25753 pts ยท April 3, 2019
Anyway, I hope you find the help and support you need. Good luck. I'm sure you'll respond to me because you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with wanting the last word. This will be my last comment to you. Enjoy the "win" of having the last word. Hopefully it won't matter so much to you moving forward.
See this is odd behavior. I haven't lied about anything, but like dozens of your comments are about people lying, so it's clearly just a go to insult for you. Again, I don't get it, I don't see the appeal, my perception is you somehow see this as like well you're just trolling, so it's funny that people respond to you. But like that's still odd behavior and not healthy. So I'm being sincere in saying I hope you get the help you need.
I don't even know what you're trying to say, but my perception is that you are literally just interested in hurling insults at people and arguing with them. Obviously that's your hobby, but I just don't get it. You spent hours today writing hundreds of comments and they all boil down to, "LOL FUCK YOU, YOURE ALL PIECES OF SHIT" and I don't get it, but ok. I don't know how to say this without sounding condescending, but that's not healthy behavior.
3/3 You spent all this time in this thread hurling insults and namecalling, because it is much easier and takes no actual insight to do that, than to be solution focused. I just think you need to look internally at yourself and consider, is this really how you want to spend your time, being rude and namecalling, or do you want to be even the least bit productive. Like has this namecalling and rudeness resulted in any positive change?
2/2 And, again this is my perception it seems like you don't want to say anything of substance or offer a suggestion, because that would mean engaging in the topic in a real way and opening up your suggestion to having to be defended with actual info. It could also lead to you being wrong about something. It's much easier to say, this thing everybody thinks is bad is bad, and should be fixed, than to offer an actual informed opinion.
So honestly, it seems like you just want to argue with people. At no point do you ever come across as someone looking for something productive to happen. There's no bait, I'm not trying to trick you. I'm just pointing out that you sound like a jerk and you seem to want everyone to hate you and argue you with you, because ultimately, you just want to argue and be angry.
Again, wasn't mocking you. And you can hate fascists, without such oddly written comments. If your goal is to actually stop fascism, why does the general populous seem to upvote other comments hating on fascism and downvote yours? It's because of the way you write being so offputting and strange. It almost seems like a caricature. Like if an actual fascist wanted to pretend to be an anti-fascist and say things to make anti-fascists look bad, they'd probably use comments similar to yours.
Are you ok? And I'm not trying to be rude with that question, I'm sincerely asking. If you take a step back and look at this comment as if someone else wrote it, I think you'd have the same concern.
Nothing in this article is evidence that he is friends with either of them. It seems like Newsom's demeanor on the podcast is friendly, likely in an attempt to attract moderate viewers he hopes to win over for an election bid in 2028, but there's no evidence presented to suggest he is friends with any of the guests listed. Like he's a scummy POS, but I don't see anything suggesting he's actual friends with either of them.
Do you have any evidence that Bannon or Kirk are friends with Newsom? I've never seen anything of the sort.
This Christmas, there is no room at the table for Middle Easterners.
The primary was in June. the election is 11/4/25.
Just for your edification, questions are different from statements. I asked a question. Now I'm going to ask some more questions. Are you suggesting your comment on this post had nothing to do with the post? Why state that you don't understand why the NFL thinks they have to make huge changes if you don't think this is a huge change? What's the point of stating that then?
No they aren't. Newsom isn't selling sneakers. This is a made-up post. What are you talking about?
I'm a little confused by your comment. Pretty sure the NFL never barred male cheerleaders, so this isn't a change. And even if it was a change, are you suggesting allowing male cheerleaders would be a "huge change"? Something that basically has no impact on the game in anyway doesn't seem like a huge change to me.
Also, in order for the business to be successful, you need these specific connections, which you can't get cause they won't return your phone call. BUT if you let me own half your company, I'll connect you to them, so that I can get even richer, but I'll spread a small fraction of the wealth to you.
And thus you've found the idiotic flaw in capitalism. It's all about exploitation and gatekeeping. I grew up rich, so I have the capital to start a company and exploit your labor to get richer. You grew up poor with no capital so you can't start a company to become rich. You took a loan out, increasing your risk beyond my risk, so you need to do even better than me to be successful.
