18984 pts ยท April 20, 2016
Once they see me fly my ship there's going to be so many women beating me off with a stick.
Of course it doesn't give them the right. I certainly wasn't try to imply that it does.
I understand your point. I was speaking on the perception of the public. You're right they have similar structures BUT they are different and react differently.
Never heard of it and it certainly doesn't make sense as to why they would prescribe both. Unless they were allowing for some type of situational dose for the user to decide... which still seems reckless and unnecessary. Either way, I'll say that I can't tell if you're right or wrong as I certainly can't find info on it but, that doesn't mean it's false. My apologies if it's true.
Methylphenidate is in the same boat though. It's even scarier because is says "Meth" in the name /s (note the sarcasm). Methylephenidate (Ritalin) is not the same thing as Methamphetamine (Meth) or Amphetamine (Adderall). Similar but not the same and not as potentially harmful as Methamphetamine (Meth). People who say Ritalin, Adderall and other ADHD drugs are addictive don't know what they are talking about. Yes, they can be abused just like any other drug. No they are not Meth.
It's used off label for ADHD. I've taken it for years and it helps me with the longer term symptoms. I don't get hooked on one thing that I have to give 100% of my attention to for weeks on end. I find it easier to work with people as I can communicate better because I can listen, without feeling the need to interrupt. I can choose what to observe and remember instead of random crap. It doesn't help me with the short term focus. Just remember what works for my may not work for you.
I usually turn them down as I know what works and am hesitant to try something different. I also am not so bad that I can't go a few weeks without. I actually take Wellbutrin in addition to Adderall and they both take care of different parts of the ADHD. I might lose short term focus without the Adderall but, my major executive functions and hype focus are handled with the Wellbutrin. So maybe a but scattered for a week or two but manageable.
Could they have been angry because they are frustrated with the situation. ADHD medicine is important for a lot of people to be able to maintain their life's in our society. Not having access to it can be super frustrating especially when an medical office isn't helping fix the problem. My doctor always call me back and asks me to call the pharmacies and find out where it's stock. They then write it for that pharmacy. If we can't find it they have offered to switch me to other perscriptions
Amphetamines are not the same thing as speed. Similar but not the same and they do not have the same effects, additctive properties, or negative sideaffects.
You couldn't tell because you don't actually know and you're making things up.
The withdrawal symptoms from abusing ADHD medicine are that you might sleep an extra day or two. That's a fairly big difference to the withdrawal from Meth. Additionally, people become dependent on ADHD medicine the same way diabetics become dependent on Insulin. It make their life function and work similar to someone who doesn't have ADHD. It is a huge benefit to ADHD people and spreading lies about it being evil, addictive, or the same as meth is destructive and harmful
This is a bullshit lie that you should stop spreading. The two are chemically similar and are both stimulants but function very differently. Meth is much much more likely to be abused as it's much more potent in creating dopamine compared to other stimulants. That is thanks to the "Methyl" part of Meth. It's very easy to become addicted to Meth and the side affects and withdrawal are much worse. If you take ADHD medicine as prescribed there is almost no chance you will become addicted.
Does anyone else see the evil clown at the top of the xray? Just me... k
I think it is. My grandparents pitbull is like that. Super big baby and super nice.
bies
wOw
4.3 Trillion is the overall spending on healthcare system in the country. That includes the profits that hospitals and insurance companies take along with the non-health related expenses that insurance companies take for advertising.
Public healthcare would still be paid for by people but, paid via taxes. No insurance companies to take profits and a bigger negotiating power. We just need to keep it in mind that it's not free but, it's also not an increased cost to the individual as you would no longer be paying insurance but would be giving an amount in taxes.
Overall spending by the entire US but not spending by the government.
First, the stamen is inaccurate as the estimated cost is 30 to 40 trillion over ten years which can't exactly be divided by 10 and compared to a different cost. There's growth calculated into that 30 to 40 trillion. Additionally, even if were accurate it's horrible misleading to state it the way you did as the US spent roughly 4.3 trillion in healthcare in 2021. M4A is not an increase in costs its a reduction in costs. The big difference is we wouldn't be paying insurance companies.
hmmm..... I'd guess... bout tree fiddy.
I was in tub eating cheetos. Phone ring. Club Penguin kil. "NNNOOOO"
So... onlyfans?
No, abortion is mentioned actually. Priests told men to have their wife drink a concoction and if the baby or the mother died than the mother had committed adultery. So no abortion by name maybe not but abortion all the same.
Anita MANDA HUGINKIS
Did you know that insulin doesn't actually fix the "low insulin" in diabetic individuals. This leads to relapses and dependence on insulin.
Doesn't your quote support the myth? Shareholders=stockholders.
