28504 pts ยท March 13, 2015
sweg sweg sweg.
Lola being a tomboy and not having any girly lingerie, and bugs having an entire walk in closet of lingere alone is 100% on point.
There is a literal TEST to see if they can do the job. If they pass the test then complaining about women firefighters is actual misogyny. They literally prove they are strong enough. There should be no MEN who fail a firefighter proficiency test allowed to do the job either.
Do you ever feel like you're more resistant to broken bones than average? There's a portion of the human population with a genetic mutation that causes them to grow 40% to 80% denser bones. One of the side effects being much harder to float since calcium is kinda a rock.
There is a difference between a character arc where someone changes for the better VS "this persons evil deed are actually good because he has a tragic backstory. You shouldn't try and change him for the better because hes already a good person deep inside"
One of the only characters on the show with the "I can fix her" factor. She's a poor little meow meow but also "I love a woman that will actually just kill me."
Supercritical fluid is a grey area but also: liquids are compressable. Sound waves through water specifically rely on micro compression. Its just it takes like 65,000psi to compress water in a % that is measurable. Kinda like how using Pi to 3.1415 compared to 3.14159 to calculate the size of the visible universe only changes by 1 hydrogen atom or something. Its on par with quantum physics with: you don't need to worry about it.
So either we need regulations, or we need to legalize the possession of real csam to protect ai csam owners/producers from facing an imperfect system that cannot differentiate between real crimes or ai. 2/2
Thats the logic, because with ai at a certain point, there is no way to really differentiate between a real child and an ai one. You would need government regulated civilian contractors to produce verified legal content. And nude filters for adults is already heavily grey area, its possible to apply to children without actively adding csam to the training data. We already make qualitative choices on filtering drawn csam, the idea is that it will be indistinguishable from real soon 1/?
You have to ask yourself at that point, someone who made or traded csam for pleasure (rather than simple money), did they ever stop at 1 picture or 1 video? I feel like the numbers would probably point to it not being a very popular program among taxpayers. 2/2
(Devils advocate is why I worded it as a social welfare concern rather than a moral one) the idea of a government regulated child porn production ring in the hopes to prevent people from digitally undressing or groping their niece is a deeply absurd idea. Reminds me of the argument "why not legalize all csam that is already made, and only criminalize new material made after this law" as it's not like spreading the material is a physical assault on a child with the same idea to prevent new 1/?
I don't remember exactly, but someone looked at the logs of cameras being used. The same source that some of the stalking case proof came from. One single youth gym had like 10 different officers, politicians, and a sheriff watching little girl gymnastics and poolside cameras. The sheriff for like 5 hours a week. Also had searches for things like "young blonde" or "blonde in yoga pants"
But then again. I believe police should actually be forced to investigate crimes. Unlike today where every dead or raped person of color, homeless person, or street worker basically gets written off and nothing gets done. 3/3
And I'm going to be completely honest, slippery slopes are stupid in general. What people in 1,000 years decide what is moral has nothing to do with me currently. I'm sure people made slippery slope arguments about freeing slaves meaning we might be forced to let black people own property when today its seen as generally acceptable for a black person to own a house. 2/?
Personally I don't see the slope. Slippery slopes tend to have a connection: "If you let people marry X, then we will be forced to let them marry Y and Z" where Y and Z are strawman arguments. In this case "creating plausible evidence of a crime" does not automatically mean that every single right we have will be stolen. And yes, this also means I think using AI to try and frame someone for murder is wrong. And also trying to create fake legal documents to scam people. 1/?
Oh, you still have hope that the files still exist. Unless proven otherwise, my world view is that anything that could possibly cause a pedo to be punished has been destroyed already.
There's plenty of social welfare reasons for banning realistic csam, the main which is if its indistinguishable from real csam then its basically red herrings on investigating abuse cases. Can't wait for the first amber alert of an AI child that doesn't exist.
And watching 12 year old little girls do gymnastics for multiple hours a day.
My guess: "Surely if someone competent actually told him what was going on, he would do the correct thing. He just doesnt have anyone around him that knows what they are doing." That, or he figured out that if he didn't resign he would be the fall guy. But maybe a little bit of "i just thought he was evil, not medically insane."
Trump isn't America. Why is he allowed to dictate something like that unilaterally? Just a little PSA, if trump orders something illegal, the person who carries out the order is caving into illegal demands.
