816 pts ยท March 7, 2014
... You can help by expanding this list
If we are counting then 1 country, Poland.
Our own stocks to the point where we become defenseless... Scholz isn't a coward, he is thinking long term benefits and drawbacks
And even if we did send tanks over there, we would not be able to send enough to make an actual difference without depleting
Instead of the ex-soviet stocks we've been dumping, now we are going to send our tier one equipment that takes 2 years to replace
And at the same point, we would be sending OUR OWN defensive means, leaving us seriously under armed in case of escalation
Or that he is seriously worried about the escalation this would cause... Same reasoning behind the lack of Abrams and Challengers
Emperor's new groove isn't even mentioned ?
That username combo
Discworld
Was busy with their own thing within the whole war. The US did openly win the Pacific war outright, with India / commonwealth]
They won it through material and military industry before openly joining the war, USSR won it through that and manpower, everyone else 1/2
Stout, for that earthy tone
If the right had their way we'd all be stuck on a dying planet killing each other for resources in wars that the rich start /s
To pay for initial cost and overheads for everybody involved in keeping the slaves working... Seems more barbarism than anything else 3 / 3
Pay for someone, but not pay the person working. In a sense, they probably would have had the same "workforce" for less than they had 2 / 3
They paid someone for the person to work in the first place.. Its not free if you had / have to pay for it, weird they were willing to 1 / 2
.
Shortly followed by
NO WASH?!
In another state
Who wrote the piece?
I was under the assumption that those type of capacitors might fall under the general rule
It seems you are correct. Would appreciate some videos if you know any good sources, fairly new to Electronical eng atm :)
... You can help by expanding this list
If we are counting then 1 country, Poland.
Our own stocks to the point where we become defenseless... Scholz isn't a coward, he is thinking long term benefits and drawbacks
And even if we did send tanks over there, we would not be able to send enough to make an actual difference without depleting
Instead of the ex-soviet stocks we've been dumping, now we are going to send our tier one equipment that takes 2 years to replace
And at the same point, we would be sending OUR OWN defensive means, leaving us seriously under armed in case of escalation
Or that he is seriously worried about the escalation this would cause... Same reasoning behind the lack of Abrams and Challengers
Emperor's new groove isn't even mentioned ?
That username combo
Discworld
Was busy with their own thing within the whole war. The US did openly win the Pacific war outright, with India / commonwealth]
They won it through material and military industry before openly joining the war, USSR won it through that and manpower, everyone else 1/2
Stout, for that earthy tone
If the right had their way we'd all be stuck on a dying planet killing each other for resources in wars that the rich start /s
To pay for initial cost and overheads for everybody involved in keeping the slaves working... Seems more barbarism than anything else 3 / 3
Pay for someone, but not pay the person working. In a sense, they probably would have had the same "workforce" for less than they had 2 / 3
They paid someone for the person to work in the first place.. Its not free if you had / have to pay for it, weird they were willing to 1 / 2
.
Shortly followed by
NO WASH?!
In another state
Who wrote the piece?
I was under the assumption that those type of capacitors might fall under the general rule
It seems you are correct. Would appreciate some videos if you know any good sources, fairly new to Electronical eng atm :)