postmalarkey

1768 pts · September 29, 2022


More disingenuous to use an avg of the top 1% given that it’s a smaller percentage of the pop. that pose the most serious problem

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep ?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do that for low income households now vs. then. Pretty easy to deduce how that works out if both sets of data are true - the poor get f*cked

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s fine, but that account even takes issue with the statement “they *knew* trickle down economics was BS” - they may know now, not then

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay but if that’s true then why did he win boomers by an absolute landslide in both of his elections?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feel free to elaborate how?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But, realistically, we need to do both. Income tax needs to be more progressive than now, maybe even lower taxes on low income as well (2/2)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree that without increases in corp & capital gains tax (as well as forcing gains to be realized) that it’s insufficient. (1/2)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tbf that number has actually come down a little to *only* 1.2 million or so ? but yeah still absurdly high

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It was also capitalism pre-Reagan, so not even necessarily knocking capitalism as much as bs laissez-faire right wing trickle down economics

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Feel free to Google search “economic inequality since COVID” too see how that’s going - the trends shown here have only gotten worse

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

~0.1% imprisoned in 1978, 0.5% in 2013 even when expressed as a percentage of population - not exactly disingenuous

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2