415 pts ยท June 11, 2013
The Cooperative Group in the UK, which has been strong and productive for 177 years, says hi too.
The town of Mondragon in the Basque Country in Spain, send their regards.
Socialism is the reason I can get my syphilis medication for free thanks to the NHS.
Prostagma? Oh wait, wrong game.
Culpable, probably. Forgivable, definitely. I find it very hard to blame people, for not wanting tolerance to become conditional.
Eeeeh, that's one angle, but there's lots of reasons White Supremacy remains so prevalent.
Autist here. Fucking hate being autistic, wouldn't wish it on anyone, would love a cure. Don't speak for me.
Show me a farm with no workers that's turning a profit.
It's their labour that makes any profit at all. Take away their labour, and the business assets are dead weight.
You spent 5 years enabling these lunatics. You built your own gallows.
Goblin Layer
At this point, you can't trust in there being an absence of treason.
It's deranged propaganda for people to recieve the rightful fruits of their labour?
It brings tears to my eyes, every time. There's so much earnest hope in his words, so much love for humanity.
Racism is encouraged by the capitalist class, to keep the working class fighting each other so they don't realise their common enemy.
You make profit by working, not by buying the rights to other people's profits.
Capital investments are loans. Repay them with interest, perhaps. But once they're repaid, profit ought to belong to the workers.
If I'm wrong, tell me why.
Sorry, what point are you trying to make, here? I feel like you're being really evasive, and I can't tell why.
I have done business accounting before. I know damned-well what "profit" is, thank you very much.
Companies are not one-time products. They are engines of ongoing production and profit. This house-flipping analogy is flawed.
No, they do. Up to a certain point. Once their initial investment has been recouped, profit should be shared according to labour invested.
Well, in either case, it depends whether they're familiar with socialist theory in the first place. Most people aren't.
Wealth that they don't even need to have worked for in the first place.
So the rich deserve to profit because they're already wealthy enough to buy their own means of production.
Over time, any number of workers will put more time and labour into a business than the owner ever could. It's basic maths.
Wait, do you mean the definition of socialism? Or the definition of capitalism?
DO NOT TAUNT THE VOLCANO GOD
I could give you the socialist definition, which is pretty clear and precise, but unfortunately it's too big for an Imgur comment.
The Cooperative Group in the UK, which has been strong and productive for 177 years, says hi too.
The town of Mondragon in the Basque Country in Spain, send their regards.
Socialism is the reason I can get my syphilis medication for free thanks to the NHS.
Prostagma? Oh wait, wrong game.
Culpable, probably. Forgivable, definitely. I find it very hard to blame people, for not wanting tolerance to become conditional.
Eeeeh, that's one angle, but there's lots of reasons White Supremacy remains so prevalent.
Autist here. Fucking hate being autistic, wouldn't wish it on anyone, would love a cure. Don't speak for me.
Show me a farm with no workers that's turning a profit.
It's their labour that makes any profit at all. Take away their labour, and the business assets are dead weight.
You spent 5 years enabling these lunatics. You built your own gallows.
Goblin Layer
At this point, you can't trust in there being an absence of treason.
It's deranged propaganda for people to recieve the rightful fruits of their labour?
It brings tears to my eyes, every time. There's so much earnest hope in his words, so much love for humanity.
Racism is encouraged by the capitalist class, to keep the working class fighting each other so they don't realise their common enemy.
You make profit by working, not by buying the rights to other people's profits.
Capital investments are loans. Repay them with interest, perhaps. But once they're repaid, profit ought to belong to the workers.
If I'm wrong, tell me why.
Sorry, what point are you trying to make, here? I feel like you're being really evasive, and I can't tell why.
I have done business accounting before. I know damned-well what "profit" is, thank you very much.
Companies are not one-time products. They are engines of ongoing production and profit. This house-flipping analogy is flawed.
No, they do. Up to a certain point. Once their initial investment has been recouped, profit should be shared according to labour invested.
Well, in either case, it depends whether they're familiar with socialist theory in the first place. Most people aren't.
Wealth that they don't even need to have worked for in the first place.
So the rich deserve to profit because they're already wealthy enough to buy their own means of production.
Over time, any number of workers will put more time and labour into a business than the owner ever could. It's basic maths.
Wait, do you mean the definition of socialism? Or the definition of capitalism?
DO NOT TAUNT THE VOLCANO GOD
I could give you the socialist definition, which is pretty clear and precise, but unfortunately it's too big for an Imgur comment.