ipmules

2414 pts ยท December 19, 2012


Yeah, WSU health programs are a bitch. Have you considered the USU/WSU co-op? I've seen a bunch of WSU nursing students up here.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uhhh... He had to go to a doctor to find out he was suffering from anal prolapse? Does the man not take shits?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, bullshit. The church brings in an estimated $7B in *tithing alone* per annum, yet has spent a mere $1.4B from 1985-2011 on aid.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

$200k chandeliers. FTFY

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, duh! I completely forgot about the PCC, and my girlfriend's dad worked there for years. *facepalm*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mall, yeah. No park, but they do own hunting ranches with permits running in the thousands.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Unreal" haha

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Especially given the stronghold the church has over liquor all across this state, to say they couldn't swing anything is hilarious.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They own the mall and have say over what retailers they lease/rent to and can make negotiations.That's nothing more than a cop-out.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I don't see how that pertains? Does not using tithes automatically make it a sober and appropriate "investment"?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Dollar in, dollar out. Why does it matter so much that tithing wasn't used? It's a mall and it sells immodest clothing, coffee and alcohol.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

(2/2) It's pretty straightforward.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Again, what does that mean? It's jointly owned by CIty Creek Reserve, Inc. (Owned by Corp. of Pres. of LDS) and Taubman Inc.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Do you have a source on the "billions every year?" Of course not, as their finances are a black box.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

What do you mean they own the property and not the mall? They were the developers.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

(S)he sounds like an asshole, but why the fuck where you suggesting a dosage regimen in the first place?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Arrested for nothing." Read up on your church history, friend.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nor Dutch in Pennsylvania Dutch, which is an Anglicized Deutch.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is that the pasta pool lady from Patch Adams?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I like group theory myself. Even if it isn't algebra, you'll find your niche; we all do.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, almost surely means that the probability *equals* 1. Surely =/= almost surely, but both have P(E)=1.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct. Groups, fields, rings, modules, etc. are different structures which form what is called "abstract (or modern) algebra."

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think quite a bit of math isn't too bad, but I can see what you're saying. I felt the same way in my first graduate real analysis class.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there are plenty of applications in "the real world." Pure math precedes applied math in a shit-ton of cases.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's no different than anything else. "Yeah, who gives a shit about oil paintings?" Plenty of people. Are they wrong? Furthermore,

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can't constrain a pseudorandom generator to create a truly random sequence. True randomness is abstract and can't be generated.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I didn't really answer the underlying question; I would say no, they're vastly different.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

set theory is an invaluable foundation for the study of algebraic structures.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0