1803 pts ยท March 13, 2022
(assuming this article was written by an American)
The writer could just be an idiot. The Troubles are not taught in public schools at all.
CENTCOM has soldiers working out of hotels, that is true. But as someone who is actually in the Army and frequently talks to people forward, I can assure you that there are still people at actual bases in CENTCOM.Just because there was extensive damage (true) and nearly a billion in losses (true) doesn't mean "we no longer have bases in the middle east" is true at all. Because it's not.
"We no longer have bases in the middle east" is just completely untrue. What do you think the people forward are doing in CENTCOM? Sitting around outside of the Middle East?
Was, yeah. I think he's at the point where he'll do anything to get back into the spotlight after his, uh, revelations about his childhood.
I have a friend in Bahrain that is in no way associated with the United States or the military. Why does she have a right to be bombed?
You first, big boy.
Is your praxis studying the blade?
You first, cowgirl.
You okay, buddy? Maybe watch the entire video.
Oh, Joey. If only you knew where that "social experiment" would land you.
The incomplete text, the engrish, etc
oh. funny coincidence
BTC? Bitcoin? What about it?
With Trump, it truly seems like he could tank the economy and only the small portion of swing voters will care.MAGA Republicans and Democrats are unlikely to ever change their minds.I don't think this was quite the case until... at least Obama / the Tea-Party era.
For the past few decades, it seems that the Republican presidents who have eased taxes have and benefitted billionaires have, ironically, also benefitted most of their voting base - the boomers who see their 401ks rising because the value of those billionaire's companies going up. Unfortunately, that's not all it takes to get an economy going and actually may be counterintuitive in the long term.
Overall, just really weird to see both MAGA, regular non-MAGA republicans, and democrats alike all being weird and dragging Reagan and Carter through the mud for no relevant reason.If you want to pick on Reagan, look no further than the Iran-Contra deal or even Carter's own lack of being able to be the jerk when necessary (I truly think he may have been too nice for his own good).
People are doing this weird dance with Reagan and lumping Carter into it. "Yeah, but Reagan destroyed the economy." "No, that was Carter." Coming from both sides, too. Carter was, at best, a lame duck president (although seemingly a fantastic person) who also had some bad luck like with the Oil Crisis and other things outside of his control (his response to the Oil Crisis was great long-term, but poorly received, sadly).Say what you want about Reagan, but he was correct in his speech.
So was this staged or was that actually her speaking english for the first time like that
I agree. Churches that idolize Trump or even politics should not be considered Christians in any more than a heretical outlying sense.
Look no further than this person's church that he ministers for. Their beliefs page only mentions inclusivity, nothing about formal religious doctrine. Why? Because that stuff is unimportant.A summation of this type of faith: "A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross."If that sounds good to you, it's because you're not a believer in any sense of the word.
Pastors from progressive / liberal churches (like the one above) often do not worship the same God even in an ontological sense, often denying the Trinity and being as different as a Muslim is from a Jew or a Christian.You're not a religious person, nor have studied Christianity, but you feel qualified to speak on it.
Do you think a Mosque or Jewish Temple should invite an atheist to come preach?
This guy is quite literally preaching to the choir. He isn't some renegade pastor speaking to a bunch of conservatives, he's a liberal pastor serving a liberal congregation.
A liberal / progressive minister in the UCC.
(assuming this article was written by an American)
The writer could just be an idiot. The Troubles are not taught in public schools at all.
CENTCOM has soldiers working out of hotels, that is true. But as someone who is actually in the Army and frequently talks to people forward, I can assure you that there are still people at actual bases in CENTCOM.
Just because there was extensive damage (true) and nearly a billion in losses (true) doesn't mean "we no longer have bases in the middle east" is true at all. Because it's not.
"We no longer have bases in the middle east" is just completely untrue. What do you think the people forward are doing in CENTCOM? Sitting around outside of the Middle East?
Was, yeah. I think he's at the point where he'll do anything to get back into the spotlight after his, uh, revelations about his childhood.
I have a friend in Bahrain that is in no way associated with the United States or the military. Why does she have a right to be bombed?
You first, big boy.
Is your praxis studying the blade?
You first, cowgirl.
You okay, buddy? Maybe watch the entire video.
Oh, Joey. If only you knew where that "social experiment" would land you.
The incomplete text, the engrish, etc
oh. funny coincidence
BTC? Bitcoin? What about it?
With Trump, it truly seems like he could tank the economy and only the small portion of swing voters will care.
MAGA Republicans and Democrats are unlikely to ever change their minds.
I don't think this was quite the case until... at least Obama / the Tea-Party era.
For the past few decades, it seems that the Republican presidents who have eased taxes have and benefitted billionaires have, ironically, also benefitted most of their voting base - the boomers who see their 401ks rising because the value of those billionaire's companies going up. Unfortunately, that's not all it takes to get an economy going and actually may be counterintuitive in the long term.
Overall, just really weird to see both MAGA, regular non-MAGA republicans, and democrats alike all being weird and dragging Reagan and Carter through the mud for no relevant reason.
If you want to pick on Reagan, look no further than the Iran-Contra deal or even Carter's own lack of being able to be the jerk when necessary (I truly think he may have been too nice for his own good).
People are doing this weird dance with Reagan and lumping Carter into it. "Yeah, but Reagan destroyed the economy." "No, that was Carter." Coming from both sides, too. Carter was, at best, a lame duck president (although seemingly a fantastic person) who also had some bad luck like with the Oil Crisis and other things outside of his control (his response to the Oil Crisis was great long-term, but poorly received, sadly).
Say what you want about Reagan, but he was correct in his speech.
So was this staged or was that actually her speaking english for the first time like that
I agree. Churches that idolize Trump or even politics should not be considered Christians in any more than a heretical outlying sense.
Look no further than this person's church that he ministers for. Their beliefs page only mentions inclusivity, nothing about formal religious doctrine. Why? Because that stuff is unimportant.
A summation of this type of faith: "A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross."
If that sounds good to you, it's because you're not a believer in any sense of the word.
Pastors from progressive / liberal churches (like the one above) often do not worship the same God even in an ontological sense, often denying the Trinity and being as different as a Muslim is from a Jew or a Christian.
You're not a religious person, nor have studied Christianity, but you feel qualified to speak on it.
Do you think a Mosque or Jewish Temple should invite an atheist to come preach?
This guy is quite literally preaching to the choir. He isn't some renegade pastor speaking to a bunch of conservatives, he's a liberal pastor serving a liberal congregation.
A liberal / progressive minister in the UCC.