9289 pts ยท September 12, 2012
Fun fact: You can add almost anything to the end of my username.
Also, look at Isaiah 56.
Allowed to be there, mainly by the Jews."
There was a meeting mixed multitude at Sinai when the law was given. Take from that what you will. I don't think they would have been "allow
Peter's vision has nothing to do with food. Since he tells us what it meant in verse 28.
Romans 11:17.
When they were preaching from Moses's seat they were preaching Torah. The law. If you really want to know a bit more look up the Talmud.
Jesus was crucified for speaking out against the Pharisees. He told people to do what they said when preaching from Moses's seat.
I don't. There is nothing in the New testament that abolishes the food laws.
If Jesus had taught against Torah he would have been stoned. If Paul had taught against it he would have been stoned. They didn't.
To make full. Which in no way indicates abolishment.
No, not at all was just attempting to explain, what I think is their reasoning.
"peaceful" protestors. To me, that would be a much bigger deal than what is actually being protested. 2/2
If the mob is. lets say 100 people. You're telling me 99 of them couldn't shut down the one asshole? They are taking away from the 1/?
I mean the WBC gets to protest and picket whatever they want and their message is full of hate.
Happen. Just my 2 cents. take it for what it's worth.
Revolting. Such as discrimination. If the 1% is drowning out the 99% then the 99% should unite against them. That way the real change can
Perhaps the peaceful protestors should be striving to shut down the violent ones. I try to speak out against far right ideals that I find
Because they are fighting for the greater good! To them the end justifies the means.
Such a great comment.
Commenting so I can watch another shitstorm in comments.
Damn, who knew changing one letter would have such a big impact.
Inspired by a fermented Korean side dish?
This is not how you test imgur.
http://imgur.com/OBrrju2
I can potentially see fighting words being somewhat related. However, I feel like it is a bit of a stretch.
No need to be hateful. Or resort to name calling. It shit like this that causes division.
That you did and I learned something, but you specified hate speech. Which was not included in the page you linked.
Nothing at all on that page about hate speech.
Prove it. I have never heard of any such thing. There is no hate speech exception to the 1st amendment. Free speech is free speech.
So shutting up someones free speech is okay?
Also, look at Isaiah 56.
Allowed to be there, mainly by the Jews."
There was a meeting mixed multitude at Sinai when the law was given. Take from that what you will. I don't think they would have been "allow
Peter's vision has nothing to do with food. Since he tells us what it meant in verse 28.
Romans 11:17.
When they were preaching from Moses's seat they were preaching Torah. The law. If you really want to know a bit more look up the Talmud.
Jesus was crucified for speaking out against the Pharisees. He told people to do what they said when preaching from Moses's seat.
I don't. There is nothing in the New testament that abolishes the food laws.
If Jesus had taught against Torah he would have been stoned. If Paul had taught against it he would have been stoned. They didn't.
To make full. Which in no way indicates abolishment.
No, not at all was just attempting to explain, what I think is their reasoning.
"peaceful" protestors. To me, that would be a much bigger deal than what is actually being protested. 2/2
If the mob is. lets say 100 people. You're telling me 99 of them couldn't shut down the one asshole? They are taking away from the 1/?
I mean the WBC gets to protest and picket whatever they want and their message is full of hate.
Happen. Just my 2 cents. take it for what it's worth.
Revolting. Such as discrimination. If the 1% is drowning out the 99% then the 99% should unite against them. That way the real change can
Perhaps the peaceful protestors should be striving to shut down the violent ones. I try to speak out against far right ideals that I find
Because they are fighting for the greater good! To them the end justifies the means.
Such a great comment.
Commenting so I can watch another shitstorm in comments.
Damn, who knew changing one letter would have such a big impact.
Inspired by a fermented Korean side dish?
This is not how you test imgur.
http://imgur.com/OBrrju2
I can potentially see fighting words being somewhat related. However, I feel like it is a bit of a stretch.
No need to be hateful. Or resort to name calling. It shit like this that causes division.
That you did and I learned something, but you specified hate speech. Which was not included in the page you linked.
Nothing at all on that page about hate speech.
Prove it. I have never heard of any such thing. There is no hate speech exception to the 1st amendment. Free speech is free speech.
So shutting up someones free speech is okay?