33 pts ยท April 16, 2017
Streamer, house spouse, and philosopher.
For sure.
I'm actually way better at dealing with kids than my wife. Thus, I shall take the mantle of house spouse!
This gets me Brock hard.
Shhh... you're already poking holes in flat earther logic.
I really dig this way of thinking. It helps set up time being nonlinear and us just not having the means to go back.... yet.
Not necessarily. You don't need to independently verify it in that moment. You could do so at a later point for the same effect.
Out of curiosity, which of the topics do you find most interesting?
Sure, but shouldn't we strive to get as close to the truth as possible? For example, we shouldn't believe the earth is flat, its not true.
Is it really knowledge or really just an approximation if we can't say a true correlation exists between some evidence and the universe?
This guy does. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkMR5q-R-sM
Then how can we truly know what evidence does or does not support true knowledge?
Then how can we ever have true knowledge if some piece of evidence that corresponds to the truth is not true knowledge?
For sure.
I'm actually way better at dealing with kids than my wife. Thus, I shall take the mantle of house spouse!
This gets me Brock hard.
Shhh... you're already poking holes in flat earther logic.
I really dig this way of thinking. It helps set up time being nonlinear and us just not having the means to go back.... yet.
Not necessarily. You don't need to independently verify it in that moment. You could do so at a later point for the same effect.
Out of curiosity, which of the topics do you find most interesting?
Sure, but shouldn't we strive to get as close to the truth as possible? For example, we shouldn't believe the earth is flat, its not true.
Is it really knowledge or really just an approximation if we can't say a true correlation exists between some evidence and the universe?
This guy does. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkMR5q-R-sM
Then how can we truly know what evidence does or does not support true knowledge?
Then how can we ever have true knowledge if some piece of evidence that corresponds to the truth is not true knowledge?