Once they see me fly my ship there's going to be so many women beating me off with a stick.
Of course it doesn't give them the right. I certainly wasn't try to imply that it does.
I understand your point. I was speaking on the perception of the public. You're right they have similar structures BUT they are different and react differently.
Never heard of it and it certainly doesn't make sense as to why they would prescribe both. Unless they were allowing for some type of situational dose for the user to decide... which still seems reckless and unnecessary. Either way, I'll say that I can't tell if you're right or wrong as I certainly can't find info on it but, that doesn't mean it's false. My apologies if it's true.
Methylphenidate is in the same boat though. It's even scarier because is says "Meth" in the name /s (note the sarcasm). Methylephenidate (Ritalin) is not the same thing as Methamphetamine (Meth) or Amphetamine (Adderall). Similar but not the same and not as potentially harmful as Methamphetamine (Meth). People who say Ritalin, Adderall and other ADHD drugs are addictive don't know what they are talking about. Yes, they can be abused just like any other drug. No they are not Meth.
It's used off label for ADHD. I've taken it for years and it helps me with the longer term symptoms. I don't get hooked on one thing that I have to give 100% of my attention to for weeks on end. I find it easier to work with people as I can communicate better because I can listen, without feeling the need to interrupt. I can choose what to observe and remember instead of random crap. It doesn't help me with the short term focus. Just remember what works for my may not work for you.
I usually turn them down as I know what works and am hesitant to try something different. I also am not so bad that I can't go a few weeks without. I actually take Wellbutrin in addition to Adderall and they both take care of different parts of the ADHD. I might lose short term focus without the Adderall but, my major executive functions and hype focus are handled with the Wellbutrin. So maybe a but scattered for a week or two but manageable.
Could they have been angry because they are frustrated with the situation. ADHD medicine is important for a lot of people to be able to maintain their life's in our society. Not having access to it can be super frustrating especially when an medical office isn't helping fix the problem. My doctor always call me back and asks me to call the pharmacies and find out where it's stock. They then write it for that pharmacy. If we can't find it they have offered to switch me to other perscriptions
Amphetamines are not the same thing as speed. Similar but not the same and they do not have the same effects, additctive properties, or negative sideaffects.
You couldn't tell because you don't actually know and you're making things up.
The withdrawal symptoms from abusing ADHD medicine are that you might sleep an extra day or two. That's a fairly big difference to the withdrawal from Meth. Additionally, people become dependent on ADHD medicine the same way diabetics become dependent on Insulin. It make their life function and work similar to someone who doesn't have ADHD. It is a huge benefit to ADHD people and spreading lies about it being evil, addictive, or the same as meth is destructive and harmful
This is a bullshit lie that you should stop spreading. The two are chemically similar and are both stimulants but function very differently. Meth is much much more likely to be abused as it's much more potent in creating dopamine compared to other stimulants. That is thanks to the "Methyl" part of Meth. It's very easy to become addicted to Meth and the side affects and withdrawal are much worse. If you take ADHD medicine as prescribed there is almost no chance you will become addicted.
Does anyone else see the evil clown at the top of the xray? Just me... k
I think it is. My grandparents pitbull is like that. Super big baby and super nice.
bies
wOw
4.3 Trillion is the overall spending on healthcare system in the country. That includes the profits that hospitals and insurance companies take along with the non-health related expenses that insurance companies take for advertising.
Public healthcare would still be paid for by people but, paid via taxes. No insurance companies to take profits and a bigger negotiating power. We just need to keep it in mind that it's not free but, it's also not an increased cost to the individual as you would no longer be paying insurance but would be giving an amount in taxes.
Overall spending by the entire US but not spending by the government.
First, the stamen is inaccurate as the estimated cost is 30 to 40 trillion over ten years which can't exactly be divided by 10 and compared to a different cost. There's growth calculated into that 30 to 40 trillion. Additionally, even if were accurate it's horrible misleading to state it the way you did as the US spent roughly 4.3 trillion in healthcare in 2021. M4A is not an increase in costs its a reduction in costs. The big difference is we wouldn't be paying insurance companies.
hmmm..... I'd guess... bout tree fiddy.
I was in tub eating cheetos. Phone ring. Club Penguin kil. "NNNOOOO"
So... onlyfans?
No, abortion is mentioned actually. Priests told men to have their wife drink a concoction and if the baby or the mother died than the mother had committed adultery. So no abortion by name maybe not but abortion all the same.
Anita MANDA HUGINKIS
Did you know that insulin doesn't actually fix the "low insulin" in diabetic individuals. This leads to relapses and dependence on insulin.
Doesn't your quote support the myth? Shareholders=stockholders.