The OP is mad that people are buying soda with food stamps. The response is, "why are you mad about that, you should be mad that most of the people on food stamps are employed by Walmart while Walmart makes billions of profits off of their labor and utilizes the gov't's money to keep their employee's alive." OP needs to redirect their priorities and what they focus their energy on. The counter isn't, they should be allowed to buy soda, the counter is get your priorities in order.
She's a comedian and that woman just yelled out she wishes she was single, in front of her husband, at a comedy show. I think we can take the comedians remarks with a grain of salt.
TIL, I'm racist for knowing Jesse Eisenberg wrote, directed, and starred in a movie just last year specifically about being Jewish.
Who is "them?"
Nah, it was you all along lol
Yes, that's why his number one nemesis is a billionaire who exploits people...
Basically, he's someone who's life was going extremely well until about 40 and then for the past 20 years had to shift to Christian/Conservative media to make a living and get any kind of attention whatsoever. So he fell off pretty hard.
One time my wife asked me to help her carry her groceries in. Yes her groceries, we buy groceries separately to avoid an environment where we help and do things for one another. I told her absolutely not because she's not a helpless child and she can do it herself. She immediately apologized for asking and carried them in herself.
Well he doesn't like packing his lunch, but loves doing the dishes, which she hates. So they talked about it and felt a division of labor based on interest was the smartest thing to do. Hence, she packs his lunch every day, but he does her dishes. I hope this rational and well-thought explanation gives you peace of mind as you go about your day.
Am I allowed to pay for therapy with my money?
I think you have wildly misunderstood this post. You seem to think its suggesting that counseling should be replaced by money. That's not what its saying. It's saying that no amount of counseling can fix one's need for money. If I am in poverty and dealing with trauma. No amount of counseling will fix the poverty part and being in poverty is likely causing me additional trauma. I need BOTH counseling AND money if I'm going to escape poverty and my trauma. Counseling alone will not solve it.
Anyway, I hope you find the help and support you need. Good luck. I'm sure you'll respond to me because you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with wanting the last word. This will be my last comment to you. Enjoy the "win" of having the last word. Hopefully it won't matter so much to you moving forward.
See this is odd behavior. I haven't lied about anything, but like dozens of your comments are about people lying, so it's clearly just a go to insult for you. Again, I don't get it, I don't see the appeal, my perception is you somehow see this as like well you're just trolling, so it's funny that people respond to you. But like that's still odd behavior and not healthy. So I'm being sincere in saying I hope you get the help you need.
I don't even know what you're trying to say, but my perception is that you are literally just interested in hurling insults at people and arguing with them. Obviously that's your hobby, but I just don't get it. You spent hours today writing hundreds of comments and they all boil down to, "LOL FUCK YOU, YOURE ALL PIECES OF SHIT" and I don't get it, but ok. I don't know how to say this without sounding condescending, but that's not healthy behavior.
3/3 You spent all this time in this thread hurling insults and namecalling, because it is much easier and takes no actual insight to do that, than to be solution focused. I just think you need to look internally at yourself and consider, is this really how you want to spend your time, being rude and namecalling, or do you want to be even the least bit productive. Like has this namecalling and rudeness resulted in any positive change?
2/2 And, again this is my perception it seems like you don't want to say anything of substance or offer a suggestion, because that would mean engaging in the topic in a real way and opening up your suggestion to having to be defended with actual info. It could also lead to you being wrong about something. It's much easier to say, this thing everybody thinks is bad is bad, and should be fixed, than to offer an actual informed opinion.
So honestly, it seems like you just want to argue with people. At no point do you ever come across as someone looking for something productive to happen. There's no bait, I'm not trying to trick you. I'm just pointing out that you sound like a jerk and you seem to want everyone to hate you and argue you with you, because ultimately, you just want to argue and be angry.