It sucks but filming employees is legal, and doing it while you work at home is also legal. But check state laws consistently. I swear things change week to week. 2/2
There are certain rights you can't sign away via contract however the right to privacy is one that you CAN. There are some limits like A: Camera can only be on while person is on the clock. B: Camera only captures the minimum required to fulfill the contract. Otherwise your only recourse is to quit the job... or to refuse to comply and be fired. You MAY be able to get unemployment if you argue that the company hid their camera policy and acting in bad faith while you acted in good faith. 1/?
Naw, Its transmute: Idaho. Transmuting something into the entire state of idaho. So far, other than some minor ~wagon sized floating islands it is one of the only land masses found that can be created via transmutation. It is quite disruptive, the mage tower where it was first cast is now split roughly in half and separated by 500km. It's a huge issue because the eastern half no longer has a single bathroom and is therefor no longer compliant to builders code for a guild building.
Don't forget: She also liked to have hotsauce on her fried chicken. Unacceptable.
Surely if I create an environment purposefully built to be exploited there will never be someone who does exactly the thing I designed the system to do? /s. Every level of government is designed to be ignored when it suits those in that position, its not corruption: the system works as intended.
Of course, a giant dog that weighs more than her is the littlest baby to ever baby.
Generally even in that situation, even if a woman is into it: she doesn't want some random dude she's never met before ramming his armpit in her face. Consent is at play here, and 99.99% of people consent to the smell of someone who took a shower (even with unscented soap if you care THAT much about natural scents), and only 0.00001% consent to... pheromone maxing... from an unsolicited source.
I think we're all just skipping the step where you talk to your partner about what they like first before attempting. Even people into natural body scents generally don't prefer it to be unsolicited.
The problem is that sounds like confronting my inadequacies, working on myself, and then putting my best foot forward to treat women with care like they are a human being. How about I not do that, regurgitate a few misogynistic pickup lines, and then get rejected and call her an ugly and/or fat bitch? ~ '""""Alpha"""" males
You know I started off pessimistic... but reminding caring people to keep caring is a good thing too. Welp, ill take a spark of "hope in humanity" where I can get it. 2/2
Locks only keep honest people honest. A good person tempted to steal sees a lock and decides its a step too far. Someone who WANTS to steal already has 5 ways to break a lock in less than a second. By the power of analogy/metaphor/comparison: Telling people to verify only affects the kinds of people who already have critical thinking abilities, those who lack critical thinking will continue not to verify anything. At most "trust and verify" just makes caring people remember to care. 1/?
Lola being a tomboy and not having any girly lingerie, and bugs having an entire walk in closet of lingere alone is 100% on point.
There is a literal TEST to see if they can do the job. If they pass the test then complaining about women firefighters is actual misogyny. They literally prove they are strong enough. There should be no MEN who fail a firefighter proficiency test allowed to do the job either.
Do you ever feel like you're more resistant to broken bones than average? There's a portion of the human population with a genetic mutation that causes them to grow 40% to 80% denser bones. One of the side effects being much harder to float since calcium is kinda a rock.
There is a difference between a character arc where someone changes for the better VS "this persons evil deed are actually good because he has a tragic backstory. You shouldn't try and change him for the better because hes already a good person deep inside"
One of the only characters on the show with the "I can fix her" factor. She's a poor little meow meow but also "I love a woman that will actually just kill me."
Supercritical fluid is a grey area but also: liquids are compressable. Sound waves through water specifically rely on micro compression. Its just it takes like 65,000psi to compress water in a % that is measurable. Kinda like how using Pi to 3.1415 compared to 3.14159 to calculate the size of the visible universe only changes by 1 hydrogen atom or something. Its on par with quantum physics with: you don't need to worry about it.
So either we need regulations, or we need to legalize the possession of real csam to protect ai csam owners/producers from facing an imperfect system that cannot differentiate between real crimes or ai. 2/2
Thats the logic, because with ai at a certain point, there is no way to really differentiate between a real child and an ai one. You would need government regulated civilian contractors to produce verified legal content. And nude filters for adults is already heavily grey area, its possible to apply to children without actively adding csam to the training data. We already make qualitative choices on filtering drawn csam, the idea is that it will be indistinguishable from real soon 1/?
You have to ask yourself at that point, someone who made or traded csam for pleasure (rather than simple money), did they ever stop at 1 picture or 1 video? I feel like the numbers would probably point to it not being a very popular program among taxpayers. 2/2
(Devils advocate is why I worded it as a social welfare concern rather than a moral one) the idea of a government regulated child porn production ring in the hopes to prevent people from digitally undressing or groping their niece is a deeply absurd idea. Reminds me of the argument "why not legalize all csam that is already made, and only criminalize new material made after this law" as it's not like spreading the material is a physical assault on a child with the same idea to prevent new 1/?
