MufLR

1254 pts ยท August 26, 2018


Muskat nuss! Frau Weidel..

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should check some videos from technologically less advanced manufacturers. But even late tech equipped manufacturers are often including human factor (typically in quality control, supervision and packaging). Still, I dont quite see your point, it has nothing to do with anything I wrote above.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It depends. Normally it should be safe, but if some particular primer is too sensitive (chemicals can be tricky), it can be possibly set off even by smaller impact. I *did* hear story about accidental discharge caused by manually closing bolt carrier into forward position in gun with removed firing pin. The thing is, even if it's one in million chance, ammo *is* manufactured by millions and possible consequences pretty dire.

4 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sorry for months late reply, but your post is too absurd to let it go. My post is meant literally. No reading in between the lines. i.e. I was specifically commenting on "they mean us no harm" and nothing else, I'm not advocating for this mess (in case it's not clear, I'm not from US and I *DO* have to suffer consequences). Also it's almost funny how you trying to act from moral high ground, yet you wish me "to be caught in retribution". Unlike you, I wish others no harm for disagreeing with me.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@TK421isAFK (for some reason I cannot reply to you directly). Wow, you *seriously* projecting, we talking about ships and you suddenly implying rape? wtf? Were you on Epstein island by any chance? I didn't defend anything, that is your imagination. What I was pointing out is, that from all legit reason why you should be against this BS maga/trump moron operation, the bogus fallacy "ThEy HaD nO aMmO" ain't one. Be outraged about your country bombing schools, warship is at least military target.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sounds like you projecting.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'd just like to point out, that lack of ammo means nothing, that class of ship doesn't have ASW capabilities anyway (like most small warships), only could carry ASW helicopter. But that is very nature of the submarine warfare - they are *supposed* to fight targets which cannot fight back.

6 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You cannot possibly believe, that Iran means you no harm, wtf? They consider you biggest satan out there.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It doesn't matter if they had ammo or not, that ship is without ASW capabilities anyway (only can carry ASW helicopter). Fuck maga Trump and all that, sure, entire operation is BS, sure, but any submarine attack could be considered "cowardly" by definition, as they are amongst the hardest thing to fight against, even for modern navies. Most smaller warships cannot detect them at all and subs are also supposed to sink even defenseless logistic ships etc. Modern warfare is no joust and chivalry.

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Also "Iron Cross" (eiserneskreuz/tatzenkreuz) is still used as symbol of Bundeswehr (the current German armed forces) and while it may be Nazi adjacent, it is not Nazi symbol (hell, even angular version - the balkenkreuz - is not strictly Nazi symbol, although that one is certainly heavily associated with Wehrmacht/Luftwaffe/Kriegsmarine, but first appeared in WW1).

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's definitely Kobayashi Maru. Just because it's from videogame, doesn't make it any less valid than drawing you posted. In the end, they are both equally non-canon.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It wasn't Sony game though. Developed by Core Design, published by Eidos Interactive, released for Sega Saturn first, followed by PC an PlayStation less than month later.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(Ok, now when I'm looking at this, I should probably explain my poor attempted joke: They are quoting 377 ft, which is correct for earlier block I-IV Virginias, but later block V are 460 ft long. Also there is 453 ft Jimmy Carter, sub-class of Seawolf btw)

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Even Virginia is bigger than Virginia lol.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That is basically how it works in my country. No symbols are prohibited, swastika included. But intention and context is important. i.e. showing them in historical context is fine, but using them to promote hate ideologies is not.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still, glucose-fructose is used a lot, so my point (that europe is not using just sugar) stands.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(I take it back. I took better look and there is still sweetener - acesulfam K.)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is not like I said "all of them". Though I suppose it is possible CocaCola changed it as Im 90% sure there used to be HFCS in a past (Im not drinking these for couple of years now). I have Dr. Pepper in my fridge and you are right, they list only sugar, though there used to be combination with sweetener years ago. So at least that is changed for sure.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is how Czech (especially food) market works entire year - except you put that high price in first picture as well, because otherwise, it would be shady practice, lol. Only during sales, we get somewhat real value for the money. Czechs are really (and I mean REALLY) crazy about sales and sellers know it full well. Entire industry reshaped itself around that.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As other people already pointed out elsewhere - Tesla occupants are least likely to die in those fatal accidents. i.e. when electric cars are going to be more common, people will likely get demolished by heavy batteries equally, regardless of the brand.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can tell you, that in CZ, most sodas are using HFCS or combination of HFCS and sugar. Only one with just sugar I can think of, is Pepsi. They even built add campaign around that ("taste the real sugar" or some such).

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We have those here in cz and we don't even need arctic for that.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A-10 can work only from position of air superiority, if not supremacy. And would be still vulnerable to shorad and manpads. Su-25 are getting dismantled in Ukraine and A-10 is even slower juicy target. It would have to use stand-off munition, as getting in gun blazing, would be a suicide. And for stand-off JDAM delivery, you can just as well (better actually) use faster platform. A-10 really is dead end, some people are just in denial, because it goes brrrt.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They also getting some newest stuff. Iris SLS is literally right from assembly lines and includes modern radar, latest effectors for himars like GLSDB and GMLRS (M30A1/A2 entered production 2015/2019) etc. Not everything is just old.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People shouldn't call even AK as an "AK 47" heh.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Koda Be Praised \o/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's industry-accurate.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

It's because of displacement and therefore shape and size of the hull and overall weight being less than weight of displaced water.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0