ParagonPrime

2471 pts · September 20, 2015


How kind :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

>has answered this a few times on other comment threads and is going to have a stroke if he has to do so again

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

(2) roughly two days after the experiment, everything is uncertain. You want a clear, solid answer? Stop reading, wait for a few months.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Biased about what? They say what they know and talk about the potential of it. They have never lied and I doubt they ever will- for now (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As another consideration, most imgurians may not WANT to read an in-depth scientific article, and even editing it for brevity would be hard

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you can find me the original study on the internet, and link it here, I will be happy to update this post.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One can only hope for the best, but yes, I understand that there's a good chance we're going to be sorely disappointed.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If you follow the link right above my TL;DR, you'll see the method they use, which I removed from this post for brevity.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Presumably this article wouldn't LIE, considering it says it WAS published. Whether you can find it freely on the internet is something else

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) a use for it? And the "vastly superior rocket fuel" bit.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Cost efficient for replacing current superconductors? Maybe not. But isn't small-scale use of superconductors (hyper expensive laptops!) (1)

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

There ISNT much to interpret. The study is fresh off the press. As details surface, so will changes to existing information.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As I said, I felt it was necessary to link the original source rather than secondary news articles.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

This experiment was performed BY Harvard scientists.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

(2/2) whereas the original Harvard source is more specific as to HOW they did it, which is also important. That said, thanks for telling me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm going to be a tiny bit arrogant and say that I don't like that post as much. It's not linking directly to the original source (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is true, but for the sake of the future of humanity I hope the results are real and the MH is stable.

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 2

I lost my grandfather on October 8th. Stay strong, friend - many of us are in it together.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I stared in shock at how you're nearly boiling over there, but then remembered that you savages don't use metric.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to photoshop Lüdenscheid everywhere onto a world map. Do it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This has been reposted more times than there are gingers on Earth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For those who don't know, that's a photo of Osama Bin Laden. Al-Qaeda was initially funded by the US to help fight the USSR.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's pretty cutting of you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that most of us don't know how to do this is why we needed this person ;)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You are the hero we needed.

9 years ago | Likes 278 Dislikes 3

Underrated comment.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You even look a little like Walter White.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only Christmas selfie that doesn't get my downvote.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 10