Again, wasn't mocking you. And you can hate fascists, without such oddly written comments. If your goal is to actually stop fascism, why does the general populous seem to upvote other comments hating on fascism and downvote yours? It's because of the way you write being so offputting and strange. It almost seems like a caricature. Like if an actual fascist wanted to pretend to be an anti-fascist and say things to make anti-fascists look bad, they'd probably use comments similar to yours.
Are you ok? And I'm not trying to be rude with that question, I'm sincerely asking. If you take a step back and look at this comment as if someone else wrote it, I think you'd have the same concern.
Nothing in this article is evidence that he is friends with either of them. It seems like Newsom's demeanor on the podcast is friendly, likely in an attempt to attract moderate viewers he hopes to win over for an election bid in 2028, but there's no evidence presented to suggest he is friends with any of the guests listed. Like he's a scummy POS, but I don't see anything suggesting he's actual friends with either of them.
Do you have any evidence that Bannon or Kirk are friends with Newsom? I've never seen anything of the sort.
This Christmas, there is no room at the table for Middle Easterners.
The primary was in June. the election is 11/4/25.
Just for your edification, questions are different from statements. I asked a question. Now I'm going to ask some more questions. Are you suggesting your comment on this post had nothing to do with the post? Why state that you don't understand why the NFL thinks they have to make huge changes if you don't think this is a huge change? What's the point of stating that then?
No they aren't. Newsom isn't selling sneakers. This is a made-up post. What are you talking about?
I'm a little confused by your comment. Pretty sure the NFL never barred male cheerleaders, so this isn't a change. And even if it was a change, are you suggesting allowing male cheerleaders would be a "huge change"? Something that basically has no impact on the game in anyway doesn't seem like a huge change to me.
Also, in order for the business to be successful, you need these specific connections, which you can't get cause they won't return your phone call. BUT if you let me own half your company, I'll connect you to them, so that I can get even richer, but I'll spread a small fraction of the wealth to you.
And thus you've found the idiotic flaw in capitalism. It's all about exploitation and gatekeeping. I grew up rich, so I have the capital to start a company and exploit your labor to get richer. You grew up poor with no capital so you can't start a company to become rich. You took a loan out, increasing your risk beyond my risk, so you need to do even better than me to be successful.
The OP is mad that people are buying soda with food stamps. The response is, "why are you mad about that, you should be mad that most of the people on food stamps are employed by Walmart while Walmart makes billions of profits off of their labor and utilizes the gov't's money to keep their employee's alive." OP needs to redirect their priorities and what they focus their energy on. The counter isn't, they should be allowed to buy soda, the counter is get your priorities in order.
She's a comedian and that woman just yelled out she wishes she was single, in front of her husband, at a comedy show. I think we can take the comedians remarks with a grain of salt.
TIL, I'm racist for knowing Jesse Eisenberg wrote, directed, and starred in a movie just last year specifically about being Jewish.
Who is "them?"
Nah, it was you all along lol
Yes, that's why his number one nemesis is a billionaire who exploits people...
Basically, he's someone who's life was going extremely well until about 40 and then for the past 20 years had to shift to Christian/Conservative media to make a living and get any kind of attention whatsoever. So he fell off pretty hard.
One time my wife asked me to help her carry her groceries in. Yes her groceries, we buy groceries separately to avoid an environment where we help and do things for one another. I told her absolutely not because she's not a helpless child and she can do it herself. She immediately apologized for asking and carried them in herself.
Well he doesn't like packing his lunch, but loves doing the dishes, which she hates. So they talked about it and felt a division of labor based on interest was the smartest thing to do. Hence, she packs his lunch every day, but he does her dishes. I hope this rational and well-thought explanation gives you peace of mind as you go about your day.
Am I allowed to pay for therapy with my money?
I think you have wildly misunderstood this post. You seem to think its suggesting that counseling should be replaced by money. That's not what its saying. It's saying that no amount of counseling can fix one's need for money. If I am in poverty and dealing with trauma. No amount of counseling will fix the poverty part and being in poverty is likely causing me additional trauma. I need BOTH counseling AND money if I'm going to escape poverty and my trauma. Counseling alone will not solve it.