I don't remember exactly, but someone looked at the logs of cameras being used. The same source that some of the stalking case proof came from. One single youth gym had like 10 different officers, politicians, and a sheriff watching little girl gymnastics and poolside cameras. The sheriff for like 5 hours a week. Also had searches for things like "young blonde" or "blonde in yoga pants"
But then again. I believe police should actually be forced to investigate crimes. Unlike today where every dead or raped person of color, homeless person, or street worker basically gets written off and nothing gets done. 3/3
And I'm going to be completely honest, slippery slopes are stupid in general. What people in 1,000 years decide what is moral has nothing to do with me currently. I'm sure people made slippery slope arguments about freeing slaves meaning we might be forced to let black people own property when today its seen as generally acceptable for a black person to own a house. 2/?
Personally I don't see the slope. Slippery slopes tend to have a connection: "If you let people marry X, then we will be forced to let them marry Y and Z" where Y and Z are strawman arguments. In this case "creating plausible evidence of a crime" does not automatically mean that every single right we have will be stolen. And yes, this also means I think using AI to try and frame someone for murder is wrong. And also trying to create fake legal documents to scam people. 1/?
Oh, you still have hope that the files still exist. Unless proven otherwise, my world view is that anything that could possibly cause a pedo to be punished has been destroyed already.
There's plenty of social welfare reasons for banning realistic csam, the main which is if its indistinguishable from real csam then its basically red herrings on investigating abuse cases. Can't wait for the first amber alert of an AI child that doesn't exist.
And watching 12 year old little girls do gymnastics for multiple hours a day.
My guess: "Surely if someone competent actually told him what was going on, he would do the correct thing. He just doesnt have anyone around him that knows what they are doing." That, or he figured out that if he didn't resign he would be the fall guy. But maybe a little bit of "i just thought he was evil, not medically insane."
Trump isn't America. Why is he allowed to dictate something like that unilaterally? Just a little PSA, if trump orders something illegal, the person who carries out the order is caving into illegal demands.
It sucks but filming employees is legal, and doing it while you work at home is also legal. But check state laws consistently. I swear things change week to week. 2/2
There are certain rights you can't sign away via contract however the right to privacy is one that you CAN. There are some limits like A: Camera can only be on while person is on the clock. B: Camera only captures the minimum required to fulfill the contract. Otherwise your only recourse is to quit the job... or to refuse to comply and be fired. You MAY be able to get unemployment if you argue that the company hid their camera policy and acting in bad faith while you acted in good faith. 1/?
Naw, Its transmute: Idaho. Transmuting something into the entire state of idaho. So far, other than some minor ~wagon sized floating islands it is one of the only land masses found that can be created via transmutation. It is quite disruptive, the mage tower where it was first cast is now split roughly in half and separated by 500km. It's a huge issue because the eastern half no longer has a single bathroom and is therefor no longer compliant to builders code for a guild building.
Don't forget: She also liked to have hotsauce on her fried chicken. Unacceptable.
Surely if I create an environment purposefully built to be exploited there will never be someone who does exactly the thing I designed the system to do? /s. Every level of government is designed to be ignored when it suits those in that position, its not corruption: the system works as intended.
Of course, a giant dog that weighs more than her is the littlest baby to ever baby.
Generally even in that situation, even if a woman is into it: she doesn't want some random dude she's never met before ramming his armpit in her face. Consent is at play here, and 99.99% of people consent to the smell of someone who took a shower (even with unscented soap if you care THAT much about natural scents), and only 0.00001% consent to... pheromone maxing... from an unsolicited source.
I think we're all just skipping the step where you talk to your partner about what they like first before attempting. Even people into natural body scents generally don't prefer it to be unsolicited.
The problem is that sounds like confronting my inadequacies, working on myself, and then putting my best foot forward to treat women with care like they are a human being. How about I not do that, regurgitate a few misogynistic pickup lines, and then get rejected and call her an ugly and/or fat bitch? ~ '""""Alpha"""" males
You know I started off pessimistic... but reminding caring people to keep caring is a good thing too. Welp, ill take a spark of "hope in humanity" where I can get it. 2/2
Locks only keep honest people honest. A good person tempted to steal sees a lock and decides its a step too far. Someone who WANTS to steal already has 5 ways to break a lock in less than a second. By the power of analogy/metaphor/comparison: Telling people to verify only affects the kinds of people who already have critical thinking abilities, those who lack critical thinking will continue not to verify anything. At most "trust and verify" just makes caring people remember to care. 1/?