33405 pts ยท June 11, 2019
"Enjoy what you enjoy" is honestly one of those statements that shouldn't need to be said. People are weirdly judgy about what others like.
Job requirements for social programs are horseshit. People struggling with work are among those who MOST need some goddamn help.
Is "reasonable suspicion" as vague and/or easy-to-manufacture as it sounds?
A quick Google suggests this might be a fire suppression system. Not sure if that's what it was in the story or not.
My dude, first off, you have GOT to decide what you're actually trying to say before you hit "Post." Second, I saw you refer to her as a "female" in one of your deleted comments, which sort of casts you in an unpleasant light. Third, and for-goddamn-sure LAST, suggesting I'm using AI support to respond to you just because you disagree with what I've said is a seriously bad-faith argument. It makes it look like you don't have anything to say. Learn to argue in good faith, or don't fucking speak.
Because anything that's going to go up inside an orifice not intended for food should, in fact, be free of food. This is a good way to get an infection. More immediately, it's just kind of gross, and it doesn't sound like she was into that.
While that is a tactic they would indeed use, I'm really not sure they feel they need the excuse anymore.
I think the implication is he had sauce on his fingers.
This is actually a fair question. I have trouble believing he didn't get a LOT of help from somewhere besides just social programs.
I think their definition of the "best of the best" is somewhat different from a normal person's, but I agree in practice.
Understood. The idea just gave me the willies and I needed to speak.
I really, really don't want that man to be amending your Constitution, and I'm pretty sure you shouldn't want that, either.
Yeah, I can't help thinking about how toxic it is to make having a tab a prerequisite for being considered masculine. Still, fuck that guy.
I'm a little interested to hear what Ti West considers logic and good arguments in this context.
Nah, he's from Wisconsin.
You certainly did. That... doesn't actually disprove what I said.
While technically grammatically-correct, what you've done makes for a more convoluted read. Of course, what reads more easily is up to interpretation. Parentheses tend to be smoother and can be done as an afterthought, rather than having to restructure the sentence.
Imagine the same information in the parentheses as a footnote. It serves basically the same function but includes it in the same sentence.
#2 So, is there someone secretly holding her in place, or do they think she can fly?
"Vincent and the Doctor." I'm a simple man with simple tastes. Make me tear up, and you have my sword, bow, AND axe.
I think people were expecting a different song or something.
He looks like his own fake ID photo.
People downvote AI art.
They already have those in there. They're just playing the 18-year-olds and/or MILFs in question.
There was a surprisingly-good film adaptation of John Dies at the End in 2012. It had an awesome cast. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1783732/
Knew a guy named Richard Head when I was in high school. He'd cultivated a general antipathy toward people. For some reason.
Has a defensive component, too. It's difficult to close while it isn't extended without getting the business end accidentally-on-purpose.
My bad. That was just the kind of thing people continually go on about vegans saying. I've literally never met one who didn't just mind their own business, so to see someone talking that way made me think, "Oh, they ARE real."
It's illegal to fuck with Flock cameras, too, and yet. Don't you worry, plenty of these things will find their way into multiple dumpsters.
The Turtles certainly made them look very breakable, in those Saturday Morning Cartoons for kids.
"Enjoy what you enjoy" is honestly one of those statements that shouldn't need to be said. People are weirdly judgy about what others like.
Job requirements for social programs are horseshit. People struggling with work are among those who MOST need some goddamn help.
Is "reasonable suspicion" as vague and/or easy-to-manufacture as it sounds?
A quick Google suggests this might be a fire suppression system. Not sure if that's what it was in the story or not.
My dude, first off, you have GOT to decide what you're actually trying to say before you hit "Post." Second, I saw you refer to her as a "female" in one of your deleted comments, which sort of casts you in an unpleasant light. Third, and for-goddamn-sure LAST, suggesting I'm using AI support to respond to you just because you disagree with what I've said is a seriously bad-faith argument. It makes it look like you don't have anything to say. Learn to argue in good faith, or don't fucking speak.
Because anything that's going to go up inside an orifice not intended for food should, in fact, be free of food. This is a good way to get an infection. More immediately, it's just kind of gross, and it doesn't sound like she was into that.
While that is a tactic they would indeed use, I'm really not sure they feel they need the excuse anymore.
I think the implication is he had sauce on his fingers.
This is actually a fair question. I have trouble believing he didn't get a LOT of help from somewhere besides just social programs.
I think their definition of the "best of the best" is somewhat different from a normal person's, but I agree in practice.
Understood. The idea just gave me the willies and I needed to speak.
I really, really don't want that man to be amending your Constitution, and I'm pretty sure you shouldn't want that, either.
Yeah, I can't help thinking about how toxic it is to make having a tab a prerequisite for being considered masculine. Still, fuck that guy.
I'm a little interested to hear what Ti West considers logic and good arguments in this context.
Nah, he's from Wisconsin.
You certainly did. That... doesn't actually disprove what I said.
While technically grammatically-correct, what you've done makes for a more convoluted read. Of course, what reads more easily is up to interpretation. Parentheses tend to be smoother and can be done as an afterthought, rather than having to restructure the sentence.
Imagine the same information in the parentheses as a footnote. It serves basically the same function but includes it in the same sentence.
#2 So, is there someone secretly holding her in place, or do they think she can fly?
"Vincent and the Doctor." I'm a simple man with simple tastes. Make me tear up, and you have my sword, bow, AND axe.
I think people were expecting a different song or something.
He looks like his own fake ID photo.
People downvote AI art.
They already have those in there. They're just playing the 18-year-olds and/or MILFs in question.
There was a surprisingly-good film adaptation of John Dies at the End in 2012. It had an awesome cast. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1783732/
Knew a guy named Richard Head when I was in high school. He'd cultivated a general antipathy toward people. For some reason.
Has a defensive component, too. It's difficult to close while it isn't extended without getting the business end accidentally-on-purpose.
My bad. That was just the kind of thing people continually go on about vegans saying. I've literally never met one who didn't just mind their own business, so to see someone talking that way made me think, "Oh, they ARE real."
It's illegal to fuck with Flock cameras, too, and yet. Don't you worry, plenty of these things will find their way into multiple dumpsters.
The Turtles certainly made them look very breakable, in those Saturday Morning Cartoons for kids.