220 pts ยท October 9, 2014
Long time lurker, occasional comment provider, and skilled web surfer.
And here we have the no true Scotsman fallacy, fresh in the wild. No true feminist would protest without rational basis!
The senate represents the state's interest, not the populace. It's the job of the house to represent the electorate.
Filtering by tag is a powerful tool that not many bother to utilize. It greatly improves your browsing experience, let me assure you.
I have filtered "rhm", "sexy", "Identified human female", "lovely", and "honry 14-year olds" and don't see any of it. Add tags as needed.
Blacklist the tags like honry 14 year olds or identified human female. Generally clears it all up a great deal
Blacklist: honry 14 year olds, identified human female. Add others as needed. Problem solved
As a Texan, welcome!
They don't gotta burn the books, they just remove 'em
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lordosis, I'd do some corrective exercises man, that's not good for you.
For real, very disproportionate. Not very healthy or good on your back.
I might be downvoted for this, but I really don't think that's accurate based on the many pro-life people I've heard speak.
more like snapcity
But why not the departed?
I, for one, welcome out new robot overlords
Some of them are reasonable, though most of them aren't. I'm all for DIY, but toothpaste and sunscreen? Butter and nutella? no way.
If you want to make nutella and butter and spend 2x the money, go right on ahead my friend.
Talk shit, get hit.
or bad inherently.
More like "water is really good for you" versus "alcohol is bad for you", they both have an acceptable range of ingestion, they aren't good
that is 100% safe at all levels of exposure. So it stems from lack of education more than anything.
It's the amount of space between these upper and lower limits that makes something "dangerous" to humans, but there is no known compound
The reality of it is that mercury, like everything else known to man, has safe limits of exposure and unsafe ones.
The issue is the misconception that things are inherently "good" or "bad" for you.
Fucking gold, mate
This needs to be a new reaction gif
yes, I love this!
I guess so. To each their own and whatnot
Compared to having your eyes dilated and not being able to see all day? No way, it takes like 30 seconds.
Still can't turn right on red
And here we have the no true Scotsman fallacy, fresh in the wild. No true feminist would protest without rational basis!
The senate represents the state's interest, not the populace. It's the job of the house to represent the electorate.
Filtering by tag is a powerful tool that not many bother to utilize. It greatly improves your browsing experience, let me assure you.
I have filtered "rhm", "sexy", "Identified human female", "lovely", and "honry 14-year olds" and don't see any of it. Add tags as needed.
Blacklist the tags like honry 14 year olds or identified human female. Generally clears it all up a great deal
Blacklist: honry 14 year olds, identified human female. Add others as needed. Problem solved
As a Texan, welcome!
They don't gotta burn the books, they just remove 'em
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lordosis, I'd do some corrective exercises man, that's not good for you.
For real, very disproportionate. Not very healthy or good on your back.
I might be downvoted for this, but I really don't think that's accurate based on the many pro-life people I've heard speak.
more like snapcity
But why not the departed?
I, for one, welcome out new robot overlords
Some of them are reasonable, though most of them aren't. I'm all for DIY, but toothpaste and sunscreen? Butter and nutella? no way.
If you want to make nutella and butter and spend 2x the money, go right on ahead my friend.
Talk shit, get hit.
or bad inherently.
More like "water is really good for you" versus "alcohol is bad for you", they both have an acceptable range of ingestion, they aren't good
that is 100% safe at all levels of exposure. So it stems from lack of education more than anything.
It's the amount of space between these upper and lower limits that makes something "dangerous" to humans, but there is no known compound
The reality of it is that mercury, like everything else known to man, has safe limits of exposure and unsafe ones.
The issue is the misconception that things are inherently "good" or "bad" for you.
Fucking gold, mate
This needs to be a new reaction gif
yes, I love this!
I guess so. To each their own and whatnot
Compared to having your eyes dilated and not being able to see all day? No way, it takes like 30 seconds.
Still can't turn right on red