105 pts ยท June 5, 2018
That he claimed to be? I'm not saying he was fully socialist, but he had firm government control. And the NSDAP claimed to be socialist
murderers are hailed as heroes today.
And I also believe people in capitalist countries generally have to answer for their wrongs, unlike in places like the USSR where mass
Oh I think capitalism should answer for that, but I also know things would be much worse if say, the US was fully socialist
USSR* and the likes
Because of it's state control. Besides, USSR killed more socialists than anyone else
Also, Hitler was the leader of NSDAP... National SOCIALIST... He claimed to be a socialist, so where does he advocate capitalism?
mass murder and strong government control... I fail to see where exactly the capitalism fits in, cause it was never there
Now if you wish to make the claim that capitalism has it's problems.... fine, I even agree. But claiming capitalism should answer for
And you're describing government control, meaning not a free market, meaning the opposite of capitalism
Stalin and the communist leaders extracted wealth from their victims, they were interested in wealth, but they were not at all capitalist
If the deaths were a direct cause of capitalism? Sure, it was however much closer to socialism
so in itself, it's not really an argument.
He did kill socialists, but socialists have been killing socialists for as long as socialist existed. Doesn't mean you're not one yourself,
The economy was, however, state controlled. And the further Hitler ruled, the stronger this control became.
manage to associate this with capitalism? It's not. They were pretty much socialist, except they allowed some private ownership of companies
He was leading an autocracy, there was no free capitalist market. The market was under heavy control by the government, how on earth do you
one spesifies it's "two sides of the same coin". Cause it is. They are both horribly destructive, leading to mass murders in the millions
No, he said it's to sides of the same coin, two great evils. Not being a fan of communism doesn't equal being pro nazi, especially when
You would have to be a horrible person to even suggest that communism is even remotely ok, it's not.
the utopia you claim will happen if you have "proper communism"? Cause communism has always been about mass murder and starvation
possibility. Hundreds of millions have died because of communism. Isn't it time to acceot that this is thereal face of communism? And not
Communism had NEVER worked, and it will never work, at this point only people who never read a history book would even think it was a
Also, it is such a bad argument.... "It wasn't real communism"
Hitler didn't advocate capitalism
He did however advocate communism, claimed he was communist and killed in the name of communism
Hitler wasn't really capitalist, he was authoritarian, a dictator
Communism is extremely dangerous and anti-democratic, seems like you didn't even manage to understand that, no name will change that fact
You're describing something that can't exist, a utopia. There will always be conflicts, always a chance of war. Better to be prepared for it
We can try but the assumtion that war easily can be eradicated is false
That he claimed to be? I'm not saying he was fully socialist, but he had firm government control. And the NSDAP claimed to be socialist
murderers are hailed as heroes today.
And I also believe people in capitalist countries generally have to answer for their wrongs, unlike in places like the USSR where mass
Oh I think capitalism should answer for that, but I also know things would be much worse if say, the US was fully socialist
USSR* and the likes
Because of it's state control. Besides, USSR killed more socialists than anyone else
Also, Hitler was the leader of NSDAP... National SOCIALIST... He claimed to be a socialist, so where does he advocate capitalism?
mass murder and strong government control... I fail to see where exactly the capitalism fits in, cause it was never there
Now if you wish to make the claim that capitalism has it's problems.... fine, I even agree. But claiming capitalism should answer for
And you're describing government control, meaning not a free market, meaning the opposite of capitalism
Stalin and the communist leaders extracted wealth from their victims, they were interested in wealth, but they were not at all capitalist
If the deaths were a direct cause of capitalism? Sure, it was however much closer to socialism
so in itself, it's not really an argument.
He did kill socialists, but socialists have been killing socialists for as long as socialist existed. Doesn't mean you're not one yourself,
The economy was, however, state controlled. And the further Hitler ruled, the stronger this control became.
manage to associate this with capitalism? It's not. They were pretty much socialist, except they allowed some private ownership of companies
He was leading an autocracy, there was no free capitalist market. The market was under heavy control by the government, how on earth do you
one spesifies it's "two sides of the same coin". Cause it is. They are both horribly destructive, leading to mass murders in the millions
No, he said it's to sides of the same coin, two great evils. Not being a fan of communism doesn't equal being pro nazi, especially when
You would have to be a horrible person to even suggest that communism is even remotely ok, it's not.
the utopia you claim will happen if you have "proper communism"? Cause communism has always been about mass murder and starvation
possibility. Hundreds of millions have died because of communism. Isn't it time to acceot that this is thereal face of communism? And not
Communism had NEVER worked, and it will never work, at this point only people who never read a history book would even think it was a
Also, it is such a bad argument.... "It wasn't real communism"
Hitler didn't advocate capitalism
He did however advocate communism, claimed he was communist and killed in the name of communism
Hitler wasn't really capitalist, he was authoritarian, a dictator
Communism is extremely dangerous and anti-democratic, seems like you didn't even manage to understand that, no name will change that fact
You're describing something that can't exist, a utopia. There will always be conflicts, always a chance of war. Better to be prepared for it
We can try but the assumtion that war easily can be eradicated is false