kind of stopped
In large parts of the world. Yup.
So does mining. I haven't seen mining illegalized
And there are plenty of places where it became *worse* after it became illegal. But nobody gives a shit about that.
That would *ONLY* be true if these were immovable objects, not autonomous beings, or if they didn't move for an ambulance. No ambulance seen
Translation: When you can't give a source ad hominem
I 'don't think you got the "normal" in question here.
I meant tinfoil hat. Google it if you are in effin doubt.
That's *why* they made that law.
And *legally* you are responsible for anyone using your WiFi (yes, they made a law for that purpose)
*looks at door awaiting Spanish inquisition* also The woman is still there, browsing.
Aaaand? You just proved my point.
This is the source for the suicide rate drop.
I believe this http://pubmed.gov/20220861 is what you are looking for.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed">2947672">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947672, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180205
Contradiction.
Dichotomy again.
Yes, that is the quote. So what I said was *not* obvious to you, or you wouldn't have said what I quoted.
Anyone with half a brain can see it. Except you, because you are too invested in your conclusion.
Apparently not "Considering I never said ALL women experience it"
No, they don't. You are just so set on a conclusion that you can't see what is being said, just your conclusion.
First error in your reading: The "all" in question is not "all women", but "all women who report 'sexism'"
WTF? Your reading comprehension needs some work.
See what I mean by your dichotomy issue. I'm not saying *ALL* are fake, I am saying that *Not all* are real.