7563 pts · May 12, 2012
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"It wasn't even a fight" You mean aside from the attempted vehicular homicide?
*10. Enterprise was decommissioned.
23, single, de-vaccinated self via bendy straw, American rebel without a cause (male). May or may not eat babies.
At least our engines, you know....work
You're thinking of Yakov. Vasily commanded the Air Forces of Moscow. Did pretty good under his dad.
rekt
Info is always categorized when it is obtained. Sec of State should make these determinations. "After the fact" arguments are rubbish.
She's not exactly complex. Nothing wrong with the religious vote. It is some people's policy.
Yeah but Trump is demolishing states with margins that are way better than they should be with as many candidates as there are.
I don't think that is the case. I have heard many R friends say "He's better than Hillary" so I don't think it'd be an exodus like you think
But he had the time to build the recognition. Post-convention campaigning would be a frenzy
Known and respected by those that have educated themselves on it. Not the same name recognition as Clinton or Trump
You underestimate the power of racism and virtually endless money.
Not how I've seen it.
"Yeah who?" is the question that will ring. And that's how you get President Trump.
Surprised, no. But, it doesn't change that she objectively broke written laws.
Well, I can say you clearly do not know. And your reluctance to learn astonishes me. I think the politics of it are influencing you.
Not considering what this nation has to lose if we loosen up.
The fact that you ignore someone who has real information on the subject is nothing less than bull-headed and small-minded
Actually, given the likely candidates I would vote for her. I just know that her actions are criminal and she should answer for them.
Then our justice system would be deeply flawed for ignoring the laws based on who broke them.
And there was a confirmed count of how many emails were which level of classification. I can't remember off the top of my head.
We should ignore it because each citizen should answer to the law equally. Is that so ridiculous?
There isn't a case yet. The FBI hasn't given a recommendation to the attorney general yet.
We should ignore it. And besides, he had 1 count. She has many thousands to answer for.
He should have seen worse. This just proves more that high power people get less punishment.
Yeah, that's not true.
Yeah, sorry that's how it works. Classified information is no joke.
I'm making a post as we speak.
4 that is determined by the project security officer, 5 the media has no idea what this information does or does not protect us from.
"It wasn't even a fight" You mean aside from the attempted vehicular homicide?
*10. Enterprise was decommissioned.
23, single, de-vaccinated self via bendy straw, American rebel without a cause (male). May or may not eat babies.
At least our engines, you know....work
You're thinking of Yakov. Vasily commanded the Air Forces of Moscow. Did pretty good under his dad.
rekt
Info is always categorized when it is obtained. Sec of State should make these determinations. "After the fact" arguments are rubbish.
She's not exactly complex. Nothing wrong with the religious vote. It is some people's policy.
Yeah but Trump is demolishing states with margins that are way better than they should be with as many candidates as there are.
I don't think that is the case. I have heard many R friends say "He's better than Hillary" so I don't think it'd be an exodus like you think
But he had the time to build the recognition. Post-convention campaigning would be a frenzy
Known and respected by those that have educated themselves on it. Not the same name recognition as Clinton or Trump
You underestimate the power of racism and virtually endless money.
Not how I've seen it.
"Yeah who?" is the question that will ring. And that's how you get President Trump.
Surprised, no. But, it doesn't change that she objectively broke written laws.
Well, I can say you clearly do not know. And your reluctance to learn astonishes me. I think the politics of it are influencing you.
Not considering what this nation has to lose if we loosen up.
The fact that you ignore someone who has real information on the subject is nothing less than bull-headed and small-minded
Actually, given the likely candidates I would vote for her. I just know that her actions are criminal and she should answer for them.
Then our justice system would be deeply flawed for ignoring the laws based on who broke them.
And there was a confirmed count of how many emails were which level of classification. I can't remember off the top of my head.
We should ignore it because each citizen should answer to the law equally. Is that so ridiculous?
There isn't a case yet. The FBI hasn't given a recommendation to the attorney general yet.
We should ignore it. And besides, he had 1 count. She has many thousands to answer for.
He should have seen worse. This just proves more that high power people get less punishment.
Yeah, that's not true.
Yeah, sorry that's how it works. Classified information is no joke.
I'm making a post as we speak.
4 that is determined by the project security officer, 5 the media has no idea what this information does or does not protect us from.